#26 _oldjohnno_
Posted 01 January 2012 - 07:01 AM
Firstly the effect on intake port flow of the smaller bore. Heads of this type are usually fairly sensitive to the bore size so if it turns out the head flows lets say 10% less on the little 253 bore then this will have to be taken into account.
Friction losses will be proportionally higher because of the need to spin more rpms. This alone will be enough to ensure that components that make 400hp on a 308 won't quite cut it with the little thong slapper..
The 253 piston is dimensionally very similar to the 202 unit. Many sixes have been spun well beyond 7000rpms with Duralites so I see no reason why ACL RaceSeries wouldn't hold up well here. Of course you'd have to be on top of the tune and not let it rattle. Whatever piston you use a very thin ring pack would be very advantageous as far as high rpm sealing and controlling friction is concerned.
I can't see any reason why you couldn't make the numbers but again take this with a grain of salt.
#27 _nzstato_
Posted 01 January 2012 - 07:14 AM
#28 _mad350_
Posted 01 January 2012 - 10:26 AM
#29
Posted 01 January 2012 - 06:12 PM
Chopper wants a bigger motor. We have a merlin 560 cub 8/71 running methenol with 1200HP just back from the bank manager shop. Not a lot of fun just money.
We have started. Heads are sandblarsted, ports cleaned up and a little bit removed between the push rod holes. Should flow 480 500 so if its 10% less still should get 430 hp. Should do the job, probley bad (very bad) air speed down low so we will just have to keep it reving.
The 288 cam is a long shot. Its just siting there, one less thing for the shopping list.
Lots of bridges to cross, lots of thing we don’t know about or understand. But if we blow all 5 motors and don’t make 400hp I will be pist about the $10 but more room in the shed and less sh-- laying around.
#30 _Mint_
Posted 01 January 2012 - 06:43 PM
since your gunna rev the ring out of it your gunna need a decent manifold..Torquepower or Harrap?
and gettin back to pistons ..dont ACL do forgies for both 308 and 253?
was this a bet made after a few drinks
Edited by lxssv8, 01 January 2012 - 06:53 PM.
#31 _CHOPPER_
Posted 01 January 2012 - 08:12 PM
#32
Posted 01 January 2012 - 09:27 PM
motor.
The big problem with them is that they actually need slightly less valve size (curtain area,CSA to bore volume,,etc blah blah)
Most engine rebuilders jam big valves and cams in them and it kills them dead in the water,,worse than stok in most cases.
I beleive the blue 253 that Broky had a bit to with went just as hard in std trim as some 308s.
They will spin to 7 with w/out forgies,good cam,good valve springs,,all the boys use up here on the
202 stockies is basic ACL stuff.my 2c worth.
#33 _Mint_
Posted 01 January 2012 - 09:59 PM
thats right..well at least the pistons are..and the wholesaler is NasonACL are now Mahle,
#34
Posted 01 January 2012 - 10:15 PM
I have a Torque power but the runner have been ported, maybe to big ? The runners on a Harrap manifold are 1742 square mm T/P 1677. My heads are about 1550 so I was thinking of making one. Using 45mm id pipe (1590 square mm) and rolling the pipe to make oval runners and a bit taller than a T/P ?
Some one from this forum has emailed me with lumpy top forged piston and also AMCA is a 253 powed speedway cay, But still running about 300HP and 6500rpm but do make forged pistons.
And yes people and cars both prefom differently when running on alcohole.
Well, I hope NOBALLSUC is wrong or I am off in the wrong direction ?
#35 _oldjohnno_
Posted 02 January 2012 - 06:15 AM
Once you have these you can work out how much camshaft etc. you'll need to meet your target.
#36
Posted 02 January 2012 - 09:11 AM
The last set of heads I did took my 40 hours of grinding, lots of mechning, bigger valves ect with flow sheet and cost me over $2000. If I was to do it all agen I would buy alloy heads ready to go.
If we can get it all to fit with the wrght comp and valves not hitting pistons, I think it will make good power up top, but lower rev range way down. So use what we have got, add a little nutty professor then stand back and pull the trigger
I geas its really about are the skills and knowledge we have picked up over the years as good or bad as we think they are ?
#37 _oldjohnno_
Posted 02 January 2012 - 11:47 AM
#38 _mad350_
Posted 02 January 2012 - 06:18 PM
#39
Posted 02 January 2012 - 11:09 PM
Some one from this forum has emailed me with lumpy top forged piston
Attached Files
#40 _Mint_
Posted 03 January 2012 - 12:05 AM
Edited by lxssv8, 03 January 2012 - 12:08 AM.
#41
Posted 03 January 2012 - 05:39 PM
#42
Posted 03 January 2012 - 06:52 PM
Edited by greens nice, 03 January 2012 - 06:57 PM.
#43
Posted 03 January 2012 - 08:33 PM
#44
Posted 03 January 2012 - 08:49 PM
Maybe overkill but still not many options.
I also sent JE a email but closed for Xmas.
No deadline on build. Sooner the better
#45
Posted 03 January 2012 - 08:54 PM
#46
Posted 07 January 2012 - 10:12 AM
#47
Posted 14 January 2012 - 07:10 AM
A bloke I know ran forged hemi pistons with an offset ground crank and saw quite a few more rpm than mine did in his race boat with quad webbers
#48
Posted 14 January 2012 - 03:13 PM
OK this is were it strated. We have a 355 VN heads crane 288 cam and so on we made 500HP. I said if all this is in a smaller motor (253) and you spen it harder you can make near the same power in theory. Reply, Bull sh--, so its on for a $10 bet.
First time I have seen this thread so sorry about the late reply.
Airflow is horsepower. To make your 500HP with the 355 and 288 combo you need to spin it to about 6800rpm. 6800 x 355 ci = 2,414,000 cubic inches of air per minute to make the 580 HP. To get the 580HP from 253 ci we then divide the 2,414,000 by 253 to equal 9541 rpm. OK thats the first problem. To make the same amount of power by moving the same amount of air we have to turn the poor old 253 to 9500 rpm.
Wait, it gets worse ! As someone else mentioned the flow is compromised on a 253 by the restrictive bore size. Also getting any real compression out of a 253 is hard enough with HQ heads, let alone the bigger chamber VN heads. This knocks our Volumetric Efficiency around considerably so we are probably 20% behind the 355 on the big details before looking at the smaller stuff like rotating friction etc.
OK, so you only want to get 400HP. Well your typical 355/288/VN combo will make 400 HP at about 5200rpm. Applying the same airflow maths gives us 7300 rpm, before we factor in the 20% losses in flow and efficiency. You might get close by 8700 rpm.
I don't hate 253's, in fact I quite like them. To get the best out of them requires tiny standard HQ port volumes and standard HQ valve sizes with conservative camshaft profiles.
Good luck !
#49
Posted 14 January 2012 - 05:02 PM
I also have VT heads with 58cc chamber for better compression if need.
Not sure about your formula though ? If my 355 is using 2414000 cubic inches of air per minute which ( if I am rite ? ) = 1396.990 CFM. All this threw a 750 carby ?
Thanks
#50 _Bomber Watson_
Posted 14 January 2012 - 06:16 PM
That said, i havnt checked the maths myself, but struggler is generally correct lol.
Cheers.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users