Jump to content


Photo

F5000 Repco 308 V8 Engine


  • Please log in to reply
11 replies to this topic

#1 xu2308

xu2308

    Grail Hunter

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,704 posts
  • Name:AL
  • Location:Belconnen ACT
  • Car:SMP LJ GTR V8 Prototype-Confirmed By HHS and Ex GMH XW7 Engineers
  • Joined: 09-April 09

Posted 04 May 2012 - 10:13 PM

The Block's for the F5000 Repco 308 V8
were they 308H Blocks from the 1969/1970 HT-HG Monaro, as some of them 308H Blocks were ment to have steel-cranks
Any one know what type of Block that the F5000 Repco 308 V8 used ?????

#2 dattoman

dattoman

    Do I feel lucky? Well, do ya, punk?

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,470 posts
  • Name:Neil
  • Location:Perth Western Australia
  • Car:LX SS , 76 Cadillac , 3 x dattos
  • Joined: 04-February 07

Posted 04 May 2012 - 10:18 PM

Think you will find they were custom cast blocks done by Repco
And not much Holden anywhere to be seen

#3 xu2308

xu2308

    Grail Hunter

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,704 posts
  • Name:AL
  • Location:Belconnen ACT
  • Car:SMP LJ GTR V8 Prototype-Confirmed By HHS and Ex GMH XW7 Engineers
  • Joined: 09-April 09

Posted 04 May 2012 - 10:24 PM

Thanks Datto
i wasent sure, as the 308H Engine was Holden's first 308 V8, I thought Repco might of used them blocks

#4 _Quagmire_

_Quagmire_
  • Guests

Posted 04 May 2012 - 11:23 PM

l34 blocks where more akin to the f5000 than run of the mill htgk blocks...
afaik l34 had the stronger webbing incorperated into the vl on blocks

#5 xu2308

xu2308

    Grail Hunter

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,704 posts
  • Name:AL
  • Location:Belconnen ACT
  • Car:SMP LJ GTR V8 Prototype-Confirmed By HHS and Ex GMH XW7 Engineers
  • Joined: 09-April 09

Posted 04 May 2012 - 11:33 PM

Yeah
you would think the L34 Block would be close to the F5000 Repco V8 Block, due to Repco playing apart with the L34 Engine, did the L34 Engine use the F5000 Flat Top Pistons ??

#6 dattoman

dattoman

    Do I feel lucky? Well, do ya, punk?

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,470 posts
  • Name:Neil
  • Location:Perth Western Australia
  • Car:LX SS , 76 Cadillac , 3 x dattos
  • Joined: 04-February 07

Posted 04 May 2012 - 11:59 PM

About page 4

http://www.aussiev8....8-hp-block.html

#7 _Liam_

_Liam_
  • Guests

Posted 05 May 2012 - 11:33 AM

The F5000 had a smaller bore than a 308 and was I think closer to 304 CID and made almost 500HP. According to Torana Tough, so it sounds like a stand-alone engine.

#8 xu2308

xu2308

    Grail Hunter

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,704 posts
  • Name:AL
  • Location:Belconnen ACT
  • Car:SMP LJ GTR V8 Prototype-Confirmed By HHS and Ex GMH XW7 Engineers
  • Joined: 09-April 09

Posted 05 May 2012 - 03:37 PM

Thanks Datto and LX Torry Freak

#9 _crompton7572_

_crompton7572_
  • Guests

Posted 11 October 2012 - 11:06 AM

Repco used semi machined holden blocks, Repco then finished the machining. They had slightly smaller bores to make them 5L. They used holden heads and cast cranks also

#10 yel327

yel327

    Oh My, Don't you post alot

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,081 posts
  • Joined: 10-February 08

Posted 11 October 2012 - 02:26 PM

As far as I am aware the F5000 blocks were just early versions of the re-designed HJ block. The ones I have known of were cast early in 1973 (like 3/73 or 5/73 or thereabouts). Most of these appear to have an X on them. The same design was used in L34. They were GMH cast blocks, at least they were GMH castings afaik.

Alan, the 308H blocks were mainly in HT and HG Brougham, and they are not really any different to HQ blocks. Apart from the timing chain cover mounted oil filler, sump/pickup and heads they are just about identical. The early blocks (almost exclusively HT Brougham) had HP cast into the side. Some of these made their way into Belmont, Kingswood, Monaro, Monaro GTS and Premier once 307's ran out but not long after the castings changed to 308 on one side just like they stayed until around VK introduction. The reason some forged crankshafts have turned up will be because these engines were under development prior to GMH's new nodular iron foundry opening in 1967, so naturally some of the early cranks will be forged just like all red motor cranks were prior to around 4/67. As GMH were a business they never wasted anything, so any development stuff left laying around that was good to use went into production engines. The fact that the early 253's are blank on the side and 308's had HP gives you a timeframe as to when these castings were finalised. Just look at the EH-HD era engines: 149 were blank and 179 had HP until it was replaced with 179 at some stage. Later 161's in HR were also blank afaik. Just remember that 308 was only available in Brougham from release until late in 1969 so it was a low volume engine until it was made available across the HT series range. This possibly explains the apparant protracted changeover period from HP to 308 as new castings were introduced to cope with the increased demand for the 308 engine.

#11 TerrA LX

TerrA LX

    Fulcrum Fixture

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,241 posts
  • Location:Sid 'n' knee
  • Joined: 31-May 06

Posted 11 October 2012 - 04:17 PM

As far as I am aware the F5000 blocks were just early versions of the re-designed HJ block. The ones I have known of were cast early in 1973 (like 3/73 or 5/73 or thereabouts). Most of these appear to have an X on them. The same design was used in L34. They were GMH cast blocks, at least they were GMH castings afaik.

Alan, the 308H blocks were mainly in HT and HG Brougham, and they are not really any different to HQ blocks. Apart from the timing chain cover mounted oil filler, sump/pickup and heads they are just about identical. The early blocks (almost exclusively HT Brougham) had HP cast into the side.


So all the blocks upto and including HQ would have been neo seal/crank and HJ and on, including L34 and 5000 blocks would have been rope seal and crank.

#12 yel327

yel327

    Oh My, Don't you post alot

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,081 posts
  • Joined: 10-February 08

Posted 11 October 2012 - 05:14 PM

I'm not sure if F5000 and L34 used neoprene or rope. That is only a minor machining change anyway. The L34 parts catalogue supplement dated 8/74 list the neoprene seal part number, so my guess is the rope seals were in use by that time in engine production anyway hence the need to show the different part number for the L34 engine. I don't think the changeover was exactly on the change from HQ to HJ on V8's, but it will be close to but before that (possibly months earlier). Remember engines were all made at Fisherman's bend and sent out to assembly plants to be used at seemingly random times. My guess is HJ style V8 engines started into production at some time prior to the end of HQ, and those engines just got used in the very last of the HQ's. HJ's were supposed to have the new higher performance 308 (253 didn't change) so I guess it makes sense no full production HJ's got the lower comp HQ 308. I guess V8 LH SLR owners will have a good handle on what oil seals are in their engines from cars close to the changeover date from HQ-HJ (9/74).




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users