Jump to content


202 head > 2811930<with adjustables rockers


  • Please log in to reply
28 replies to this topic

#1 _hookem4341_

_hookem4341_
  • Guests

Posted 16 August 2013 - 06:49 AM

2811930 Holden Frankenstein casting just those that have never seen one . Application very late HG/ GTR in adjustable from HQ to HJ in non adjustable. YES it came out both. this head is a 202 casting with earlier 186 machining and large plugs dated 15/4/71  

Attached Files



#2 _hookem4341_

_hookem4341_
  • Guests

Posted 16 August 2013 - 07:38 AM

2811930 Holden Frankenstein casting just those that have never seen one . Application very late HG/ GTR in adjustable from HQ to HJ in non adjustable. YES it came out both. this head is a 202 casting with earlier 186 machining and large plugs dated 15/4/71  .......

The car you see in my avatar is my Son's, 5.7L 1991 1LE Z28 Camaro  An extremely rare only 2 here in Australia of this model and very collectable in the USA, only 174 ever produced. a production car only produced so Chev could race it in Players challenge road race in Canada, for production cars.... Simaliar to what Holden did with TORANA in the A9X version so they could race at Bathurst. Specs quarter mile time stock 14.5 11.86" rear brakes 36mm front sway bar, factory engine oil cooling, dual cat exhaust, 145mph speedo, 5500 redline tacho, 350 HO-700R4 box/ positraction 3.23  lsd diff not your common Iroc Z or basic Z28.  245hp rated at rear of box not flywheel HP. Nice :)



#3 S pack

S pack

    Scrivet Counter

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,536 posts
  • Name:Dave
  • Location:Luggage Point
  • Car:73 LJ
  • Joined: 25-January 10

Posted 16 August 2013 - 08:55 AM

2811930 Holden Frankenstein casting just those that have never seen one . Application very late HG/ GTR in adjustable from HQ to HJ in non adjustable. YES it came out both. this head is a 202 casting with earlier 186 machining and large plugs dated 15/4/71  

Dave, a 2811930 head was low comp 173 and high comp 202. The high comp 173 head used on 173s GTR was casting 2811929. 

 

So that 2811930 head came off either a HG commercial vehicle, a HQ or an LC Torana with a low compression 173.

All in all still a rare puppy with adjustable rockers.


Edited by S pack, 16 August 2013 - 08:56 AM.


#4 Dr Terry

Dr Terry

    Technical + Numbers Guru + Moderator

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,276 posts
  • Location:Eastwood (Sydney) NSW
  • Joined: 13-November 05

Posted 16 August 2013 - 09:10 AM

I've seen head casting no. 2811930 dated as early as March 1971, so they were very common in the last several months production of HG 186 (because the 186 was the most common engine fitted) as well as HQ/LJ 202.

 

It appears the casting was so designed that it could be machined for large spark plugs & adjustable rockers (186) or small spark plugs & fixed rockers (202).

 

Dr Terry



#5 _hookem4341_

_hookem4341_
  • Guests

Posted 16 August 2013 - 09:40 AM

S pack and Dr terry thanks guys.. Apparently its a high compression 202 head. I've Haven't read that it was used on commercial's though if it was then it would be better than the common non adjustable casting meaning meant for heavy use. I might molest it and get it ported. I bought it recently on an 186p that runs like a clock. I just threw thread up so others can see they were made. I had never seen one before myself. I read they were a GTR head as well?? adjustable rockers are definitely better than non adjustable on a red motor, though this is my personal opinion> no alloy bridges to wear out. don't know why Holden used Alloy as steel bridges would have been a better option. haven't seen anyone produce them as yet.    Dr Terry so were they a 186 head as well or used only on late 202 HG's


Edited by hookem4341, 16 August 2013 - 09:43 AM.


#6 S pack

S pack

    Scrivet Counter

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,536 posts
  • Name:Dave
  • Location:Luggage Point
  • Car:73 LJ
  • Joined: 25-January 10

Posted 16 August 2013 - 09:56 AM

Dave, when HQ production commenced the HQ commercial vehicle range was still months off, so Holden continued producing HG utes and vans, so these HG commercial vehicles got 173 and 202 engines.



#7 Dr Terry

Dr Terry

    Technical + Numbers Guru + Moderator

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,276 posts
  • Location:Eastwood (Sydney) NSW
  • Joined: 13-November 05

Posted 16 August 2013 - 10:31 AM

The way it is explained above is a little confusing. I'll see if I can simplify it.

 

Firstly, normal (HC) 186 & 202 heads shared the same (large) sized combustion chamber, it's only the spark plug & rocker gear that differs. Head casting no. 2811930 was used in both applications, it was just differently machined when the HQ went into production. So basically, ALL late (3/71 on) HG 186 motors had the same head casting number as 202 engines in HQ, HJ, LJ & LH etc.

 

Where the commercial vehicle bit comes in, is that the last 4 months of HG van & ute production (after the HQ sedans & wagons were released) used 173 & 202 engines instead of 161 & 186 engines. These HG 173 & 202 engines had small spark & non-adjustable rockers, they were really just HQ engines with HG sumps etc. This really has nothing to do with the use of 2811930 on late 186 motors.

 

Also a lot of mention is made of low compression motors, but these were very rare in the day & ultra rare these days. I have to say in my 40 plus years in the motor trade, the number of low compression Holden sixes I've seen is in the single digits & I've never sighted a 186 or 202 low compression motor.

 

Dr Terry



#8 _hookem4341_

_hookem4341_
  • Guests

Posted 16 August 2013 - 12:51 PM

Thank Dr Terry thank s for that info greatly received as I had never seen 930 with adjustable rockers before,  Although are they same as  LJ GTR head as the186 style would of had to of been the better of the two machining's not talking about an XU1 head it was different number again I think 2815843 casting  



#9 Dr Terry

Dr Terry

    Technical + Numbers Guru + Moderator

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,276 posts
  • Location:Eastwood (Sydney) NSW
  • Joined: 13-November 05

Posted 16 August 2013 - 02:26 PM

Yes, that's correct, LJ GTR was just a stock 202 so it had the 2811930 head, with the later rockers & spark plugs.

LC & LJ XU1s had the 2815843 head.

Dr Terry

#10 _RS250_

_RS250_
  • Guests

Posted 17 January 2020 - 11:13 AM

Dr Terry / S pack or anyone in the know,

I have a head just like in this topic casted p/n 2811930, dated D231 (23 April 71) with L cast (low comp?) and it is fitted onto a 1972 dated 202 (not the original combo)

The head uses posts so adjustable rockers with pivet balls and nuts supplied. The cam is a heetseeker stage 3 hydraulic (31-69 / 73-32) with hydraulic lifters (as per cam card supplied). The engine was fresh rebuild about 22 years ago (I've had it for 20 years), it's never been started from rebuild and been in storage all this time. Because was going into storage till the car was completed 22 years ago, the pushrods were removed and then misplaced.

1) What length pushrods do I need to use with this head 2811930 (April '71) stud head, the 202 version or 186 version pushrod? Please tell me length dimensions as well so I'm double sure to get correct ones.

2) What would be the comp in this 202 motor using standard dished pistons and this "L" head (possibly off a 186 LC/HG per original postings). Would it be Low or High comp engine result?

I don't know who built it all the years ago but I was told back then it was a engine rebuild/reconditioning shop (most likely Parry's at Arncliffe NSW) and likely done to similar or same as XU1 spec as the guy was building a LJ GTR to be a XU1 mock up.

I want to piece this motor together, thanking you in advance for your advice.



#11 S pack

S pack

    Scrivet Counter

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,536 posts
  • Name:Dave
  • Location:Luggage Point
  • Car:73 LJ
  • Joined: 25-January 10

Posted 17 January 2020 - 11:34 AM

Your cylinder 2811930 head was originally cast for use on a low compression 173 or a high or low compression 202. It is the pistons that determine if a 202 engine is high or low compression.

Your 202 engine will be high compression if the engine builder has used the correct pistons.

Sounds like your cyl head is one of those early production oddball 138, 173, 202 heads that had the 149, 161, 179,186 type adjustable rockers.

I don't know for sure which valve pushrods you need for this head however I expect it will be the longer 149, 161, 179,186 type.

I can't remember the lengths of either type off hand, I will need to look it up when I have more time. Dr Terry will probably know.

 

Cheers

Dave.


Edited by S pack, 17 January 2020 - 11:34 AM.


#12 Dr Terry

Dr Terry

    Technical + Numbers Guru + Moderator

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,276 posts
  • Location:Eastwood (Sydney) NSW
  • Joined: 13-November 05

Posted 17 January 2020 - 11:37 AM

Holden Red 6-cyl with adjustable rocker gear use the longer (9.136-inch) pushrods.

 

The fixed rocker gear requires the shorter (9.00-inch) pushrods.

 

Dr Terry



#13 _RS250_

_RS250_
  • Guests

Posted 17 January 2020 - 11:41 AM

Wow, thanks for the fast responses both extremely helpful.

So the longer 9.136" ones it is.

You guys are assets to our community.

Thanks,

 

 

Sam



#14 yel327

yel327

    Oh My, Don't you post alot

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,072 posts
  • Joined: 10-February 08

Posted 17 January 2020 - 01:32 PM

I know it’s a 7 year old post Terry but I’m surprised you didn’t see many low comp engines. Every CF Bedford with a 173 was low comp, I would have seen 100’s of these. I’d also have dozens of low comp 202 powered commercials recorded but I wouldn’t have looked at many of the engines, just recorded or took photos of the tags. The ones that have particularly eluded me have been 186L, QS and BV. I think I saw a 253L once but an old memory and the odd BS. The really rare ones would be GE, GM, HE, HM and the XQ or XZ examples. I don’t recall ever seeing a ZM but I think I have an L23 plated HZ recorded. Will check.
I’m sure you told me once you saw an 11QS, wouldn’t be too many of them.

Edited by yel327, 17 January 2020 - 01:33 PM.


#15 Dr Terry

Dr Terry

    Technical + Numbers Guru + Moderator

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,276 posts
  • Location:Eastwood (Sydney) NSW
  • Joined: 13-November 05

Posted 17 January 2020 - 01:44 PM

It was all a matter of where I worked & on what type of car. In my first job I saw a lot of hire cars & taxis. I saw a few low comp Falcon 6-cyl & that 11QS Statesman engine, strangely very few lo-comp Holden 6-cyls.

 

When I had my business on Parramatta Rd in the late 70s & into the 80s, I think most of the CF Bedfords that I saw had V8s fitted. The few stockers that I saw had 202s in them.

 

There is a good chance that I saw more lo-comp motors, but like most guys I take more notice of numbers & ID tags etc. nowadays, than I did 40 years ago.

 

Dr Terry



#16 yel327

yel327

    Oh My, Don't you post alot

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,072 posts
  • Joined: 10-February 08

Posted 17 January 2020 - 01:49 PM

Just checked.
8 x L23 plated, all commercials except for a single 8/77 HX Belmont wagon. Latest an 11/79 HZ.
14 x L21 plated, latest one a really late HJ.

Most are either Kiewa Grey or Shell Grey, but a few others in white or chamois. So mainly Fleet.

#17 yel327

yel327

    Oh My, Don't you post alot

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,072 posts
  • Joined: 10-February 08

Posted 17 January 2020 - 01:58 PM

The first CF’s with Holden 6 were all FE prefix afaik. My Dad bought one of those as a milk truck. 3spd in the floor using an Aussie 4spd shifter. The later ones with 202 were FL prefix. My Dad had a pantec in one of these too, it was a Trimatic. I think they changed to the 202 after the end of HJ.

#18 claysummers

claysummers

    Lotsa Posts!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,307 posts
  • Name:Clay
  • Location:Willunga
  • Car:186 FB Ute, 3.3 EK sedan
  • Joined: 13-December 18

Posted 18 January 2020 - 06:55 AM

Mate had a 173LC HQ Belmont wagon in 1980. Don't think it was fleet but could have been being a Belmont.

Sent from my SM-A705YN using Tapatalk

#19 yel327

yel327

    Oh My, Don't you post alot

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,072 posts
  • Joined: 10-February 08

Posted 18 January 2020 - 07:52 AM

My Dad also had a HQ Belmont Ute, 173 3spd. Can’t remember if it was a low or high comp. The HQ wagon we had was a 202HC. I also had two HQ Belmont vans and a HQ cab chassis, all 3spd manuals. One van was 202HC and the other two were 173HC. They were all white apart from the wagon which was Russet.
From what I have found so far collecting data for 1000’s of HQ-HZ the low comp engines were primarily in Holden or Belmont models (mainly commercials) and mostly in Fleet vehicles. I’m not sure what the big shift was in 1976 that saw the low comp engines all but disappear even from CF Bedford. Dr Terry might have more info. Maybe the low comp engines didn’t work as well with emissions gear?

#20 RallyRed

RallyRed

    Oh My, Don't you post alot

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,835 posts
  • Name:Col
  • Location:NSW
  • Car:LC GTR etc
  • Joined: 02-October 11

Posted 18 January 2020 - 05:34 PM

I'm guessing no one ever saw one of these in the flesh.............

Attached Files


Edited by RallyRed, 18 January 2020 - 05:35 PM.


#21 I'm a Red Motor fiend

I'm a Red Motor fiend

    Forum Fixture

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 758 posts
  • Name:Adam
  • Location:Nairne SA
  • Car:LJ 4 door, LC GTR
  • Joined: 04-January 16
Garage View Garage

Posted 19 January 2020 - 05:53 AM

Thats a great read Col. The elusive heron head. Saw a claimed one for sale recently, wanted $15,000.

#22 yel327

yel327

    Oh My, Don't you post alot

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,072 posts
  • Joined: 10-February 08

Posted 19 January 2020 - 07:23 AM

Imagine how horrible a diesel red 6 would be? I remember how horrid a standard HQ cab chassis with 173, 3spd and 3.55 rear axle was. HJ with 173 or 202 with 3spd and 4.44 was even worse. Almost halve the hp and they’d be woeful.
I love how they tried an Olds 350 diesel V8 in a Statesman but it was as slow as a Statesman with an Opel big block 1.9 and used similar fuel amounts.

#23 claysummers

claysummers

    Lotsa Posts!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,307 posts
  • Name:Clay
  • Location:Willunga
  • Car:186 FB Ute, 3.3 EK sedan
  • Joined: 13-December 18

Posted 19 January 2020 - 09:38 AM

Yes a bizarre concept. Quite a few valiants in South Africa and New Zealand with diesels I believe.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

#24 Dr Terry

Dr Terry

    Technical + Numbers Guru + Moderator

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,276 posts
  • Location:Eastwood (Sydney) NSW
  • Joined: 13-November 05

Posted 20 January 2020 - 07:38 AM

 I’m not sure what the big shift was in 1976 that saw the low comp engines all but disappear even from CF Bedford. Dr Terry might have more info. Maybe the low comp engines didn’t work as well with emissions gear?

Lo-comp engines were made to accept standard grade fuel. The availability of standard grade fuel diminished dramatically during the 70s. As a matter of fact it disappeared entirely in the early 80s, about 3 or 4 years before unleaded was introduced.

 

As such lo-comp ADR27A engines are quite rare. Given the power loss already associated with ADR27A they were virtually ignored & sales dropped to zero.

 

AFAIK lo-comp versions of Blue motor 6-cyls appear in engineering data but didn't go into production.

 

Dr Terry



#25 yel327

yel327

    Oh My, Don't you post alot

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,072 posts
  • Joined: 10-February 08

Posted 20 January 2020 - 08:40 AM

I remember the Standard and Super bowsers in the later 70’s. The low comp engines are still in the HX and HZ Features and POA manuals. Application as follows in HZ:

L21 - export only and only with delete exhaust emissions controls (delete ADR27A). LD1 is the same. Both do say available with XT5 engine equipment, but that will just be getting ready for WB I think. Date for this info appears to be May 17 1978, and possibly March 23 1979 for the XT5 bit. It looks like “cancel as soon as possible” was added to L21 at some stage too. LD1 has the same revision on March 23 1979, which I think is the XT5 bit.

L23 appears to be available on every model in Holden, Kingswood and Premier luxury levels except for cab-chassis and Sandman. Premier usage is as per L21 though, ie export only and with delete ADR27A. Plus it appears L20 remains optional on Premier although L32 became standard during later 1978, no “export only” caveat on L20 Premier.

HX is pretty much the same except L33 is still there but for “Engineering Records Only”.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users