i would like to know who will make the most power using a 2 barrell carby,does not matter if it is aspriated of forced induction.And with the fastest 1/4 mile times and terminal speed.
2 barrell carby
Started by
_ljxu1torana_
, Sep 02 2014 12:41 AM
25 replies to this topic
#2
N/A-PWR
-
- Members
-
- 9,594 posts
CABIN ENGINE CONTROLS GALORE
- Name:Dave I
- Location:Wooroloo, 65km's East of Perth
- Car:'1969' LC RAT TORANA
- Joined: 08-December 12
Posted 02 September 2014 - 12:58 AM
So for the Holden Six, we have a:-
- 52mm Dellorto
- 48mm Weber
- 500 2bbl Holley
and what other ones do we have to compare Jason?
Edit:-
- 650 2bbl Holley ( rare to get )
Edited by GASPOWER, 02 September 2014 - 01:01 AM.
#3
_ljxu1torana_
_ljxu1torana_
-
- Guests
Posted 02 September 2014 - 01:04 AM
350 holley.45mm weber,40mm weber.even the webers of of any car that can be used on a holden 6.
i am still a big fan on the weber carbys in turbo or aspriated form.i will probaly get roasted over this.Webers are the closest carby to mechanical fuel injection.
#4
N/A-PWR
-
- Members
-
- 9,594 posts
CABIN ENGINE CONTROLS GALORE
- Name:Dave I
- Location:Wooroloo, 65km's East of Perth
- Car:'1969' LC RAT TORANA
- Joined: 08-December 12
Posted 02 September 2014 - 01:11 AM
I would of thought the 500 holley would of done well,
also I remember the supercharged Red Six with two 500 holleys on.
Not sure how well that went,
but a Guy called 'Mr Chev' from Melbourne I think built them hey.
Edit:-
But yeah, winning is something different,
Turbo I think wins hands down.
Edited by GASPOWER, 02 September 2014 - 01:16 AM.
#5
_ljxu1torana_
_ljxu1torana_
-
- Guests
Posted 02 September 2014 - 01:20 AM
i founded a site a bout air pressure for the turbo cars.i put in my info and they came out with 330hp.Now mine has a lot bigger intake manifold so my guess would be about 380hp.Close to 2 ton of air pressure.
#6
N/A-PWR
-
- Members
-
- 9,594 posts
CABIN ENGINE CONTROLS GALORE
- Name:Dave I
- Location:Wooroloo, 65km's East of Perth
- Car:'1969' LC RAT TORANA
- Joined: 08-December 12
Posted 02 September 2014 - 01:23 AM
Holey Moley,
that is some serious HP there Jason,
and what size 2bbl was used there Mate.
Edit:-
Edited by GASPOWER, 02 September 2014 - 01:36 AM.
#7
_ljxu1torana_
_ljxu1torana_
-
- Guests
Posted 02 September 2014 - 01:41 AM
48mm weber dave.they are the best carbys to use on turbo holden 6.my friend who built my engine,he also had a car name turbulance back in the 80s with a turbo 192, 48mm weber carby.He tried su no good could not keep the fuel up to it.same with the 500 holley.he also tried a like a 750 double pumper it went alright,but went close to a full second quicker over the 1/4 mile with the weber carby.Back in the 80s he was featured in the dragster australia magazine.12.001 @ 121 mph on bf goodrich ta 265/60/14 on the rear 2.78 diff gears m20 4 speed,5500 rpm.
#8
N/A-PWR
-
- Members
-
- 9,594 posts
CABIN ENGINE CONTROLS GALORE
- Name:Dave I
- Location:Wooroloo, 65km's East of Perth
- Car:'1969' LC RAT TORANA
- Joined: 08-December 12
Posted 02 September 2014 - 01:48 AM
Not Bad at all Jason,
the good old day's are back.
Would of gone over the line in 3rd hey.
#9
N/A-PWR
-
- Members
-
- 9,594 posts
CABIN ENGINE CONTROLS GALORE
- Name:Dave I
- Location:Wooroloo, 65km's East of Perth
- Car:'1969' LC RAT TORANA
- Joined: 08-December 12
Posted 02 September 2014 - 02:04 AM
Damn, I only get 104mph in 3rd with a 2.78 using the 265/60/14 at 5500rpm,
I must be doing something wrong, hmm
and 157mph in 4th, at 5500rpm.
Edit:-
I use to do 104mph in 3rd using 215/60/13 and a 3.08 diff at 7000rpm
Edited by GASPOWER, 02 September 2014 - 02:18 AM.
#10
N/A-PWR
-
- Members
-
- 9,594 posts
CABIN ENGINE CONTROLS GALORE
- Name:Dave I
- Location:Wooroloo, 65km's East of Perth
- Car:'1969' LC RAT TORANA
- Joined: 08-December 12
Posted 02 September 2014 - 02:21 AM
Maybe you mean 151mph in top at 5500rpm Jason.
#11
_ljxu1torana_
_ljxu1torana_
-
- Guests
Posted 02 September 2014 - 02:22 AM
Not Bad at all Jason,
the good old day's are back.
Would of gone over the line in 3rd hey.
yeah dave his torana made 410 rear wheel horsepower back in the 80s super fuel with avgas.yes he did go across the line in third gear.
Maybe you mean 151mph in top at 5500rpm Jason.
it would be very close to 150m/ph dave.
#12
N/A-PWR
-
- Members
-
- 9,594 posts
CABIN ENGINE CONTROLS GALORE
- Name:Dave I
- Location:Wooroloo, 65km's East of Perth
- Car:'1969' LC RAT TORANA
- Joined: 08-December 12
Posted 02 September 2014 - 02:29 AM
Got it,
it was, 6500rpm in 3rd using a 2.78 diff,
and 265/60/14 tyres at 121mph.
and an Aussie M20 3rd is 1.51:1
#13
_ljxu1torana_
_ljxu1torana_
-
- Guests
Posted 02 September 2014 - 02:44 AM
i am having a guess with mine 2.78 gears 13 inch wheels top gear @5500rpm 140 m/ph.
#14
N/A-PWR
-
- Members
-
- 9,594 posts
CABIN ENGINE CONTROLS GALORE
- Name:Dave I
- Location:Wooroloo, 65km's East of Perth
- Car:'1969' LC RAT TORANA
- Joined: 08-December 12
Posted 02 September 2014 - 02:52 AM
While trying to find a 121mph Torana 6 at 12 seconds ( which is about right ),
I found this goodie, which puts the shivers up the old spine hey:-
a 3.08 diff at 5400rpm in top is 143mph Jason, on 215/60/13's.
#15
_ljxu1torana_
_ljxu1torana_
-
- Guests
Posted 02 September 2014 - 03:34 AM
i would have passed him at half track.lol.
#17
greens nice
-
- Members
-
- 1,011 posts
Forum Fixture
- Name:Kevin
- Location:QLD
- Car:EH Holden
- Joined: 01-November 08
Posted 02 September 2014 - 05:23 PM
There was a HG monaro here at willowbank that ran mid to low 11's @ 120 odd, late 80's early 90's
It was a 186 strata setup and a 4 barrel.
It was a 186 strata setup and a 4 barrel.
#18
Dr Terry
-
- Moderators
-
- 3,276 posts
Technical + Numbers Guru + Moderator
- Location:Eastwood (Sydney) NSW
- Joined: 13-November 05
Posted 03 September 2014 - 07:22 PM
Guys, it's "naturally aspirated", not just "aspirated". All engines are "aspirated", regardless of whether they have forced induction or not.
Dr Terry
#19
N/A-PWR
-
- Members
-
- 9,594 posts
CABIN ENGINE CONTROLS GALORE
- Name:Dave I
- Location:Wooroloo, 65km's East of Perth
- Car:'1969' LC RAT TORANA
- Joined: 08-December 12
Posted 03 September 2014 - 07:30 PM
Very Good wake up there DR Terry,
as is written N/A.
we will word this properly next time.
Guys, it's "naturally aspirated"
Dr Terry
#20
rodomo
-
- Members
-
- 17,997 posts
To advertise here, call 13TORANA
- Name:R - O - B Dammit!
- Location:Way out west of Melbourne Awstraylya
- Joined: 10-December 05
Posted 03 September 2014 - 09:32 PM
I thort N/A meant no longer available? 
#22
N/A-PWR
-
- Members
-
- 9,594 posts
CABIN ENGINE CONTROLS GALORE
- Name:Dave I
- Location:Wooroloo, 65km's East of Perth
- Car:'1969' LC RAT TORANA
- Joined: 08-December 12
Posted 03 September 2014 - 09:49 PM
Acronym Definition
N/A Not Available
N/A Not Applicable
N/A North America
N/A No Answer
N/A Never Again
N/A Not Acceptable
N/A Non Alcoholic
N/A Naturally Aspirated (non-turbocharged/non-supercharged engine)
N/A Non Action
N/A Non-Aspirated (engine)
see if that helps
#24
_Bomber Watson_
_Bomber Watson_
-
- Guests
Posted 03 September 2014 - 10:29 PM
Acronym DefinitionN/A Not AvailableN/A Not ApplicableN/A North AmericaN/A No AnswerN/A Never AgainN/A Not AcceptableN/A Non AlcoholicN/A Naturally Aspirated (non-turbocharged/non-supercharged engine)N/A Non ActionN/A Non-Aspirated (engine)see if that helps
The last one is technically incorrect.
#25
Potta
-
- Members
-
- 6,026 posts
Oh My, Don't you post alot
- Name:Craig
- Location:Gozzy, WA
- Car:LC GTR, LC 4 door
- Joined: 01-May 09
Posted 03 September 2014 - 11:41 PM
The last one is technically incorrect.
I dunno, I reckon your coffee table might fit into the Non-Aspirated Engine category 
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
