Jump to content


Photo

Cyclist totally OWNED after causing accident!


  • Please log in to reply
17 replies to this topic

#1 Steve TPF

Steve TPF

    Forum Fixture

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 784 posts
  • Name:Steve
  • Location:Adelaide... city of... anyone know something good about it?
  • Car:UC hatch
  • Joined: 09-June 09

Posted 01 November 2014 - 12:35 AM

http://www.canberrat...031-11f37b.html

 

 

A cyclist has been ordered to pay his friend nearly $1.7 million in damages after the man was knocked off his bike and hit by a car when the pair collided on their way home from work.

Court documents said David Blick was riding slightly ahead of Michael Anthony Franklin on the off-ramp from Capital Circle onto Canberra Avenue during the evening peak hour on June 17, 2009.

Mr Blick hit a large wooden tree stake that was lying in the bike lane and veered into his friend, causing him to fall off his bike and into the path of an oncoming car.

Mr Franklin, who was 43 at the time of the incident, remembered his friend's body slammed into him before he was thrown on to the road, court documents said.

Advertisement

"I don't have a strong memory of what happened next, other than the fact that a car ran over my back and seemed to spin me around to face the oncoming traffic," he said.

He tried to crawl off the road, but he could not move his legs.

Mr Franklin remembered Mr Blick tried to stop oncoming traffic as another cyclist rushed to help, holding his head in place and telling him not to move.

He recalled he began to experience "incredible, intense pain" as paramedics tried to move him.

The victim suffered serious fractures to his pelvis and spine, internal bleeding, grazes and bruising. 

He required pins and screws to be inserted into his pelvis and the base of his spine. 

Mr Franklin spent 28 days in hospital and continued to suffer chronic pain, as well as burst of acute pain, which required ongoing treatment in the months after his release. 

Court documents showed Mr Blick, who went to the same school as Mr Franklin, often visited him in hospital. 

He told him the wooden stake, which he described as 1.5 to 2 metres long had "turned his wheel" towards his friend's bike.

Mr Franklin later returned to work part-time as an IT consultant but continued to experience serious flare-ups of back pain and disrupted sleep, which required medication and meditation courses.

He also underwent physiotherapy, hydrotherapy, massage therapy, and saw a psychologist.

The pain worsened every time Mr Franklin, a contractor, tried to increase his workload over the next couple of years, and he was forced to work fewer hours. 

Mr Franklin said he had been fit, healthy and took part in running groups, triathlons and decathlons before the collision.

The accident caused him to "feel down" a lot of the time due to his chronic pain and the medication he was on. 

Mr Franklin assumed he would be covered for personal injury because the accident involved a car, court documents said. 

But a solicitor advised him the the driver's third party insurance would only cover him if it could be proven the driver was negligent. 

He instead sued Mr Blick for negligence, claiming he failed to keep a proper lookout for dangers on the road and was not riding safely."



Read more: http://www.canberrat...l#ixzz3HjVlsqwg

 

So for once the car driver didn't get screwed for something out of their control. Time cyclists had to pay TAC fees and rego like the rest of us!


Edited by Steve TPF, 01 November 2014 - 12:36 AM.


#2 Potta

Potta

    Oh My, Don't you post alot

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,026 posts
  • Name:Craig
  • Location:Gozzy, WA
  • Car:LC GTR, LC 4 door
  • Joined: 01-May 09

Posted 01 November 2014 - 01:03 AM

That's a pretty sh!t outcome for the two cyclists but clearly the car driver was not at fault.



#3 UCgazman

UCgazman

    UC's FTW!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,342 posts
  • Name:Garth
  • Location:Perth
  • Car:UC S̶u̶n̶b̶i̶r̶d̶ 5000!
  • Joined: 04-August 11

Posted 01 November 2014 - 01:15 AM

Hardly his mates fault either. Some people need to accept the fact that shit happens and finding someone to sue isn't gonna make it all better.



#4 Potta

Potta

    Oh My, Don't you post alot

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,026 posts
  • Name:Craig
  • Location:Gozzy, WA
  • Car:LC GTR, LC 4 door
  • Joined: 01-May 09

Posted 01 November 2014 - 01:23 AM

Problem is someone has to pay for all of the medical bills.

 

If I was his mate I'd be suing the road authority for allowing the stake to be on the road.



#5 UCgazman

UCgazman

    UC's FTW!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,342 posts
  • Name:Garth
  • Location:Perth
  • Car:UC S̶u̶n̶b̶i̶r̶d̶ 5000!
  • Joined: 04-August 11

Posted 01 November 2014 - 01:30 AM

Medicare...

He would have been sent to a public? (non private) spinal unit regardless of what health insurance he has anyway.



#6 kiwi-lilj

kiwi-lilj

    Forum Fixture

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,420 posts
  • Name:Blair
  • Location:NZ
  • Car:LIL J
  • Joined: 14-September 08

Posted 01 November 2014 - 05:54 AM

I think we need to look at how farked up America is and then stop trying to be like them.

#7 xu2308

xu2308

    Grail Hunter

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,704 posts
  • Name:AL
  • Location:Belconnen ACT
  • Car:SMP LJ GTR V8 Prototype-Confirmed By HHS and Ex GMH XW7 Engineers
  • Joined: 09-April 09

Posted 01 November 2014 - 07:02 AM

Moral to the story is don't go bike riding with any one, I bet they are not mates any more after this

#8 orangeLJ

orangeLJ

    Yes, yes I do post alot!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,259 posts
  • Joined: 02-May 06

Posted 02 November 2014 - 09:20 AM

I'm curious as to how someone is meant to pay that much in damages? Its a ficticious figure that will never be paid.

But, its a great story to push for some kind of 3rd party for full blown "cyclists"

#9 S pack

S pack

    Scrivet Counter

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,538 posts
  • Name:Dave
  • Location:Luggage Point
  • Car:73 LJ
  • Joined: 25-January 10

Posted 02 November 2014 - 09:34 AM

I'm curious as to how someone is meant to pay that much in damages? Its a ficticious figure that will never be paid.

But, its a great story to push for some kind of 3rd party for full blown "cyclists"

Sad that two peoples lives are now in ruins.



#10 _Lazarus_

_Lazarus_
  • Guests

Posted 02 November 2014 - 10:32 AM

I can't be certain but at a guess they were probably racing style bikes. No other vehicle would be allowed on a road with such vulnerable wheels and tyres as these. Even slight imperfections or small debris must be avoided at all cost. And I have always considered cyclists riding two abreast in a lane to be not sensible practice. Many of these guys seem to throw common sense out the window. The only protection they have is a plastic shell on their heads.

 

It seems to me that the injured party believes the first guy swerved into his path to avoid the tree stake, otherwise why would he be suing ?

 

 

.


Edited by Lazarus, 02 November 2014 - 10:33 AM.


#11 rexy

rexy

    Lotsa Posts!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,584 posts
  • Name:Rexy
  • Location:Melbourne
  • Car:Kia grand carnival!!!
  • Joined: 03-November 09

Posted 02 November 2014 - 10:39 AM

I'm curious as to how someone is meant to pay that much in damages? Its a ficticious figure that will never be paid.
But, its a great story to push for some kind of 3rd party for full blown "cyclists"

Presumably he has significant assets or liability insurance. No point suing someone who can't pay.

#12 UCgazman

UCgazman

    UC's FTW!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,342 posts
  • Name:Garth
  • Location:Perth
  • Car:UC S̶u̶n̶b̶i̶r̶d̶ 5000!
  • Joined: 04-August 11

Posted 02 November 2014 - 01:25 PM

I'm curious as to how someone is meant to pay that much in damages? Its a ficticious figure that will never be paid.

But, its a great story to push for some kind of 3rd party for full blown "cyclists"

 

I've seen similar cases that usually get the ruling overturned on appeal, thus effectively ruining more peoples lives & wasting the courts time for nothing... unless you're their lawyer!



#13 Potta

Potta

    Oh My, Don't you post alot

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,026 posts
  • Name:Craig
  • Location:Gozzy, WA
  • Car:LC GTR, LC 4 door
  • Joined: 01-May 09

Posted 02 November 2014 - 02:52 PM

I don't think he is actually suing him.

The injured guy tried to get money off the car driver's 3rd party insurance, but the court said nope, he's not liable, your mate is, pay up!

Please correct me if I'm wrong but that was my understanding(I read it a few days ago though)

#14 _The Baron_

_The Baron_
  • Guests

Posted 02 November 2014 - 05:31 PM

Probably just trying to get someone to pay the medical and lawyer bills that can afford it. Which is normally an insurance company because an individual is unlikely to have those sorts of funds available (or they just claims bankruptcy to get out off it.)

 

Won't be long and Medicare will fail to mean anything and only those with private health will be attended to in Hospitals.


Edited by The Baron, 02 November 2014 - 05:32 PM.


#15 Redslur

Redslur

    Has been Torana owner

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,531 posts
  • Name:Gerry
  • Location:Canberra
  • Car:HQ GTS Replica 350.
  • Joined: 08-November 05

Posted 02 November 2014 - 06:30 PM

I actually read that in the local rag yesterday.  I nearly fell over backwards....Who would honestly sue a mate for an instance like that....I know the ridder was seriuosly hurt and now has ongoing problems, but he clearly took his mate to court as he was told 3rd party insurance won't cover it....Absolutely gobsmacked a judge would pass such asjudgement!  Who has that sort of money to pay up....unless the fornt cyclist was loaded, he in now in debt for life....I do feel for the second party but that is sh@t in my eyes!!!!



#16 Steve TPF

Steve TPF

    Forum Fixture

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 784 posts
  • Name:Steve
  • Location:Adelaide... city of... anyone know something good about it?
  • Car:UC hatch
  • Joined: 09-June 09

Posted 02 November 2014 - 09:33 PM

I'm curious as to why the first wanker - I mean cyclist - wasn't charged with causing an accident. If they want to "share the road" then they can share the responsibility - and the costs. That means rego and insurance if you want to ride on the road!

 

This isn't the first time a cyclist has hurt someone - there have been a few pedestrian deaths caused by bikes as well. Clearly we need TOUGH NEW LAWS to protect us from BIKE HOONS!



#17 Collo

Collo

    ( . Y . )

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 114,647 posts
  • Location:Newcastle...Home of me.
  • Car:A Black POS
  • Joined: 29-February 08

Posted 02 November 2014 - 09:59 PM

This isn't the first time a cyclist has hurt someone - there have been a few pedestrian deaths caused by bikes as well. Clearly we need TOUGH NEW LAWS to protect us from BIKE HOONS!

They should have their bikes confiscated and crushed :spoton:



#18 aus_yzman

aus_yzman

    Forum Participant

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 6 posts
  • Name:Mika
  • Location:Brisbane
  • Car:LC torana 4 door
  • Joined: 29-January 12
Garage View Garage

Posted 03 November 2014 - 05:33 PM

You never ride slightly behind another rider with your front wheel over lapping his rear or this can and does happen. Ride side by side or sit behind in slipstream imo its totally the injured riders fault.






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users