Jump to content


Photo

400 chev in lx torana engineering


  • Please log in to reply
63 replies to this topic

#1 SamBam

SamBam

    Forum Fan

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 435 posts
  • Location:wantirna, melbourne
  • Joined: 11-October 06

Posted 18 January 2015 - 10:02 AM

Hey guys and girls,
im currently getting my 400 chev built up by Tony at speedworks (im in vic) and was just wondering engineering wise who would be the best person to go to look over the car etc once its all done?
I know that bigger brakes, new seat belts emissions canister would be required. If i was to get the chassis strengthening kit from crs would that help too? And have i missed anything else that should be done so i can please them in one go and not waste their time going backwards n forwards.
Cheers everyone!
Sammy

#2 dattoman

dattoman

    Do I feel lucky? Well, do ya, punk?

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,470 posts
  • Name:Neil
  • Location:Perth Western Australia
  • Car:LX SS , 76 Cadillac , 3 x dattos
  • Joined: 04-February 07

Posted 18 January 2015 - 01:04 PM

Find an engineer first before you spend any more money

Your rego authorities might not allow the 400



#3 _434LX_

_434LX_
  • Guests

Posted 18 January 2015 - 02:29 PM

You probably want to read this too....

 

http://www.infrastru...1jan2011_v3.pdf

 



#4 SamBam

SamBam

    Forum Fan

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 435 posts
  • Location:wantirna, melbourne
  • Joined: 11-October 06

Posted 18 January 2015 - 03:42 PM

Just had a read through, from the table on LA1 stating weight x 3,4,5 an lx torana weighs in at 1183 kerb weight so 1183x5=5915cc which works out to be 360 cubic inches so a 400 is not possible from those figures. Is there a way around it like just saying its a 350? Or just bite the bullet n sell the block n get a 350 n bore it out to suit 400 crank, rods n pistons?

#5 dattoman

dattoman

    Do I feel lucky? Well, do ya, punk?

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 16,470 posts
  • Name:Neil
  • Location:Perth Western Australia
  • Car:LX SS , 76 Cadillac , 3 x dattos
  • Joined: 04-February 07

Posted 18 January 2015 - 03:44 PM

If you stroke a 350 its a 383

Still over the limit

So do you care about it being legal and insurable or not ?



#6 SamBam

SamBam

    Forum Fan

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 435 posts
  • Location:wantirna, melbourne
  • Joined: 11-October 06

Posted 18 January 2015 - 03:49 PM

Well the only way to get it regod if going a chev would be with engineers cert. And im confused now since 434 lx showed me that link n he has a 434 in his?

#7 Bigfella237

Bigfella237

    Socially Distant

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,369 posts
  • Name:Andrew
  • Location:Far South Coast of NSW
  • Car:(s) not as many as I'd like but more than I've got space for!
  • Joined: 31-October 14

Posted 18 January 2015 - 04:10 PM

I haven't read up on this for a while but from memory there are no engine size restrictions if you call it an ICV (Individually Constructed Vehicle).

 

BUT (the really big BUT is that) if you call it an ICV you become the "manufacturer" and it has to comply with all the current ADRs the same as if it was a brand new car that left the factory on the day you get it engineered and by the sound of it, the vehicle emmissions alone will be hard to get around.

 

See Third Edition ADRs here: https://www.infrastr...adr_online.aspx

 

As Datto said, you need to consult with an engineer before you spend any more money.

 

I hate to say it but if you're committed to this engine build you may have to consider swapping the Torana for something with a greater (highest factory option) tare weight, for example, a VH Commodore SL/E had a tare of 1370kg which works out to 418 ci?

 

And I'm not even going near the subject of insurance...



#8 SamBam

SamBam

    Forum Fan

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 435 posts
  • Location:wantirna, melbourne
  • Joined: 11-October 06

Posted 18 January 2015 - 04:30 PM

I haven't bought everything yet for the block only block crank rods n pistons. Yeah bit of money already. But im not solely committed to just this engine build, if i have to go to a 350 then I'll be happy with that. The reason i went 400 was from talking with the engine builder he said for ease of gaining more power and having the flexibility to go even better down the track. But i might speak to a few engineers n ask them about possibly doing it as an icv.

#9 Bigfella237

Bigfella237

    Socially Distant

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,369 posts
  • Name:Andrew
  • Location:Far South Coast of NSW
  • Car:(s) not as many as I'd like but more than I've got space for!
  • Joined: 31-October 14

Posted 18 January 2015 - 04:36 PM

Just on a side-note:

 

an 1183kg Torana has a maximum engine size of 5915cc under NCOP

an LS1 engine is 5670cc

an LS2/L76/L98 engine is 5965cc

 

That means an LS2 is just 50cc over the limit but I've seen quite a few 6.0L engines in Toranas, is there some "tollerance" as this is within +/- 1% or are people just fudging the numbers slightly?

 

A difference of 6.25cc per cylinder is litterally a droplet, I'd reckon dome-top pistons or a good block decking would account for more than that?



#10 _NewsuxLX_

_NewsuxLX_
  • Guests

Posted 18 January 2015 - 05:33 PM

Definatly need to speak to an engineer first!!! I wasnt able to get a 350 passed unless it was in gas and even then it was guna be tuff so i ditched that idea and went icv. You could try engineering it with a 283 or 307 then just put the 400 in it but then u run the risk of no insurance ect.

#11 _NewsuxLX_

_NewsuxLX_
  • Guests

Posted 18 January 2015 - 05:52 PM

I cant rember what the engineer said now but it was something along the lines of it had to be an aussie 350 and the same year as the torana

#12 SamBam

SamBam

    Forum Fan

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 435 posts
  • Location:wantirna, melbourne
  • Joined: 11-October 06

Posted 18 January 2015 - 07:16 PM

So did you go the 350 with icv? How was the process in getting it done that way. I emailed an engineer and surprisingly they got back to me pretty quick on a Sunday, they said id need to justify compliance with ADR exhaust emissions and would be very complex in doing so. For full rego the tare weight times 5 to pass. So doesn't look possible with the 400 to get regod. Soooo next question is how many ppl have got their car regod n on the road and then put a bigger engine in later on? Yes of course insurance won't cover IF there was an accident but we all know how precious these cars are so always gotta look out for the nuff nuffs on the road!

#13 _Bomber Watson_

_Bomber Watson_
  • Guests

Posted 18 January 2015 - 07:21 PM

At a rough guess i would say 60% of people on this forum are driving illegally modefied cars, whether they know it or not. 

 

Personally i wont hold a grudge against you if you go the bigger engine. When i had a LH and a 400SBC sitting in the shed at the same time i had every intention of just saying it was a 350....Ended up turboing the 202 that was in the car though then selling both haha. 

 

Cheers. 



#14 SamBam

SamBam

    Forum Fan

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 435 posts
  • Location:wantirna, melbourne
  • Joined: 11-October 06

Posted 18 January 2015 - 07:41 PM

Hahaha im glad you wont hold a grudge against me for going bigger! I do like the idea of a 400 so i might have to change the plan a bit now. Ive only got the block scat crank rods n pistons so i could always get a cheap 350 block and use the crank but im not sure if the rods n pistons would fit in? Yes or no? So i could get the car regod again then when the time comes but the 400 in

#15 _Bomber Watson_

_Bomber Watson_
  • Guests

Posted 18 January 2015 - 07:46 PM

Im not fluent with chevs, so this might be a bit off. 

 

Pretty sure the pistons definitely wont go, 350 is 3.990" from memory and im pretty sure 400 is 4.125" or somethign like that. 

 

Rods im not so sure, they might work. 

 

Cheers. 



#16 SamBam

SamBam

    Forum Fan

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 435 posts
  • Location:wantirna, melbourne
  • Joined: 11-October 06

Posted 18 January 2015 - 07:55 PM

I do feel like an idiot for not completely checking with an engineer first, i spoke to archie in Bayswater about putting a 350 in n he said yep no probs so when discussing between the 350 n 400 with the engine builderhe recommended the 400 for ease of gaining alot more. Juat gotta think of the positives, i have the block so i can still do it later on just not straight away. I guess new plan of attack is use a 350 block, i can use the crank if its no drama n just keep the rods n pistons till im ready. Even if i do a budget build now just to get it on the road then beef it right up!

#17 _Bomber Watson_

_Bomber Watson_
  • Guests

Posted 18 January 2015 - 07:58 PM

Persionally i would be inclined to buy a cheep gm 350ci crate motor, do the 400 up on the side, do the swap then you have a low km gm crate motor for sale to the hot rod guys. 



#18 SamBam

SamBam

    Forum Fan

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 435 posts
  • Location:wantirna, melbourne
  • Joined: 11-October 06

Posted 18 January 2015 - 08:06 PM

I didnt actually think of that, i might look into that and see how much $$ im looking at for a 350ci crate motor and yeah like you said do the 400 on the side. Thanks heaps mate Thats made me feel a whole lot better!

#19 _Bomber Watson_

_Bomber Watson_
  • Guests

Posted 18 January 2015 - 08:12 PM

http://stores.ebay.c...&_sid=930581609

 

Cheers. 



#20 wot179

wot179

    Green Eggs and Spam

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,784 posts
  • Name:Jesus Bloody Christ
  • Location:Sunny Santa Maria
  • Car:Goon
  • Joined: 06-February 09

Posted 18 January 2015 - 08:14 PM

400 rods are shorter.

#21 wot179

wot179

    Green Eggs and Spam

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,784 posts
  • Name:Jesus Bloody Christ
  • Location:Sunny Santa Maria
  • Car:Goon
  • Joined: 06-February 09

Posted 18 January 2015 - 08:17 PM

https://books.google... length&f=false

#22 SamBam

SamBam

    Forum Fan

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 435 posts
  • Location:wantirna, melbourne
  • Joined: 11-October 06

Posted 18 January 2015 - 08:20 PM

Awesome thanks bomber!! I'll start saving me coins!

https://books.google... length&f=false



Ah wel there ya go! Learn something new everyday! Cheers mate!

#23 myss427

myss427

    Forum Fixture

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,636 posts
  • Location:Canberra
  • Car:427 hatch, CV8 Monaro, Ve SSV ute. Was part owner A9X sedan until he sold it without telling me!
  • Joined: 17-November 05
Garage View Garage

Posted 18 January 2015 - 09:48 PM

You are Ok to go up to 6.3 litre, its based on the heaviest Torana which is the A9X at over 1250 kgs.



#24 Bigfella237

Bigfella237

    Socially Distant

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,369 posts
  • Name:Andrew
  • Location:Far South Coast of NSW
  • Car:(s) not as many as I'd like but more than I've got space for!
  • Joined: 31-October 14

Posted 19 January 2015 - 01:38 AM

From: http://www.gmh-toran...7862-a9x-specs/

 

LH L34 Sedan:
Kerb Weight: 1306 kg

 

LX A9X Sedan:
Kerb Weight: 1306kg

 

LX A9X Hatchback:
Kerb Weight: 1242kg

 

So it seems under NCOP we have a maximum allowable engine capacity for a Torana Sedan of 6530cc (398.485ci)

 

And for Hatch a maximum capacity of 6210cc (378.957ci)

 

You're getting closer Sammy, I figure a 400ci Chev is a bee's dick under 6555cc so now you're only 25cc away (assuming a sedan), that's less than half a percent over the limit.

 

It may be worth confirming whether the 400ci figure is exact or a marketing term and then going back to your engineer with the correct values?



#25 SamBam

SamBam

    Forum Fan

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 435 posts
  • Location:wantirna, melbourne
  • Joined: 11-October 06

Posted 19 January 2015 - 08:30 AM

From: http://www.gmh-toran...7862-a9x-specs/
 
LH L34 Sedan:
Kerb Weight: 1306 kg
 
LX A9X Sedan:
Kerb Weight: 1306kg
 
LX A9X Hatchback:
Kerb Weight: 1242kg
 
So it seems under NCOP we have a maximum allowable engine capacity for a Torana Sedan of 6530cc (398.485ci)
 
And for Hatch a maximum capacity of 6210cc (378.957ci)
 
You're getting closer Sammy, I figure a 400ci Chev is a bee's dick under 6555cc so now you're only 25cc away (assuming a sedan), that's less than half a percent over the limit.
 
It may be worth confirming whether the 400ci figure is exact or a marketing term and then going back to your engineer with the correct values?


Yeah ive got a sedan so just under!! I'll let him know about the weight figures you found and if he asks i can always print off the page and show him. Maybe maybe it could be a 383 chev on paper so it's under the cc limit. I'll see what he says n even ring a few n let you know the answer




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users