Any feed back on this cam would be appreciated
Thanks
20191031_010430.jpg 88.71K 9 downloads
Posted 31 October 2019 - 08:40 PM
Posted 01 November 2019 - 04:50 AM
Posted 01 November 2019 - 07:14 AM
Maybe i'm getting a bit old, but that cam has a fair amount of duration for a comfortable street driven car. If it was a solid cam it would be a bit more street friendly. Also the longer the engine stroke the less sensitive they are the cam overlap. A 202 would be slightly better than a 186. I would only expect 10-12 inches of vacuum at idle so tuning at low engine speeds could be a bit of a challenge depending on your choice of induction system. Although you may have enough vacuum for brakes I thing it would defently be on the lower side of the spectrum.
Posted 01 November 2019 - 11:43 PM
i'll be using tripple SUs HIF6
the head is a yella terra cast iron 12 port
blue 202 block
10.5 to 1
extractors and a 2 1/2 inch single system
4 speed box
Posted 02 November 2019 - 05:17 AM
It'll work ok with that combo.
Posted 02 November 2019 - 09:14 PM
Posted 04 November 2019 - 03:45 PM
If the static compression is 10.5 I would normally add a little bit more. A cam that size would only allow for high 7 or very low 8s at idle, there are a few calculators programs on the net that allows you to enter all the known parameters and then recommends a static compression rang
What ratio would you recommend
Posted 04 November 2019 - 07:41 PM
Posted 04 November 2019 - 09:36 PM
I would generally like to see between 10.8 - 11. 1 with a cam that duration. I like to have a small quench area between the piston and head. I prefer to run .025-035 as this helps reduce the onset of detonation. When building an engine you need to workout every thing first before running out and just buying parts. You need to do correct planning. There is no value in throwing a big cam in that has the potential of 7,500 rpm when the rest of the engine components can only handle 5,500 rpm.
good advice thanks
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users