W.A. state government chasing stamp duty.
#26
Posted 11 March 2021 - 07:18 PM
my EH i've had 25years, a $1000 purchase back then unregistered, from parents.
1996 It was fixed up, registered and driven 5years as a daily,
then deregistered in 2002 for 8 years,
then spruced up again in 2010 re-registered again as a club car, as is currently.
Sorry I cant recall if anyone at Qld.TMR asked me in 1996 or 2010, what was spent on the car to actually get it on the road.
I'd say on the original 1996 Registration i woukd have paid POXY Stamp Duty on $1000.
I guess i would have to look through my Vehicle file to find the Rego paperwork from those re-registration years to confirm.
#27
Posted 12 March 2021 - 07:16 AM
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
#28
Posted 12 March 2021 - 07:28 AM
#29
Posted 12 March 2021 - 07:48 AM
Interesting,
my EH i've had 25years, a $1000 purchase back then unregistered, from parents.
1996 It was fixed up, registered and driven 5years as a daily,
then deregistered in 2002 for 8 years,
then spruced up again in 2010 re-registered again as a club car, as is currently.
Sorry I cant recall if anyone at Qld.TMR asked me in 1996 or 2010, what was spent on the car to actually get it on the road.
I'd say on the original 1996 Registration i woukd have paid POXY Stamp Duty on $1000.
I guess i would have to look through my Vehicle file to find the Rego paperwork from those re-registration years to confirm.
Screenshot from the QLD rego transfer application form.
Screenshot_2021-03-12 Vehicle Registration Transfer Application - F3520_CFD pdf.png 93.41K
5 downloads
#30
Posted 12 March 2021 - 08:41 AM
A guide to vehicle licence duties in WA.
#31
Posted 12 March 2021 - 08:42 AM
Sent from my SM-A705YN using Tapatalk
#32
Posted 12 March 2021 - 08:50 AM
Agree, that is how I read it.Stamp duty is on the transfer not renewal of rego. If as a clunker you transferred it into your name 20 years ago and let the rego lapse for ten years then it's just a reinspection and pay the new rego no stamp duty.
Sent from my SM-A705YN using Tapatalk
#33
Posted 12 March 2021 - 09:13 AM
Sent from my SM-A705YN using Tapatalk
#34
Posted 12 March 2021 - 08:52 PM
Using the figures from the XBOSS Street Machine Article.
The market value of XBOSS was declared as $15,500 which is clearly undervalued.
The stamp duty bill of $26,000 indicates the car was insured for around $400,000.
The total bill for XBOSS was $34,000 including the 30% penalty of which he then got around $25,00 back on appeal leaving a $9,000 bill.
The stamp duty on $140,000 is around $9,100.
The stamp duty on $110,000 is $7,150 plus 30% penalty is $9,295
If they waived the penalty (which seems unlikely) then the car was valued at around $140,000.
If they did not waive the penalty then the car was valued at around $110,000.
It would appear that the lesson here is rego first then restore / modify.
#35
Posted 12 March 2021 - 10:45 PM
If your vehicle was LICENSED and transferred into your name when you first bought it then you only pay stamp duty the one time .
FYI
Stamp duty is calculated on the market value of your vehicle at the time of licensing :
This is from the email I received
This review is to determine whether the vehicle’s declared dutiable value ie market value at the time of licence grant was correct. Therefore, this review must determine the vehicle’s market value at its time of licence grant when in a roadworthy condition. This market value can vary from a previously paid vehicle purchase price.
I understand that vehicles can be insured above their market value for various reasons, including to meet expected higher replacement costs or for sentimental reasons. Therefore a vehicle’s agreed insured sum is not automatically adopted as the vehicle’s correct market value, however large discrepancies are used to indicate potential review cases.
Redbook values are similarly used as a market guide for vehicle prices, but will be adjusted to reflect the vehicle’s actual condition and any exact market prices achieved, to reach the most accurate market value estimate for a vehicle.
Therefore, can you please complete the self-review form and advise upon review whether your declared sums are still correct, or whether you believe the vehicle held different values at the time of licensing when roadworthy. When advising the vehicle’s dutiable / market value you should take into consideration the costs of any works completed on the vehicle after purchase but prior to licence grant, and the price you could have expected to sell the vehicle for at its time of licensing.
#36
Posted 12 March 2021 - 10:57 PM
Laurie ,Redbook value for SLR 5000 in Oct 2017 was $26,600 - $41250 .There were no derivitives of Torana .But there are now .Have a look at Red book values now and they give you all models .This has been well planned an worked out between all parties one would easily be led in to thinking
#37
Posted 13 March 2021 - 08:08 AM
In Victoria is as follows. Buy a road registered car, pay stamp duty on market value. upon transfer of reg into your name. Buy an unregistered car , no stamp duty payable as is only applicable to road reg vehicle. Put car on Club Permit system, no stamp duty payable, road register a car NOT previously registered in YOUR name, stamp duty payable on market value, or take receipt for purchase price as proof and this is most likely accepted, unless it looks "dodgy" value wise. As far as W.A. goes, suggest the ballot box will sort that out. Insurance values have nothing to do with it, nor should they anywhere else. Of course another way to deal with this is to default on the bill being sent, get yourself and every other defaulter to get summonsed to court and choke the living daylights out of the court system. This was very successfully carried out in Victoria years ago after Melbourne City Councils parking inspectors made absolute arseholes out of themselves in CBD, a backdown by Council followed rapidly as the court system ground to a halt due to cases and appeals flooding in by fine non payers. Radical I know, but effective it can be.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users