Jump to content


Photo

CK Xu1


  • Please log in to reply
235 replies to this topic

#26 meanmachine72

meanmachine72

    Forum Fixture

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,005 posts
  • Name:Jono
  • Location:Taree Workers club
  • Joined: 12-July 06

Posted 20 November 2021 - 11:17 AM

subject is CK xu-1 not gtho



#27 FLY_AGAIN_XU-1

FLY_AGAIN_XU-1

    Forum Fixture

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,653 posts
  • Joined: 01-September 06

Posted 20 November 2021 - 01:23 PM

 

 

Ford built 300 GTHO Phase III, 200 cars for the 3.25:1 and 3.50:1 rear axle ratios and 100 cars for the alternative 3.91:1 ratio rear axle would be in line with the CAMS rules for 1971 Group E.

 

 

Attached File  thumbnail_IMG_4518001 (2).jpg   108K   7 downloads

According to the Ford documentation they fitted 200 cars with the standard 3.25 ratio, 50 with the "optional" 3.50 ratio and the other 50 with the "optional" 3.90 ratio.



#28 S pack

S pack

    Scrivet Counter

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,538 posts
  • Name:Dave
  • Location:Luggage Point
  • Car:73 LJ
  • Joined: 25-January 10

Posted 20 November 2021 - 02:37 PM

Quote "According to the Ford documentation they fitted 200 cars with the standard 3.25 ratio, 50 with the "optional" 3.50 ratio and the other 50 with the "optional" 3.90 ratio."

 

Yeah, so what? They could have fitted all 300 Phase III cars with the 3.91:1 ratio diff, or the 3.25:1 or the 3.50:1 or any combination thereof under the 1970 and 1971 Group E rear axle ratio rules.

The important thing is that they needed to build a minimum of 100 cars, regardless of the rear axle ratio fitted, to allow homologation of the alternative 3.91:1 ratio diff.


Edited by S pack, 20 November 2021 - 02:44 PM.


#29 LCK186

LCK186

    Forum Fan

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 328 posts
  • Location:Victoria
  • Car:71 CK
  • Joined: 18-August 18

Posted 20 November 2021 - 04:36 PM

ding ding  end of round one      stay tuned forum members        round 2 is coming up shortly



#30 S pack

S pack

    Scrivet Counter

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,538 posts
  • Name:Dave
  • Location:Luggage Point
  • Car:73 LJ
  • Joined: 25-January 10

Posted 20 November 2021 - 06:40 PM

ding ding  end of round one      stay tuned forum members        round 2 is coming up shortly

:wtf:  are you smoking Daryl? :)
 



#31 Indy Orange

Indy Orange

    Lotsa Posts!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,846 posts
  • Name:Paul
  • Location:Australia
  • Joined: 03-July 09

Posted 20 November 2021 - 09:18 PM

Pack that bong dazza.

#32 FLY_AGAIN_XU-1

FLY_AGAIN_XU-1

    Forum Fixture

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,653 posts
  • Joined: 01-September 06

Posted 21 November 2021 - 12:22 PM

Yeah, so what? They could have fitted all 300 Phase III cars with the 3.91:1 ratio diff, or the 3.25:1 or the 3.50:1 or any combination thereof under the 1970 and 1971 Group E rear axle ratio rules.

 

Under the 1970 & 1971 C.A.M.S. Group E Series Production Touring Cars Rules a manufacturer was required to have fitted a minimum of 200 cars with one diff ratio and 100 cars with any "optional" or "alternative" diff ratio. This required a minimum of 300 cars and why Holden produced 300 1971 CK's. In 1970 Holden produced 300 9/70 & 10/70 LC GTR XU-1,s.



#33 LCK186

LCK186

    Forum Fan

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 328 posts
  • Location:Victoria
  • Car:71 CK
  • Joined: 18-August 18

Posted 21 November 2021 - 02:28 PM

hi im not smoking any weed guys   as I predicted and said round 1 has ended     and round 2 has just began the   rocky v   Apollo 15 rounder     funny enough rocky 1  was on tv this arvo  and I enjoyed it      but I must admit these 2 members know there stuff     some correct and some incorrect but still very good knowledge for torana owners    lets see if members  join in and give some input on the ck xu1 toranas



#34 Zook

Zook

    Forum Fixture

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,536 posts
  • Joined: 02-February 06

Posted 21 November 2021 - 06:03 PM

You might not be smoking pot but you could sure use a full stop every once in a while. Surely?
I had CK car once. I've not seen it since I sold it but there's no reason I can think of why it wouldn't still be around.

#35 S pack

S pack

    Scrivet Counter

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,538 posts
  • Name:Dave
  • Location:Luggage Point
  • Car:73 LJ
  • Joined: 25-January 10

Posted 21 November 2021 - 07:18 PM

Quote "Under the 1970 & 1971 C.A.M.S. Group E Series Production Touring Cars Rules a manufacturer was required to have fitted a minimum of 200 cars with one diff ratio and 100 cars with any "optional" or "alternative" diff ratio. This required a minimum of 300 cars and why Holden produced 300 1971 CK's. In 1970 Holden produced 300 9/70 & 10/70 LC GTR XU-1,s".

 

 

Either you have not read the 1970 or 1971 CAMS Group E Series Production rules pertaining to rear axle ratios or you have very poor comprehension of the written English language.

 

Holden produced 300 (or thereabout) CK XU1s but it wasn't for homologation of diff ratios that had already been homologated by the first 200 LC XU1 built back in 1970.



#36 FLY_AGAIN_XU-1

FLY_AGAIN_XU-1

    Forum Fixture

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,653 posts
  • Joined: 01-September 06

Posted 21 November 2021 - 09:11 PM

 The first 200 LC XU1 built back in 1970.

 

Under the 1970 C.A.M.S. Group E Series Production Touring Cars Rules a manufacturer was required to build a minimum of 200 cars to be eligible to race. The next 200 8/70 LC GTR XU-1,s allowed the homologation of the baffles in the tank and diff housing. The next 300 9/70 & 10/70 LC GTR XU-1,s completed the homologation of the baffles in the tank and diff housing, 200 required. The final 100 cars homologated the optional 3.08 diff ratio. In total Holden produced a total of 700 1970 LC GTR XU-1,s.



#37 FLY_AGAIN_XU-1

FLY_AGAIN_XU-1

    Forum Fixture

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,653 posts
  • Joined: 01-September 06

Posted 21 November 2021 - 10:04 PM

Either you have not read the 1970 or 1971 CAMS Group E Series Production rules pertaining to rear axle ratios or you have very poor comprehension of the written English language.

 

Holden produced 300 (or thereabout) CK XU1s but it wasn't for homologation of diff ratios that had already been homologated by the first 200 LC XU1 built back in 1970.

 

You do understand that the 1970 race season is a completely different race season to the 1971 race season don't you ? and you do understand what the term "Eligible" or "Eligibility" means ?

The 200 2/71 LC GTR XU-1,s produced by Holden were for Eligibility into the 1971 race season.



#38 RallyRed

RallyRed

    Oh My, Don't you post alot

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,836 posts
  • Name:Col
  • Location:NSW
  • Car:LC GTR etc
  • Joined: 02-October 11

Posted 22 November 2021 - 06:41 AM

I'm in the market for a CK xu1

In this market whats would the budget have to stretch to in everyone's opinion

would like a matching numbered car

any luck finding one yet ?



#39 S pack

S pack

    Scrivet Counter

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,538 posts
  • Name:Dave
  • Location:Luggage Point
  • Car:73 LJ
  • Joined: 25-January 10

Posted 22 November 2021 - 08:06 AM

Quote "Under the 1970 C.A.M.S. Group E Series Production Touring Cars Rules a manufacturer was required to build a minimum of 200 cars to be eligible to race. The next 200 8/70 LC GTR XU-1,s allowed the homologation of the baffles in the tank and diff housing. The next 300 9/70 & 10/70 LC GTR XU-1,s completed the homologation of the baffles in the tank and diff housing, 200 required. The final 100 cars homologated the optional 3.08 diff ratio. In total Holden produced a total of 700 1970 LC GTR XU-1,s."

 

Dealer Service Letters were homologations? I must say you have a very overactive imagination.

An extra 100 cars built for a diff ratio that was already homologated by the first 200 1970 LC XU1 built. You must be on some really good drugs.



#40 S pack

S pack

    Scrivet Counter

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,538 posts
  • Name:Dave
  • Location:Luggage Point
  • Car:73 LJ
  • Joined: 25-January 10

Posted 22 November 2021 - 08:20 AM

Quote "The 200 2/71 LC GTR XU-1,s produced by Holden were for Eligibility into the 1971 race season."

 

Again your wild imagination leads you astray.



#41 FLY_AGAIN_XU-1

FLY_AGAIN_XU-1

    Forum Fixture

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,653 posts
  • Joined: 01-September 06

Posted 22 November 2021 - 11:36 AM

 

An extra 100 cars built for a diff ratio that was already homologated by the first 200 1970 LC XU1 built. You must be on some really good drugs.

 

Attached File  options.jpg   185.76K   7 downloads

 

This can be found in either the 1970 or 1971 F.I.A. Rules. In 1970 & 1971 the 3.36 diff ratio was standard fitment on the LC GTR XU-1 with the 3.08 being available as an option.



#42 FLY_AGAIN_XU-1

FLY_AGAIN_XU-1

    Forum Fixture

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,653 posts
  • Joined: 01-September 06

Posted 22 November 2021 - 12:19 PM

Dealer Service Letters were homologations? I must say you have a very overactive imagination.

 

Attached File  Brock 3.JPG   287.77K   6 downloads

 

You really don't have a F'n clue do ya ?



#43 S pack

S pack

    Scrivet Counter

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,538 posts
  • Name:Dave
  • Location:Luggage Point
  • Car:73 LJ
  • Joined: 25-January 10

Posted 22 November 2021 - 04:06 PM

Quote "This can be found in either the 1970 or 1971 F.I.A. Rules. In 1970 & 1971 the 3.36 diff ratio was standard fitment on the LC GTR XU-1 with the 3.08 being available as an option."

 

You don't really take much notice of what you are quoting as fact do you!

Go back and have a look at where you found that clause in the FIA Motorsport yearbook.

Now take notice of the Group it applies to. You will find that optional diff ratio clause only applies to FIA Group 2 'Special Touring Cars' which is the equivalent of CAMS Group C 'Improved Production Touring Cars'

FIA Group 1 ' Series Production Touring Cars' are the rules you need to look at, they are the equivalent of CAMS Group E Series Production.

 

You are the one who does not have a fcuking clue.



#44 S pack

S pack

    Scrivet Counter

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,538 posts
  • Name:Dave
  • Location:Luggage Point
  • Car:73 LJ
  • Joined: 25-January 10

Posted 22 November 2021 - 04:11 PM

The Ford Falcon XW GT HO Phase II

Minimum production/sale of 200 cars.

Attached File  XW GTHO Ph II 2 COD.JPG   110.64K   4 downloads

XW GT HO Phase II  Two diff ratios

Attached File  XW GTHO Ph II 2 Diff Ratios.JPG   96.32K   4 downloads


Edited by S pack, 22 November 2021 - 04:12 PM.


#45 WhiteA9XS

WhiteA9XS

    .

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,646 posts
  • Name:Shaun
  • Location:Billys Creek
  • Car:LJ LX
  • Joined: 08-November 05
Garage View Garage

Posted 22 November 2021 - 05:03 PM

 Correct 200 cars , Cant see why Torana would be any different than Charger or Falcon .

 

 Attached File  img20211122_17524806.pdf   231.31K   27 downloads



#46 S pack

S pack

    Scrivet Counter

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,538 posts
  • Name:Dave
  • Location:Luggage Point
  • Car:73 LJ
  • Joined: 25-January 10

Posted 22 November 2021 - 05:15 PM

 Correct 200 cars , Cant see why Torana would be any different than Charger or Falcon .

 

 attachicon.gif img20211122_17524806.pdf

No difference at all. All manufacturers had to comply with the same rules.
 


Edited by S pack, 22 November 2021 - 05:15 PM.


#47 FLY_AGAIN_XU-1

FLY_AGAIN_XU-1

    Forum Fixture

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,653 posts
  • Joined: 01-September 06

Posted 22 November 2021 - 07:39 PM

All manufacturers were required to build a minimum of 200 cars to be eligible.     :rockon:

 

 



#48 FLY_AGAIN_XU-1

FLY_AGAIN_XU-1

    Forum Fixture

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,653 posts
  • Joined: 01-September 06

Posted 22 November 2021 - 07:45 PM

300 : 1971 Ford Falcon GT HO Phase III ( Diff ratios 3.25, 3.5, 3.91 )

300 : 1971 Holden Torana CK LC GTR XU-1 ( Diff ratios 3.36, 3.08 )

316 : 1971 Chrysler Charger RT E38 ( Diff ratios 3.23, 3.5 )

 

Now all you need to do is explain why they were required to build a minimum of 300......



#49 FLY_AGAIN_XU-1

FLY_AGAIN_XU-1

    Forum Fixture

  • Banned
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,653 posts
  • Joined: 01-September 06

Posted 22 November 2021 - 08:37 PM

Quote "This can be found in either the 1970 or 1971 F.I.A. Rules. In 1970 & 1971 the 3.36 diff ratio was standard fitment on the LC GTR XU-1 with the 3.08 being available as an option."

 

You don't really take much notice of what you are quoting as fact do you!

Go back and have a look at where you found that clause in the FIA Motorsport yearbook.

Now take notice of the Group it applies to. You will find that optional diff ratio clause only applies to FIA Group 2 'Special Touring Cars' which is the equivalent of CAMS Group C 'Improved Production Touring Cars'

FIA Group 1 ' Series Production Touring Cars' are the rules you need to look at, they are the equivalent of CAMS Group E Series Production.

 

You are the one who does not have a fcuking clue.

 

Attached File  options (2)_LI.jpg   950.86K   3 downloads

 

I am glad you can tell the difference between Series Production & Special Touring.....

 

What about some C.A.M.S. Production figures of those falcons and chargers.....



#50 S pack

S pack

    Scrivet Counter

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,538 posts
  • Name:Dave
  • Location:Luggage Point
  • Car:73 LJ
  • Joined: 25-January 10

Posted 23 November 2021 - 08:20 AM

Quote "Now all you need to do is explain why they were required to build a minimum of 300......"

 

I don't NEED to explain anything to you. You are the one who concocted the BS fairytale that every XU1 was built to fulfil a CAMS requirement.

 

Facts are facts. The CAMS Group E Series Production rules for 1967, 1968, 1969, 1970, 1971 allowed a manufacturer to gain recognition of TWO different rear axle ratios every time the minimum production of the model was built.

 

ie: The 1st 200 Australian cars or 5000 cars if built overseas (1970 & 71) = recognition of 2 axle ratios, and then the possibility of recognition of another 2 different ratios every time the minimum production of the model is reached thereafter.

 

Attached File  CAMS 1970.71 Diff Ratios Group E.jpg   90.14K   4 downloads

 

 

 

post-1815-0-07956400-1637576731.jpg

 

LOL, Still clutching at straws.

 

A baffled differential housing in not a strengthened housing/suspension member.

And even if it was the options clause in those FIA rules for Special Production Touring Cars (Group II) did not require any cars to be manufactured with the option fitted.

The manufacturer was only required to produce a minimum of 100 components and make said option available as a spare part and have that optional part listed in their spare parts catalogue.

 

Holden did neither in relation to 'Dealer fitted baffles' to XU1 diff housings as there was no requirement for them to do so.

Hell, the baffled diff housings fitted to the CK XU1s was so important that it didn't even rate a mention in the CK evolution form 2/2E.

 

The CAMS did NOT require manufacturers to build cars for Dealer Service Letters.






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users