
COMMODORE K-FRAME
#1
_JNR_ATE_
Posted 18 November 2006 - 03:52 PM
Is the K-frame on a power steering fitted VH 6 cylinder the same as a Power steering fitted V8.
Will a 308 sit straight into an orig 6 k-frame with with the v8 mounts obviously.
Cheers
JNR_ATE
#2
_CHOPPER_
Posted 18 November 2006 - 03:59 PM
#3
_JNR_ATE_
Posted 18 November 2006 - 04:10 PM
Cheers
JNR_ATE
#4
_LX8VD69_
Posted 18 November 2006 - 05:40 PM
#5
Posted 18 November 2006 - 06:50 PM
I bent my V8 one a few months ago and replaced it with one from a 6 cyl.
#6
_MRNOS_
Posted 18 November 2006 - 07:14 PM
vn-vp have the same strut/s but maybe slightly wider trackim told that all commodore kframes are the same from VB to VN, but i would have thought upto and including VL
#7
_CHOPPER_
Posted 18 November 2006 - 07:43 PM
#8
_JNR_ATE_
Posted 18 November 2006 - 08:58 PM
Cheers
JNR_ATE
#9
Posted 18 November 2006 - 11:32 PM
#10
_TOBES_
Posted 19 November 2006 - 05:30 AM
I was told the VL 6 Cyl(RB30) and V8 K-frames were different so bought a V8 one.
The 6 is still in the car so they are hard to compare, but the frames themselves look to be the same... Is there a difference in the mounts..?
Also where did they get the extra width in the VN, in the K-frame or are the bottom arms longer..?
I'm using VN struts as the sway bar mount is on the strut, and have a pair of VN bottom arms that I was going to rebush. If they are longer then I will have to wait till I get the VL ones out, which will ruin my one weekend suspension boltover hopes...
Cheers
BBB
#11
_CHOPPER_
Posted 19 November 2006 - 11:53 AM
#12
_TOBES_
Posted 19 November 2006 - 05:59 PM
Had a good crawl and measure today and if there is a difference in the arms, I can't pick it(bloody hard to see tho). I will do the VN arms and keep my fingers crossed...
Cheers
BBB
#13
_moot_
Posted 20 November 2006 - 06:25 AM
vb-vk are all the same.VB - VK are the same. Rack position changed slightly with the VL. VN is wider.
vl v8-vs v8 are the same (different rack mounting positions to vb-vk)
vl 6's and any v'6's are different.
i used a vs k frame in my vk with a manual vl rack for exhaust clearance.
#14
Posted 20 November 2006 - 03:16 PM
A few myths floating around here. I'll try to remedy the situation.
1. The distance between the 2 chassis rails from VB to VS is the same. Any VB to VS K-member will bolt to any pair of VB to VS chassis rails. BUT !!
2. The front track measurement is the same from VB to VP (except for some small variations in wheel types). Bolt-up-face to bolt-up-face is identical. Lower arms, struts rods & struts are also all the same from VB to VP, the only change being the stabiliser bars links going to the strut itself on VN/VP. The VN/VP lower arm still has the hole for the VB/VL link but is not used. When Holden released the VN it had a wider rear track than the earlies but the front remained the same.
3. The K-member is the same from VB to VP except for differences in engine mounts (VL6 & VN/VP V6) & rack mounts. All Holden 6 & V8 engine mounts are the same. There are 3 different types of steering rack mounts listed below.
4. The strut mounting & lower arms is different for VR/VS & the K-member is different to cater for this. The VR & VS have more positive castor designed into the front end geometry. The VR/VS also have a wider front track than the VB to VN, because of longer lower arms.
5. All P/st racks from VB to VK use the same mounts, these mounts are also the same as non-P/St from mid-VH to VK. VB to mid-VH non-P/st rack mounts are unique, the rack is mounted higher, requiring a shorter intermediate shaft. All racks VB to VK are TRW.
6. Rack mounts from VL to VS (for the Bendix-Bishop type rack, both P/st & non-P/st) are the same, but smaller than the VK & earlier.
Has that helped or complicated things ?
Dr Terry.
#15
Posted 20 November 2006 - 03:38 PM
The way I read this means if you fit VR/VS lower control arms to a VC you would get instant negative camber and a wider track? Can this be done without too much drama? Any idea how much longer they are?4. The strut mounting & lower arms is different for VR/VS & the K-member is different to cater for this. The VR & VS have more positive castor designed into the front end geometry. The VR/VS also have a wider front track than the VB to VN, because of longer lower arms.
#16
_CHOPPER_
Posted 20 November 2006 - 04:55 PM
[EDIT] The second would be the radius rods ( Z bars ) wouldn't bolt up.
Edited by CHOPPER, 20 November 2006 - 04:56 PM.
#17
Posted 20 November 2006 - 11:05 PM

#18
_CHOPPER_
Posted 21 November 2006 - 04:12 PM
#19
_TOBES_
Posted 21 November 2006 - 06:46 PM
One further question...
I have a pair of Whiteline adjustable sway bars, 27mm front and 22mm rear.
If I use the VN struts with the sway bar mount on the strut, how will it affect the action of the front bar?
Looking at the VB-VL setup and the length of the bottom arm from bush to ball joint, the sway bar link mount is about 2/3 the distance out from the inner mount. So if the wheel moves up 3", the sway bar end moves up 2".
With the VN strut, if the wheel moves up 3" then the sway bar end will move the same 3".
Does this increase the effect of the sway bar by 50%?????????
#20
Posted 21 November 2006 - 07:07 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users