Sorry so big did it like this so it can be read enjoy
Torana SS A9X Comparison Torana TT36
Started by
LC69GTR
, Feb 25 2007 09:42 AM
12 replies to this topic
#1
LC69GTR
-
- Members
-
- 2,761 posts
Lotsa Posts!
- Location:World
- Joined: 08-November 05
Posted 25 February 2007 - 09:42 AM
Torana SS A9X Comparison Torana TT36
Sorry so big did it like this so it can be read enjoy
Sorry so big did it like this so it can be read enjoy
#3
Tiny
-
- Administrators
-
- 10,018 posts
Oh My, Don't you post alot
- Name:Tiny
- Location:Sydney
- Joined: 04-February 07
Posted 25 February 2007 - 10:33 AM
Great work there! That's a TOP comparison!
#4
Gump
-
- Members
-
- 1,146 posts
Paisty White
- Name:Russell
- Location:Bridgetown WA
- Car:LX SL hatch
- Joined: 15-November 05
Posted 25 February 2007 - 02:47 PM
ill have an a9x please, but the motor and g/box out of the new torrie would go nice in a lc-lj
#5
lxsstorana
-
- Members
-
- 2,499 posts
Forum Fixture
- Name:Mick
- Location:Eastwood, Sydney
- Car:SS Hatchback
- Joined: 23-March 06
Posted 25 February 2007 - 02:51 PM
Great art work. 
Mick.
Mick.
#6
LC69GTR
-
- Members
-
- 2,761 posts
Lotsa Posts!
- Location:World
- Joined: 08-November 05
Posted 25 February 2007 - 02:52 PM
Sorry i did not do it i just scanned it in this was from the General himself
#7
_HatchmanSS76_
_HatchmanSS76_
-
- Guests
Posted 25 February 2007 - 03:54 PM
The more time that goes by the more like a Vectra the concept THING looks.
Tiz no Torana
Tiz no Torana
#8
_LX8VD69_
_LX8VD69_
-
- Guests
Posted 25 February 2007 - 04:10 PM
actually i was thinking that supposed torana was the new commodore because jeez it looks like a VE
#9
dattoman
-
- Administrators
-
- 16,488 posts
Do I feel lucky? Well, do ya, punk?
- Name:Neil
- Location:Perth Western Australia
- Car:LX SS , 76 Cadillac , 3 x dattos
- Joined: 04-February 07
Posted 25 February 2007 - 05:04 PM
276mm discs on the A9X
And the 2.6 diff wasn't exactly standard
I'd still take a TT36 .... even in pink
Just need to figure out how to lose those back doors
And the 2.6 diff wasn't exactly standard
I'd still take a TT36 .... even in pink
Just need to figure out how to lose those back doors
#10
_The Baron_
_The Baron_
-
- Guests
Posted 25 February 2007 - 08:47 PM
A9X = 2.6 --Standard?? Good question
147 with 2.6
260 with 3.08
I wonder what the option boxes were when you ordered one.
Having sat on the fence for the last 20 yrs in one A9X club or another. I even heard they ran out of 2.6 and had to supply the last of the A9X's with 3.08.
It was a ploy to make the 2.6 available for conrod straight but when the tyre diameters grew it was a waste of time.
Cheers
147 with 2.6
260 with 3.08
I wonder what the option boxes were when you ordered one.
Having sat on the fence for the last 20 yrs in one A9X club or another. I even heard they ran out of 2.6 and had to supply the last of the A9X's with 3.08.
It was a ploy to make the 2.6 available for conrod straight but when the tyre diameters grew it was a waste of time.
Cheers
#11
_yellowa9xs_
_yellowa9xs_
-
- Guests
Posted 25 February 2007 - 10:38 PM
I guess this is the car you would buy if you liked both the hatchbacks and the 4 doors.
This is one Torana I'd love to get my hands on.
I notice in the specs that there is no mention of weight - I'll bet it would be a fat little f*cker.
I still reckon the A9X hatch was the last pretty car Holden built - except maybe for the Monaro.
This is one Torana I'd love to get my hands on.
I notice in the specs that there is no mention of weight - I'll bet it would be a fat little f*cker.
I still reckon the A9X hatch was the last pretty car Holden built - except maybe for the Monaro.
#12
_rorym_
_rorym_
-
- Guests
Posted 25 February 2007 - 10:48 PM
Michaels on the money..I am due to upgrade in 18 months..the TT36 is mine.
R
R
#13
REDA9X
-
- Inactive
-
- 0 posts
Removed
- Joined: 08-November 05
Posted 26 February 2007 - 06:31 PM
the first 145 with 2.60 diff, the last 260 with 3.08. No option boxes to tick, you wanted something, the dealer fitted it. As darky said, the 2.60 wasn't used at bathurst
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
