Jump to content


Photo

How important is a PCV valve???


  • Please log in to reply
30 replies to this topic

#1 LXCHEV

LXCHEV

    Lotsa Posts!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,617 posts
  • Name:Brett
  • Location:Melbourne
  • Car:'76 LX - 383 Chev
  • Joined: 08-November 05

Posted 29 March 2007 - 03:08 PM

Ok, obviously there are 2 reasons that I see why engines have a PCV valve connected from the rocker cover to the carb vacuum;

1. Pollution reasons - crankcase fumes are sucked back into the intake airstream and burnt/expelled inside the combustion chamber.

2. The vacuum helps relieve pressure from the crankcase

What I want to know is more info on point 2. Exactly how important is this? So many people just run breathers without a PCV, some use catch cans and breathers, also without a PCV. Does this have any effect on the engine? Obviously, if it's a heavy breather, it will be more likely to build up excess oil and possibly drip from the breather... but anything else???

#2 rodomo

rodomo

    To advertise here, call 13TORANA

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,041 posts
  • Name:R - O - B Dammit!
  • Location:Way out west of Melbourne Awstraylya
  • Joined: 10-December 05

Posted 29 March 2007 - 03:35 PM

Old red sixes (179, 149 etc) used to have a steel pipe coming out of the rocker cover and pointing to the ground, a bit like a walking stick. The oil caps weren't sealed and thats how they breathed. I think the PCV's came in with 186? but could be wrong. If so that was about the same time as V8's in Holdens. The info I have is all Holden V8's were PCVentilated.

#3 _73LJWhiteSL_

_73LJWhiteSL_
  • Guests

Posted 29 March 2007 - 06:12 PM

2. The vacuum helps relieve pressure from the crankcase

How much preasure it relieves is questionable. On a mate LC coupe, he had a sealed (non breather) oil cap on it and even with the PCV it generated enough preasure to push half the contents of his sump down the valves and burn it in a trip to hanging rock a few years ago.

I would have through the PCV would do little more than allow crankcase fumes to be burn.

Steve

#4 _devilsadvocate_

_devilsadvocate_
  • Guests

Posted 29 March 2007 - 06:27 PM

Positive crankcase ventilation means that the pressure has to build up inside the crankcase for gases to be vented out the rocker cover, hence the valve that uses the force of gravity on a steel ball as the pressure setting. Being attached to a vac inlet on the manifold just assists the removal to the inlet manifold once the pressure has built up. Supposedly the positive pressure(which I would anticipate just means slightly above atmospheric) assists in reducing the actual amount of blow by that can leak pass the rings than if the engine was just run at atmospheric with a breather.

Edited by devilsadvocate, 29 March 2007 - 06:31 PM.


#5 FastEHHolden

FastEHHolden

    Steptoe

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,114 posts
  • Location:Central Coast NSW
  • Joined: 16-November 05

Posted 29 March 2007 - 06:37 PM

Even a fresh engine has blowby...an old text claims 40 litres per minute for a 2 litre 4 cylinder engine..so more for a worn 3 litre 6 cylinder.

The PCV shouldn't work at full throttle when blowby is high...as manifold vacuum is low and the spring should close the valve. Crank case pressure is then vented thru the pipe intop the air cleaner....so there is never a negative pressure in the sump.

at high manifold vacuum conditions crancase air is drawn thru the pcv valve into the manifold

#6 _devilsadvocate_

_devilsadvocate_
  • Guests

Posted 29 March 2007 - 06:49 PM

Disregard what I posted ^ for the moment.......there's something Im not so sure about. From memory pulling the pcv out while the engine is at idle does create enough suction to open the valve......not quite in keeping with the "positive" definition Ive given. Positive probably more likely means that the pressure inside the crankcase is higher than what is in the inlet manifold.

Edited by devilsadvocate, 29 March 2007 - 06:56 PM.


#7 Litre8

Litre8

    Thrillseeker

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,399 posts
  • Name:Howard
  • Location:Melbourne, Victoria
  • Car:1976 LX SLR8000
  • Joined: 05-February 07

Posted 29 March 2007 - 09:56 PM

This system draws air into the engine through the oil filler cap or the air cleaner and circulates it through the engine. The air combines with vapors in the crankcase and exits the engine through a metering valve (pcv) mounted in the rocker arm cover. The air vapor mixture than re-enters the engine through the carb or intake manifold and passes the combustion chamber where it is burned.

In this case I think positive is in reference to the fact that unlike earlier crankcase ventilation systems (ie the old hook pipe) this system actively attempts to evacuate the crankcase of vapors.

#8 surfmaster

surfmaster

    Marineboy

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,019 posts
  • Location:Nowra N.S.W.
  • Joined: 08-November 05

Posted 29 March 2007 - 10:17 PM

The PCV is effectively removing vapours from the atmosphere and burning them by recycling the gas through the manifold and into the combustion chambers. As correctly stated above the older cars had a black tube that ran from the rocker cover down the engine to under the car where the burnt crap was exhausted into the atmosphere, (here insert global warming, drowning polar bears and a chronic beer shortage).

Older engines with a lot of air would fume straight into the atmosphere, PCV's limit some of that by recycling the fumes.

#9 _DocDamage_

_DocDamage_
  • Guests

Posted 29 March 2007 - 10:22 PM

My FB is all pretty stock with the breather snorkel, but I might have to do something about if that's going to happen to the beers.

Edited by DocDamage, 29 March 2007 - 10:22 PM.


#10 ls2lxhatch

ls2lxhatch

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,332 posts
  • Location:Perth
  • Car:LX Hatch
  • Joined: 29-May 06

Posted 29 March 2007 - 11:07 PM

When I was reading the oil bible it had a section on oil sludge and its causes. It appears that combustion gases and moisture in the crankcase are detrimental to oil.
http://www.carbibles...eoil_bible.html

One commonly held belief is that moisture causes or accelerates the formation of sludge. We do not disagree, and we wonder if SAAB's trouble with leaking head gaskets contributes to the moisture content in the crankcase. We also wonder if the relative increase in the length of the crankcase ventilation "circuit" is preventing the removal of combustion gases in the crankcase.


http://www.saabservi...ne_failure.html

#11 surfmaster

surfmaster

    Marineboy

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,019 posts
  • Location:Nowra N.S.W.
  • Joined: 08-November 05

Posted 29 March 2007 - 11:38 PM

When I was reading the oil bible it had a section on oil sludge and its causes. It appears that combustion gases and moisture in the crankcase are detrimental to oil.
http://www.carbibles...eoil_bible.html

One commonly held belief is that moisture causes or accelerates the formation of sludge. We do not disagree, and we wonder if SAAB's trouble with leaking head gaskets contributes to the moisture content in the crankcase. We also wonder if the relative increase in the length of the crankcase ventilation "circuit" is preventing the removal of combustion gases in the crankcase.


http://www.saabservi...ne_failure.html

That is why taxi engines last so long, they don''t have time to cool down and form water vapour and other corrosive mixes. Most of the damage to engines is done at startup and cold running, that is why short trips and stop start running on the way to the office is bad to the donk.

#12 LXCHEV

LXCHEV

    Lotsa Posts!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,617 posts
  • Name:Brett
  • Location:Melbourne
  • Car:'76 LX - 383 Chev
  • Joined: 08-November 05

Posted 30 March 2007 - 01:05 AM

Thanks for all the excellent input and comments so far. ls2lxhatch - yet another great article on that carbibles site, I hadn't read that page before, thanks for the link - I found that extremely interesting and educational.

So we have definitely found several things out:

* The extraction & recirculation of crankcase gases assists in reducing condensation/acid buildup/sludge buildup... and helps to keep the engine oil cleaner longer, and therefore increasing the life of the engine.

* Obviously it reduces pollution by not venting these gases straight into the atmosphere.

That first point above, I believe is only an issue if regular oil & filter changes are not carried out. Would you agree with this??

It seems a huge factor in determining the frequency of oil changes is the number of short trips/cold starts etc... as well as things like how long the car is left sitting around for, esp in colder weather etc....

Ok, next question.... so not worrying about pollution, nor contaminated oil...

Does not having a PCV connected have any other affects? I've heard people say without it, it places extra strain on gaskets, seals etc... is there any truth to this? (Let's assume we're talking a big cube V8, fitted with a fully breathable cap to each rocker cover). Could this place extra strain on the seals and stuff??

Considering the huge amounts of air that an engine pumps, would these allow enough air both in and out of the crankcase???

And lastly... for racing purposes - it seems most racers always prefer to run no PCV... to maximise the cleanest possible intake air into their engine. We did a test on the dyno recently with my Chev.... 1st pass with PCV connected.... monitored air:fuel ratio's etc... then removed the PCV from the rocker cover and plugged it..... we then did a 2nd pass, and we could definitely see a slightly neater line... HP reading didn't actually change, but it certainly seemed to clean up the intake air... which could mean running bigger jets and making more HP according to my dyno guy.

#13 _Keithy's_UC_

_Keithy's_UC_
  • Guests

Posted 30 March 2007 - 03:08 AM

Yeah, thats pretty much the go - running a pcv is similar to burning oil too. Only your not feeding the oil to the motor in concentration.

Devils, it works on vacuum. There is no other technical explaination. A PCV Valve is a non-return valve that only opens when vacuum from the carb/manifold is present to suck the valve open.

Anyone running a KC Alloy rocker cover on a holden 6 will understand what i'm talking about. If you see a puff of oil smoke when someone gets off the gas in a recently rebuilt motor (like mine), its just the manifold vacuum sucking the vapours rather quickly from the motor and burning it at a rapid rate. It's a pollution requirememt on later model cars (and some Torries too!). Thats because the baffles in the KC rocker covers are piss weak!

Cheers
Keith

Edited by Keithy's_UC, 30 March 2007 - 03:13 AM.


#14 _devilsadvocate_

_devilsadvocate_
  • Guests

Posted 30 March 2007 - 04:42 AM

:

* The extraction & recirculation of crankcase gases assists in reducing condensation/acid buildup/sludge buildup... and helps to keep the engine oil cleaner longer, and therefore increasing the life of the engine.

* Obviously it reduces pollution by not venting these gases straight into the atmosphere.

That first point above, I believe is only an issue if regular oil & filter changes are not carried out. Would you agree with this??

It seems a huge factor in determining the frequency of oil changes is the number of short trips/cold starts etc... as well as things like how long the car is left sitting around for, esp in colder weather etc....

Ok, next question.... so not worrying about pollution, nor contaminated oil...

Does not having a PCV connected have any other affects? I've heard people say without it, it places extra strain on gaskets, seals etc... is there any truth to this? (Let's assume we're talking a big cube V8, fitted with a fully breathable cap to each rocker cover). Could this place extra strain on the seals and stuff??

Considering the huge amounts of air that an engine pumps, would these allow enough air both in and out of the crankcase???

And lastly... for racing purposes - it seems most racers always prefer to run no PCV... to maximise the cleanest possible intake air into their engine. We did a test on the dyno recently with my Chev.... 1st pass with PCV connected.... monitored air:fuel ratio's etc... then removed the PCV from the rocker cover and plugged it..... we then did a 2nd pass, and we could definitely see a slightly neater line... HP reading didn't actually change, but it certainly seemed to clean up the intake air... which could mean running bigger jets and making more HP according to my dyno guy.

The point about reducing unburnt combustion products(that get past the combustion chambers) is a good one..... Ive owned a couple of older cars that had breathable caps and they did blacken and thin their oil quite quickly(I know thats not definitive as the motors were old as well). On could conclude that the oil would need to be changed more frequently than a non pcv motor, unburnt petrol will still combine with the oil and a % will remain there even in a motor that is run continuously due to the continual higher pressure of petrol vapor(compared to a pcv equipped engine) in the crankcase while running.....whereas the water vapor and oil is generally not as easily mixed.....but can still create mayonaise in the rocker cover. ( I get small amounts of this in my pcv 202 when only doing short trips in winter) This is one reason that motors on lpg dont blacken their oil or suffer from fuel dilution in the oil.
In regards to power output, it would possibly be correct to assume that having more oxygen and more reactive fuel in the intake would be better than it being partially replaced by largely water vapor and CO2 and partially and unburnt fuel......hopefully the quantity of oil vapor sucked out of the engine would be small in comparison. Technically the mixtures would be slightly richer with a pcv installed , the unburnt products recycled would aid economy with the mixtures set to as near as stoich(though this difference would perhaps be insignificant) , yet reduce full power output.

Edited by devilsadvocate, 30 March 2007 - 04:45 AM.


#15 _2X044_

_2X044_
  • Guests

Posted 30 March 2007 - 02:28 PM

Does anyone know of an ADR that specifies the use of a PCV to avoid "evaporative emmissions"? I believe it may be ADR 27 or ADR 27A...

Which torries came from the factory with a PCV system?

#16 FastEHHolden

FastEHHolden

    Steptoe

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,114 posts
  • Location:Central Coast NSW
  • Joined: 16-November 05

Posted 30 March 2007 - 06:51 PM

All after july 76...there is a good thread about it all...use the "My Assistant" link and search ADR 27 or 27A.

It depends on what style of rocker cover you have, as to whether your oil cap is vented or not.....there are 2 and three hole rocker covers...2 hole have vented...3 hole are closed.

#17 orangeLJ

orangeLJ

    Yes, yes I do post alot!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,261 posts
  • Joined: 02-May 06

Posted 30 March 2007 - 08:12 PM

In reference to the idea of a non PCV motor (gray motors etc) wouldnt they, theoretically blacken (dirty) oil quicker as they didnt run an oil filter anyway?

so not running a pcv valve wouldnt have been the only cause of problems with oil in early motors.

#18 _why-psi_

_why-psi_
  • Guests

Posted 30 March 2007 - 08:22 PM

mine is weird. if i take out the pcv valve from rocker cover with engine running and block the pcv valve the engine runs like shit and stalls. anyone know why this could be?

#19 _DocDamage_

_DocDamage_
  • Guests

Posted 30 March 2007 - 08:29 PM

In reference to the idea of a non PCV motor (gray motors etc) wouldnt they, theoretically blacken (dirty) oil quicker as they didnt run an oil filter anyway?

so not running a pcv valve wouldnt have been the only cause of problems with oil in early motors.


Oil filtration system was a Nasco accessory on the Oldies.

#20 _devilsadvocate_

_devilsadvocate_
  • Guests

Posted 30 March 2007 - 08:50 PM

In reference to the idea of a non PCV motor (gray motors etc) wouldnt they, theoretically blacken (dirty) oil quicker as they didnt run an oil filter anyway?

so not running a pcv valve wouldnt have been the only cause of problems with oil in early motors.

If you are referring to my reference of running cars without pcv's, the ones I owned werent holdens and ran oil fiters.

mine is weird. if i take out the pcv valve from rocker cover with engine running and block the pcv valve the engine runs like shit and stalls. anyone know why this could be?

Possibly blocking this small amount of airflow is crucial to the correct mixture at idle.

#21 TerrA LX

TerrA LX

    Fulcrum Fixture

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,241 posts
  • Location:Sid 'n' knee
  • Joined: 31-May 06

Posted 30 March 2007 - 11:38 PM

mine is weird. if i take out the pcv valve from rocker cover with engine running and block the pcv valve the engine runs like shit and stalls. anyone know why this could be?

DA is correct, this unmetered air flow is factored into the carby design and tune so even a rocker cover gasket or side plate gasket leak can make a carby hard to tune on a holden six of this vintage as the motor is suppose to be sealed.
And always ensure your oil cap has a good seal.

#22 _why-psi_

_why-psi_
  • Guests

Posted 31 March 2007 - 05:43 PM

this is on a 202 with tripple SU's tho

#23 _lurkin308_

_lurkin308_
  • Guests

Posted 02 April 2007 - 07:31 PM

lxchev in the passed few days i have done some resurch with this i ran the filter type on top of the rocker cover and they started to leak so i got some pcv vales what a joke slowed the engine right up so today i went to vpw and brought a crankcase ventlation system for $60 it is the breather you put on top of the cover and then a hose to a valae to the end of the extrotors and my mech said i should pick up 5+hp and that was over the filter system and this mech knows his stuff too

cheers caine

#24 LXCHEV

LXCHEV

    Lotsa Posts!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,617 posts
  • Name:Brett
  • Location:Melbourne
  • Car:'76 LX - 383 Chev
  • Joined: 08-November 05

Posted 03 April 2007 - 12:45 AM

Very interesting Caine! Thanks for the report! I've thought about fitting that same kit to mine - very common on drag cars... most people refer to them as "vacu-pans".... and yeah, the flow of exhaust gases down the extractors, creates massive suction, and pulls any fumes straight out of the rocker cover/s and shoots it down the exhaust system. Therefore your engine is not burning any of the old fumes like with a PCV.. but it's still relieving the crankcase pressure....

So do you have to weld in some kind of fitting into your collectors or what??? I'd be intersted to hear how easy they are to install... and if you notice any difference etc... keep us posted!!

#25 TerrA LX

TerrA LX

    Fulcrum Fixture

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,241 posts
  • Location:Sid 'n' knee
  • Joined: 31-May 06

Posted 03 April 2007 - 05:07 AM

^^ pics please.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users