
Foam Filters Vs Pod Filters
#1
_mike_nofx_
Posted 19 January 2006 - 04:22 PM
I've heard that foam filters arent the best and i was thinking of maybe getting 2 pod filters instead.
Which would be better??
The carbs are suck though on a turbo set-up.
#2
Posted 19 January 2006 - 08:05 PM
#3
_Bomber Watson_
Posted 19 January 2006 - 08:14 PM
#4
Posted 19 January 2006 - 08:25 PM
#5
Posted 19 January 2006 - 09:07 PM
None of them will really make a substancial difference though, you can experiment etc but those panel filters can cost a lot more than they're worth. Just my two bobs.
#6
_mike_nofx_
Posted 20 January 2006 - 03:00 PM
I only had some concern over the filters when i went to get it engineered, the engineer said the engine will be running too rich with foam filters, i said i would get it tuned, and he said it didnt matter. (for those of you who may have read my thread on getting my car engineered, i did say he said a lot of things i didnt agree with). Its not engineered with foam filters, i used an airbox to pass engineering.
Thanks for clearing that up.
I wasnt concerned so much about gaining extra power, than i was about my engine not running correctly. So i will stick with the foam filters.
#7
_Bomber Watson_
Posted 20 January 2006 - 08:46 PM
#8
_NinetySix_
Posted 21 January 2006 - 02:33 PM
foam is pretty free flowing, tho its probably the worst at filtering.. not too much of an issue if you clean then very regularly
do you recon the air box setup you used for engineering it was less than ideal? id probably stick with that setup and use a K&N drop in panel filter (about $100rrp)... saves any hassle from mr plod
tho pod filters might look a bit better, and sound nicer
#9
_rorym_
Posted 21 January 2006 - 05:38 PM
R
LCBOI, some one wrote in a ricer magazine that pods are the go, little did they point out it is sucking the hot air produced under the bonnet by the engine therefore actually making the car produce less horsepower, but if it is print somewhere, all 18 yo ricers say it is gospel, you are excluded from the above reference as you are actually a 43yo but in a 17 yo body!

R
Edited by rorym, 21 January 2006 - 05:42 PM.
#10
_82911_
Posted 21 January 2006 - 07:28 PM
If all else fails at least comon logic should prevail!
EVERY motorcross bike I have owned since I was 12 years old has used a FOAM FILTER....
Now you can't restrict the breathing on a 2 stroke at all they just won't go.
Motorcross bikes are designed to be ridden in extremely dusting environments, they are also designed by small Japanese guys whpo have more brain power than most of us collectoively can muster!
So I'm with the Japs... Foam filters all the way.
Not as sexy as a K&N but a lot less $ and they do the job.
I use them on the race car and my bores look fine.
Cheers Greg..
#11
_rorym_
Posted 21 January 2006 - 07:47 PM
R
#12
_NinetySix_
Posted 22 January 2006 - 08:09 AM

my road bike came from the factory with a reuseable oiled foam filter, as do basically all kawasakis
if you find its too lean then using a little extra oil can help richen it up too
#13
_Bomber Watson_
Posted 23 January 2006 - 10:33 PM
aaahhhh now i understand. cheers for clearing that one up.LCBOI, some one wrote in a ricer magazine that pods are the go, little did they point out it is sucking the hot air produced under the bonnet by the engine therefore actually making the car produce less horsepower, but if it is print somewhere, all 18 yo ricers say it is gospel, you are excluded from the above reference as you are actually a 43yo but in a 17 yo body!
![]()
R
seriously...people going on about how great pods are is one of my absolute pet hates....grrr....suppose the few of us older (nyuk nyuk) car nuts use lodgic to work out it's all not true.....
#14
_NinetySix_
Posted 24 January 2006 - 08:36 AM
but really, when you can just drop in a K&N panel filter and open up the holes in the stock air box, why bother...
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users