
Panhard Rod Debate
#1
_Viper_
Posted 02 April 2008 - 11:26 PM
Talking about panhard rods like those fitted to Gemini's and VN-VS commodores...
We all know that if you lower a car with a panhard rod (not watts link) the car shifts to one side as the rod is a solid bar...
But my mate is also saying that when you lower the car it will also adjust the ride height on one side... Im not sure his reasoning behind this... he just said he seen heaps of lowerd gems and they all slant to one side...
I said its just a coincidence and it would have been from sagged springs, badly seated springs or one tyre not inflated as much...
Only way I can see the panhard rod effecting ride height is because the weight of the vehicle is shifted to one side so is lower on that side... But were only talking like a 1-2inch shift and I cant see that causing a noticable height difference..
Can anyone confirm or deny?
#2
_82911_
Posted 03 April 2008 - 07:33 AM
#3
Posted 03 April 2008 - 08:46 AM
#4
_82911_
Posted 03 April 2008 - 11:58 AM
#5
_Viper_
Posted 03 April 2008 - 05:51 PM
I dis-agree with what you said 82911 to a point... If you fitted the lowerd springs and then fitted the panhard rod while the car was just sitting there, there panhard rod wouldnt be trying to twist at all, the only force would be left and right...
I agree that while your driving and the diff is moving up and down the bushes could bind up tho..
#6
_82911_
Posted 03 April 2008 - 06:01 PM
This is true only if you use an adjustable panhard rod as Orange suggested.If you fitted the lowerd springs and then fitted the panhard rod while the car was just sitting there, there panhard rod wouldnt be trying to twist at all, the only force would be left and right...
#7
_rorym_
Posted 03 April 2008 - 06:33 PM
R
#8
_82911_
Posted 03 April 2008 - 08:06 PM
The total stiffness of the suspension is determined by spring rate + any extra rate from binding bushes etc.....
The side load forced on the trailing arm bushes are greater on one side than the other because the diff is pushed sideways by the panhard rod.
This makes the suspension stiffer on one side than the other. It is this that makes one side higher than the other.
Clear as mud hey!

#9
Posted 03 April 2008 - 08:39 PM
So, if 2 identical cars (except car 1 has panhard mounted left to body and right to diff, and car 2 is visa versa) were running around the same clockwise circuit one would handle better than the other, yes?Something else that might help to explain a little better....
The total stiffness of the suspension is determined by spring rate + any extra rate from binding bushes etc.....
The side load forced on the trailing arm bushes are greater on one side than the other because the diff is pushed sideways by the panhard rod.
This makes the suspension stiffer on one side than the other. It is this that makes one side higher than the other.
Clear as mud hey!
#10
_82911_
Posted 03 April 2008 - 08:54 PM
Exactly why Winston cup cars mount their Panhards to the chassis on the left side.
Anticlockwise ovals...........Not the most high tech machines for road racing(Nascar).
#11
_Viper_
Posted 03 April 2008 - 09:14 PM
If you pushed that side down tho wouldnt it move down to the same height and hold? or would it push up again...
I still dont quite understand how it would hold one side higher, I understand now that one side would have more resistance to suspension travel due to the extra force on the bushes.
So say you did up your trailing arm mount bolts up supertight which put extra pressure on the bush would this also make it sit higher?
#12
Posted 03 April 2008 - 09:35 PM
#13
_82911_
Posted 03 April 2008 - 10:12 PM
It would come back up to where it was before you pushed, because that side has a higher wheel rate than the other side.If you pushed that side down tho wouldnt it move down to the same height and hold? or would it push up again...
Spring rate + rate from bush bind= wheel rate. One side is stiffer so it sits higher.I still dont quite understand how it would hold one side higher, I understand now that one side would have more resistance to suspension travel due to the extra force on the bushes.
If they were rubber bushes and you did them up with the suspension at full droop, then YES.If they were urethane then no.So say you did up your trailing arm mount bolts up supertight which put extra pressure on the bush would this also make it sit higher?
#14
Posted 03 April 2008 - 11:39 PM
If the car was assembled AND all the ride heights were even AND you fitted a panhard that slipped straight on without having to jack the car or push the body across, it wouldn't alter anything until the car accellerated and/or turned a corner.Hmmk so its the pressure its putting on all the bushes (including the trailing arms) thats making it sit higher eh?
If you pushed that side down tho wouldnt it move down to the same height and hold? or would it push up again...
I still dont quite understand how it would hold one side higher, I understand now that one side would have more resistance to suspension travel due to the extra force on the bushes.
So say you did up your trailing arm mount bolts up supertight which put extra pressure on the bush would this also make it sit higher?
#15
_Viper_
Posted 03 April 2008 - 11:42 PM
#16
Posted 04 April 2008 - 12:20 AM
Stationary, it would depend on how much the body had to be jacked or pushed to fit the rod. Again, if the rod "slips" on (adjustable/custom rod) it wouldn't alter anything.Yea thats true. Ok I guess I conceed defeat, and he was right in the panhard rod thats not central will cause a difference in ride height... How much are we talking here tho? like mm's or would it be visually noticable?
#17
Posted 04 April 2008 - 07:35 PM
The standard bar on my racecar fouls against the 9 inch. The adjustable bars with a bend in them that I've looked at don't quite bend far enough.
#18
Posted 04 April 2008 - 07:53 PM
#19
_82911_
Posted 04 April 2008 - 09:36 PM
Adjustable panhard to suit 9" in commodore?
Do you want it made from 4130 or CDW ?
#20
_moot_
Posted 05 April 2008 - 06:42 AM
have you guys seen how sloppy most gemini diffs are without the panard rod? i doubt that the 10 odd mm that the diff is going to move to one side would bind the bushes.and i'd hate the see thwe diff angle articulate up a driveway with these bushes

#21
_82911_
Posted 05 April 2008 - 07:27 AM
Of course there is a lot of lateral movement without the panhard fitted.....have you guys seen how sloppy most gemini diffs are without the panard rod?
THEY ARE A 3 LINK.

#22
_Viper_
Posted 05 April 2008 - 08:59 AM
#23
_moot_
Posted 05 April 2008 - 11:56 AM
i think you missed my point.my point is that with all that slop,i find it hard to belive that the bushes will bind.Of course there is a lot of lateral movement without the panhard fitted.....have you guys seen how sloppy most gemini diffs are without the panard rod?
THEY ARE A 3 LINK.![]()
#24
Posted 05 April 2008 - 04:33 PM

This pic shows why I need a panhard rod with a bend in it.
82911 - I'm not fussed what its made of, whatevers cheapest I guess, the standard one would be staying there if it didn't foul the diff housing. I've chopped out one bush and I guess this is why. While we're at it, I don't suppose you can make me some front castor rod bushes that will give me more +ve castor than std? I've got the adjustable rods atm but they need to come off to meet the Improved Production regs.
Hmmm, must sort out my diff breather too.
#25
_rorym_
Posted 05 April 2008 - 04:45 PM
R
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users