Jump to content


Why do engines need exhaust back pressure?


  • Please log in to reply
25 replies to this topic

#1 _Viper_

_Viper_
  • Guests

Posted 24 August 2008 - 09:28 PM

Hey guys, just wondering if someone could explain to me why engines need back pressure to make optimal power? and how having more or less back pressure effects what rpm your torque peaks at etc...

I thought the less restriction would mean the piston could push the exhaust out of the head alot easier? so yea dont understand why a restriction can increase power?

Is it true that if its a forced induction engine then you want as big exhaust as possible?

Cheers

#2 rodomo

rodomo

    To advertise here, call 13TORANA

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,042 posts
  • Name:R - O - B Dammit!
  • Location:Way out west of Melbourne Awstraylya
  • Joined: 10-December 05

Posted 24 August 2008 - 11:20 PM

Good question? :huh:

Why do drag cars have single pipes coming straight out of the heads?

I thought back pressure was about maintaining some sort of even temperature in crappy old engines that had lo-tech valve materials so the valves wouldn't burn out too quick?

#3 _1QUICK LJ_

_1QUICK LJ_
  • Guests

Posted 25 August 2008 - 12:25 AM

performance engines do not like any back pressure.

#4 ls2lxhatch

ls2lxhatch

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,334 posts
  • Location:Perth
  • Car:LX Hatch
  • Joined: 29-May 06

Posted 25 August 2008 - 02:30 AM

This clip from the Dynomation 5 promo video explains why you would tune exhaust pressure.

https://cache.gmh-to...on5_exhaust.flv

#5 orangeLJ

orangeLJ

    Yes, yes I do post alot!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,261 posts
  • Joined: 02-May 06

Posted 25 August 2008 - 08:45 AM

I was always told that having no backpressure made the car doughy down low (reduced the bottom end torque)

#6 FastEHHolden

FastEHHolden

    Steptoe

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,114 posts
  • Location:Central Coast NSW
  • Joined: 16-November 05

Posted 25 August 2008 - 08:46 AM

An exhaust is a complex thing..its not just a bit of pipe to funnel gas out...its acoustic, its got pressure pulses, its got low pressure areas.

Basically its gets back pressure (I hate that term) as a by product. The exhaust has to be big enough to flow well...but small enough to have a high pressure pulse go down the tube....because behind the high pressure pulse is a low pressure area and that draws thru the fresh air because the inlet and exhaust valve are open (overlap).....its way more complicated than that but you get a basic idea.

#7 TerrA LX

TerrA LX

    Fulcrum Fixture

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,241 posts
  • Location:Sid 'n' knee
  • Joined: 31-May 06

Posted 25 August 2008 - 08:53 AM

So what we are trying to say that an exhaust too big relative to engine output, either by way of diameter or less restrictive (ie mufflers, bends etc) will actually slow down the exhaust cycle in turn hurting torque and final output.

#8 RIM-010

RIM-010

    DON'T PANIC

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,079 posts
  • Name:Tim
  • Location:Cowell, SA
  • Car:LJ 2 Door - HQ Premier
  • Joined: 01-March 06
Garage View Garage

Posted 25 August 2008 - 09:21 AM

So the 3.5" system off of my cousin's VL will be too big for my 173? :P

Tim

#9 MRLXSS

MRLXSS

    The Render Garage

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,415 posts
  • Name:Matt
  • Location:Upwey, Melbourne
  • Car:355 LX Hatchback, DeLorean DMC-12, LX SS Hatch, VY Cross8 Crewman
  • Joined: 09-November 05

Posted 25 August 2008 - 09:40 AM

good question, but seems to be a really complicated answer... One of those things that you answer with... "Just cos"

I have always pictured it as a hose... A Garden hose can pump out a fair bit of water quite comfortably and it is a reasonably small size, it doesnt need to produce heaps of pressure (power) to make the water flow at its full potential... Get yourself a bigger hose (Say a fire hose) and you are able to pump out a heap more water, heaps faster than before! (But you need to create a shitload more pressure to push it out, and make full use off the greater hose size) If you still have the same pressure and water flow as before with the garden hose, you aren't going to get any more water coming out, and its just going to trickle out... As they always say... its not the size of the hose that you have, its the way you use it!! HAHA (and can you supply enough energy to it!!)

Is the back pressure an actually air pressure thing? or is it more a sound wave reverberation? If the exhaust pipe is too big, the sound waves reverberate and bounce backwards, sideways etc etc restricting flow there for the larger exhaust size is pointless and just sounds like an untuned piece of crap!

Correct me if i am wrong, this is just how i have always pictured/imagined it

#10 TerrA LX

TerrA LX

    Fulcrum Fixture

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,241 posts
  • Location:Sid 'n' knee
  • Joined: 31-May 06

Posted 25 August 2008 - 10:49 AM

^ sorta, just cause, no really that and hot air is less dense so an over sized exhaust will allow it to cool more before exiting the tail pipe, making it slower.

The aim is to keep the exhaust flowing as fast as possible and as with ur garden hose comparison, a small motor with little overlap will need more and a top fueler making bout 500 a cylinder just needs something to funnel the exhaust away from the car and look pretty.

#11 FastEHHolden

FastEHHolden

    Steptoe

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,114 posts
  • Location:Central Coast NSW
  • Joined: 16-November 05

Posted 25 August 2008 - 11:59 AM

Another thing to think about is the fact the exhaust size is fixed...but the gas volume your engine pushes out is not...so your exhaust, no matter what the size, will have a range it works best in...its just working out the compromise that suits your car the best.

#12 _Viper_

_Viper_
  • Guests

Posted 25 August 2008 - 02:27 PM

I also thought about that FastEH and wonderd if it would be beneifical to have like a oversize exhaust but then have electronic valves inside which open/close to restrict flow according to RPM/Load?

But then I thought if it was beneficial and that easy then why hasnt anyone else done it?!

#13 _The Baron_

_The Baron_
  • Guests

Posted 25 August 2008 - 04:06 PM

Viper, (last post) sounds like the inlet track on those frauds.

FASTEHHolden. Your first post was very good.

Horses for courses guys.

(Your answer Viper)
Why do they have overlap on the valves? The mass of air exiting through the exhaust and the low pulse wave tuned at the right RPM etc will assist (draw) the intake charge into the cylinders.

Any one can make an engine run and make power.

But it takes a guru to get their head around all the black art issues to make a real special that makes legendary power. And then it will only suit a specific appplication, all others will always be a compromise.

PS the bigger the overlap, the worse the idle/bottom end. The mechanical cycle of the engine is fixed. To make better use of the scavenge affect of the exiting exhaust gases, the inlet opens earlier and the exhaust later. Unfortunately this effect is lost at low RPM to the point that the exhaust gases push into the inlet manifold initially before the exhaust valve closes. The charge now draw into the engine cylinder is dilluted with burnt gases= less bang for your buck.
But get the revs up and then hang on.

Cheers

#14 _hatcher_

_hatcher_
  • Guests

Posted 25 August 2008 - 04:40 PM

I also thought about that FastEH and wonderd if it would be beneifical to have like a oversize exhaust but then have electronic valves inside which open/close to restrict flow according to RPM/Load?

But then I thought if it was beneficial and that easy then why hasnt anyone else done it?!

One of the latest 'vettes in the States does (I think the Z06 but dont quote me!)

Dave.

#15 FastEHHolden

FastEHHolden

    Steptoe

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,114 posts
  • Location:Central Coast NSW
  • Joined: 16-November 05

Posted 25 August 2008 - 05:01 PM

A bloke from Wollongong call up with the Varizorst...however he spells it....he uses an air pressure powered servo to open a butterfly valve to another part of an exhaust system....so the system volume is smallish....when you plant it..it opens up allowing more flow to suit the increased gas flow.

Edited by FastEHHolden, 25 August 2008 - 05:02 PM.


#16 _Bomber Watson_

_Bomber Watson_
  • Guests

Posted 25 August 2008 - 07:12 PM

Buell Motorcycles also use this feature.

#17 Struggler

Struggler

    Forum Fixture

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,426 posts
  • Name:Andrew or AJ
  • Location:Canberra A.C.T.
  • Car:UC Sedan
  • Joined: 08-November 05

Posted 25 August 2008 - 09:57 PM

As a few have said its all about the scavenge effect. A small exhaust will prove efficient on a small engine with small rpm and v/v.

Mechanically supercharged engines don't rely on the exhaust to pull intake charge into the motor so therefore do not really need an exhaust except to direct gas away from the engine. This is why T/Fuel engines use the Zoomie style headers.

Here is a great article on exhaust systems..... http://www.superchev..._exh/index.html

It is interesting to note the author feels that "the exhaust system draws on the intake port as much as 500 percent harder than the piston going down the bore." Interesting stuff.

#18 FastEHHolden

FastEHHolden

    Steptoe

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,114 posts
  • Location:Central Coast NSW
  • Joined: 16-November 05

Posted 25 August 2008 - 10:22 PM

[quote Is it true that if its a forced induction engine then you want as big exhaust as possible?

Cheers
[/quote]

Sort of...there is a rule of thumb...and I love rules of thumb...it goes for every psi of restriction you take out of the exhaust...you get 1 psi more boost.


So again you want lots of flow...but the thing to remember about big exhausts on turbo cars is they aren't always on boost....and they can be painful when off boost.....so a smaller exhaust with a higher gas velocity may help a car get onto boost quicker...but ultimately it might have less top end...its all down to compromise again.

#19 _Viper_

_Viper_
  • Guests

Posted 25 August 2008 - 11:52 PM

Very good article there struggler

#20 _willo_

_willo_
  • Guests

Posted 26 August 2008 - 02:22 AM

exhaust??? what the f*ck is an exhaust???? and why the f*ck would anyone want one???????

#21 _73LJWhiteSL_

_73LJWhiteSL_
  • Guests

Posted 26 August 2008 - 08:49 AM

All i know is i went from a 2 1/4" exhaust on the LJ with the stock 173 to a 2" and got a noticable increase in grunt throught the bottom end of the rev range (1800 - 2200RPM) however at the same time, the car was less keen to rev up near redline.

But thats a daily driven street car.

My thoughts would be a smaller exhaust would give better driveablility but less top end and a bigger exhaust would make the car boggy down low, but it would rev out better at the top end.

Steve

Edited by 73LJWhiteSL, 26 August 2008 - 08:50 AM.


#22 MRLXSS

MRLXSS

    The Render Garage

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 12,415 posts
  • Name:Matt
  • Location:Upwey, Melbourne
  • Car:355 LX Hatchback, DeLorean DMC-12, LX SS Hatch, VY Cross8 Crewman
  • Joined: 09-November 05

Posted 26 August 2008 - 09:01 AM

When i stepped up from twin 2" to twin 2.25" i noticed my down low torque dropped a bit. But once i got it dyno-tuned i gained more down low than i ever had before! So each exhaust you try would need to be "re-tuned" to get everything right, before you can really judge whats better etc...

#23 EunUCh

EunUCh

    Lotsa Posts!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,770 posts
  • Location:not this planet
  • Car:japos
  • Joined: 23-November 06

Posted 27 August 2008 - 04:45 PM

Very interisting stuff,seems as though exhaust systems will always be a compromise,too many varibles involved,did a bit of looking around and found a book that dealt with tests on exhausts and it seems we are dealing with sound which travels differntly at different temperatures,flow of gas at high velocities,some way out equations are used but basically they used a morrison indicator that measured pressure waves in the exhaust at certain rpm ranges,positive pressure waves at valve overlap are not desireable,if anyone has driven a car with a blocked muffler will testify they dont go real good(too much back pressure similar too a positive pressure wave,just constant) then we have other problems like the length of exhaust pipe which changes the harmonics therefore the "tuning" and time it takes sound to travel from one end to other,then engine rpm changes the whole thing again,what was interisting is that a pipe about 10 in long showed the positive peaks reducing to buggerall very quickly and not as strong,noticed in glossy mag that you can now buy whats called merge collectors,basically they are a venturi where the collector used to be and apparantly they work by keeeping gas speed high and because its high at the merge the "reverse" pressure waves from the rest of the system cant get back to valve and cause havok,everything keeps flowing,bloke up here made a set of merge collectors and header pipes etc. for a 3.8 pajero,3.5 in system,picked up in bottom end power,hes had a bit to do with cars and his idea of backpressure in exhausts should be least as poss.

#24 _brett_32i_

_brett_32i_
  • Guests

Posted 28 August 2008 - 11:13 AM

yamaha have used an 'exup' system for years which has a servo controlled butterfly in the collector underneath the engine.

i think the new gt's run a pressure sensing valve (probably just a sprung flap) in the muffler that bypasses part of the muffler at higher engine loads.

#25 _The Stig_

_The Stig_
  • Guests

Posted 28 August 2008 - 07:33 PM

yamaha have used an 'exup' system for years which has a servo controlled butterfly in the collector underneath the engine.

i think the new gt's run a pressure sensing valve (probably just a sprung flap) in the muffler that bypasses part of the muffler at higher engine loads.


Honda have a valving type arrangement on the exhaust of the Fireblade, too, I believe.
Exhaust size can be critical to the performance of an engine, just look at how much HP drops off a F1 engine when their exhaust gets a crack in it. I tend to think of the exhaust size as a way of controlling the speed of air/gases through it. Higher RPM requires a bigger diameter to maintain the same air speed. Lower RPM needs a smaller diameter to maintain the same air speed. (I love the firehose/garden hose explanation - sums it up perfectly :spoton: )
As far as I'm aware there is no advantage in creating restrictions in the exhaust system (Ie mufflers, etc.), they create back pressure, which is actually undesirable.
Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong tho - as stated previously, it really is a bit of a black art!




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users