
Why do engines need exhaust back pressure?
#1
_Viper_
Posted 24 August 2008 - 09:28 PM
I thought the less restriction would mean the piston could push the exhaust out of the head alot easier? so yea dont understand why a restriction can increase power?
Is it true that if its a forced induction engine then you want as big exhaust as possible?
Cheers
#2
Posted 24 August 2008 - 11:20 PM

Why do drag cars have single pipes coming straight out of the heads?
I thought back pressure was about maintaining some sort of even temperature in crappy old engines that had lo-tech valve materials so the valves wouldn't burn out too quick?
#3
_1QUICK LJ_
Posted 25 August 2008 - 12:25 AM
#4
Posted 25 August 2008 - 02:30 AM
https://cache.gmh-to...on5_exhaust.flv
#5
Posted 25 August 2008 - 08:45 AM
#6
Posted 25 August 2008 - 08:46 AM
Basically its gets back pressure (I hate that term) as a by product. The exhaust has to be big enough to flow well...but small enough to have a high pressure pulse go down the tube....because behind the high pressure pulse is a low pressure area and that draws thru the fresh air because the inlet and exhaust valve are open (overlap).....its way more complicated than that but you get a basic idea.
#7
Posted 25 August 2008 - 08:53 AM
#8
Posted 25 August 2008 - 09:21 AM

Tim
#9
Posted 25 August 2008 - 09:40 AM
I have always pictured it as a hose... A Garden hose can pump out a fair bit of water quite comfortably and it is a reasonably small size, it doesnt need to produce heaps of pressure (power) to make the water flow at its full potential... Get yourself a bigger hose (Say a fire hose) and you are able to pump out a heap more water, heaps faster than before! (But you need to create a shitload more pressure to push it out, and make full use off the greater hose size) If you still have the same pressure and water flow as before with the garden hose, you aren't going to get any more water coming out, and its just going to trickle out... As they always say... its not the size of the hose that you have, its the way you use it!! HAHA (and can you supply enough energy to it!!)
Is the back pressure an actually air pressure thing? or is it more a sound wave reverberation? If the exhaust pipe is too big, the sound waves reverberate and bounce backwards, sideways etc etc restricting flow there for the larger exhaust size is pointless and just sounds like an untuned piece of crap!
Correct me if i am wrong, this is just how i have always pictured/imagined it
#10
Posted 25 August 2008 - 10:49 AM
The aim is to keep the exhaust flowing as fast as possible and as with ur garden hose comparison, a small motor with little overlap will need more and a top fueler making bout 500 a cylinder just needs something to funnel the exhaust away from the car and look pretty.
#11
Posted 25 August 2008 - 11:59 AM
#12
_Viper_
Posted 25 August 2008 - 02:27 PM
But then I thought if it was beneficial and that easy then why hasnt anyone else done it?!
#13
_The Baron_
Posted 25 August 2008 - 04:06 PM
FASTEHHolden. Your first post was very good.
Horses for courses guys.
(Your answer Viper)
Why do they have overlap on the valves? The mass of air exiting through the exhaust and the low pulse wave tuned at the right RPM etc will assist (draw) the intake charge into the cylinders.
Any one can make an engine run and make power.
But it takes a guru to get their head around all the black art issues to make a real special that makes legendary power. And then it will only suit a specific appplication, all others will always be a compromise.
PS the bigger the overlap, the worse the idle/bottom end. The mechanical cycle of the engine is fixed. To make better use of the scavenge affect of the exiting exhaust gases, the inlet opens earlier and the exhaust later. Unfortunately this effect is lost at low RPM to the point that the exhaust gases push into the inlet manifold initially before the exhaust valve closes. The charge now draw into the engine cylinder is dilluted with burnt gases= less bang for your buck.
But get the revs up and then hang on.
Cheers
#14
_hatcher_
Posted 25 August 2008 - 04:40 PM
One of the latest 'vettes in the States does (I think the Z06 but dont quote me!)I also thought about that FastEH and wonderd if it would be beneifical to have like a oversize exhaust but then have electronic valves inside which open/close to restrict flow according to RPM/Load?
But then I thought if it was beneficial and that easy then why hasnt anyone else done it?!
Dave.
#15
Posted 25 August 2008 - 05:01 PM
Edited by FastEHHolden, 25 August 2008 - 05:02 PM.
#16
_Bomber Watson_
Posted 25 August 2008 - 07:12 PM
#17
Posted 25 August 2008 - 09:57 PM
Mechanically supercharged engines don't rely on the exhaust to pull intake charge into the motor so therefore do not really need an exhaust except to direct gas away from the engine. This is why T/Fuel engines use the Zoomie style headers.
Here is a great article on exhaust systems..... http://www.superchev..._exh/index.html
It is interesting to note the author feels that "the exhaust system draws on the intake port as much as 500 percent harder than the piston going down the bore." Interesting stuff.
#18
Posted 25 August 2008 - 10:22 PM
Cheers
[/quote]
Sort of...there is a rule of thumb...and I love rules of thumb...it goes for every psi of restriction you take out of the exhaust...you get 1 psi more boost.
So again you want lots of flow...but the thing to remember about big exhausts on turbo cars is they aren't always on boost....and they can be painful when off boost.....so a smaller exhaust with a higher gas velocity may help a car get onto boost quicker...but ultimately it might have less top end...its all down to compromise again.
#19
_Viper_
Posted 25 August 2008 - 11:52 PM
#20
_willo_
Posted 26 August 2008 - 02:22 AM
#21
_73LJWhiteSL_
Posted 26 August 2008 - 08:49 AM
But thats a daily driven street car.
My thoughts would be a smaller exhaust would give better driveablility but less top end and a bigger exhaust would make the car boggy down low, but it would rev out better at the top end.
Steve
Edited by 73LJWhiteSL, 26 August 2008 - 08:50 AM.
#22
Posted 26 August 2008 - 09:01 AM
#23
Posted 27 August 2008 - 04:45 PM
#24
_brett_32i_
Posted 28 August 2008 - 11:13 AM
i think the new gt's run a pressure sensing valve (probably just a sprung flap) in the muffler that bypasses part of the muffler at higher engine loads.
#25
_The Stig_
Posted 28 August 2008 - 07:33 PM
yamaha have used an 'exup' system for years which has a servo controlled butterfly in the collector underneath the engine.
i think the new gt's run a pressure sensing valve (probably just a sprung flap) in the muffler that bypasses part of the muffler at higher engine loads.
Honda have a valving type arrangement on the exhaust of the Fireblade, too, I believe.
Exhaust size can be critical to the performance of an engine, just look at how much HP drops off a F1 engine when their exhaust gets a crack in it. I tend to think of the exhaust size as a way of controlling the speed of air/gases through it. Higher RPM requires a bigger diameter to maintain the same air speed. Lower RPM needs a smaller diameter to maintain the same air speed. (I love the firehose/garden hose explanation - sums it up perfectly

As far as I'm aware there is no advantage in creating restrictions in the exhaust system (Ie mufflers, etc.), they create back pressure, which is actually undesirable.
Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong tho - as stated previously, it really is a bit of a black art!
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users