

308HT engine number
#1
_xr81966_
Posted 17 December 2008 - 01:11 PM

#2
Posted 17 December 2008 - 01:35 PM
#3
Posted 17 December 2008 - 01:43 PM
#4
_@milco@_
Posted 17 December 2008 - 02:29 PM
#5
Posted 17 December 2008 - 03:05 PM
i had a HT is most likey out of a lh or lx SLR5000 ( date code on the size can verify which model/year) you can get a pretty penny for them as they are sought after if the date match's with in a few months of a SLR5000 i also beleive they came in SL tagged 308 toranas as well.
Did 308's come out in sl's?
#6
_brutass08_
Posted 17 December 2008 - 03:55 PM
Edited by brutass08, 17 December 2008 - 03:57 PM.
#7
Posted 17 December 2008 - 05:16 PM
If the stamps don't look factory it means the block has been decked and an engine shop has stamped the R there to mean the number has been restamped. If this is the case the block is worth no more than any other 308.
There has also been some XU-1 and L34 engines turn up with an R on the engine pad too, but the meaning for these is unclear at this stage. However for all other Holden engines the R means as above.
#8
Posted 17 December 2008 - 05:40 PM
#9
_xr81966_
Posted 17 December 2008 - 06:05 PM
#10
_darrenmark1_
Posted 17 December 2008 - 06:41 PM
Thanks for all the info . Where would we find the cast date ? Is that stamped inside the motor ? The motor is complete and running and we do not wish to pull it down . Thanks for the offers to sell/swap but i only wanted to find out if in fact it came from a Torana or not . A mate of mine said he thought it might have come from one .
Mate the date cast is inbetween the manifold and timing cover, Should be somthing like 5F6 or something like that.
#11
Posted 17 December 2008 - 06:43 PM
#12
Posted 17 December 2008 - 07:14 PM
Engine number HT68585 is an early/mid1977 range engine number, so from an LX. The cast date will give some idea if the number is original or a restamp.
True, but usually the original number has been restamped if an R is placed on the end so the casting date won't help. If this is the case and the engine belonged to your car I suppose you'd live with it. But if it doesn't you might as well have a QT block. I've got a similar problem with a Bathurst HK engine here. It's an original 327 from an early Dandenong GTS327, but it's been decked during a rebuild and the original engine number restamped. It's of no use as it is so I'm going to deck it again and use it as a spare engine for one of my early GTS327's, basically build it up as a 400hp 377 so if I bust it I haven't busted the original motor. It'll probably be on club rego anyway so I won't even bother with a number. If I have to i'll get a NxxxxP number for it.
#13
_xr81966_
Posted 17 December 2008 - 07:16 PM
#14
_gtr-xu1_
Posted 17 December 2008 - 07:41 PM
#15
Posted 18 December 2008 - 05:43 AM
#16
Posted 18 December 2008 - 08:09 AM
If you put a phot here of the engine number it should be obvious it it's a restamp or not.
#17
_brutass08_
Posted 18 December 2008 - 12:09 PM
#18
Posted 18 December 2008 - 12:35 PM
Now you guy's have me thinking , I was always going to try and get a block that matched my genuine 76 model slr5000 , due to when I bought it it had no engine # so obviously had to put one on when it went over the pits( motor had been decked when it was rebuilt by previous owner/s ). But now checking the cast date , which is 27j6, it may very well be the original motor due to the car build date being 10/76 , not sure what to do to check , but I have put a # on it from a broken 308 I had in the shed ,a few years ago now , was'nt aware of cast dates etc back then. May have to do more research I guess , cheers.
27J6 (27/9/76) is a spot on cast date for a 10/76 Holden. If it was too much later it'd be getting awful close, although Toranas are probably a bit closer in build vs cast date since the Engine plant and Dandenong assembly plant are in the same area. It'd take a little while for engines to get to Elizabeth, Mosman Park, Acacia and Elizabeth. It is also possible that a 10/76 build was completed a few weeks into 11/76.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users