
cast iron xu1 headers vs extractors
#1
Posted 13 September 2009 - 05:53 PM
#2
Posted 13 September 2009 - 06:35 PM
Anyway, not all extractors are the same - equal or unequal length runners, different diameters of primaries, secondaries, collector, different transitions etc but put simply, yes extractors will go a lot further than XU-1 headers.
Even mediocre ones will probably flow better and have a useful scavenging effect, assuming your motor is actually hot enough to need them. If it's a very mild motor, the XU-1 headers are probably advantageous over some extractors that are suited to a car that's supposed to sit at 6,000rpm on a speedway track

Edited by Heath, 13 September 2009 - 06:37 PM.
#3
Posted 13 September 2009 - 07:18 PM
http://www.gmh-toran...=&hl=extracyors v headers&fromsearch=1
And you can troll through this search result:
http://www.gmh-toran...re&fromsearch=1
#4
Posted 13 September 2009 - 08:35 PM
The XU1 manifolds were worth 9HP and 42 ft/lbs over the handmade extractors.
I could scan the article if your keen.
#5
_mello92_
Posted 13 September 2009 - 08:58 PM

Im stuggling to swallow that!
I might just be leaving mine on for a bit longer then! Everyone has been telling me to get strakkies, now Ive got something to back up my arguments!
#6
Posted 13 September 2009 - 10:43 PM
#7
Posted 14 September 2009 - 07:44 AM
I can tell you that I have seen some unbelieveable gains and losses on engine dynos and at the drag strip changing exhaust. Simple collector extensions on 4:1 pipes that pick up 90 ft/lbs on a 550Hp engine, almost 4 tenths ET gain by reducing collector diameter 1/4", the list goes on.
The 42 ft/lb increase is not that hard to imagine if the original pipes didn't have enough collector length.
The test only involved the original extractors and the manifolds (so there could well be something out there even better) but there are some lessons to be learnt by closely reading the article.

#8
_threeblindmice_
Posted 14 September 2009 - 09:05 AM
#9
Posted 14 September 2009 - 09:35 AM
Interesting read, especially about that paint on the pipe thing actually working so effectively!The test only involved the original extractors and the manifolds (so there could well be something out there even better) but there are some lessons to be learnt by closely reading the article.
But what pipes did it have on it in the first place? It really doesn't give any detail about that
#10
_mello92_
Posted 14 September 2009 - 05:26 PM
As Heath said, very interesting read!
Its amazing how such an old engine has been discussed, debated and modified so much!
Even today we are still rabbling on about it!
I rekon some up to date comparisons between the XU1 headers with the cut-where-paint-stops-burning-off length of pipe and some new extractors such as Pacemaker/Genie with the same amount of pipe would be the go.
Comparisons between extractors with different secondary and outlet sizes would be nice too.
#11
Posted 14 September 2009 - 08:49 PM
Paint any pipe and the paint will burn off to a point about 4" from the open end. Cut the pipe and repaint, you end up cutting another 4" off. It doesn't really work. I have had most success with using 18" or 500mm (depending on what measure I have at the time)of pipe from the point where the cylinders merge in the collector.
I was once at Sams Performance in Sydney with a VN headed 355 on the engine dyno when Mark Arblaster walked in. "Try the paint burn collector length trick" he calls out, sure enough we end up cutting 4" off my 18" collector extensions. Lost 15 ft/lbs at 4000 rpm but maintained the same HP. Turned around and he was gone !!
Edited by Struggler, 14 September 2009 - 08:50 PM.
#12
_mello92_
Posted 14 September 2009 - 09:15 PM
Would it be fine on, say, my XR200 engined gokart? Needs a new exhaust, the old one got brokened.
Bend it up then spray it and see where it stops burning, or will it just be roughly 4" from the end?
#13
Posted 14 September 2009 - 10:09 PM

#14
Posted 15 September 2009 - 08:08 AM
Harry Firth used them for 3 Bathursts (including the 1972 win) before finding a set of extractors that worked as well across the rev range as the factory headers.
Sure, if your after peak power or peak torque any set a bent pipes will work in some fashion, but the question is, is it usable.
Dr Terry
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users