
custom efi 202 manifold
#1
_EFI-GTR_
Posted 14 February 2010 - 11:12 AM
Was thinking of using a weber manifold and either making a plenum on the end with say 2 standard vk throttle bodies????? Or trying to find 6 smaller throttle bodies (gemani, barina,camira,) not sure of sizes though?? and adapting them to fit like the ones you can buy.. need help guys:)
#2
_oldjohnno_
Posted 14 February 2010 - 02:45 PM
#3
_oldjohnno_
Posted 14 February 2010 - 03:13 PM
#4
_coupe202_
Posted 14 February 2010 - 03:20 PM
#5
Posted 14 February 2010 - 03:50 PM
#6
Posted 14 February 2010 - 05:03 PM
Is that for a 9-port or a 12-port setup? I'm interested in having a geeze if you have any photos, and yeah would love some results once it's been dyno'd. Keep us posted TonyJust finished building a custom efi manifold for holden six, will know how it works once engine is dynoed.
#7
_coupe202_
Posted 14 February 2010 - 05:27 PM
#8
Posted 14 February 2010 - 06:15 PM
http://autospeed.com...71/article.html
#9
_oldjohnno_
Posted 14 February 2010 - 07:51 PM
actually, might not even be an su manifold, but still worth a look
http://autospeed.com...71/article.html
I sincerely don't mean to sound critical of the builder of that HR - the workmanship and finish looks to be very good - but it seems to be another example of an engine that would have turned out much better with a bit of planning. Another 50% on the hp output would have been easy to achieve without making it the slightest bit cranky. It combines the disadvantages of both the 9 and 12 port heads.
To get the full performance benefits of a true IR manifold, whether carbureted or injected, you need to use a 12 port head (and not just a 9 port with dividers). As well, the manifold must be dimensioned carefully to match the cam and the desired torque peak, otherwise you may as well just jam a two barrel on it.
#10
_EFI-GTR_
Posted 14 February 2010 - 09:19 PM
lobe separation:105
valve lift :.339
inlet open .48 close .87 ex open.78 closes .57
duration 262@ .50
it has been on the dyno twice in the last few weeks and can't go over 5500rpm and made 130kw..
Be interested to hear your progress also coupe 202
#11
_evil UC hatch_
Posted 14 February 2010 - 09:40 PM
#12
_Bomber Watson_
Posted 14 February 2010 - 09:44 PM
Cheers.
#13
Posted 14 February 2010 - 09:55 PM
#14
Posted 14 February 2010 - 10:10 PM
Was sitting on the floor but run ever so smooth.
We were looking at a four barrel manifold from aussie speed, i think thats what there called to suit the 12 port with a large thottle body on top.
they come with thicker locating points for injection and are flow tested with the yellow terra 12 port allow head which is what i wanted to use.
The other option was to chop down the vk unit and weld on a pre fabbed plemium chamber,that being there biggest restriction
#15
_EFI-GTR_
Posted 15 February 2010 - 04:35 PM
Edited by EFI-GTR, 15 February 2010 - 04:38 PM.
#16
_oldjohnno_
Posted 15 February 2010 - 05:49 PM
These are the sort of sizes to shoot for - assuming a 6500rpm power peak:
Runner length 13.78" (this includes the 3.7" port length of a 12 port intake!!)
Runner entry CSA 1.95 sq.in
Plenum volume 160 to 200 cu.in
The runner entries need to be radiused, and obviously you'll want to position the TBs so as to avoid disrupting the flow into the runners. Forgot to look at TB sizing but can do if you want.
I guess you already have the exhaust done but I'll chuck in the PipeMax recommendations just for interest (tri y style): Combined pri/sec length 32", 1.59" pri, 1.7" sec, 3" x 2" tapered collector. Collector length for best torque spread 17.9", for best peak hp 9".
#17
_Bomber Watson_
Posted 15 February 2010 - 05:57 PM
For some reason i had turbo in my mind not NA. Note everyone takes the six throttle body setup off the R34's and puts a single tb with a big plenum on....
My bad, gotta stop drinking

IF DONE PROPERLY, i think a Plenum would work better in most cases.
You do know you can just buy webber style throttle bodies that bolt strait to a webber manifold and have injector bosses etc already built in.....would be a good way to go for a masimum effort NA engine...
Cheers.
#18
Posted 15 February 2010 - 06:44 PM
#19
_EFI-GTR_
Posted 15 February 2010 - 07:19 PM
Edited by EFI-GTR, 15 February 2010 - 07:19 PM.
#20
_Bomber Watson_
Posted 15 February 2010 - 09:39 PM
Gotta be heaps of stuff big enough that you can get cheaply, standard tb off a vn 308 perhaps?? Or even a LS1 job? Toyota or nissan v8? Even a 3.8 ecotec one might be big enough....Just do some sums

Just throwing ideas around....
#21
Posted 15 February 2010 - 10:19 PM
I think the old standard 5L runs a 70 or 75mm tb one would think that would be enough for a six and less work than two as the bomber mentioned.
Does your computor system have a rev limiter which might not be helping,just checking?
Your injectors could be two small, and as johnno mentioned check your runner lengths.
A mate also mention the cam ,fuel injection prefers a wider lobe separation for vacume 108 /110/112 Your cam may be two big?
#22
_oldjohnno_
Posted 16 February 2010 - 06:07 AM
Dont shoot me down just a few thoughts.
I think the old standard 5L runs a 70 or 75mm tb one would think that would be enough for a six and less work than two as the bomber mentioned.
Does your computor system have a rev limiter which might not be helping,just checking?
Your injectors could be two small, and as johnno mentioned check your runner lengths.
A mate also mention the cam ,fuel injection prefers a wider lobe separation for vacume 108 /110/112 Your cam may be two big?
Good points. A single 75mm flows the equivalent of about 580cfm so would be just big enough, a single 80mm would be ideal. I think the std VK was about 65mm, I'll drag one out and measure it later but two 65s would be plenty.
I'm concerned about the amount of overlap as well, and can see much of the fuel charge going straight out the exhaust. The fuel control will obviously have to be a crude rpm/tps only deal. Ideally the duration would be shortened a fair bit but the LSA widened to keep the inlet closing at somewhere near the same point. To be completely honest (and I know EFI-GTR has committed a lot of time and money to the injection system) if it was me I'd keep the cam and can the injection for some good carburetors. Maybe I'm a luddite but I think once you get to this stage of tune the main advantages of EFI (smooth and "civilised") are lost anyway, and good carbs will make power within a percent or two of injection.
I'd assume the injector flows and the rev limiter would have been checked while it was on the dyno. The VK manifold - because of it's length and tiny CSA near the port face - simply refuses to co-operate over the high 5s.
#23
_EFI-GTR_
Posted 16 February 2010 - 03:49 PM
Dont shoot me down just a few thoughts.
I think the old standard 5L runs a 70 or 75mm tb one would think that would be enough for a six and less work than two as the bomber mentioned.
Does your computor system have a rev limiter which might not be helping,just checking?
Your injectors could be two small, and as johnno mentioned check your runner lengths.
A mate also mention the cam ,fuel injection prefers a wider lobe separation for vacume 108 /110/112 Your cam may be two big?
Good points. A single 75mm flows the equivalent of about 580cfm so would be just big enough, a single 80mm would be ideal. I think the std VK was about 65mm, I'll drag one out and measure it later but two 65s would be plenty.
I'm concerned about the amount of overlap as well, and can see much of the fuel charge going straight out the exhaust. The fuel control will obviously have to be a crude rpm/tps only deal. Ideally the duration would be shortened a fair bit but the LSA widened to keep the inlet closing at somewhere near the same point. To be completely honest (and I know EFI-GTR has committed a lot of time and money to the injection system) if it was me I'd keep the cam and can the injection for some good carburetors. Maybe I'm a luddite but I think once you get to this stage of tune the main advantages of EFI (smooth and "civilised") are lost anyway, and good carbs will make power within a percent or two of injection.
I'd assume the injector flows and the rev limiter would have been checked while it was on the dyno. The VK manifold - because of it's length and tiny CSA near the port face - simply refuses to co-operate over the high 5s.
#24
_EFI-GTR_
Posted 16 February 2010 - 03:59 PM
#25
_coupe202_
Posted 16 February 2010 - 04:18 PM
Attached Files
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users