
Driveshaft pinion angle question again?
#1
Posted 07 September 2010 - 03:57 PM
The unis are good and the tranny mount is ok.
At normal ride height the tranny is .5deg down, the tailshaft is 1.5deg down and the diff pinion is 3.5 deg down.
So its only .5deg at front and 4.5 deg back.( I have nolathane busheson the back)
Now thats not right is it?
Shouldnt you have some more angle than .5 difference at the front to at least have movement in the uni joint
rather than it being almost straight?
#2
_niterida_
Posted 07 September 2010 - 04:24 PM
Regardless the box and diff should be parallel.
#3
Posted 07 September 2010 - 05:18 PM
#4
Posted 07 September 2010 - 05:19 PM
Look elsewhere for your vibration.
#5
_niterida_
Posted 07 September 2010 - 05:38 PM
Dont touch it fuzzy,its spot on.
Look elsewhere for your vibration.
Not according to this article : http://www.streetrod...gles/index.html
The diff and gearbox should be set to the same angle, one up and one down. Street cars should be set with the diff pinion on the angle it will be in most normal driving situations which I guess would be pretty much static ride height.
So by my reckoning his diff and/or gearbox are out by 4 degrees.
#6
Posted 07 September 2010 - 06:03 PM
I disagree with the opinion in the article and stand by my statement.
Diff pinion angle should be 2-4 degrees down.
Fuzzys car sounds like all angles are dead standard.
#7
Posted 07 September 2010 - 06:39 PM
The black art is in estimating the amount the diff will rotate for a given application. The perfect pinion angle for drag racing will not be the perfect pinion angle for a street car.
Edited by ls2lxhatch, 07 September 2010 - 06:40 PM.
#8
Posted 07 September 2010 - 07:10 PM
front became 3.5 and rear 5.5 deg, so only 2 deg difference now instead of 4deg.
The other question I still have is shouldnt there be some minimal angle the unis should run at e.g(like 3deg)
so rotation can occur for the needle bearings? If so my front only has .5deg , its practically straight.
#9
_Squarepants_
Posted 07 September 2010 - 07:28 PM
Sorry to change the subject, but can anyone tell me why we don't use CV joints instead of unis in a tail shaft?

#10
Posted 07 September 2010 - 07:51 PM
Spicer Drivetrain Components - Driveshaft Installation
Rule 1: Universal joint operating angles at each end of a driveshaft should always be at least 1 degree.
Rule 2: Universal joint operating angles on each end of a driveshaft should always be equal within 1 degree of each other (one half degree for motor homes and shafts in front of transfer case or auxiliary
device).
Rule 3: For virtual vibration free performance, universal joint operating angles should not be larger than 3 degrees. if they are, make sure they do not exceed the maximum recommended angles.
#11
Posted 07 September 2010 - 08:15 PM
For the moment I have replaced my current shaft with other one I have for the SLR which has
new unis in it and will over next weeks driving, see if that has made any difference.
I also may consider adding a plate under the tranny mount to increase the front angle from .5 to 1.5deg but this will
unfortunately increase the rear pinion angle too.
Yes, uni's need to work at an angle, I can't tell you what the optimum is, but I'm pretty sure it's more than half a degree.
Sorry to change the subject, but can anyone tell me why we don't use CV joints instead of unis in a tail shaft?
Didnt the 4cyl opel , manual tailshaft have CV joint on the front yoke? I distinctly remember that when I threw it out 20 years ago.
#12
Posted 07 September 2010 - 08:41 PM
[/quote]
Thats a definate as I remember throwing one of those out also.
I too am interested why we cant use as per the Sunbird. ie CV front and uni rear
#13
Posted 07 September 2010 - 09:03 PM
Driveshaft Angles
In travelling this ellipse, the U-joint speeds up and slows down twice per shaft revolution. A second U-joint having an equal but opposite angle is used to convert this pulsating power back into smooth power feeding the pinion.
Was the CV joint in the Sunbird actually a CV joint or was it a rubber uni?
#14
_Squarepants_
Posted 07 September 2010 - 09:51 PM
Might be a stupid question with an obvious answer but I can't see why not...

Edited by Squarepants, 07 September 2010 - 09:53 PM.
#15
Posted 07 September 2010 - 10:07 PM
Shouldnt you have some more angle than .5 difference at the front to at least have movement in the uni joint
rather than it being almost straight?
They majority is right here, the shaft should be near straight as possible.
You do not want the uni joints moving around just rotating with the shaft.
The only reason they are "universal" is so the suspension can move around.
#16
Posted 07 September 2010 - 11:26 PM
The only reason CV joints are not used is cost.
Edited by ls2lxhatch, 07 September 2010 - 11:27 PM.
#17
_Viper_
Posted 08 September 2010 - 07:42 AM
#18
Posted 08 September 2010 - 08:25 AM
#19
Posted 08 September 2010 - 07:16 PM
#20
Posted 09 September 2010 - 09:21 PM
It became immediately obvious to me that the spare tailshaft with new unis I installed drove with almost no vibration at all.
Looks like the tailshaft I had is out of balance. I rechecked the unis and they are OK.
I noticed the shaft had at one time been re-balanced as it had a non factory weight added.
I can only assume the balance was done with old unis before I replaced with new ones as was now out of balance again.
So who does a good tailshaft balance in eastern suburbs of Melbourne?
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users