Jump to content


LPG Octane Rating?


  • Please log in to reply
20 replies to this topic

#1 _Viper_

_Viper_
  • Guests

Posted 26 March 2011 - 08:11 AM

Hey guys, I went and spoke to the machine shop yesterday and got some advice for my new motor, I asked what compression ratio he would recommend (Forced Induction with LPG EFI) and he said 8.5:1

I said really even with the LPG? he said yea, reakons he knew a guy who worked for BP and altho sometimes LPG is up to 105ron the Australian Standard minimum is only 91 so if you build and tune a motor for 105 and get a poor quality fill ya will likely pop ya motor...

Conflicting information as the guys who fitted my gas system and have built alot of turbo LPG motors said they run 11:1, and 13:1 for their N/A engines...

So had abit of a look around on the net and found this article:
http://motormouth.co...etters/0501.htm

It is interesting to note that the minimum motor octane number set for LPG in Australia is 90.5 (approx 102 RON). While this is the minimum, some retailers may in practice offer a higher-octane product.


Now thats both promising and confusing.... why does it say the octane number is 90.5 but the ron is 102? why is there 2 different numbers?

Im guessing Ron is worked off of the Octane rating, is that the same for petrol?

Basically I wanna know if the minimum ill get from the pump is 102 (which is higher then the 95 of Premium unleaded)

#2 TerrA LX

TerrA LX

    Fulcrum Fixture

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,241 posts
  • Location:Sid 'n' knee
  • Joined: 31-May 06

Posted 26 March 2011 - 08:33 AM

Several things have to be taken into consideration, firstly, to answer the question to the two different numbers, they are measured in different ways.

FWIW I was under the impression that that LPG has no octane rating as it is too high, as anything over 100 octane is a guesstimate, LPG is taken off the top of the refinement process, meaning it is lighter than premium, to put it into prospective, diesel is at the bottom, regular petrol in the middle and premium at he top, they used to just burn off the gas till they worked out how to store it safely and then burn it in cars.

Further more you have to consider that petrol as a gas burns better than petrol as a liquid so the more gaseous the fuel charge the better it will burn enabling you to raise the compression ratio limited by the shape and heat retention of the combustion chamber.

#3 _Viper_

_Viper_
  • Guests

Posted 26 March 2011 - 06:15 PM

Ok, sorta answered my question.... But does that mean that LPG is at least 100ron compared to Premiums 95ron?

The way this guy was talking was that the national minimum for lpg is only 91ron and id have to run a 8.5:1 comp ratio to suit....

But from that article national standard is 91 Octane Level but 102 Rated octane level (RON)..... So does that mean that 91 Ron unleaded would have (guesstimate) 80 "Octane level".


Either way seems you know abit about it Terra, What Comp ratio would you run in a Forced Induction Straight LPG motor?

Edited by Viper, 26 March 2011 - 06:16 PM.


#4 _Bomber Watson_

_Bomber Watson_
  • Guests

Posted 26 March 2011 - 07:01 PM

MON and RON are two different things.

You have it right, 90ish MON would be over 100 RON, and yes normal ULP is about 80MON.

They quote RON at the bowsers cause it sounds better, obviously.

#5 _Viper_

_Viper_
  • Guests

Posted 26 March 2011 - 09:46 PM

Sweet so I can stick with my High comp ratio

#6 Lima31

Lima31

    Forum Fixture

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 874 posts
  • Name:Lee
  • Location:Perth WA
  • Joined: 18-April 10

Posted 27 March 2011 - 01:38 AM

Further more you have to consider that petrol as a gas burns better than petrol as a liquid so the more gaseous the fuel charge the better it will burn enabling you to raise the compression ratio limited by the shape and heat retention of the combustion chamber.


All fuels burn as an atomized gas

#7 TerrA LX

TerrA LX

    Fulcrum Fixture

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,241 posts
  • Location:Sid 'n' knee
  • Joined: 31-May 06

Posted 27 March 2011 - 08:53 AM

Either way seems you know abit about it Terra, What Comp ratio would you run in a Forced Induction Straight LPG motor?


I think the answer lies with your supply, what octane rating are they quoting?
More over I think if you followed closely what they do with petrol at that rating you should be fine provided particular attention is, as always should be, paid to your spark timing and quality.

ACL have taken the time to summarise some of the finer points, interesting reading; http://www.acl.com.a...3e?OpenDocument




#8 _Gunmetal LH_

_Gunmetal LH_
  • Guests

Posted 27 March 2011 - 09:24 AM

The way I understand it is you can run a higher ratio on a N/A engine (LPG only not dual fuel) up to about 13:1.

For boosted engines, start with a lower ratio and give it more boost for a higher 'effective ratio'. That's why your machine shop suggested 8.5:1.


Have a look for Ford turbo's on LPG. Many haven't reduced their ratio.

#9 _Viper_

_Viper_
  • Guests

Posted 27 March 2011 - 10:40 AM

Machine shop suggested 8.5:1 because he believed that you only get 91ron for LPG minimum. LPG Workshop said 11:1 for Turbo, 13:1 N/A

#10 _Bomber Watson_

_Bomber Watson_
  • Guests

Posted 27 March 2011 - 10:55 AM

The way I understand it is you can run a higher ratio on a N/A engine (LPG only not dual fuel) up to about 13:1.

For boosted engines, start with a lower ratio and give it more boost for a higher 'effective ratio'. That's why your machine shop suggested 8.5:1.


Have a look for Ford turbo's on LPG. Many haven't reduced their ratio.


Starting with low comp and "just winding more boost in" causes way more troubles than its worth.

End up having to run a bigger turbo that takes longer to come on, its going to be more sluggish down low, etc etc.

Cheers.

#11 _Gunmetal LH_

_Gunmetal LH_
  • Guests

Posted 27 March 2011 - 01:40 PM

Viper: "Machine shop suggested 8.5:1 because he believed that you only get 91ron for LPG minimum."

Would that be because your going to boost it or is that his 'rule of thumb"?


Bomber: "Starting with low comp and "just winding more boost in" causes way more troubles than its worth."

Yep, I agree.



:threadjacked:
I've always been of the thought that a 'small' turbo on a 'normal' compression engine is the way to go for street and drift engines!

Many disagree with me and many agree?

If BIG power is what your after then lower the static compression ratio and boost boost boost!

#12 _Bomber Watson_

_Bomber Watson_
  • Guests

Posted 27 March 2011 - 01:44 PM

Grenade still had around the factory 9.2:1, drove like a stocker off boost then drove like two stockers on boost.

If i was to build a proper turbo street engine i'd follow the same theory, prolly a bit more compression and a bit bigger turbo though :P

Cheers.

#13 Heath

Heath

    I like cars.

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 18,394 posts
  • Name:Heath
  • Location:Eastern Suburbs, Melbourne
  • Car:Heavily Modified UC Sunbird Hatchback
  • Joined: 07-November 05
Garage View Garage

Posted 29 March 2011 - 12:10 PM

Grenade still had around the factory 9.2:1, drove like a stocker off boost then drove like two stockers on boost.

hahahhaa

re: the question. LPG is general doesn't seem to be THAT consistent, but it's still pretty consistently high from what I've seen. Compression ratio isn't the only variable. A lot of factors can make detonation appear sooner than it 'should' on a sorted motor.

#14 FastEHHolden

FastEHHolden

    Steptoe

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,114 posts
  • Location:Central Coast NSW
  • Joined: 16-November 05

Posted 29 March 2011 - 12:31 PM

Its not that consistant....and it all depends on how much butane gets put in the mix. There was a local supplier near me who claimed the gas they sold was mainly propane as their main business is bottled gas and their automotive gas came from the same source...My brother had an AU factory gas ute at the time and the onboard trip computer said it had increased consumption when he used their gas....enough that he couldn't make it from Gosford back to Brisbane on one fill up, like he had on the way down.

The problem is that there isn't a strict "recipe" for any of our fuels....its just harder for people selling gas to alter the mix, so you are more likely to receive the same mix that left the refinery gate...unlike liquid fuels where people like to try their hand at chemistry and buy cheap fuel and boost the RON number.

For years the figure of 115 RON has been bandied around for LPG....I'm not a beleiver.

#15 bryanw

bryanw

    Forum Fan

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 294 posts
  • Location:mildura
  • Joined: 04-July 06

Posted 30 March 2011 - 05:21 PM

I thought LPG had a high Ron when we first got to use it, it was Barby gas, then they realized they could add lower taxed fuels to it to make money, the trade off was lower Ron, and you don't want to cook your snags with it.
so the more money they make, the lower the Ron.
but I could be wrong?

#16 _Inj gtr202_

_Inj gtr202_
  • Guests

Posted 31 March 2011 - 10:58 PM

Been doing a bit of snooping on this forum and come across this..

My link

might be useful info

Adam

#17 _torbirdie_

_torbirdie_
  • Guests

Posted 07 April 2011 - 04:42 AM

Hey guys, I went and spoke to the machine shop yesterday and got some advice for my new motor, I asked what compression ratio he would recommend (Forced Induction with LPG EFI) and he said 8.5:1

I said really even with the LPG? he said yea, reakons he knew a guy who worked for BP and altho sometimes LPG is up to 105ron the Australian Standard minimum is only 91 so if you build and tune a motor for 105 and get a poor quality fill ya will likely pop ya motor...


As far as I know, there is no Australian standard for a minimum RON rating for lpg, so take any advice from that direction with a grain of salt.

The reason there is no minimum standard is that its basically very difficult to end up with a blend of lpg that has a RON less than 98.

As has been explained LPG is just a mixture of gaseous petroleum, could be any of the many isomers of propane or butane. The RONs of these can vary from as low as 94 to 112. However, that doesnt stop non gaseous fractions of fuel ending up in there, like butanol etc where the RON is even lower.

Overall, though, at pumps in Australia, you are unlikely to have a mix that goes below 30% propane, otherwise the stuff just wont come out of the tank at low temperatures. Actually determining the RON for a mixture is tricky and isnt simply taking the % mix of the fuels and applying that tow the RONs. However, it is safe to say that the value of the RON of a mix will not fall outside the min RON of either of the mixes.
Based on a worst case scenario of a 30% propane content, my best guess would be the RON would still be as good as ULP ~98.

Of course, if you were building a motor right on the edge and wanted to ensure a high RON, supagas supplies a 100% propane mix. Suppliers to service stations will be able to tell you the relative mixtures of their supplies, but dont expect too much if you ask the attendant!

MONs and RONs? there is plenty on the internet about it.

Bascially there needed to be a way of establishing the quality of fuel compared to "pure" petrol which would be 100% octane and have a 100% octane rating. The detonation quality of fuels is measured relative to 100% octane, a fuel with a rating of 88 would mean it has the same qualities as 88% octane 12% n heptane(typically what makes up the rest of petrol)

The R in RON stands for research where the detonation of the fuel under test is compared to 100% octane in a test engine.
MON is similar and stands for Motor where the intake temp of the fuel is heated to a higher temp and the test motor is run at a higher speed.

The MON rating is typically lower than the RON rating for the same fuel, the MON rating perhaps being more relevant to today's engines.

There is much misinformation out there, certainly anyone claiming to be an expert on the matter who simply refers to the octane rating of lpg is out of their depth as there is no octane in lpg, they should be quoting RON or MON.

I think its a fair call for an engine builder not to recommend going beyond a compression ratio of 10.5:1 if you are just going to run normal lpg, rather than propane.
though you havent mentioned here whether you are going straight lpg or dual fuel, you still have to build the motor for the lowest quality fuel that may end up in there.

#18 _Viper_

_Viper_
  • Guests

Posted 07 April 2011 - 07:56 AM

Straight LPG.

Is that 10.5 you recommend for a turbo motor or N/A

#19 _torbirdie_

_torbirdie_
  • Guests

Posted 09 April 2011 - 04:55 PM

Straight LPG.

Is that 10.5 you recommend for a turbo motor or N/A

sorry, I skimmed over the forced induction bit, I was talking normally aspirated.

I'd be a bit out of my depth suggesting what the right ratio would be for a turbo(wont it depend on how much turbo pressure you run?), but as a guestimate would have thought it would be ok to go at least 10% higher than the same motor designed to run on petrol.

#20 _Viper_

_Viper_
  • Guests

Posted 06 June 2011 - 11:16 PM

Ok I thought id follow up on this I e-mailed Shell, BP & Caltex and another company (LPG Autogas).

Shell:
Hi Clint. The minimum MON for Shell LPG in Australia is 92. The lowest RON may be 100 depending on the propane/butane mix available at different times of the year

BP:
The legislated minimum 'octane' requirement for automotive LPG is actually a Motor Octane Number (MON) and is 90.5 minimum.
The typical Research Octane Number (RON) is approximately 96.

LPG Autogas:
Autogas in Australia does not have its RON measured in any way. It is MON (Motor Octane Number) which is measured, but RON can be estimated.
In Australia, the minimum MON is 90.5, and as an estimate, the corresponding RON would be about 98.

Caltex:
Yet to reply... will update when they do.

Ok so it didnt really clear it up 100% and still got ranging numbers of 96-100 minimum RON I think the biggest problem will be knowing that RON fuel I have in the tank at the time of tuning... what If I just happen to get a really good mix (say 110ron) on the day of dyno tuning then go out the next day and pick up some 96???

Edited by Viper, 06 June 2011 - 11:21 PM.


#21 enderwigginau

enderwigginau

    Admin Wrangler

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,000,527 posts
  • Name:Grant
  • Location:Parramatta
  • Car:76 LX Sedan, 4 seater
  • Joined: 04-February 07

Posted 07 June 2011 - 09:57 PM

Clint, email em back and ask for the AKI. There is a reason the US uses this number instead - it gives a better idea of what the fuel is suitable for.

http://en.wikipedia....i/Octane_Rating






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users