Jump to content


Photo

Standard Exhaust Manifolds vs Extractors


  • Please log in to reply
31 replies to this topic

#1 LXCHEV

LXCHEV

    Lotsa Posts!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,635 posts
  • Name:Brett
  • Location:Melbourne
  • Car:'76 LX - 383 Chev
  • Joined: 08-November 05

Posted 30 June 2006 - 04:02 PM

How restrictive are factory exhaust manifolds? (ie. on a Holden V8).

I can't decide whether or not to fit extractors to my hatchback (running a good 'ol 253). I know a lot of extractor manufacturer's claim both power gains as well as less fuel usage - obviously this comes down to just how restrictive the standard manifolds are.... I'm sure some cars would be a lot worse than others, so what do people think about the Holden V8 ones???

#2 _JBM_

_JBM_
  • Guests

Posted 30 June 2006 - 09:33 PM

An exhaust is only as restrictive as the narrowest part.

If you put in extractors you may not get any benefit if you retain the restrictive mufflers.

Get the entire system working well.

The factory cast headers are rough "as cast" finish inside and create turbulent gas flow inside them. Pipe headers are smooth inside.

Tri Y extractors are good for low rev power and torque while 4-1 extractors are good for high revs.

Choose the extractor type that suits your usage, the cam rev range and inlet manifold type.

The factory headers have short unequal length runners, which can hinder the exiting of the gases ie if no 1 cylinder fires just before no 5, the gases from no 5 will collide with the gases from no 1 as they move through the header, with longer exhaust runners the gases are further away from the ports before they combine.

Regards James

#3 LXCHEV

LXCHEV

    Lotsa Posts!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,635 posts
  • Name:Brett
  • Location:Melbourne
  • Car:'76 LX - 383 Chev
  • Joined: 08-November 05

Posted 01 July 2006 - 12:09 AM

Hi James, thanks for the input.

Yeah a brand new, free-flowing exhaust system is on the cards, that's why I'm wondering if I should also do the extractors at the same time. (Am thinking just some off the shelf Pacemaker Tri-Y's), going into a twin 2" system.

Has anyone done this on a stock 253 before and noticed any major differences?

#4 TerrA LX

TerrA LX

    Fulcrum Fixture

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,241 posts
  • Location:Sid 'n' knee
  • Joined: 31-May 06

Posted 01 July 2006 - 12:24 AM

exhaust isnt just how un restrictive it is, flow paths and timing of each port (in what order they intercect) and sizing is crutial to torque out put in time with rpm.
what im saying is that open zoomies work on top fuel and tri y works on the street and everything in between. (certine types of motors need more than others)
pacemakers i think would be top shelf.
beware of inferiour products as it does make a difference on which pipes meet where.

done the same job on 253 and if any thing i did notice that it was smoother alround and it did seem a bit pokier.

Edited by ALX76, 01 July 2006 - 12:25 AM.


#5 Peter UC

Peter UC

    Forum Fixture

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 771 posts
  • Location:Emerald Vic
  • Joined: 08-November 05

Posted 01 July 2006 - 01:30 PM

With the extractors I would recomend 1 1/2 inch primaries instead of the 1 5/8 on the 308 extractors. Twin 2" sounds ideal.

#6 LS1LX

LS1LX

    Forum Fixture

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,931 posts
  • Location:Sydney
  • Joined: 22-November 05

Posted 02 July 2006 - 06:07 PM

With a 253 id wouldnt waste my time with extractors, run stock manifolds if its a stock motor, into twin 2" system or single 2.5"

#7 LXCHEV

LXCHEV

    Lotsa Posts!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,635 posts
  • Name:Brett
  • Location:Melbourne
  • Car:'76 LX - 383 Chev
  • Joined: 08-November 05

Posted 03 July 2006 - 12:37 AM

I'm not sure how long the engine will remain stock for though. At a minimum, it is about to cop a 4 barrel intake, quaddy, and electronic dizzy. (Currently running 2 barrel strommy, and points dizzy).

With these mods alone, do you think extractors would then be more beneficial, or still not worth the effort?

#8 TerrA LX

TerrA LX

    Fulcrum Fixture

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,241 posts
  • Location:Sid 'n' knee
  • Joined: 31-May 06

Posted 03 July 2006 - 12:54 AM

imho you wont look back with a decent set of extractors.

#9 Struggler

Struggler

    Forum Fixture

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,426 posts
  • Name:Andrew or AJ
  • Location:Canberra A.C.T.
  • Car:UC Sedan
  • Joined: 08-November 05

Posted 03 July 2006 - 10:00 AM

FWIW many years ago I had a VH S/LE C/dore with a 308, tri and 2.60 rear. It was dead stock. I fitted a set of extractors and it was the worst thing I could of done. Torque and fuel efficiency went on holiday below 2000 rpm, were this thing spent most of its time (due to the highway gearing).

A few years later I had another VH S/LE, this one was a 308 (Crane 276 and Performer intake), M21 4 speed and 3.08 rear. I drove it around with the fresh engine and manifolds with a 2.5" single for about a year and was quite happy. I scored a set of extractors and despite my previous experience fitted them. As this motor cruised at about 2200rpm it seemed to like the new setup. Economy even improved slightly but the performance increase was hardly noticable.

As the 253 is a bit smaller in capacity I would assume that the point of beneficial returns would be a bit higher in the rev range.

I might also add that the extractors made the engine noise a bit louder in the cabin.

#10 LS1LX

LS1LX

    Forum Fixture

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,931 posts
  • Location:Sydney
  • Joined: 22-November 05

Posted 03 July 2006 - 06:03 PM

The more standard you leave a 253 the better, at the end of the day you'll spend another $2-3k on it and in reality it may feel so much quicker and better but your only going to pick up 20-30hp from all those bolt ons, and 20-30HP on a 150HP engine still isnt enough.

Save the performance stuff for the SBC's, the lil 253 is going to drink the same amount of fuel as the same spec 308. Id rather drop a stock/mild $3000 308 in instead.

#11 gtrboyy

gtrboyy

    Lotsa Posts!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,235 posts
  • Location:SYDNEY,NSW
  • Joined: 07-November 05

Posted 03 July 2006 - 11:14 PM

When my brother had his 253 vh SLE we put extractors/exhaust on it which made it sound better but didn't give it any noticeable difference in performance,it even seemed to use a little more fuel.Having a 2.60 rear end didnt help much either.Another mate's 253 SLE had 3.08 gears,small cam,more compression & it was better on petrol but not that much quicker.

#12 _MAWLER_

_MAWLER_
  • Guests

Posted 04 July 2006 - 04:32 PM

I agree, you're not going to get much improvement out of a 253 by just adding extractors. Fuel consumption may go up, it may go down, but not enough to be noticibly worried about being able to afford running costs. In the end the car is a daily cruiser and its not really about loads of performance but cool factor so I say put em on anyway cos it will make it sound heaps tougher, especially with twin pipes out the back!

Cheers,

#13 _LHoon_

_LHoon_
  • Guests

Posted 04 July 2006 - 05:35 PM

Step 1. Leave the 253 stock standard
Step 2. Get the Pacemakers and good free flowing exhaust.
Step 3. Drop in a fresh 308 at a later stage, and take full advantage of the exhaust system.

#14 LXCHEV

LXCHEV

    Lotsa Posts!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,635 posts
  • Name:Brett
  • Location:Melbourne
  • Car:'76 LX - 383 Chev
  • Joined: 08-November 05

Posted 04 July 2006 - 11:42 PM

Thanks for all the latest replies and opinions guys, some very informative stuff.

It's funny you mention that LHoon - I've decided to start looking around for a 308 to replace the 2fluffy!!! Even though the 2fluffy runs like a dream and is tuned all nicely, it's just so thirsty on fuel. I put it down to the fact that I have to work it so much to cruise around, whereas with a 308, the extra torque would move the car a lot easier.

I've been speaking to a few mates, some of which run very mild 308's backed up with manual's and they get better fuel economy than my stock 253. One car in particular makes 160 rwKw too. But a big factor in his excellent economy is the fact he's running a Supra 5 speed. That car runs 13's too.

So I am officially on the lookout for a nice stock to mild 308. The more I think about now, I can't wait! I don't want to spend more than 2K all up, running in the car. I already have a Bosch elec dizzy and a good quaddy ready to go. The hunting begins....

As for the exhaust - well I'm still undecided. I might even keep the stock manifolds for now and when the 308 goes in, see how it goes. At a minimum I'm going to replace the original system itself, esp the mufflers. Will see what happens.

Cheers again.

#15 makka

makka

    A m��se once bit my sister

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,559 posts
  • Name:Cohen
  • Location:ya daughters place
  • Joined: 08-November 05

Posted 05 July 2006 - 11:35 AM

the bug has bitten again hasnt it Brett!

#16 LXCHEV

LXCHEV

    Lotsa Posts!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,635 posts
  • Name:Brett
  • Location:Melbourne
  • Car:'76 LX - 383 Chev
  • Joined: 08-November 05

Posted 05 July 2006 - 11:39 AM

Yeah I went and saw Tokyo Drift last night with our car club, and afterwards I was having a good chat with a few of the boys, and somehow the conversation ended with me now wanting a 308! I AM KEEN YEAH BABY.

#17 _MAWLER_

_MAWLER_
  • Guests

Posted 05 July 2006 - 05:38 PM

Gee Wiz, there's no stopping you! What is it you have for breakfast, cos I'm staying well away from it! Mind you, a 308 would be cool :spoton:

#18 LXCHEV

LXCHEV

    Lotsa Posts!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,635 posts
  • Name:Brett
  • Location:Melbourne
  • Car:'76 LX - 383 Chev
  • Joined: 08-November 05

Posted 05 July 2006 - 06:17 PM

A 308 would be WAY COOL!

Today I had a Mars Bar for breakfast actually, now it's all GO GO GO!!!

Come on Liam, don't be shy, you know you want to 308 your daily ride, don't deny yourself the POWER, you owe it to the torry!!! You owe it to yourself!!!

#19 LS1LX

LS1LX

    Forum Fixture

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,931 posts
  • Location:Sydney
  • Joined: 22-November 05

Posted 05 July 2006 - 06:43 PM

I told you, everyone tries sticking to the 253's but eventually they give in to a 308.
Everything is a straight swap.

If your going to be using 18L/100kms might as well have a 308 instead of a 253. Nothing worse then a car that loves a drink but has no performance.

Now just dont get carried away and turn that 308 into a 355 or 383, thats the next thing that worries us.

#20 LXCHEV

LXCHEV

    Lotsa Posts!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,635 posts
  • Name:Brett
  • Location:Melbourne
  • Car:'76 LX - 383 Chev
  • Joined: 08-November 05

Posted 05 July 2006 - 07:10 PM

Hmmmmmm.... 383 ....... !!! hahahahaha. It could be done. A 383 in my weekender, and a 383 in my daily!

NO WAY. 308 and no more! I will restrain myself, I promise ;)

#21 _LHoon_

_LHoon_
  • Guests

Posted 05 July 2006 - 10:13 PM

You get much better resale value with a 308 if you ever decide to sell the car as well.

Thought about a straight LPG setup for the 5L Brett? It would make a nice ecconomical daily.

#22 _chevy_253_torana_

_chevy_253_torana_
  • Guests

Posted 05 July 2006 - 10:31 PM

mate i reckon stay with the 253 do up a cheap little hot motor just bump the compression ratio right up change the rod bolts whack on a 4 barrell carby and a big cam try and get something like makkas magnificant 253 screamer that does 7rpm

:D a couple of weeks ago i got the privelige to experience/ witness the engines capabilities but we went up to 6 but goes good and hard for a 253 ^_^ cheers chevy

#23 TerrA LX

TerrA LX

    Fulcrum Fixture

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,241 posts
  • Location:Sid 'n' knee
  • Joined: 31-May 06

Posted 05 July 2006 - 11:01 PM

if you driving a staty with a/c n p/s ill say go the 308 but if its a torry and your not happy with it as a daily then there is something wrong with your 253.

#24 _jabba_

_jabba_
  • Guests

Posted 06 July 2006 - 12:00 AM

253's arnt as bad as people make out, they sound nice and go well with 308 manifold + 4barrel + extractors. Im happy with my 253 in my hq, goes fine with the a/c on aswell (not a delco compressor tho :P). The worst part of my setup is the fact that im running a 3 sp manual on the tree, 5sp and then new cam and i think ill be completely happy ;). Fuel econ seems about the same as a 202 when im not driving like an idiot, when thoes seconardys open its a different matter ;).

#25 LXCHEV

LXCHEV

    Lotsa Posts!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,635 posts
  • Name:Brett
  • Location:Melbourne
  • Car:'76 LX - 383 Chev
  • Joined: 08-November 05

Posted 06 July 2006 - 02:43 PM

ALX76 - I can't say that I'm unhappy with the 253 - it runs like a dream and is making good power for a stock 253, however it does use a lot of fuel, and it just does not have the grunt of a 308. In particular, when overtaking, or trying to pull out of somewhere quickly, or trying to tow a heavy trailer behind it, this is when the lack of power really shows.

LHoon - I had thought about LPG, but have since decided against it. Simply because I don't want the hassle of mounting a gas tank in the hatchback. I use my hatchback a lot, and it's excellent having so much storage space, so I don't want to take away the practicality of that by having a gas tank taking up so much room.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users