
Standard Exhaust Manifolds vs Extractors
#1
Posted 30 June 2006 - 04:02 PM
I can't decide whether or not to fit extractors to my hatchback (running a good 'ol 253). I know a lot of extractor manufacturer's claim both power gains as well as less fuel usage - obviously this comes down to just how restrictive the standard manifolds are.... I'm sure some cars would be a lot worse than others, so what do people think about the Holden V8 ones???
#2
_JBM_
Posted 30 June 2006 - 09:33 PM
If you put in extractors you may not get any benefit if you retain the restrictive mufflers.
Get the entire system working well.
The factory cast headers are rough "as cast" finish inside and create turbulent gas flow inside them. Pipe headers are smooth inside.
Tri Y extractors are good for low rev power and torque while 4-1 extractors are good for high revs.
Choose the extractor type that suits your usage, the cam rev range and inlet manifold type.
The factory headers have short unequal length runners, which can hinder the exiting of the gases ie if no 1 cylinder fires just before no 5, the gases from no 5 will collide with the gases from no 1 as they move through the header, with longer exhaust runners the gases are further away from the ports before they combine.
Regards James
#3
Posted 01 July 2006 - 12:09 AM
Yeah a brand new, free-flowing exhaust system is on the cards, that's why I'm wondering if I should also do the extractors at the same time. (Am thinking just some off the shelf Pacemaker Tri-Y's), going into a twin 2" system.
Has anyone done this on a stock 253 before and noticed any major differences?
#4
Posted 01 July 2006 - 12:24 AM
what im saying is that open zoomies work on top fuel and tri y works on the street and everything in between. (certine types of motors need more than others)
pacemakers i think would be top shelf.
beware of inferiour products as it does make a difference on which pipes meet where.
done the same job on 253 and if any thing i did notice that it was smoother alround and it did seem a bit pokier.
Edited by ALX76, 01 July 2006 - 12:25 AM.
#5
Posted 01 July 2006 - 01:30 PM
#6
Posted 02 July 2006 - 06:07 PM
#7
Posted 03 July 2006 - 12:37 AM
With these mods alone, do you think extractors would then be more beneficial, or still not worth the effort?
#8
Posted 03 July 2006 - 12:54 AM
#9
Posted 03 July 2006 - 10:00 AM
A few years later I had another VH S/LE, this one was a 308 (Crane 276 and Performer intake), M21 4 speed and 3.08 rear. I drove it around with the fresh engine and manifolds with a 2.5" single for about a year and was quite happy. I scored a set of extractors and despite my previous experience fitted them. As this motor cruised at about 2200rpm it seemed to like the new setup. Economy even improved slightly but the performance increase was hardly noticable.
As the 253 is a bit smaller in capacity I would assume that the point of beneficial returns would be a bit higher in the rev range.
I might also add that the extractors made the engine noise a bit louder in the cabin.
#10
Posted 03 July 2006 - 06:03 PM
Save the performance stuff for the SBC's, the lil 253 is going to drink the same amount of fuel as the same spec 308. Id rather drop a stock/mild $3000 308 in instead.
#11
Posted 03 July 2006 - 11:14 PM
#12
_MAWLER_
Posted 04 July 2006 - 04:32 PM
Cheers,
#13
_LHoon_
Posted 04 July 2006 - 05:35 PM
Step 2. Get the Pacemakers and good free flowing exhaust.
Step 3. Drop in a fresh 308 at a later stage, and take full advantage of the exhaust system.
#14
Posted 04 July 2006 - 11:42 PM
It's funny you mention that LHoon - I've decided to start looking around for a 308 to replace the 2fluffy!!! Even though the 2fluffy runs like a dream and is tuned all nicely, it's just so thirsty on fuel. I put it down to the fact that I have to work it so much to cruise around, whereas with a 308, the extra torque would move the car a lot easier.
I've been speaking to a few mates, some of which run very mild 308's backed up with manual's and they get better fuel economy than my stock 253. One car in particular makes 160 rwKw too. But a big factor in his excellent economy is the fact he's running a Supra 5 speed. That car runs 13's too.
So I am officially on the lookout for a nice stock to mild 308. The more I think about now, I can't wait! I don't want to spend more than 2K all up, running in the car. I already have a Bosch elec dizzy and a good quaddy ready to go. The hunting begins....
As for the exhaust - well I'm still undecided. I might even keep the stock manifolds for now and when the 308 goes in, see how it goes. At a minimum I'm going to replace the original system itself, esp the mufflers. Will see what happens.
Cheers again.
#15
Posted 05 July 2006 - 11:35 AM
#16
Posted 05 July 2006 - 11:39 AM
#17
_MAWLER_
Posted 05 July 2006 - 05:38 PM

#18
Posted 05 July 2006 - 06:17 PM
Today I had a Mars Bar for breakfast actually, now it's all GO GO GO!!!
Come on Liam, don't be shy, you know you want to 308 your daily ride, don't deny yourself the POWER, you owe it to the torry!!! You owe it to yourself!!!
#19
Posted 05 July 2006 - 06:43 PM
Everything is a straight swap.
If your going to be using 18L/100kms might as well have a 308 instead of a 253. Nothing worse then a car that loves a drink but has no performance.
Now just dont get carried away and turn that 308 into a 355 or 383, thats the next thing that worries us.
#20
Posted 05 July 2006 - 07:10 PM
NO WAY. 308 and no more! I will restrain myself, I promise

#21
_LHoon_
Posted 05 July 2006 - 10:13 PM
Thought about a straight LPG setup for the 5L Brett? It would make a nice ecconomical daily.
#22
_chevy_253_torana_
Posted 05 July 2006 - 10:31 PM


#23
Posted 05 July 2006 - 11:01 PM
#24
_jabba_
Posted 06 July 2006 - 12:00 AM



#25
Posted 06 July 2006 - 02:43 PM
LHoon - I had thought about LPG, but have since decided against it. Simply because I don't want the hassle of mounting a gas tank in the hatchback. I use my hatchback a lot, and it's excellent having so much storage space, so I don't want to take away the practicality of that by having a gas tank taking up so much room.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users