rochester on a 253
#1
Posted 09 March 2009 - 08:54 PM
Is a rochester too big for a mild 253 v8, reason i ask is that i am having trouble tuning the carby
Does any one know what jets etc i should be using
The car just isn't responsive in 3rd or 4th gear.
any advice?
thanks
#2
Posted 10 March 2009 - 11:25 AM
#3 _Herne_
Posted 10 March 2009 - 11:58 AM
I did run the quaddy on my 253 and found it to be ok. I changed engines before I got to swapping the carby.
Herne
#4 _clinto_
Posted 10 March 2009 - 01:57 PM
I know next to nothing about tuning carbs, so take this with a grain of salt:
I found that when i swapped the two barrel + standard intake manifold off my 253 for a edelbrock performer + quaddy (with spacer/adapter) that i lost torque down low. It did however gain a fair bit top end responsiveness and ability to rev. Thats how things felt by the seat of my pants.
Cheers,
Clint
#5
Posted 10 March 2009 - 05:54 PM
#6
Posted 13 March 2009 - 03:10 PM
#7
Posted 13 March 2009 - 03:22 PM
Run AN secondary metering rods, they are standard 308 rods, make sure that the secondayr flaps have a bit of tension on them or else it will bog down.
#8
Posted 13 March 2009 - 06:52 PM
Holley was marginally quicker off the mark.
Quaddy was marginally better mid range.
Couldnt really check top end but in lower gears there wasnt anything in it.
Big difference was fuel usage.
Opinion at time was quaddy was too much carb for 253.
Ended with both cars with 350 Holley
#9 _Herne_
Posted 13 March 2009 - 07:01 PM
Did a comparison years ago with a quadrajet and a 350 Holley. Both cars were VB 253 manuals.
Holley was marginally quicker off the mark.
Quaddy was marginally better mid range.
Couldnt really check top end but in lower gears there wasnt anything in it.
Big difference was fuel usage.
Opinion at time was quaddy was too much carb for 253.
Ended with both cars with 350 Holley
Pity you didn't try a Holley 465, would have been interesting to compare the results.
Herne
#10
Posted 13 March 2009 - 08:41 PM
Pity you didn't try a Holley 465, would have been interesting to compare the results.
Herne
I did.
Both were set up for the motor with jetting and metering, mild 253, throated heads and cam to match.
There was not much in it by way of seat of the pants or speed in each gear but the holley was noticeably crisper so the holley went back on.
My personal preference is for the holley, for the ease of jet selection etc etc etc as the rochester is a pain to reset the float and chasing metering rods can be hard.
Edited by ALX76, 13 March 2009 - 08:42 PM.
#11
Posted 13 March 2009 - 09:17 PM
#12
Posted 13 March 2009 - 09:25 PM
#13
Posted 13 March 2009 - 09:47 PM
#14
Posted 14 March 2009 - 07:21 PM
Admittedly the Holley is a lot easier to tune and ultimately will make more power in some applications but the Q jet is a great street and mild race carb.
As for the 253 applications, you just need to tighten up the sec. air flap tension to get it to work properly on the small engine. Get Purple LC to reco it for you and let him know its for a 253, it will be unbeatable.
JMHO
#15
Posted 14 March 2009 - 09:10 PM
#16 _purpleLC_
Posted 14 March 2009 - 11:01 PM
Hi Guys,
Is a rochester too big for a mild 253 v8, reason i ask is that i am having trouble tuning the carby
Does any one know what jets etc i should be using
The car just isn't responsive in 3rd or 4th gear.
any advice?
thanks
Give me a call on Monday if you like, 0418278487 and Im sure we can sort out the
quaddy.
Cheers Louie
#17 _torana_49_
Posted 15 March 2009 - 02:29 PM
now thats some power, but i havnt touched the setting on it besides the idle screw
Edited by torana_49, 15 March 2009 - 02:30 PM.
#18
Posted 15 March 2009 - 06:48 PM
the amount of air that gets into the motor is massive, the engine idles at around 900 - 1,000rpm, and thats even with NO idle screw LOL
You realise something is wrong? Don't you?
#19 _@milco@_
Posted 19 March 2009 - 11:14 PM
You realise something is wrong? Don't you?
LOL
#20
Posted 20 March 2009 - 10:44 AM
#21
Posted 20 March 2009 - 04:33 PM
what about this weekend sometime?
tony
#22
Posted 20 March 2009 - 04:37 PM
#23
Posted 21 March 2009 - 11:34 AM
#24 _waratah_
Posted 25 March 2009 - 05:11 PM
went 650 dp, had nothing down low and after a thrash less, but frack she pulled hard up high!!!
i'd reccomend the 600 vac but if your standard 253,standard exhaust and such the rochester would suit!!
#25
Posted 26 March 2009 - 12:00 AM
Still with us T?PM sent
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users