Most powerful torana (standard)
#51 _Torana482HP_
Posted 12 January 2006 - 09:51 PM
Horsepower all comes from the heads, if the heads can flow the airflow, then you match a carby and camshaft and exhaust to the head and whammo, MAX POWER.
im getting a fully worked 308 and the heads flow upto 482HP (hence my name) and with my engine setup, im aiming for around 450 - 470. when my mate first owned that engine before the rebuild, he was pumpin about 470HP.
heads on a standard 308 would only flow about 260HP.
So anyway, the A9X must have had good heads to get upto 400HP, i dont think race teams were allowed to do any modifications to the standard heads. Thats what the redco development team was for.
#52
Posted 12 January 2006 - 09:51 PM
As changed in the quote.Ok, i just had another quick read of my "how to rebuild and hotrod holden v8" book, ( awesome book i reccomend everyone to buy a copy, best book i have.
anyways heres some quotes and information.
I borrowed this book from a a mate at work before Christmas, we had a very good laugh at some of the crap written in it about L34 and A9X.
"Early testing of the (standard) L34 engine on the dynomometer proved that the engine was on the right track. Horse power varied between 300 and 320 horsepower and the engine would successfully rev to 7000 rpm."
Thats not standard, thats an engine, out of the car on a bench dyno at Repco.
5.0 litre - red option L34 High Performance Package
Blah Blah Blah
Power output : 260kW (350 bhp) @ 6000 rpm
Torque : 400Nm (544lbs/ft) @ 3000 rpm
Read above, High Performance package
"A9X power specifications were not released to the public as it was deemed that public opinion would be negative to a registered road car suitable for race team development for the race track. This was similar to the L34 high output option for the LH. (CRAP)
The standard A9X engine was the blue block (SINCE WHEN WAS IT A BLUE BLOCK????? AS I SAID THE BOOK IS FULL OF SHIT) with performance heads (BULLSHIT), modified intake manifold (BULLSHIT), ignition as on the L34 (BULLSHIT) and an exhaust system similar to the L34 (MORE BULLSHIT). The A9X was a better handling car than the LH, due to "radial tuned suspension".
Touring car racing and bathurst homologation allowed A9X Toranas to run the L34 ngine and L34 improvements. Race teams worked on the fuel and exhaust systems and eventually increased the horsepower to 395 - 400."
Well looks like the A9X did have modified heads and should have gone just as hard as the L34. There are no A9X power figures in this book, only the L34 HO.
AGAIN THIS BOOK IS FULL OF IT
Race teams didn't just tune, carby exhaust and cam. I think you need to do a little reading back. The A9X engine was basically stock. What it had over a 5l SS or 5000 af the same Polution specs was a different cam, and no engine driven fan.
The L34 had a list of parts designed to make the engine stronger, and capable to be prepared by a race team within the rules for racing purposes. As I said, there is no doubt at all, these changes would make a stock L34 go harder , but the way Holden built the cars from the factory, the difference wasn't that great, and the 0-100 and quarter mile times of the day prove that.
You have to understand Holden was in the business of making money, they did as little as they had to to make the cars racable within the rules of the day, thats why the A9X didn't need a shit hot engine, they had homolgated that with the L34, all they needed was a decent diff, gearbox and brakes. They got that with the A9X. Anyway, the original arguemant was what had more power, a stock SS 5l or aa A9X, and as I said before, you have to compare cars of the same pollution specs, so the SS would have to be an ADR27A car, simple as that.
Well thats enough typing for tonight.
Edited by REDA9X, 12 January 2006 - 09:55 PM.
#53 _Torana482HP_
Posted 12 January 2006 - 09:55 PM
#54
Posted 12 January 2006 - 09:58 PM
Edited by REDA9X, 12 January 2006 - 09:59 PM.
#55 _Torana482HP_
Posted 12 January 2006 - 10:02 PM
Well red, u own an a9x, so i think you would probably know best.
Catcha mate.
#56
Posted 12 January 2006 - 10:10 PM
#57 _Torana482HP_
Posted 12 January 2006 - 10:21 PM
Most of the reading i do is engine/car performance building, that 308 book has some good info in it and me turbo 350 handbook taught me a shitload about autos - didnt have a clue how they worked before i read that.
I was hanging out last night to get the new AMC issue but they didnt have it at the supermarket, they only stock ricer mags.
#58
Posted 12 January 2006 - 10:27 PM
#59 _Torana482HP_
Posted 12 January 2006 - 10:29 PM
#60 _dave720gtr_
Posted 16 January 2006 - 07:39 PM
Reading reda9x coments i don,t know there seems to be a contradiction here
In 1974 i could go in to one of 4 gmh dealerships in sydney if i had a cams licence i could order a L34 with all the hot gear ie HO hi output pack. remember
This is only a hoted up SLR5000 and drive away .Now these L34s with the HO pack where alot faster than the SLR5000 . you can,t compare them I owned a
SLR5000 in 1986-93 dead stock from factory. Ait nd a mate at the time had a L34-HO
yer with all the good gear from holden parts divisions. genuine and it shit all over
my slr5000
My point is. Could you go in two holden when the A9X or SS came out and get the same HO pack as the L34 if knot then in my mind i think L34 is the quickest ?
YOU GUY,S REALLY GET STUCK INTO SOME OF THESE TOPICS :
#61 _Torana482HP_
Posted 16 January 2006 - 07:55 PM
yeah it was a good discussion i reckon.
dont think you could get a "HO" pack for the a9x, it was a l34 special.
#62
Posted 16 January 2006 - 08:47 PM
As has been said over and over, a stock L34. HO pack was NOT a factory fitted item, it was a Dealer option, and $1500 at the time was alot of money. To answer your question, NO, the HO pack was not allowed to be fitted to the A9X as it was against the ADR's of the day. A letter was even sent out to the dealers in 78 stating HO packs were not to be fitted for this reason. Apparently some dealers had been fitting them, so there may be some A9X's or even HX's etc with HO kits fitted by dealers.Hay i just read this from start to finnish and i thought oldschool was right but after
Reading reda9x coments i don,t know there seems to be a contradiction here
In 1974 i could go in to one of 4 gmh dealerships in sydney if i had a cams licence i could order a L34 with all the hot gear ie HO hi output pack. remember
This is only a hoted up SLR5000 and drive away .Now these L34s with the HO pack where alot faster than the SLR5000 . you can,t compare them I owned a
SLR5000 in 1986-93 dead stock from factory. Ait nd a mate at the time had a L34-HO
yer with all the good gear from holden parts divisions. genuine and it shit all over
my slr5000
My point is. Could you go in two holden when the A9X or SS came out and get the same HO pack as the L34 if knot then in my mind i think L34 is the quickest ?
YOU GUY,S REALLY GET STUCK INTO SOME OF THESE TOPICS :
#63 _Yella SLuR_
Posted 17 January 2006 - 09:58 AM
Doesn't surprise me that an LH L31 SL/R 5000 pasted the L34, remember the L34 development was aimed at greater reliability rather than outright speed. The L31 first release was one of the General's lemons reliability wise. 1974 was a bad season for the new cars.
I've swapped Trevor a drive for the L34 while he drove mine. We both agreed after getting out of the cars, that they were remarkably similar to drive, so very little noticable difference between the two. We gave them bit of a basting on a windy road up in the mountains.
Don't get overly excited about L34 heads. The valves are only like 20-30% bigger than standard. Yella Terra Stage 3 on the other hand are like twice the size of standard.
Just to clarify, the L34 engine was homologated with CAMS, maybe even by Harry Firth, to run in the A9X race cars.
#64 _oldschool_
Posted 17 January 2006 - 12:38 PM
u must have a fairly warm 5000 or your mate must have a fairly sad l34 if they performed the same on a drive!
#65 _Yella SLuR_
Posted 17 January 2006 - 01:56 PM
Edited by Yella SLuR, 17 January 2006 - 02:00 PM.
#66 _Yella SLuR_
Posted 17 January 2006 - 03:25 PM
#67
Posted 17 January 2006 - 04:04 PM
Edited by REDA9X, 17 January 2006 - 04:05 PM.
#68 _Torana482HP_
Posted 17 January 2006 - 04:37 PM
Yeah come to think of it, me mrs' old mans L34 that he owned had HO option - holley carb + race camshaft, thats probably why it went better.
#69 _purpleLC_
Posted 17 January 2006 - 05:53 PM
you could buy from them?
Louie
#70 _oldschool_
Posted 17 January 2006 - 06:31 PM
#71
Posted 17 January 2006 - 06:44 PM
#72 _Torana482HP_
Posted 17 January 2006 - 06:54 PM
#73
Posted 17 January 2006 - 07:06 PM
Where did you hear about Bill Patterson Pack A9X's?Red, what options were fitted on the "Bill Paterson Pack" A9X's
you could buy from them?
Louie
A9X had 2.60 and 3.08 ratio diffs only.
#74 _purpleLC_
Posted 17 January 2006 - 07:16 PM
was modifying them at the time, and also seeing one,
it was a 2 door A9X , lowered all round with big wheels, roll cage
and big exhaust, being driven around by an elder gentelman.
And this is when it was new, not some years later.
Louie
#75 _Yella SLuR_
Posted 17 January 2006 - 08:05 PM
That's the other part of the equation, you can have all the HP you want, but it's only as fast as the person driving the car at the time, unless your driving in a straight line.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users