tyre fryer, I'm in W.A and the cam is taken. At the time I was deciding on a cam upgrade I spoke with Sam(?) out at C.O.M E. They can probably help/ confirm the suitability of such a cam for you application.
Sammy, I understand where your comming from.
Without listing the 202 specs. I would put the motor build just ahead of the one put together for the Street Machine article "Grunt Hunt" which has come up in threads before. They used the CROW 35667 cam and got 166rwhp with stock VK efi and aftermarket fuel only computer. If I can move current torque higher up the rev range (~5300RPM) this should give me around 170rwhp.
Hopefully the precedent for this cam also applies to my build. I'll let you know how it goes.
suitable cam for mild 202.
Started by
_tyre fryer_
, Oct 16 2007 05:54 PM
26 replies to this topic
#26
MustardGTR
-
- Members
-
- 243 posts
Forum Member
- Location:Western Australia
- Car:72 GTR, 73 GTR
- Joined: 16-March 07
Posted 30 October 2007 - 10:25 PM
#27
_Sammy_
_Sammy_
-
- Guests
Posted 31 October 2007 - 02:09 PM
my guess is turbo 700 gearbox, commodore brakes and axles make a good start to the extra weighthaha. must be something a little extra added to the car. ohwell. that's equivelant to a big 'friend. still like 600 odd kilos less than an ss VE.
anyway, mustardGTR let me know, sounds like a good little street cam.
i dunno my opinion is you really need the head work to get the power ... most the rest of it doesn't contribute as much!
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
