Supra 5 speed HP limit
#1 _TORANR AMORE_
Posted 17 February 2006 - 09:43 AM
I have read a few different things and have also been told different things. I have been told things btw 200 to 300HP but I have also heard about people using stock supra 5 speeds behind V8's that generate more than 350HP.
I just read some stuff from another site, the link is in the other thread:
http://www.gmh-toran...t=0
which is:
http://users.tpg.com.../gearboxes.html
Which talk about HP figures which are a lot lower still.
So now I'm a little confused about the practicality of using one of these behind a 308, (mild or worked). Especially when dumping the clutch may become a daily exercise.
#2 _Sammy_
Posted 17 February 2006 - 01:11 PM
either way i thought figures were something like 300Nm for the celica an 350Nm for the supra, or 250 and 300 ... can't remember.
also, i can tell you from experience, dumbing the clutch is going to kill stuff no matter what box you have i reckon .... i have a celica behind a 202 and i blew a box up from burnouts etc ....
Edited by Sammy, 17 February 2006 - 01:12 PM.
#3 _lxhatch_jim_
Posted 17 February 2006 - 05:43 PM
http://users.tpg.com.../gearboxes.html
Cheers
Jim
#4 _Baronvonrort_
Posted 17 February 2006 - 06:03 PM
228 rwhp on the Ford Muscle Parts dyno and 430nm....I am told the FMP dyno reads lower than others and my 265 injected hemi put out more hp+nm than GT spec 351's.
I did some burnouts and 2nd and 3rd gear drifts out of some corners...
The box is now in a Turbo 13b RX 7 and the owner is very happy with it.
The w57 is so much stronger than a M21 or T5 but lacks the pose value for bar room bs.
#5 _Baronvonrort_
Posted 17 February 2006 - 11:50 PM
It is the ONLY gearbox they are allowed to use and they run a pretty warm 253V8 for the engine.
They used VB-VH commodores and now run the VS.
If anyone has a CAMS rulebook they can look it up.
#6
Posted 18 February 2006 - 11:28 AM
However if you've ever watched a C C race and seen how close it is, you can imagine the torture the boxes have to withstand. A bit different to driving on the street.
#7 _Baronvonrort_
Posted 18 February 2006 - 05:59 PM
#8
Posted 19 February 2006 - 08:58 PM
I don't want to argue , I just want to make sure nobody else reads something that isn't correct.
I also don't want to bag the Supra 5 speed, they are an ace gearbox to use, really nice ratios and fairly strong. I've got one myself behind a 308 in a VC Commodore. However in full racing conditions, they do have their weaknesses.
I wouldn't hesitate to recomend it to anyone behind a mild 308, and I'm interested to hear from anybody running them behind big HP engines.
#9 _Torana482HP_
Posted 20 February 2006 - 06:20 PM
2. I wouldnt even trust a celica box behind a 173.
3. standard 308 pumps around 427 Nm
4. Tremec!
5. Auto will do for now, funds are tight at the moment.
#10 _70rey_
Posted 20 February 2006 - 08:15 PM
there is the w57 which is goor for about 300hp
and then there is the r154 box alot better and if its out of the right car itll be able to handle about 500 hp...
all depending upon torque... but yer a good r154 will set u back around 1500...
#11 _bango_
Posted 22 February 2006 - 08:11 AM
#12
Posted 22 February 2006 - 11:07 AM
#13
Posted 25 February 2006 - 12:29 AM
I tend to load it up in 1st 2nd and 4th but not in 3rd and dont even think about loading it up in 5th. 3rd is where you get heaps of torque and 4th is direct drive which will probably take 1000hp
#14 _big chris_
Posted 28 February 2006 - 11:01 PM
This might help
another link,
Toyota Engine Specs,
http://www.abautos.c...cs/engines.html
Give torque and kw.
Cheers
Chris.
#15 _LC2250_
Posted 01 March 2006 - 04:28 PM
I'm not sure if I've missed something here but whats the big difference between the supra and celica boxes? are the celica boxes just a hell of a lot weaker? are they as adaptable to the holden 6's as the supra boxes or what?
Cheers
-Al
#16 _lexa_
Posted 01 March 2006 - 05:16 PM
#17 _Bomber Watson_
Posted 01 March 2006 - 07:06 PM
#18 _LC2250_
Posted 01 March 2006 - 09:02 PM
-Al
#19 _lexa_
Posted 01 March 2006 - 09:08 PM
#20 _Bomber Watson_
Posted 01 March 2006 - 09:19 PM
and to answer the " worse than my $80 m20?" question, probably about on par, perhaps a tiny bit stronger.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users