Jump to content


Supra 5 speed HP limit


  • Please log in to reply
19 replies to this topic

#1 _TORANR AMORE_

_TORANR AMORE_
  • Guests

Posted 17 February 2006 - 09:43 AM

How much power can a standard Supra 5 speed take? approximately.

I have read a few different things and have also been told different things. I have been told things btw 200 to 300HP but I have also heard about people using stock supra 5 speeds behind V8's that generate more than 350HP.

I just read some stuff from another site, the link is in the other thread:
http://www.gmh-toran...t=0
which is:
http://users.tpg.com.../gearboxes.html
Which talk about HP figures which are a lot lower still.

So now I'm a little confused about the practicality of using one of these behind a 308, (mild or worked). Especially when dumping the clutch may become a daily exercise.

#2 _Sammy_

_Sammy_
  • Guests

Posted 17 February 2006 - 01:11 PM

well i wasn't aware they were measured by HP i thought they were measure by how much torque they could handle ....

either way i thought figures were something like 300Nm for the celica an 350Nm for the supra, or 250 and 300 ... can't remember.

also, i can tell you from experience, dumbing the clutch is going to kill stuff no matter what box you have i reckon .... i have a celica behind a 202 and i blew a box up from burnouts etc ....

Edited by Sammy, 17 February 2006 - 01:12 PM.


#3 _lxhatch_jim_

_lxhatch_jim_
  • Guests

Posted 17 February 2006 - 05:43 PM

This website has some good info about all supra boxes with a few HP figures quoted.

http://users.tpg.com.../gearboxes.html

Cheers
Jim

#4 _Baronvonrort_

_Baronvonrort_
  • Guests

Posted 17 February 2006 - 06:03 PM

I had a w57 supra box in my Torana with a E38 and E49 spec and another performance grind cam hemi 265 in front of it and had no problems with it for 10 years.

228 rwhp on the Ford Muscle Parts dyno and 430nm....I am told the FMP dyno reads lower than others and my 265 injected hemi put out more hp+nm than GT spec 351's.

I did some burnouts and 2nd and 3rd gear drifts out of some corners...

The box is now in a Turbo 13b RX 7 and the owner is very happy with it.

The w57 is so much stronger than a M21 or T5 but lacks the pose value for bar room bs.

#5 _Baronvonrort_

_Baronvonrort_
  • Guests

Posted 17 February 2006 - 11:50 PM

The commodore cup racers have been using the w series supra box for over 5 years and they dont have any problems with the gearbox.

It is the ONLY gearbox they are allowed to use and they run a pretty warm 253V8 for the engine.

They used VB-VH commodores and now run the VS.

If anyone has a CAMS rulebook they can look it up.

#6 micklx

micklx

    Forum Fixture

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,785 posts
  • Name:Mick
  • Location:Frankston South
  • Joined: 18-November 05

Posted 18 February 2006 - 11:28 AM

I think you will find that the Comm. Cup cars have used a Super T10 gearbox for quite a few years now because the Supre boxes weren't reliable enough.
However if you've ever watched a C C race and seen how close it is, you can imagine the torture the boxes have to withstand. A bit different to driving on the street.

#7 _Baronvonrort_

_Baronvonrort_
  • Guests

Posted 18 February 2006 - 05:59 PM

The last few commodore cup cars i have seen have all had the supra 5 speed.

#8 micklx

micklx

    Forum Fixture

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,785 posts
  • Name:Mick
  • Location:Frankston South
  • Joined: 18-November 05

Posted 19 February 2006 - 08:58 PM

Check out www.commodorecup.com and click on regulations, choose either the VC/H or VR/S regs and open them. Scroll down to page 10 from memory and read which gearbox they have to use.

I don't want to argue , I just want to make sure nobody else reads something that isn't correct.

I also don't want to bag the Supra 5 speed, they are an ace gearbox to use, really nice ratios and fairly strong. I've got one myself behind a 308 in a VC Commodore. However in full racing conditions, they do have their weaknesses.

I wouldn't hesitate to recomend it to anyone behind a mild 308, and I'm interested to hear from anybody running them behind big HP engines.

#9 _Torana482HP_

_Torana482HP_
  • Guests

Posted 20 February 2006 - 06:20 PM

1. Torque from a engine is what breaks gear teeth.

2. I wouldnt even trust a celica box behind a 173.

3. standard 308 pumps around 427 Nm

4. Tremec!

5. Auto will do for now, funds are tight at the moment.

#10 _70rey_

_70rey_
  • Guests

Posted 20 February 2006 - 08:15 PM

mate there are two types of supra boxes...

there is the w57 which is goor for about 300hp

and then there is the r154 box alot better and if its out of the right car itll be able to handle about 500 hp...

all depending upon torque... but yer a good r154 will set u back around 1500...

#11 _bango_

_bango_
  • Guests

Posted 22 February 2006 - 08:11 AM

Yeah i hear the R154 can go 500+ Hp

#12 knoath

knoath

    far.... FAR

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,036 posts
  • Location:Melbourne, Northern Subs
  • Joined: 09-November 05

Posted 22 February 2006 - 11:07 AM

Had a supra 5 sp in a UC many moons ago.....wish I had have kept that one... great box for the road.

#13 turbotrana

turbotrana

    Forum Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 155 posts
  • Joined: 03-January 06

Posted 25 February 2006 - 12:29 AM

I use a w57 in my 500rwhp turbo trana. I use 3.55 in the rears to take a bit of load from the box. It will cope with 3-400 rwhp well but over 400 3rd gear will let go after a while.

I tend to load it up in 1st 2nd and 4th but not in 3rd and dont even think about loading it up in 5th. 3rd is where you get heaps of torque and 4th is direct drive which will probably take 1000hp

#14 _big chris_

_big chris_
  • Guests

Posted 28 February 2006 - 11:01 PM

Hey,
This might help
another link,
Toyota Engine Specs,

http://www.abautos.c...cs/engines.html

Give torque and kw.
Cheers
Chris.

#15 _LC2250_

_LC2250_
  • Guests

Posted 01 March 2006 - 04:28 PM

Hope it's not a stupid question ...

I'm not sure if I've missed something here but whats the big difference between the supra and celica boxes? are the celica boxes just a hell of a lot weaker? are they as adaptable to the holden 6's as the supra boxes or what?

Cheers
-Al

#16 _lexa_

_lexa_
  • Guests

Posted 01 March 2006 - 05:16 PM

i think you've got it LC2250 from wat i gather the only difference is the amount of power u can put behind it. and yes they are as adaptable as the supras (someone please correct me if i'm wrong on that one)

#17 _Bomber Watson_

_Bomber Watson_
  • Guests

Posted 01 March 2006 - 07:06 PM

sillycar boxes are just as easy to get conversions for, but they are shit. i wouldent put one behind a stock 202.

#18 _LC2250_

_LC2250_
  • Guests

Posted 01 March 2006 - 09:02 PM

worse than my $80 m20?

-Al

#19 _lexa_

_lexa_
  • Guests

Posted 01 March 2006 - 09:08 PM

wat gearbox are u running bomber?

#20 _Bomber Watson_

_Bomber Watson_
  • Guests

Posted 01 March 2006 - 09:19 PM

m22 atm. looks like i will be getting a supra 5 speed...

and to answer the " worse than my $80 m20?" question, probably about on par, perhaps a tiny bit stronger.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users