could i get an approx cost to do the conversion, and how much would a 253 be worth running condition?
is it worth going 253 or is a 308 a better option?
202 to 253 swap
Started by
_just_matt_
, Nov 21 2005 07:38 PM
5 replies to this topic
#1 _just_matt_
Posted 21 November 2005 - 07:38 PM
#2 _UCV80_
Posted 21 November 2005 - 08:28 PM
might not be worth going for a stock 253 conversion, if your gonna be paying the extra rego and fuel u may as well go up to somthing more powerfull like the 308
bout to bin my pile of v8s, (4x 253's) they probly belong in a dump
-nathan
bout to bin my pile of v8s, (4x 253's) they probly belong in a dump
-nathan
Edited by ToranaZ, 21 November 2005 - 08:28 PM.
#3 _[BOTTLEDUP]_
Posted 21 November 2005 - 09:15 PM
If you can find a decent 308 block, grab one of them 253 cranks and get it offset ground to make a 336 stroker. then run some 283-307 Chev rods and 350 Chev pistons.
They use the 253 crank for its smaller counterwieghts which make balancing easier.
They use the 253 crank for its smaller counterwieghts which make balancing easier.
#4
Posted 21 November 2005 - 09:22 PM
Hey bottledup do u have to run the chev rods n pistons dont the 350 pistons sit lower in the bore (lower comp?) to get a 336 combo? While ive got your attention have u played much with 4 corner idle holleys?
Sorry to steal the thread hehe
CHeers
Stedz
Sorry to steal the thread hehe
CHeers
Stedz
#5 _[BOTTLEDUP]_
Posted 21 November 2005 - 09:26 PM
No 350 pistons sit lower when used with a Holden rod (5.680") You run small journal Chev rods (2.000" pin, 5.7" length). Naturally you do a dummy up before milling the deck to set your final comp ratio
What you want to know about the carbs? Either PM or start another thread, no stealing tolerated here...
Cheers,
-Dave.
What you want to know about the carbs? Either PM or start another thread, no stealing tolerated here...
Cheers,
-Dave.
#6
Posted 22 November 2005 - 07:24 AM
I thought it was best to use the 308 crank and 327 rods and 350 pistons for better strength than the 283 rods.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users