Jump to content


Your Opinions On LPG


  • Please log in to reply
44 replies to this topic

#26 _Viper_

_Viper_
  • Guests

Posted 07 March 2010 - 08:57 AM

I'm planning on getting around the boot space issue (that really wasn't a problem in the EH) by removing the petrol tank in the LX and having the LPG underneath the boot floor...with a fake droptank style cover.


Exactly what Im doing... Also the Gem is on straight Gas so Put the LPG tank where the Petrol tank was and it takes up no more room, less if any.... I actually gained room cos I got rid of my surge tank, filter and efi pump and the bunch of fuel lines from the boot

#27 rexy

rexy

    Lotsa Posts!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,604 posts
  • Name:Rexy
  • Location:Melbourne
  • Car:Kia grand carnival!!!
  • Joined: 03-November 09

Posted 07 March 2010 - 04:14 PM

Use more LPG than petrol - what a crock!
The torrie 308 and driven hard av 26L per 100KM with prof tuned quaddie on petrol. On gas research twin system used 20L per 100KM, driven possibly harder!
If you choose a cheap shit system yes you may suffer. Pay for the good stuff, its nearly always worth it. Highway only driving was much better and with a useable 76 litres in the tank range was nearly 500km.
R

#28 _UC HATCH_

_UC HATCH_
  • Guests

Posted 07 March 2010 - 05:20 PM

FastEHHolden and Viper How are you going to fit a tank under the rear and get the 200mm ground clearance and fit it within the departure angle.
Do you have a tank design/size in mind or any info, I would like to do this on a UC Hatch.

#29 xu1kid

xu1kid

    Forum Fan

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 364 posts
  • Name:anthony
  • Location:Albury
  • Car:lj gtr xu1
  • Joined: 30-December 08

Posted 07 March 2010 - 05:25 PM

my old wb ute 308 trimatic 3.08 diff had a smallish cam in it, 97 litre tank ohg x convertor and the fuel economy was sh&t house around 210 to a tank, appently the motor was built for turbo when i bought it so low comp mayb that effected the fuel economy it struggled to rev over 5000 but the old ute has a new owner now so its his problem

but my new vs ute has an impco system on it and its a dream to drive and great economy too

+1 for lpg for me

#30 _Viper_

_Viper_
  • Guests

Posted 07 March 2010 - 05:45 PM

By using a Scubatank style setup of a donut tank in place of the original tank... I havnt actually looked into it fully and checked tank dimensions etc but yea, the Scuba style tanks are no bigger then a normal petrol drop tank... its just a question of how many I can fit in there.... Might possibly have to cut the boot floor out and have the tanks enter the boot space a little and raise the floor to suit.

#31 _UC HATCH_

_UC HATCH_
  • Guests

Posted 07 March 2010 - 06:26 PM

Thanks for that Clint.

Look forward to see how you attack it. when you do.

Cheers Mark

#32 FastEHHolden

FastEHHolden

    Steptoe

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,114 posts
  • Location:Central Coast NSW
  • Joined: 16-November 05

Posted 07 March 2010 - 07:39 PM

I have to raise the car.

#33 _bathurst-racer_

_bathurst-racer_
  • Guests

Posted 07 March 2010 - 08:23 PM

Until 10 years ago I worked as an automotive LPG mechanic. I hated doing installations but that didn't worry my boss because we had heaps of work doing rectification and tuning on vehicles which had been converted somewhere else. Doing rego checks was another goood money spinner too.
The biggest issue I found regarding tuning was to do with fuel quality. Back then automotive LPG was made up of about 82% propane, 12% butane and the rest was any rubbish the refinery wanted to get rid of. There wasn't any legislation which demanded a minimum amount of propane in automotive fuel. It wasn't uncommon to think that your car was going really well then fill up and would run like a dog until you were able to put some decent gas back in.
I don't know whether this has changed or not and I realise that engine management systems will compensate for poor fuel quality but this was an issue when we worked on carbies or cars without an O2 sensor.
It's also important to use low ash engine oil too. Also change it every 5K because it will look clean but will contaminated by acid which forms in the combustion process. If you're running LPG and a Trimatic the box will need to be adjusted as well because using gas which doesn't have the same bang as petrol means you open the throttle more which changes the vacuum signal to the modulator. I used to tighten the band and back it off only 2 turns from memory and the fill the box with ATF and a litre of Moreys Oil Stabilizer which kept the trans from melting.

#34 _LH8VD69_

_LH8VD69_
  • Guests

Posted 07 March 2010 - 08:39 PM

FastEHHolden and Viper How are you going to fit a tank under the rear and get the 200mm ground clearance and fit it within the departure angle.
Do you have a tank design/size in mind or any info, I would like to do this on a UC Hatch.



The cheating way.....Good ole pump up shocks !!!!
Torries look damn fine with a nice fat polished drop tank as we all know....*pictures* big fat BBQ gas cylinder hanging down.....Very sexy...perhaps customise even further and put a big hotplate in the boot for those day cruises out wiff da boyz...lol

#35 Steve TPF

Steve TPF

    Forum Fixture

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 784 posts
  • Name:Steve
  • Location:Adelaide... city of... anyone know something good about it?
  • Car:UC hatch
  • Joined: 09-June 09

Posted 08 March 2010 - 10:06 AM

I've been running my L300 van on gas for several years now (was fitted when I bought it). It's cheap in Melbourne (50-55c), and I'm glad I have it. The only reliability issue I have had was with a corroded terminal on one of the shut-off valves. Damn thing wouldn't start sometimes. Once I fixed that, no problems. The van is pissweak admittedly, but in the breif period I ran it on petrol it did't seem any more powerful.

I'm going to fit a proper gas carby when I have the cash, do away with the crap diffuser ring. Be interesting to see if it makes any difference.

#36 _torbirdie_

_torbirdie_
  • Guests

Posted 08 March 2010 - 05:36 PM

Use more LPG than petrol - what a crock!
The torrie 308 and driven hard av 26L per 100KM with prof tuned quaddie on petrol. On gas research twin system used 20L per 100KM, driven possibly harder!
If you choose a cheap shit system yes you may suffer. Pay for the good stuff, its nearly always worth it. Highway only driving was much better and with a useable 76 litres in the tank range was nearly 500km.
R


Are you basing your conclusion on just the above? perhaps your vehicle had a problem with petrol consumption?

Unfortunately your experience is not replicated by the majority of users or even claimed by manufacturers, nor does the new commodore which uses svi lpg system, and neither does any other vehicle that you can look up in the australian fuel guide:

http://www.greenvehi...84-2a2173a26656

#37 ls2lxhatch

ls2lxhatch

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,332 posts
  • Location:Perth
  • Car:LX Hatch
  • Joined: 29-May 06

Posted 08 March 2010 - 07:32 PM

The LPG Autogas Australia Payback Calculator factors in a consumption increase of 30% when using LPG.

If you put in petrol as costing $1.00 and gas at $0.77 then the calculator works out that the cost is the same. This is because you have to buy 1.3 litres of LPG to get the same mileage as 1 litre of petrol.

Edited by ls2lxhatch, 08 March 2010 - 07:33 PM.


#38 _AD_75_

_AD_75_
  • Guests

Posted 09 March 2010 - 04:55 PM

The LPG Autogas Australia Payback Calculator factors in a consumption increase of 30% when using LPG.

If you put in petrol as costing $1.00 and gas at $0.77 then the calculator works out that the cost is the same. This is because you have to buy 1.3 litres of LPG to get the same mileage as 1 litre of petrol.


I see where you are coming from but when is the last time you bought premium ULP at $1.00 per Ltr? gas is still a viable option imo and currently priced a lot cheaper then premium petrol.

After seeing Vipers build thread and how he is planning on running a straight gas injection system i started browsing the net and found this which seems very interesting, http://www.gas-injection.com/ its a multi-point sequential vapor system and has apparently won awards for design innovation. I think the future for autogas seems bright if they can keep the costs of LPG down somewhat, one things for sure petrol isn't going to be getting any cheaper and from an ecological standpoint its a much cleaner alternative to fossil fuels.

Edited by AD_75, 09 March 2010 - 04:58 PM.


#39 rexy

rexy

    Lotsa Posts!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,604 posts
  • Name:Rexy
  • Location:Melbourne
  • Car:Kia grand carnival!!!
  • Joined: 03-November 09

Posted 09 March 2010 - 05:16 PM

Unfortunately the provided herd statistics on LPG conversions and consumption are nearly irrelevant to the individual. As the reports in this thread so far indicate there is a wide variation in consumption post converion. I bet some of the respondents would love to have seen only a 30% increase over petrol.
My point?
A well set up and tuned conversion does not necessarily increase consumption in L/100km terms.
Another nail in the coffin of the herd stats - my VY2 SS sedan has the same consumption on LPG and petrol using a current technology ecu controlled vapour gas system. It was money very well spent.
R

#40 Steve TPF

Steve TPF

    Forum Fixture

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 784 posts
  • Name:Steve
  • Location:Adelaide... city of... anyone know something good about it?
  • Car:UC hatch
  • Joined: 09-June 09

Posted 09 March 2010 - 06:55 PM

This article on LPG vapour injection is an interesting read.

So if aftermarket LPG has progressed to this extent, is there are any bad news? John Parnell was frank.

"Typically there's a 3 per cent drop in power," he said. "But I don't know if many of our customers are really concerned by that. I always tell them that driveability remains exactly the same as on petrol."

More serious is the rise in fuel consumption. John Parnell says that typically fuel consumption on LPG rises by 15 � 20 percent.

"That's more than our competitors will tell you but it's what I have seen on the emissions test cycle," he said.






[

#41 ls2lxhatch

ls2lxhatch

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,332 posts
  • Location:Perth
  • Car:LX Hatch
  • Joined: 29-May 06

Posted 09 March 2010 - 07:37 PM


The LPG Autogas Australia Payback Calculator factors in a consumption increase of 30% when using LPG.

If you put in petrol as costing $1.00 and gas at $0.77 then the calculator works out that the cost is the same. This is because you have to buy 1.3 litres of LPG to get the same mileage as 1 litre of petrol.


I see where you are coming from but when is the last time you bought premium ULP at $1.00 per Ltr? gas is still a viable option imo and currently priced a lot cheaper then premium petrol.


You appear to have completely missed the point. My post was replying to this.

Use more LPG than petrol - what a crock!


The point is that LPG Autogas Australia Payback Calculator factors in using 30% more LPG than Petrol.

The point of using $1 for petrol and $0.77 for LPG is to demonstrate that the calculator is using a %30 increase.

1.0 litres of Petrol at $1.00 per litre = $1.00
1.3 litres of LPG at $0.77 per litre = $1.00

Total saving $0.

The bottom line is that the energy available in one litre of petrol is approximately the same as the energy available in 1.3 litres of LPG. If you replace a poor performing petrol system with a state of the art LPG system then fuel consumption will not increase by %30. However if both systems were perfect then the difference will be approximately %30.

Edited by ls2lxhatch, 09 March 2010 - 07:42 PM.


#42 xu1kid

xu1kid

    Forum Fan

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 364 posts
  • Name:anthony
  • Location:Albury
  • Car:lj gtr xu1
  • Joined: 30-December 08

Posted 09 March 2010 - 08:11 PM

i put 31 dollars of gas in my ute v6 vs 55 cents a litre i get 380 ks around town, now put 31 dollars of petrol@ $1.26 in and see how many ks you get, if the cost of gas was very close to petrol then there wouldnt be any real saving

#43 ls2lxhatch

ls2lxhatch

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,332 posts
  • Location:Perth
  • Car:LX Hatch
  • Joined: 29-May 06

Posted 09 March 2010 - 08:40 PM

:Headbang2: :Headbang2: :Headbang2: :Headbang2: :Headbang2: :Headbang2: :Headbang2: :Headbang2: :Headbang2:

#44 _Viper_

_Viper_
  • Guests

Posted 09 March 2010 - 08:44 PM

To be honest, saving money on fuel costs was a secondary thing for me...

Going straight gas meant I can run a higher static compression and still run high boost due to the higher octane so better power off boost...

is Also less pollution so alot easier to get my car engineered with the turbo and no need for cat converters or other petrol pollution items

No noisy efi fuel pump in the boot or fuel system taking up space

No carbon build up in the motor

There is the few negatives... ie not as easy as a simple jerry can if you run outa gas... not all regional areas have LPG

#45 xu1kid

xu1kid

    Forum Fan

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 364 posts
  • Name:anthony
  • Location:Albury
  • Car:lj gtr xu1
  • Joined: 30-December 08

Posted 09 March 2010 - 10:09 PM

:cry:




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users