What Diff Ratio in my LJ
#1
Posted 03 May 2006 - 09:12 AM
As i am about to buy a Reco'd Banjo to replace the very tired one in my car at present and would like to double check the ratio before i buy. I read on that holdenpedia at oldholden.com that it would most likely be 3.55:1 ratio.
Could some one confirm this or tell me where to find it as my car was built before it noted the driveline on the tags. The details of my car are as follows;
1972 LJ 4dr SL Sedan, Brisbane built in May '72,
173 with Tri Matic.
Cheers,
Mick
#2 _Flamenco_
Posted 03 May 2006 - 09:54 AM
#3
Posted 03 May 2006 - 02:25 PM
try and get either 3.08 or 3.36 on your reco diff.
#4
Posted 03 May 2006 - 03:45 PM
#5 _gtr161s_
Posted 03 May 2006 - 10:30 PM
Depending on what you do with your car ie highway cruising, short trips, racing etc or whether its auto or manual, gernerally i think the 3:08 is good allround diff ratio.
#6
Posted 04 May 2006 - 08:37 AM
Mick
#7 _devilsadvocate_
Posted 04 May 2006 - 11:02 AM
Jack a wheel up.
Have car out of gear with handbrake off.
Put a marker on the tailshaft that you can see, piece of tape or similar.
Rotate the wheel exactly 10 times....counting how many rotations of the tailshaft you see.
Divide tailshaft rotations by 10
ie if you rotate the wheel 10 times and count 31 rotations of the tailshaft:
31/10 = 3.1 .....would be a 3.08.
#8
Posted 04 May 2006 - 04:25 PM
#9
Posted 04 May 2006 - 05:00 PM
It is a 4 dr, Auto, 173 with Extractors & Exhaust (possibly a 350 holley soon). I drive mainly to work on 60km/h roads and then highway (90km/h) for 10min to & from work and when i cruise down to Wollongong on weekends.
What would suit me best ??
Cheers,
Mick
#10 _Flamenco_
Posted 04 May 2006 - 05:17 PM
#11 _devilsadvocate_
Posted 04 May 2006 - 07:42 PM
Have you figured out what youve got now, does it suit at present, or do you feel its revving too hard on the highway etc.Okay guys its either gonna be the 3.08 or 3.36 ratio. I really dont want to get the wrong ratio as its a fair chunk of $$$ for me to spend.
Mick
What size tyre? an important factor too.
#12 _73LJWhiteSL_
Posted 04 May 2006 - 08:17 PM
If its just around town I would go with the 3.36 cause it will give you easier driveablitity and better launch. I smoked the LJ up (stock 173, M20 with extrators and 2 1/4"exhaust) on the first hill start i did after going from 2.78 to 3.36
If you do some highway miles i would go with a 3.08
If you are running 205/60R13 in theory your RPMs at 100KPH with each diff centre will be as follows.
2.78 ~ 2500RPM @ 100KPH
3.08 ~ 2700RPM @ 100KPH
3.36 ~ 3100RPM @ 100KPH
3.55 ~ 3300RPM @ 100KPH
I can tell you the 2.78 and 3.36 are pretty much spot as my Torana did about 2500 RPM @ 100KPH with the old 2.78 With the 3.36 i am running now it does around 3100RPM @ 100KPH which isn't great, its a bit tiring after a long drive.
Steve
#13 _lexa_
Posted 04 May 2006 - 09:58 PM
#14 _73LJWhiteSL_
Posted 04 May 2006 - 10:27 PM
Having said that i am just running a stock 173. If i had a mild anything or a stock 202 i would be running a 3.08 I assume it would give much better cruising at 100KPH.
Steve
#15 _devilsadvocate_
Posted 05 May 2006 - 05:27 AM
In theory?........If you are running 205/60R13 in theory your RPMs at 100KPH with each diff centre will be as follows.
2.78 ~ 2500RPM @ 100KPH
3.08 ~ 2700RPM @ 100KPH
3.36 ~ 3100RPM @ 100KPH
3.55 ~ 3300RPM @ 100KPH
3.08 = 2836rpm/100kmh/205-60-13
2.78 = 2560rpm....
other 2 are 'about right'
But that's for a manual transmission......not sure that the torque convertor in a trimatic is supposed to lock up at 100kmh, perhaps 2-3% slip.
Edited by devilsadvocate, 05 May 2006 - 05:40 AM.
#16
Posted 05 May 2006 - 09:46 AM
Thanks for all your help and suggestions guys , when she goes in on the 17th i will let you know how she goes when i pick her up.
Cheers,
Mick
#17 _73LJWhiteSL_
Posted 05 May 2006 - 10:47 PM
I was expecting someone, mainly you, to comment on this.In theory?........
If you are running 205/60R13 in theory your RPMs at 100KPH with each diff centre will be as follows.
2.78 ~ 2500RPM @ 100KPH
3.08 ~ 2700RPM @ 100KPH
3.36 ~ 3100RPM @ 100KPH
3.55 ~ 3300RPM @ 100KPH
3.08 = 2836rpm/100kmh/205-60-13
2.78 = 2560rpm....
other 2 are 'about right'
But that's for a manual transmission......not sure that the torque convertor in a trimatic is supposed to lock up at 100kmh, perhaps 2-3% slip.
I agree they are not exact, but they are ball park. And 205/60R13s can have different circumference depening on preasure and manufacturer. The only way to get the revs exactly would be by measuring the wheel. And then unless you have a digital tacho, you won't be able to tell anyways.
Yes i did forget to mention manual transmittion, but the the Trimatic has a 1:1 top right?
Glad to see you got your conclusion LOWS2. Hope you are happy with the setup. I am starting to consider a Celica 5 speed with the 3.36
Steve
Edited by 73LJWhiteSL, 05 May 2006 - 10:48 PM.
#18 _devilsadvocate_
Posted 06 May 2006 - 12:27 AM
What is the point of your response Steve?I was expecting someone, mainly you, to comment on this.�
I agree they are not exact, but they are ball park. And 205/60R13s can have different circumference depening on preasure and manufacturer. The only way to get the revs exactly would be by measuring the wheel. And then unless you have a digital tacho, you won't be able to tell anyways.�
Yes i did forget to mention manual transmittion, but the the Trimatic has a 1:1 top right?
Steve
Why state "in theory" and then complain when someone points out that your figures are as you put it "ballpark"?
You did use the ~sign, but two of your figures were not within the tolerances suggested by your post. ie ~2700RPM would indicate true value anywhere from 2650-2750rpm, whereas the correct value was 2838rpm.
You've been around the forum long enough and have read/contributed to similar threads b4 where Ive posted formulae on how to calculate this figures to a high level of accuracy and a technique to measure your rolling wheel circumference , so I do find it puzzling/annoying that you would claim "in theory", when you have obviously not used any formula to post your figures? If its possible to be accurate, why not be?
Trimatic has a torque convertor, possibly 2-3% slip when warm at 100kmh, but open to suggestions on this.
Edited by devilsadvocate, 06 May 2006 - 12:39 AM.
#19
Posted 06 May 2006 - 01:29 AM
If you are changing the axle anyway I would suggest removing the centre as the crownwheel will have the exact "diff ratio" stamped on it regardless of the flange splash sheid and/or tyre size. From there you should be able to choose your replacement. Personally, I'm with Flamenco with the 3.08 for a stocky.
Good Luck!
Edited by rodomo, 06 May 2006 - 01:44 AM.
#20 _73LJWhiteSL_
Posted 06 May 2006 - 01:49 PM
Please understand devilsadvocate I was not taking a swipe at you for correcting my post, it was ment to be taken in fun, but i do apolige if my post came across in any other way than in the light humor i intended. My point for posting was in humor and not to put you down or your post.
Steve
#21 _devilsadvocate_
Posted 06 May 2006 - 02:03 PM
Anyway, glad we've sorted that out.
Cheers.
Edited by devilsadvocate, 06 May 2006 - 02:05 PM.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users