front end bushes
#1 _brenden83_
Posted 08 December 2011 - 07:44 PM
What are the best bushes to put in, its mainly gonna be a street driven car but i want to try and get maximum handling and performance i can.
I was also wondering where i can buy the Moog ball joints all the places in town have never heard of them.
Any info would be greatly appreciated
Thanks Brenden
#2
Posted 08 December 2011 - 07:46 PM
Whiteline/Nolathane/Noltec are all the same company nowdays
But the whiteline bushes would be my choice
#3 _toranarama_
Posted 08 December 2011 - 07:50 PM
They were crap 30 years ago & still are...
Only good for race style limitations where suspension travel is "low".
Rubber is GOOD.
End of story.
Moog is an American brand as is 777.
#4 _robslxhatch_
Posted 08 December 2011 - 08:44 PM
#5 _toranarama_
Posted 08 December 2011 - 08:52 PM
They all fail as they do not have the GIVE of rubber ..
I'm not making this up !
I'm also guessing that they can't copy the original bush design (with their product) as this would infringe a copyright.
Just say that I warned you
#6
Posted 08 December 2011 - 08:57 PM
Red, blue, black, white, yellow. blurple....
They all fail as they do not have the GIVE of rubber ..
I'm not making this up !
I'm also guessing that they can't copy the original bush design (with their product) as this would infringe a copyright.
Just say that I warned you
isnt the whole point of them, that they dont have the "GIVE" of rubber??
#7 _toranarama_
Posted 08 December 2011 - 09:03 PM
As in LCAs, Wishbones, Trailing arms etc...
Ok for front & rear swaybars & the vertical mounts where they just slide/pivot
but not where crush tubes etc are involved...
I'm surprised there isn't a "sticky' pertaining to this to stop people wasting their money (sigh...)
As previously stated - Only good for track application where VERY LITTLE travel is involved
Edited by toranarama, 08 December 2011 - 09:04 PM.
#8
Posted 09 December 2011 - 01:18 AM
I had my front suspension rebuilt in the late 80's with all rubber bushes except for the rear lower bush which was a SuperPro bush. I also fitted SuperPro k-frame insulators at the same time. The car was my daily driver for 10-15 years with regular country trips over some very poor bitumen and gravel roads.
When I pulled the suspension down a couple of years ago all the rubbers where worn but the SuperPro bushes were as new. The k-frame bushes were also as new.
I know someone who fitted the Rare Spares rubber k-frame bushes last year and they have split.
Edited by ls2lxhatch, 09 December 2011 - 01:19 AM.
#9 _robslxhatch_
Posted 09 December 2011 - 06:13 AM
#10
Posted 09 December 2011 - 08:21 AM
I would think a harder compound may not flex as much and may give better handeling, but the rubber seemed to cushion the ride in my car.
#11 _glenn l_
Posted 09 December 2011 - 08:57 AM
Edited by glenn l, 09 December 2011 - 08:57 AM.
#12 _rorym_
#13 _brenden83_
Posted 11 December 2011 - 06:51 PM
Thanks Brenden
#14
Posted 16 December 2011 - 06:28 AM
Only had minor squeaks, bit of grease always fixed that.
Just remember, they give you that big thing of greasr for a reason, use it well and you wont have squeaks
Id take nolathane with a firm ride over rubber anyday, the whole point, as said above, is less give for more consistent handling characteristics, track only? what horseshit.
#15 _nolathane_
Posted 20 December 2011 - 10:13 AM
Please understand that Nolathane has been around for over 25 years and in the past 5 years has advanced significantly with formulation, designs and lubricant. We like to draw the analogy of mobile phone advancement over the past 10 years how far they have come (Nokia 5110 to an iPhone 4S) and believe material technology, advanced testing and designs means our industry and product has advanced in the same way. In fact, Nolathane is set to announce a LIMITED LIFETIME WARRANTY in the new year, thats how far the product has come and how confident we are in the Nolathane offering today.
We are also at a softer durometer than many years back but in the case of the Torana we offer two types of rear trailing arm bushings in the softer standard Duro or the competition harder Duro as many people do not want the movement of rubber as it will let things come out of alignmenmt when taking up the deflection of the bushing.
Click this link to view the parts we offer for LC-LJ and the two offerings of rear trailing arm bushings.
http://www.nolathane...vehicle=1969-74
Edited by nolathane, 20 December 2011 - 10:14 AM.
#16 _robslxhatch_
Posted 20 December 2011 - 12:53 PM
#17
Posted 20 December 2011 - 01:10 PM
Sorry but i find it hard to believe the reason you now offer a lifetime warranty is because your product improved, I would believe it is because you now buy them so cheap from overseas that you don't care if you have to replace them 10 times under warranty as you don't cop the fee for labour for changing the part.
Why don't you share with us where they are now made.
Any suspension shop that knows their salt would not be recommending anything but rubber for the rear trailing arm bushes. Nuf said there.
#18 _nolathane_
Posted 20 December 2011 - 01:16 PM
To be fair , i should add that the xf falcon bushes that fell to bits the day after fitment in my post above was a several years ago, and we have fitted plenty of the Nolathane product over the last few years without any failures.
Thanks as this is a great forum thread for feedback and reviews.
All feedback positive or negative is great for us and we use this to keep improving our range from year to year.
#19
Posted 20 December 2011 - 03:06 PM
#20
Posted 20 December 2011 - 07:45 PM
I do not have any facts to backup this theory but it could help point Nolathane in the right direction to finding the problem.
Edited by ls2lxhatch, 20 December 2011 - 07:47 PM.
#21 _My74LH_
Posted 06 January 2012 - 06:41 PM
I deal with Bayer and 99% of our product is some sort of Urethane from 75 sore to 92 sore hardness, What works in Europe falls to bits in Australia, when all else fails we return to rubber full stop.
With a world shortage of rubber, don’t you think if urethane was up to it we would be driving on it, it will never happen . Polyurethane forklift wheels are rated no more than 20kph, this is why you will only see them on Electric Forklifts once they exceed that it’s the end for that wheel , hence the huge electric truck wheel industry in Australia, we all like to speed on the forklift .
You have all seen the urethane that cracks itself to bits this is caused by overheating which dehydrated the urethane, once this happens it becomes hard and any high impact or compression will destroy it.
Rubber all the way for me
Edited by My74LH, 06 January 2012 - 06:44 PM.
#22
Posted 10 January 2012 - 11:55 AM
Id put money on there being better tech available for forklift tyres, but why develop it, all that would do is kill their ongoing profits from the wearing of traditional rubber tyres.
I still use and recomend nolathane, even having seen failures first hand.
#23 _CHOPPER_
Posted 10 January 2012 - 01:44 PM
Forklifts are a load carrying vehicle.
They are a low speed vehicle for safety reasons.
OH&S shoot first and ask questions later in regards to forklift incidents where speeding/overloading is suspected.
Most forklift owners will sack drivers, rather than spend money on things that will allow drivers to speed.
Most owners will not spend more money than they have to on replacement tyres. An expensive tyre can fail just as quickly as a cheap tyre.
#24
Posted 10 January 2012 - 04:23 PM
You are definitely right though, solid rubber tyres are easily damaged by clipping corners, large rocks etc.
99% of forklift drivers speed, unfortunate, but true. Most forklifts could be easily speed limited, but they always opt not to. The quicker they drive, the more they move, the more efficient the whole situation is. But dont ask them to put that on paper! lol.
I suppose I was more talking tyres in general though, passenger, industrial etc etc.
#25 _CHOPPER_
Posted 10 January 2012 - 06:12 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users