Unleaded Fuel
#1
Posted 08 November 2005 - 09:52 PM
What are peoples experiences with these additive and all the brands - good and bad.
What unleaded fuel do you use - 91, 95 or 98 octane.
Was LRP minimum 96 octane?
Thanks in advance.
#2
Posted 08 November 2005 - 09:59 PM
And a valve saver type lubricant that I can't remember the name of (haven't driven the car in awhile)
New engine will have hardened seats
#3 _high_rpm_
Posted 08 November 2005 - 10:00 PM
in my vh i just wack normal unleaded in it with upper cylinder lube as the motor is probebly gonna die soon anyway and id rather spend the extra money on the tory
#4 _73LJWhiteSL_
Posted 08 November 2005 - 11:02 PM
Will be running straigh gas soon.
I am planning on rebuilding a 202 to replace the 173 atm with straight gas and harden valves and seats.
Steve
#5 _draglc_
Posted 09 November 2005 - 09:44 AM
#6 _ToranaGuy_
Posted 09 November 2005 - 10:36 AM
Cheers
ToranaGuy
#7 _Yella SLuR_
Posted 09 November 2005 - 10:50 AM
I drove on PULP for 18 months with no additive and put the $3.50 per tank in the glove box that I would have spent on additive. Got some other heads and got the hardened seats to the exhaust valves @ $35/cylinder (pretty common price). Did some other bits as well.
There was no noticable deterioration in the seats after 18 months, even if there was, the material that gets affected by recision gets machined out anyways, so no love lost there.
Recision is a very slow process, and unlikely to cause significant damage in the short term.
I have pics of the seats being put in, but alas, we can't post pics ATM.
Currently use Premium E10 98 Octane.
#8 _ToranaGuy_
Posted 09 November 2005 - 11:32 AM
Having said that tho, my mums XD 351 only took about 30k kms to burn out a set of exhaust valves & seats, 6 of the 8 were screwed.
Cheers
ToranaGuy
#9 _Yella SLuR_
Posted 09 November 2005 - 11:46 AM
If you understand how valve recission occurs, I'd say that the engine was screwed before the ULP was put in the fuel tank. From my mucking around, I'd say it would take a good 60,000 to get any noticable wear to the eye, an possibly 80-90,000 before you'd have trouble with valves not sealing properly.
Older cars that used to run leaded fuel also have the added benefit of lead embedded in the valves & seats that continue to provide lubrication for the valve smashing down on the seat.
We are talking micro-scopic heat induced welds here.
Edited by Yella SLuR, 09 November 2005 - 11:52 AM.
#10 _ToranaGuy_
Posted 09 November 2005 - 10:30 PM
Yeah, LPG has the issue, as there is nothing to lube the valves and seats, so with no lube and increased exhaust temp's that can be seen on lpg, you tend to get recission, esp if the car is running lean, you get it real fast. I have a feeling that's why flashlube was first invented, fitted to under hood tanks that feed it to the engine, think hospital drip like, to keep valves running longer.Don't know if recission is an issue on LPG, as I've never been interested in LPG, and don't know what mods they do in their gas conversions, others here will know though.
Older cars that used to run leaded fuel also have the added benefit of lead embedded in the valves & seats that continue to provide lubrication for the valve smashing down on the seat.
We are talking micro-scopic heat induced welds here.
Normally you would change to harder valves and seats when rebuilding heads for a gas engine, just like you do to make an old engine happier to run unleaded. It's as tough on the exhaust valves as unleaded is. That's why there is so many horror stories of LPG killing old engines. Cheap conversions that didn't upgrade the valves and seats, and it cost's them in the end.
Cheers
ToranaGuy
#11
Posted 10 November 2005 - 08:09 AM
#12 _Yella SLuR_
Posted 10 November 2005 - 08:23 AM
Current additive cost = $0.00/tank
#13
Posted 10 November 2005 - 04:38 PM
#14 _Feigz_
Posted 15 November 2005 - 06:49 AM
#15
Posted 15 November 2005 - 04:40 PM
And its like shit to a blanket on everything in the boot!Buy flashlube in 1 ltr bottles and it lasts quite a while except when silly bugger doesn't put the lid back on tight enough - doh!
Im using Caltex Vortex 98]
found this to be the most engine friendly, and the most economical out of ultimate, mobil 8000 and the rest
have tried unleaded but runs like crap
WHY COULDNT THEY JUST KEEP GOOD OLD SUPER
We wouldnt be in this bloody mess
FUGGIN HIPPIES
cheers
dave
#16 _4door_LJ_
Posted 18 November 2005 - 11:48 PM
Due to running out of fuel last weekend & putting 5 ltr's of ULP 91 in, I discovered 2 things.
1. My car doesn't like std ULP at all
2. 95 RON seems ok as we have run out of 98 here in WA.
#17 _73LJWhiteSL_
Posted 21 November 2005 - 12:15 PM
In the past when i have run the car on straight ULP (when i run out of petrol) it was almost undrivable. It wouldn't idle had no go, and i had to keep pumping the pedal to keep the motor running. But i got to a servo and stuck PULP in.
Steve
#18
Posted 21 November 2005 - 01:25 PM
#19 _LX406_
Posted 21 November 2005 - 02:46 PM
#20
Posted 21 November 2005 - 03:32 PM
98 Octane should be back at most servos today.
Seems BP was filling up their stations first then others will follow suit.
I noticed on the way to work the BP's at Cannington & Manning Rd both had the red covers off the pumps but the 4 Caltex's I pass still didnt have any.
#21 _rorym_
Posted 21 November 2005 - 05:18 PM
Rory
#22
Posted 21 November 2005 - 07:11 PM
Octane boosters can be deceiving, whilst you may get a good increase in octane if added to standard unleaded, the increase is much less when you add to the higher octane fuels. Most of the claims on the bottle are more reallistic if applied to standard unleaded.
#23 _rorym_
Posted 21 November 2005 - 08:44 PM
R
#24 _draglc_
Posted 21 November 2005 - 09:12 PM
#25
Posted 22 November 2005 - 07:26 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users