Can you recheck at 0.050" tappet lift, and post the numbers in BTDC/ABDC format?
What lobes are they?
Posted 05 August 2013 - 08:57 PM
Can you recheck at 0.050" tappet lift, and post the numbers in BTDC/ABDC format?
What lobes are they?
Posted 05 August 2013 - 09:32 PM
Posted 05 August 2013 - 10:01 PM
There seems to be a bit of a discrepancy with either the cam or your measurements. The intake lobe is only out by a degree of duration but the exhaust is out by two. As well the LSA works out to about 102 and the ICL is retarded. But before you get too excited check with Comp on the lobe centreline location - it can turn out to be different to the "normally" calculated position with these assymetric lobes. I wouldn't be surprised if this is the case here. What are the figures on the cam card for 0.050"?
Posted 05 August 2013 - 10:19 PM
Posted 05 August 2013 - 10:53 PM
Posted 30 August 2014 - 01:54 PM
Posted 31 August 2014 - 06:39 AM
Ouch.
Posted 02 September 2014 - 08:00 AM
Posted 02 September 2014 - 11:29 AM
Posted 02 September 2014 - 11:54 AM
Has been a couple of broken cams lately,bit hard to tell what happened,in my case it was a regrind and after a close look at the ramps it looks
like what happened was the lifter dug itself into the ramp and decided to pull things up a bit,after blaming the oil and 350lb open springs it looks like because of the grind i got it went through the hard facing and was not re-hardened,this made sense to me because most lobes were worn and the worst one was 1mm worn.
Edited by EunUCh, 02 September 2014 - 11:54 AM.
Posted 02 September 2014 - 12:52 PM
Posted 02 September 2014 - 12:56 PM
Something is going on, has it broken right of the edge of the machining undercut?
I'm assuming you saw my broken comp cam? But I put mine down to running 400lbs open pressure, maybe not.
I've got two more here that I'll crack test before they go Into service.
I have one still running with .392" lobe lift and 370lbs though.
Take some pics and send it to comp.
Posted 02 September 2014 - 06:30 PM
Could be wrong, but by the looks of the wasting away it looks like a regrind,the odd thing about where it broke?,when the horrendous
starfire cam broke it was at the back as well,#4 intake?
The other thing i was wondering without drifting too far off topic is do we really need all that spring pressure?
Posted 02 September 2014 - 07:10 PM
Kev has my brand spankers new one in his hot little hands atm, i'll see if he can get a pick of it to compare.
Posted 02 September 2014 - 08:21 PM
The undercut is normal for highish lobe lifts - without them the grinding wheel hits the shaft on the base circle. Lower lift lobes don't need it though. The most likely cause of the break is insufficient fillet between the machined and unmachined sections. A larger fillet - or simply just machining the whole length of shaft between the lobes - probably would have saved it. Keep in mind that Holden (and Chev) sixes put unusual stresses on the shaft because there is such a long distance between the journals. Lay one alongside a SBC cam and you'll see what I mean. For big lifts, heavy springs and prolonged use it might pay to use a billet steel core, once you've done your testing on the cheap cast cores.
Heres another comp with moderate (0.56") lift.
Edited by oldjohnno, 02 September 2014 - 08:24 PM.
Posted 02 September 2014 - 08:37 PM
I see what you did there.
Why such a good cam manufacturer makes such a mistake, of just hard cutting edges, is beyond me.
Once Kev hands mine over to me in a cople of weeks i might look at putting it in a lathe at work and taking the whole thing back to the size of the undercuts....Or just run it....Hmmm, decisions decisions.
Cheers.
Posted 02 September 2014 - 08:40 PM
Great Information Oldjohnno,
I haven't seen one of those Cam's before, with the shaft relief,
but yes about the edges having some sort of radius instead of a machined sharp corner,
as this is to prevent cracking.
Posted 02 September 2014 - 08:58 PM
Posted 02 September 2014 - 09:00 PM
Yeah, sure, something ahs to be done about it AFTER you get my cam in........Demand a recall, i dont need mine instantly
Posted 02 September 2014 - 09:09 PM
Posted 02 September 2014 - 09:13 PM
I know i know
Posted 02 September 2014 - 09:16 PM
So it's got around .370 lobe lift john?
After this amount of carnage something has to be done about it.
Eunuch, they were xtq&xtx lobes, 140 seat pressure and 370 open and the valvetrain went nuts after 7100
.900 core diameter probably isn't much of a problem in a shorter v8.
Something like that, I don't remember exactly...
I wouldn't get over-excited, and I don't think it necessarily means that every undercut cam for a Holden is going to break. I wouldn't worry too much at all for a street and strip or a drag car, but for something that does prolonged high rpms (like a boat perhaps?) it might pay to check it out.
Like most aftermarket parts these things are made to a price, and I really don't think you can complain when the occasional cast-core cam breaks when it's run with heavy springs and a few revs. It's rare to find a performance part that's 100% ready to use straight from the box.
Posted 02 September 2014 - 09:22 PM
BUT....i....LIVE....OVEREXCITED!!!
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users