I was just trying to remember which one it is, can anybody tell me? Spreadbore comes to mind but i can't trust it these day's.
Also what's the difference in performance terms between the two?
Cheers
Steve
Edelbrock Performer manifold
Started by
_J&S Racing_
, Jul 24 2006 06:14 PM
6 replies to this topic
#1 _J&S Racing_
Posted 24 July 2006 - 06:14 PM
#2
Posted 24 July 2006 - 06:33 PM
I seem to recall they are drilled for both. I used to swap between a 650dp spreadbore and a 780 vacuum secondary squarebore on my old 308 that was running an Edelbrock Torker...dont recall using an adaptor.
#3 _J&S Racing_
Posted 24 July 2006 - 07:15 PM
Thanks Howard, did you notice any difference with the size of the carbies?
#4 _1QUICK LJ_
Posted 24 July 2006 - 07:49 PM
yep they have both patterns drilled, for a mild setup the spread bores work well, if you step up the power say over 300hp @flywheel then thats where the square bore comes in to play.
#5 _J&S Racing_
Posted 24 July 2006 - 09:45 PM
Thanks 1QUICK LJ, i have been told to use a squarebore but a 600cfm, i thought it might be to small.
#6 _1QUICK LJ_
Posted 25 July 2006 - 09:07 PM
600 cfm works awesome on a worked 308. dont over carb it 600 is plenty for all but the tuffest of 308s.
#7
Posted 25 July 2006 - 09:16 PM
Th 650 s/bore was a double pumper so while the small primaries gave great low rpm response the accompanying fuel economy was not one of its strongest attributes. The old 3310/ 780fcm was a nice carb, vacuum secondaries could be tuned via a spring change to give great performance while being more fuel miserly than the double pumper.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users