
Twin charger
#1
Posted 12 April 2015 - 03:10 PM
#2
_Gunmetal LH_
Posted 15 April 2015 - 10:50 PM
No one? OK, my 2c...
I wouldn't think so. Too bloody hard!
Not enough room with all the piping, pulleys and tensioners. Then there's the intakes- carby's or injection?
A properly matched supercharger (s/c) would be plenty to power a 6cyl without taking too much power to spin it. Having 2 would double the power required.
Heat! A correct sized s/c will not heat up the intake charge too much.
If you were using 2 I'd guess they'd be pretty small and would be running at max which would heat up the intake charge too much and cost you power.
Add the double-drag and you'd be doing yourself out of some ponies.
On the other hand, using a s/c that is too big will also cost efficiency as it won't work until it's really spinning along- which would waste power being used to spin it up.
Unless, you were going to use 2 different sized s/c's say a tiny one overdriven to give max punch in the lower part of the rev range, and a larger one to take over when the smaller one runs out of puff?
Then I would be looking at turbo's for that. Something along the lines of the setup on the supra's and soarer's engines. WAAAAY more efficient than even a single s/c.
The weight would be starting to get pretty hefty with 2 s/c's even though they're aluminium. There's the extra bracing and piping adding to that aswell.
Just my thoughts with the very limited knowledge on supercharging. Not trying to dismiss the idea completely- does sound intersting, but I reckon there would be plenty of options with a single s/c.
Some ideas I've had was a commodore eaton M90 or even a (usually American) ford eaton M112 slightly underdriven.
Had a bit of a look at the toyota(?) SC14 and it's internals are pretty basic flat rounded paddles and cause too much heat when the boost get up to a decent amount on a 6cyl.
A much better design is the eaton style with twisted rotors. Had a look at the M45 off mini's and Jag's but I think it would be too small to work efficiently. (Unless you used 2 of them! )
#4
Posted 16 April 2015 - 09:57 AM
Rexy, that first image looks like a pair of Toyota SC14's. I wouldn't think two would be enough for a mild VN V6.
#5
Posted 16 April 2015 - 12:02 PM
One sc14 on a 3.8 v6 gives a moderate boost, two would be a lot of fun! that green one is a Gemini too so I'd say its pretty quick. I've considered doing the same thing to a few previous conversions because sc14's are cheap as, and easy to setup...
#6
Posted 16 April 2015 - 12:48 PM
I was told an SC14 is only good for 5 PSI boost on a 202.
#7
Posted 16 April 2015 - 01:22 PM
I agree with Peter, and would think twin hairdryers the better setup, esp. the third picture where that germ-in-my-eye is powering 3 puffers... More wow than pow factor......
#8
Posted 16 April 2015 - 02:36 PM
Sc for low revs and allows for yhe use of a larger turbo (no down low lag)
#9
Posted 16 April 2015 - 06:25 PM
I was told an SC14 is only good for 5 PSI boost on a 202.
There abouts, you dont need as much boost from a supercharger to make good power as the boost is instant ie. no lag (+ you can run with a higher c/r). If you run a single sc14 on a VN V6 with a smaller pulley (I used to make a kit using a modified VN A/C compressor pulley) they will average around 6psi.
#10
Posted 21 April 2015 - 02:19 PM
#11
_The Baron_
Posted 21 April 2015 - 04:57 PM
As for the concept of superchargers being used with turbos, anyone remember the Bandag Bullet truck?
I know it is a diesel but the arrangement/concept could be worth investigating for ideas.
#12
Posted 21 April 2015 - 05:14 PM
A Real Supercharger can't be switched on / off, And although there are a few exceptions most don't work correctly, So forget the Mad Max set-up where it was either a dummy blower driven by electric motor or they turned engine on & off for the screen shots... Hairdryers & blowers have been paired together but again either 1 of them when correctly matched to engine output / revs should function better... Sort of like putting a roots style blower on top of another = "What's the point"
Edited by WhaleOilBeefHooked, 21 April 2015 - 05:20 PM.
#13
Posted 21 April 2015 - 05:52 PM
Have a look at those pics, the toyota blowers have an a/c style clutch pulley so they can be turned on and off.
#14
Posted 21 April 2015 - 05:58 PM
Bolt one of these on,frokal lag they reckon ? but they need a bit of lube in the fuel.
http://www.gmh-toran...er/#entry894083
No need for the "glimmer belt" 2 or 3 "V's" should work?
The clutched ones were used in Japan on Taxis or so the story goes?,they did work, they had some sort of "bypass" that would allow a diverted airflow.
Edited by EunUCh, 21 April 2015 - 05:58 PM.
#15
Posted 21 April 2015 - 06:10 PM
Sc12's were on 4agze powered MR2's and the sc14 was fitted to 1ggze supra's, crowns, chasers etc. No need for any type of bypass, they spin freely with the intake suction and dont seem to restrict flow when off, even on a v6 commo.
#16
Posted 21 April 2015 - 06:15 PM
Oops actually the Supra got the 1ggte (turbo version)...
#17
_Bomber Watson_
Posted 21 April 2015 - 08:00 PM
I"ve been watching this thread for a bit but havnt commented, but I think there are a few misconceptions/misunderstandings IMO so i'll bite.
Now, im certainly not fluent in this shit, so I could be wrong to.
Now, as far as the original question, certainly possible.
But you need to understand some theory first.
If you have a very undersized supercharger, say a SC14 on a 202, and a reasonably sized turbo, say a GT35, they would work together pretty well I think.
The SC14 would be driven so it delivers a set amount of boost, say 14psi, down low, while the turbo is still spooling up, and the turbo would take over with the same 14psi once its on.
The supercharger would not need to be switched off or bypassed as essentially the rotors would be spinning with the same pressure on both sides, so spinning in a vacuum if you will. It will not actually push any air neither will it restrict it.
THe reason you would do this is to increase the adiabatic efficiency over a wider rev range, theoretically with that combo you could have full boost from just off idle to 5500 or so rpm easily enough WITHOUT OVERHEATING THE AIR.
The only thing that would be a limiting factor is supercharger speed, i'd need to do some sums to work that out but from what i gather the SC14 doesnt like turning past about 14000rpm, starts delaminating rotors and stuff from waht i gather, this would be an issue as to work properly in this example it would need a fair amount of overdrive. This would in turn limit the max rpm achievable.
Re the bandag bullet, the GM engines it ran came factory with a supercharger and twin turbo's, the supercharger was on all 2 stroke detroit diesels, Its function is a scavenge pump as the air/fuel doesnt go through the crank case like a typical 2 stroke engine, the crankcase pressure is what usually pushes the fresh charge in. The supercharger is there purely to push the fresh charge in. The turbo's were added later to boost performance, so nothing to be learnt there.
Re stacking two blowers on top of each other, this is called compound supercharging. The top blower, the larger one, compresses the air, then the second blower compresses the air further. This is preferable for high boost applications over just a single stage as the superchargers are working closer to there efficiency range. Similar theory to dual or tripple compound turbocharging, where you have a very large turbo feeding air into a smaller turbo, and sometimes a smaller one again, each further compressing the air. Again each one is working a lot closer to its peak efficiency range. This is how some factory diesel engines get upwards of 80psi boost, and 100 is not unheard of in test situations.
This is not to be confused with straight twin supercharging or twin turbocharging where both compressors are the same size and simply to small, or to be confused with multiple stage turbocharging like the 1jzgte had with a small turbo and a big turbo working individually with complicated bypass valves and the like.
Cheers.
Edited by Bomber Watson, 21 April 2015 - 08:01 PM.
#18
Posted 21 April 2015 - 08:12 PM
So while your blower is pumping out 14psi at 2000???rmp the turbo is spooling up at 5?psi, forming a vacuum behind the turbo, driving the exhaust out... rpm increases, blower stays at 14psi while the turbo is now at 14psi at 6000???rpm filling the void?
Edited by TerrA LX, 21 April 2015 - 08:13 PM.
#19
_Bomber Watson_
Posted 21 April 2015 - 08:21 PM
As I understand it yeah, pretty much.
You should definitely experience a lot less lag from the turbo with both the blower pulling on the turbo, and the increased exhaust from the extra air in the cylinder due to the blower spooling it up faster, and theoretically the blower ends up just spinning in free air so to speak while the turbo handles the top end.
Its not a new theory:
Exact theory that thing worked on tmk, and although it was a show pony the engine did make wikid hp through a ridiculous rpm range, something that wouldnt have been possible with either the twin turbo's or the blower on there own.
Im sure i've seen a few examples from the factory as well working on a similar theory, but #@$^%& if i can remember exactly what at this second, SAAB and Volvo both spring to mind.
ANd yeah I forgot clarify in my first post that the turbo would feed into the supercharger, then into the engine.
So in the case of our SC12 and GT35 fed 202 I mentioned above, Ideally it would be blow through with a carb mounted in the stock position, so it would be airfilter, turbo, supercharger, carb, inlet manifold, for example.
Cheers.
Edited by Bomber Watson, 21 April 2015 - 08:25 PM.
#20
Posted 21 April 2015 - 08:44 PM
My head hurts.
#21
_Bomber Watson_
Posted 21 April 2015 - 09:02 PM
Lol, when i first realized how it worked it took me a few days thinking about it to actually understand the theory....
I keep sayign theory...I have yet to actually try it. Or find a real need to.
Cheers.
#22
Posted 21 April 2015 - 10:31 PM
Re the bandag bullet, the GM engines it ran came factory with a supercharger and twin turbo's, the supercharger was on all 2 stroke detroit diesels, Its function is a scavenge pump as the air/fuel doesnt go through the crank case like a typical 2 stroke engine, the crankcase pressure is what usually pushes the fresh charge in. The supercharger is there purely to push the fresh charge in. The turbo's were added later to boost performance, so nothing to be learnt there.
Cheers.
Correct, the blower didn't pressurise the intake charge. Which is why it's called a blower.
#23
_Bomber Watson_
Posted 21 April 2015 - 10:39 PM
THats a good point, I never looked at the terminology that way before.
Cheers.
#24
Posted 22 April 2015 - 03:24 AM
Just to clarify I am new to car engines beyond servicing oil and spark plug, so be gentle. Maybe a little lube first.
When people ask about superchargers, half say turbo gets better total performance, then the other half say s/c are cheaper and quicker to kick in, so that got me thinking, that's all.
There are a few different setups getting about on the net, DJs one, s/c feeding turbo with a bypass, and turbo feeding s/c with bypass.
Thers a lot of speculation with your idea DJ with the s/c restricting the boost from the turbo or the complete opposite of the s/c compressing the already boosted turbo air.
My idea was to have a sc12 being small enough not to drawer too much power to run, and also has the mag clutch to turn offend bypass when the turbo has spooled up.
originally I was just curious as to what people had done, but the more I look into it, the more I want to do it so I can get an answer.
#25
Posted 22 April 2015 - 12:14 PM
Not an expert on twin charger setups like you're talking about but I have fitted a lot of toyota sc's so I thought I'd better point out that the sc12 is the smaller 4cyl version and would probably do nothing for a 202. Use the sc14!
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users