
Twin charger
#26
Posted 22 April 2015 - 02:14 PM
While we are talking blocks, what would be the best engine size to use for strength when it is going to be boosted.
I was maybe going to fit small supercharger and turbo with low boost so I don't have to do much to the engine, just to get the fundamentals of a twin harge system sorted. Then once it all works do it properly with something a bit bigger.
#27
Posted 22 April 2015 - 05:42 PM
I think there will be some "number crunching " involved,Garret offer a list of Turbo's with "maps" of where the best islands are for a particular turbo.
With 2 of them ,a small one for "primary boost" to reduce lag would be nice and then have the "bigger" one kick in once things are up to speed,who knows how you would go about "compound boost" from a twin turbo set up but there should be some-one that knows.
Heat will be a problem,might need an inter-cooler the size of a Mack truck radiator?
The beauty about an engine driven super charger air pump is that lag is minimal and even though adiabatic compression is still present the Norman style pump seems to be able to overcome this to a degree?
From what i found out the SC 14 is max 14000 ,and that is probably pushing it,some say 12000 for a bit of reliability?
They were from what i understand bolted to low capacity 4 cylinder engines and were slightly "under driven"?
Some people say that a super charger should be capable of pumping half the cubic capacity of the engine?
SC14 is 1.4L/revolution,double that, and that is the engine size it would be suited to at 2:1 overdrive,a 186 would just make it?
#28
Posted 22 April 2015 - 06:12 PM
Post #15...
By your numbers an sc14 at 2:1 o/d will pump 2.8lt per rev. Meaning it would suit up to a 5.6lt engine? I'm telling you from experience they are ok with a smaller pulley on a 3.8lt commo, but nothing bigger.
#29
Posted 22 April 2015 - 08:41 PM
#30
Posted 23 April 2015 - 10:31 PM

#31
Posted 24 April 2015 - 01:47 AM
Im no expert but I looked into this a while ago.
First thing is with compound boost it is a higher than it seems. i cant remember the exact formula but for example if you have 8psi boost from your turbo and another 8 psi from blower that would be about 20psi not 16. it goes by a factor of 1.5 or something?
Second is the complexity in bypassing the supercharger and the switch over point, you don't want to have a big hole in your power waiting for the boost to get back up.
Obviously you can run a much bigger turbo than you normally could.
You can either run the supercharger through the turbo (hks, vw ) or you can do it the other way run the turbo through the supercharger (Lancia delta).
supercharger through the turbo is probably going to be easiest to set up.
But strange as it may seem running the turbo through the supercharger is actually a better setup for power, because you increase the efficiency of the supercharger. Group b lancia deltas ran 1800 4cyl making over 600hp with that setup.
I suggest you look into the setup of the lancia engine. Also a good book to get is "Maximum Boost" by Corky Bell it tell you everything you want to know.
#32
Posted 24 April 2015 - 07:39 PM
So far I'm thinking air filter-turbo-supercharger-ic(either air to air or water to air, undecided)-manifold. Have a computer so once the sc boost equals the turbo boost, the sc clutch is disengaged and a valve opens bypassing the sc. this seems to be the best way to keep a fairly linear power curve. If I was to compound the turbo boost through the sc the whole time it would be a big kick when it spooled up like a standard turbo car.
This is what I have so far. Anyone else got anything too add or subtract. Be brutal.
#33
_Bomber Watson_
Posted 24 April 2015 - 09:14 PM
Due to the way they work a supercharger running at x rpm to generate y boost wont "compound" the boost from a turbocharger making the same y boost. It cant happen.
The one big benefit I can see switching the supercharger off is you eliminate the over speed issue i mentioned in my last long winded post, Didnt think of that at the time.
Cheers.
#34
Posted 24 April 2015 - 10:11 PM
Until I do it its just a bit of a guessing game for me with experience chucked in by you blokes. I really appreciate the feedback.
#35
Posted 24 April 2015 - 10:11 PM
Until I do it its just a bit of a guessing game for me with experience chucked in by you blokes. I really appreciate the feedback.
#36
_Bomber Watson_
Posted 24 April 2015 - 10:14 PM
In that case year your right.
#37
Posted 25 April 2015 - 11:04 AM
1) can I use a normal engine stand to build and run an engine. If not what can I use, or do I need to make a bench kind of jig myself.
2) is there some kind of equipment I can buy that will give me a hp figure with the engine out of the car. I know engine builders have equipment to do it, so if anyone could give me any info, that would be awesome.
I have an LM-2 which will give me some handy info. I just feel that I need original hp figures as a base point then final hp to see if this project will be worth moving onto my real car.
#38
_Bomber Watson_
Posted 25 April 2015 - 11:19 AM
As far as gaining anything from this beyond running in a cam or checking for leaks, you will basically need to build an engine dyno....google is your friend but its probably out of most peoples league.
#39
Posted 25 April 2015 - 07:33 PM
If you had access to an old HQ ute or van chassis, that would be a more stable way of testing it.
#40
Posted 26 April 2015 - 01:33 AM
Due to the way they work a supercharger running at x rpm to generate y boost wont "compound" the boost from a turbocharger making the same y boost. It cant happen.
Ridiculous Bomber. if i run compressed air from a turbo into a supercharger that air will be compressed further (compounded). doesn't matter what speed it runs at supercharger moves a fixed volume of air per revolution
Vic i don't know if you have your hardware yet but i would consider using an eaton supercharger either from the commodore (m90) or mercedes (m62) they also have built in bypass valves, and running a old t04 through one of them. all cheap and plentiful
the m90 recommended sustained max revs are 12000 and the m62 14000 run @ 2:1 ratio gives you a 6000rpm limit which is ringing a red 6. i would also lower your CR to 7 something but not with a decomp plate. then you dont have to worry about any switch piont would be easier to setup and tune.
i can hear bombers keyboard working a response . From my understanding and im no expert how this works:
running turbo > supercharger > engine
the supercharger increases the air consumption of engine = more exhaust gas = turbo spooling up quicker = more efficiency
turbo into supercharger = increased supercharger efficiency (no back flow) = more boost
running supercharger > turbo > engine
the supercharger increases the air consumption of engine = more exhaust gas = turbo spooling up quicker (but will have back flow in blower)
turbo becomes an obstruction in a way because the air from the blower has to turn the turbo compressor (Cold side) and the turbine (hot side) then into engine, until it builds up enough speed to compress the air its self. so all you are doing is forcing the turbo to spin before it wants to. you also need to bypass the blower or that becomes a restriction for the turbo when switch to turbo alone.
Just my 2c but good luck how ever you do it
#41
_Bomber Watson_
Posted 26 April 2015 - 08:50 AM
The blower runs at a fixed crankshaft speed.
If it is running at a fixed speed to pump enough air for say 10psi, and the turbo is making 10 psi, the supercharger lobes/screws/veins whatever will have equal pressure on each side and the lobes will spin in a vaccuume.
Give or take a bit.
If you keep that same example but try to put in 15psi with the turbo, the blower will be a restriction.
If you overdrive the blower more so it puts in 15psi but keep the turbo at 10, the blower will obviously increase the pressure, but it will think its only running 5psi.
Cheers.
Edited by Bomber Watson, 26 April 2015 - 08:55 AM.
#42
Posted 27 April 2015 - 02:37 PM
I have a sc12 and a td04 off a forester. I know they are both baby boosters, but for testing I hope they will tell me what I need to know. I may still get a m90 as fly Lx recomended but see what happens. All I need now is a 186 and a mig. Tossing up wether to buy new or second hand with the welder. Any recommendations?
With centrifugal sc, are they instant like roots, lobes and screws, or do they require a small amount of build up?
#43
Posted 27 April 2015 - 02:42 PM
#45
Posted 27 April 2015 - 10:38 PM
forester turbo is petty small, i think factory wastegate is about 6-7psi and run out of puff about 5500rpm on a 2ltr, so i don't think it will do much on a 3ltr. you can try it and see what happens, but when you get over 15psi your boost will start to fall off in the top end as your on the wrong side of the compressor map.
i bought a small mig years ago for $100 not the best but it runs on gas and it welds ok as long as steel not to thick, and duty cycle terrible at full power. I bought for rust repairs so it does the job.
Shop around or i think there's a post on here somewhere about welders.
#46
Posted 27 April 2015 - 11:01 PM
US $160K for an engine? I'm not that keen.
#47
Posted 27 April 2015 - 11:02 PM
I agree, but I read today there is a controller you can put between the boost sensor and wastegate to control what psi the wwastegate opens at, or does this not matter due to the small size. But at the same time, I have a tiny sc too, so even though I won't get full rpm with the small combo, it will still allow me to work out the changeover point, bypass valves etc before I start playing with the real stuff and spending big cash. To start with,
I suppose I could do this on a four banger for my tests, but I want to do it with the red six so I can learn everything I can about these engines.
#48
Posted 28 April 2015 - 12:58 AM
#49
_Gunmetal LH_
Posted 29 April 2015 - 12:59 AM
Here's an interesting thread- http://www.gmh-toran...king-on/page-12
Bottom of page 12 Jabba is talking about using an SC14 to fill in the boost up to 4000rpm. Using the computer to bypass the s/c when the turbo spools up.
Might be worth keeping a close eye on?
#50
Posted 29 April 2015 - 10:57 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users