I have just started a 186 with a Crow 35647 cam , built by an engine builder , in which he fitted longer pushrods , but I have found the push rods are binding on the valve side of the guide slots in the head , is there a thread on valve geometry someone can direct me to ?
Rocker geometry
#1 _threeblindmice_
Posted 19 January 2016 - 12:36 PM
#2
Posted 19 January 2016 - 12:46 PM
1.5:1 or 1.6:1 ratio rockers?
#3 _threeblindmice_
Posted 19 January 2016 - 03:37 PM
Stock rockers , ground for extra lift .
#4
Posted 19 January 2016 - 04:48 PM
#5 _threeblindmice_
Posted 19 January 2016 - 05:07 PM
I have always run them with no real dramas , and it's an XU1 used only for the street .
#6
Posted 19 January 2016 - 05:16 PM
#7 _threeblindmice_
Posted 19 January 2016 - 05:27 PM
I put a stock set in and it and it runs without noise now , just want to make sure what to check , to avoid future damage .
#8
Posted 19 January 2016 - 06:00 PM
#9
Posted 19 January 2016 - 06:18 PM
That Crowe cam is a solid lifter grind isn't it?
#10
Posted 19 January 2016 - 06:22 PM
I have just started a 186 with a Crow 35647 cam , built by an engine builder , in which he fitted longer pushrods , but I have found the push rods are binding on the valve side of the guide slots in the head , is there a thread on valve geometry someone can direct me to ?
How far off the centre of the valve tip is the rocker when this happens?
#11
Posted 19 January 2016 - 06:28 PM
Sure is with a massive 517 liftThat Crowe cam is a solid lifter grind isn't it?
mmm with stock rockers i dunno
#12 _Bomber Watson_
Posted 19 January 2016 - 06:35 PM
Thats the biggest solid crow makes, I think your going to have issues.
#13 _threeblindmice_
Posted 19 January 2016 - 06:37 PM
Neither do I Gene , a long running machine shop taken over , the motor sat for a while as I did the rest of the car , and now looks like it they are gone out of business .
#14 _Bomber Watson_
Posted 19 January 2016 - 06:46 PM
Personally I would be pulling it out and down asap to find everything else they #@$^%& up.
#15 _threeblindmice_
Posted 19 January 2016 - 06:59 PM
This is with the longer push rods
Attached Files
#16 _threeblindmice_
Posted 19 January 2016 - 08:29 PM
Could anyone tell me did the 73 Bathurst , 150 motors run roller rockers ?
#17
Posted 19 January 2016 - 08:48 PM
Could be wrong but it looks like that if that is at full lift that the rocker is on the outer edge of the tip where as it should be more towards the pivot (stud side)
from where it started out at zero lift,bit hard to tell from pic but it looks like more where it should be be at mid lift in the pic ?
The YT pictures are very basic
http://static.shop03...metry-guide.pdf
tits on a bull more or less...although they make some good products.
Like said...could be wrong..the frokin stupid settings on this pc wont let me upload a pic of the geometry that is "supposed" to be correct for travel of the rocker tip through the arc of travel.
Also looks like some plus 10's or 20's collets have been fitted ?
#18
Posted 19 January 2016 - 09:05 PM
Could anyone tell me did the 73 Bathurst , 150 motors run roller rockers ?
No, same rockers as all XU1's before them.
Also, whats with the shiny new looking rockers and the one discoloured one?
Are those new rockers the ones being flogged on ebay as original Holden 6 rockers but are in fact chev rockers that do not correctly fit the holden 6?
Edited by S pack, 19 January 2016 - 09:11 PM.
#19 _Bomber Watson_
Posted 19 January 2016 - 09:13 PM
Could anyone tell me did the 73 Bathurst , 150 motors run roller rockers ?
No, they also ran a LOT less lift and duration than your current cam.
Only benefit you have is, like most crow grinds, its a very, very lazy profile, so stock rockers might live, but I would never run pressed steel rockers with a solid cam, to much jarring on them during the lash phase.
Cheers.
#20
Posted 19 January 2016 - 09:30 PM
This might help with geometry
Edited by ant285, 19 January 2016 - 09:30 PM.
#21 _threeblindmice_
Posted 19 January 2016 - 09:53 PM
I have been checking and the push rods the builder installed were 9.450 instead of the recommended PR726 which is 9.i3 in length , ( which would be closer to the standard ones I test fitted after the problem ) thanks Adam I found the article and will check them out when I get back to the car . DJ the car is all done now , rego in a couple of weeks , the first thousand miles will be easy , I'll see how it all feels before I decide to dismantle and check everything . Thanks for all the feedback guys .
#22 _threeblindmice_
Posted 19 January 2016 - 10:11 PM
No Dave he bought the dear stuff , the discoloured one was when I started checking and swapping things to see what gave me clearance in the guide on the head .
#23 _Bomber Watson_
Posted 19 January 2016 - 10:17 PM
He didnt buy stock replacement sbc pressed steel rockers did he?
They will cause you no end of wowes with far less lift and duration than you have.
Re looking at the pick I recon Im onto something.......
Cheers.
#24 _threeblindmice_
Posted 19 January 2016 - 10:40 PM
I'll measure them up , easy to change them after it's run in , and a little less lift mightn't be a bad thing atm .
#25
Posted 20 January 2016 - 03:12 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users