Just wondering if anyone has had a go at port matching there own cylinder head? and if so, how difficult/easy was it? ie: is it a job best left for the professionals. I presume you need carbide tip burr tools, not sure if they work in a drill or only die grinders. I was hoping to have a go at 12 port 3.3 blue motor with triple webbers. Not a full on port and polish, but just to match extractors, intake manifold/s to head. any help or advice greatly appreciated. I tried to find a thread on this forum and found a Q&A type thread but didn't have any info as yet. Final Q, does it make much of a difference? Thanks Paul.

port and polishing a cylinder head?
#1
Posted 23 June 2016 - 10:44 PM
#2
_LS1 Taxi_
Posted 23 June 2016 - 11:00 PM
Port matching to manifolds and a deburr will make a difference.
Loads of YouTube/hotrod forum stuff to read and watch.
#3
Posted 23 June 2016 - 11:17 PM
Thanks Daz, appreciate that, as they always say, "How hard can it be!"
#4
Posted 24 June 2016 - 06:37 AM
Not hard if you are just port matching. Use a gasket as a template to help you match the manifold to the head- use a scribe to outline your sizing.
You will need a die grinder and some carbide burrs. I bought some cheapos off ebay for about $35 (think it came with 5 burrs for that). These have held up well with alluminium but cant say how good they would stay sharp with cast iron. Still, they are cheap enough.
Patience, take your time and you will be fine. Also with porting, less is more. Only port enough to create a smooth transition from the manifold to the port face. There will be some gains with smoothing out the short turn as well but others who have a flow bench will be able to give you more specific advice for that area.
Edited by LC-GTR-1969, 24 June 2016 - 06:39 AM.
#5
_Bomber Watson_
Posted 24 June 2016 - 07:34 AM
Its already to big.
#6
Posted 24 June 2016 - 09:42 AM
Bomber, does that mean don't touch inlet ports at all? Thanks paul
#7
_Bomber Watson_
Posted 24 June 2016 - 09:58 AM
If your inlet Mani has already been hogged to the gasket either weld it back up or get another one. Take it out so its a little smaller than the inlet port, but mostly pay attention to the transition into the port, try to avoid abrupt changes in shape or volume.
#8
Posted 24 June 2016 - 08:33 PM
Bomber, this is how much I may need to remove, but is obviously the no-go area you are talking about. The exhaust ports are almost spot on with extractors. All three inlet port/s need almost exactly the same metal removed (I have only shown the first port) and the engine builder mentioned when he re-coed the heads he gave them a bit of a "tickle up".. I notice the area that needs to be removed is mostly top of port, almost a "v" shaped rectangle, so maybe he had already ported the lower section, as this would be where the fuel flows into engine? The other thing is that manifold/s I have for the triples are 3 piece, (not fixed one piece) so I have a bit of flexibility to try and move each manifold to match ports as close as possible without machining them. If engine builder has already fiddled around with them I definitely won't touch them, as if I break through the walls, the head will be stuffed and have already spent a bit of dough on it. (re-seated, larger valves ect). At this stage it may be best to leave as is, because it isn't going to be drag motor, just a cruiser with a bit of grunt, Cheers Paul.
Attached Files
#9
Posted 24 June 2016 - 09:10 PM
Dont rely on just the gasket though, check through the end of the manifold to see what the match is like. The gasket shoudl be first checked against the manifold then checked against the head, then decide where to go from there.
#10
_Bomber Watson_
Posted 24 June 2016 - 11:51 PM
Edit, Infact re looking at the picks he's a mong who has no idea about flow whatsoever, any idiot can see the massive change in x section from the gasket face to the middle of the port, and he's dangled a die grinder in there and made the issue worse!!!!
I would be very, very worried about the rest of the engine.
Edited by Bomber Watson, 24 June 2016 - 11:53 PM.
#11
_Muzzy_
Posted 25 June 2016 - 08:14 AM
Attached Files
#12
_Muzzy_
Posted 25 June 2016 - 08:19 AM
Attached Files
#13
_oldjohnno_
Posted 25 June 2016 - 09:41 AM
Port matching is something nearly everyone does, but in reality there's zero to very little gain for your time. If there are really big, obvious steps here and there you could knock them off, but definitely don't enlarge everything out to the gasket, that doesn't gain anything and can easily make things worse.
If the ports are basically stock now then you won't gain a thing by messing with the openings at the faces, there's much worse areas flow-wise further downstream. If you spent even half the time it'd take to match the ports on cleaning up the short turns you'd be a mile in front.
Don't worry about the way the top of the port is narrower at the top; this is a dead area so opening it up into a perfect rectangle does nothing positive for the port. Grind where you'll get the most return on your time: the short turns.
Edited by oldjohnno, 25 June 2016 - 09:52 AM.
#14
_oldjohnno_
Posted 25 June 2016 - 09:54 AM
Loads of YouTube/hotrod forum stuff to read and watch.
And around 80% of it will be wrong.
#15
Posted 25 June 2016 - 12:32 PM
Sorry for the thread hijack, What are your thoughts on matching carbs to the manifold Johnno? Like 2 inch SUs to a 1 3/4 manifold?
#16
_oldjohnno_
Posted 25 June 2016 - 01:58 PM
Sorry for the thread hijack, What are your thoughts on matching carbs to the manifold Johnno? Like 2 inch SUs to a 1 3/4 manifold?
Sure, make the hole in the manifold as big as the hole in the carb.
#17
Posted 25 June 2016 - 02:23 PM
what oldjohnno said ^,
when dealing with just atmospheric pressure ( 1 bar - 14.7psi ), or a partial vacuum,
the bigger diametre - area size of the manifold - tube, get's the best flow, as size is the go.
This is because we have no greater pressure to force air flow like a turbo or supercharger.
learned this installing ventilation ducting with multiple inlets.
#18
_LS1 Taxi_
Posted 25 June 2016 - 02:46 PM
And around 80% of it will be wrong.
Lol.
The guru
#19
Posted 25 June 2016 - 04:33 PM
Sure, make the hole in the manifold as big as the hole in the carb.
Sorry, my wording was not clear- What I am interested to hear your thoughts on is how far to extend the transition from the face of the manifold- how far along the length of the manifold to blend the hole?
#20
_oldjohnno_
Posted 25 June 2016 - 05:54 PM
Sorry, my wording was not clear- What I am interested to hear your thoughts on is how far to extend the transition from the face of the manifold- how far along the length of the manifold to blend the hole?
You were clear, I wasn't.
If you wanted the best possible flow - and this assumes that the head end of the runner has a bigger area than the carb end - then you'd try to expand the runner gradually so that flow separation didn't occur. Separation usually starts to happen when the walls diverge from the centreline at an angle greater than around 5 to 10 degrees. If the runner is short and/or the port-end area is large then it mightn't be physically possible to make the angle so gentle. So you'd just blend it for as long as you could. On the other hand if the runner was long you'd angle the walls out until the area equalled that of the port face and make the rest parallel.
But all this probably doesn't matter so much in the real world of street cars that don't flow much anyway. For a Holden six if you just blended it far enough in that the runner no longer reduced in diameter it'd be fine.
#21
Posted 25 June 2016 - 08:37 PM
You were clear, I wasn't.
If you wanted the best possible flow - and this assumes that the head end of the runner has a bigger area than the carb end - then you'd try to expand the runner gradually so that flow separation didn't occur. Separation usually starts to happen when the walls diverge from the centreline at an angle greater than around 5 to 10 degrees. If the runner is short and/or the port-end area is large then it mightn't be physically possible to make the angle so gentle. So you'd just blend it for as long as you could. On the other hand if the runner was long you'd angle the walls out until the area equalled that of the port face and make the rest parallel.
But all this probably doesn't matter so much in the real world of street cars that don't flow much anyway. For a Holden six if you just blended it far enough in that the runner no longer reduced in diameter it'd be fine.
Cheers mate, pretty much what I was thinking but I thought I should check. Ill be having a dig at the manifold in the next week or so. I might throw some pics up here...
Thanks again, regards
#22
Posted 25 June 2016 - 09:27 PM
Thanks for everyone's input and feedback. I think I might er on the side of caution and leave well enough along at this stage, might even pick up an old 12 port to practice on. There is some good info on an internet post entitled "Holden Six Motor Build". I tried to link or cut/paste onto this thread but unable to do so. LC-GTR-69, if you can post pics as you go that would be great, or if anyone else has any relevant pics like Muzzy's, that would also be great. Cheers paul
#23
Posted 25 June 2016 - 09:40 PM
Sorry, made a bit of a blue, the engine build info is actually called "building the hot holden six by [email protected]", my bad!
#24
Posted 25 June 2016 - 09:46 PM
* that's our snarley oldjohnno Paul.
#25
Posted 25 June 2016 - 10:39 PM
Wow, small world hey, its a great read oldjohnno, you obviously know your holden 6's.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users