
Mandrel Bends and Donuts
#26
Posted 05 October 2006 - 10:36 PM
I've seen the jap/chinese manifolds with goldy coloured welds. I can weld stainless quite well but would love to know how the jap/chinese get those goldy coloured welds.
#27
Posted 05 October 2006 - 10:48 PM
#28
_coupe202_
Posted 05 October 2006 - 11:02 PM
#29
Posted 05 October 2006 - 11:04 PM
2" too big?i dont have prices of 321 as i dont use it.
2" pipe is way too big.
steampipe bends are about $2.50 each and the pipe is about $100/6.5m
im in wollongong mate.
The internal port diameter is 48mm. Thats pretty close to 2" isnt it? Or am i missing something here? Its a Nissan V8 by the way.
#30
_coupe202_
Posted 05 October 2006 - 11:28 PM
#31
Posted 05 October 2006 - 11:35 PM
https://cache.gmh-torana.com.au/i50.photobucket.com/albums/f312/toranacar/DSC00438.jpg[/img]]My Webpage://https://cache.gmh-torana.com.au/i50.photobucket.com/albums/f...img]]My Webpage://https://cache.gmh-torana.com.au/i50.photobucket.com/albums/f...img]]My Webpage
#32
_jap-xu1_
Posted 07 October 2006 - 12:25 AM
the gold welds are from good gas coverage.Main benefit of stainless steel is that it keeps the heat in the manifold much better than mild steel. It is generally well know that stainless aids spool time.
I've seen the jap/chinese manifolds with goldy coloured welds. I can weld stainless quite well but would love to know how the jap/chinese get those goldy coloured welds.
notice the sooner the weld is exposed to atmo the darker the colour will be.
if you use a big gas lense and crank the gas you will get welds ranging from no colour to yellow.
you can see some of the colour spectrum in this weld here of mine on 316L

#33
Posted 07 October 2006 - 01:02 AM
Although a nice cosmetic look is important, for me if it is a sound weld, then that is all that matters. When the heat gets in the manifold it changes colour anyway.
Regards
#34
Posted 07 October 2006 - 09:57 AM
With the size of tube i would need, 2" would be ok yeah?
#35
_jap-xu1_
Posted 07 October 2006 - 11:30 AM
what is the capacity of the engine?
Edited by jap-xu1, 07 October 2006 - 11:31 AM.
#36
Posted 07 October 2006 - 01:43 PM
Yep it sure is, the wire ring under it is something i made up to work out the diameter of the port, I bent up the shape of the port with that wire then bent it round and mesured the diameter and got 46mm. 48mm if wall is 2mmis that exhaust gasket the shape of the port bart?
what is the capacity of the engine?

Obviously I would have to shape the primaries oval like the ports.
Forgot to mention capacity, its 4.1lts, can be stroked to 6ltrs, thought id mention that to make things more complicated lol

Edited by Bart, 07 October 2006 - 01:48 PM.
#37
_jap-xu1_
Posted 07 October 2006 - 03:04 PM
4.1L capacity v8 is .5125L per cylinder.
rb engines are .5L per cylinder,thats pretty damn close.
i would use 32nb(36mm id) steampipe and flare out the pipe at the join to the head flange,this will keep the gas velocity high in the manifold which is a good thing.
32nb pipe has proven to be the perfect size on rb engines,any bigger and you will be creating unwanted lag.
how much hp are you looking to make?
Edited by jap-xu1, 07 October 2006 - 03:05 PM.
#38
Posted 07 October 2006 - 04:59 PM
So the idea is approx 700hp eventually
Just an idea, instead of flaring out the primaries maybe I should buy cones?? and weld them to the primaries, as cones can make a nice gradual step down.
Edited by Bart, 07 October 2006 - 05:02 PM.
#39
_jap-xu1_
Posted 07 October 2006 - 05:03 PM
#40
Posted 07 October 2006 - 05:24 PM
I still have to ring Gair about the 321 SS if thats too far out of reach ill go Liverpool exhaust steam pipe otherwise if you werent so far id buy the stuff off you.
#41
_jap-xu1_
Posted 07 October 2006 - 05:48 PM
cut it down the middle and add a triangle piece.
perfect reducer;)
#42
Posted 07 October 2006 - 08:12 PM
sounds like a goeri would make reducers from straight pipe.
cut it down the middle and add a triangle piece.
perfect reducer;)
Thanks mate

#43
_jap-xu1_
Posted 07 October 2006 - 08:29 PM
#44
Posted 08 October 2006 - 01:31 AM

#45
Posted 08 October 2006 - 02:48 AM
Stainless steel comes in sched 10 thickness (about 2.77) as opposed to mild steel that only comes in sched 40 thickness (about 3.something). Just use mild steel flanges as this has benefits of not expanding as much as stainless.
I prefer to have the manifold tubing at least the same size as the port or slighly bigger for the primaries in performance applications. Those exhaust ports look pretty big.
(32nb)1 1/4" with inside daimeter of approx 36mm is too small IMO for this large size port.You would need to go the next size up with 1 1/2" which in stainless would give a I/D of around 43mm in stainless sched 10
I then use a press and a big flat bar on the insides of the pipe to get the oval shape of the port. If its still slightly too small you can use a die grinder to take a bit out of the walls of the thick pipe to match port.
There are so many considerations and more than one way to skin a cat. Remember all this pipe work has to make its way into a turbine. I've spent many hours just pondering the best possible way to make a turbo manifold.
#46
Posted 10 October 2006 - 08:21 PM
A bit too pricey, the steam pipe is looking more inviting

The guy i spoke to seems quite helpfull and even suggested other suppliers, nice bloke.
Edited by Bart, 10 October 2006 - 08:22 PM.
#47
_jap-xu1_
Posted 11 October 2006 - 01:18 PM
steampipe works fine and is great value
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users