
Reproduction SLR Steering Wheel
#26
Posted 20 January 2009 - 09:12 PM
#27
Posted 20 January 2009 - 09:16 PM
#28
_ass308_
Posted 21 January 2009 - 06:27 AM
#29
_Pallbag_
Posted 21 January 2009 - 07:24 AM
Maybe they were made for replacement of these later models and not for the torries ... Just a thought.what i am saying is if you are going to copy something, make it correct. For the record, 3mm spokes were introduced with the UC and HZ, the older wheels are not 5mm thick, they are imperial 3/16 from memory
#30
Posted 21 January 2009 - 08:06 AM
The originals are one piece, the copies are 2, requiring a BOSS kit. The rim itself is also fifferent. The only difference in the original factory ones was the early were thick spoked, late were thin.
Anyone who has the new wheel post up some pics of it around the boss area (particularly where it's attached) and around the edges of the rim and I'll get some pics of the originals thick and thin spoked examples.
#31
Posted 21 January 2009 - 10:12 AM

if you look close you can see the separation between wheel and boss
#32
Posted 21 January 2009 - 10:19 AM

Its probably easier to see with the horn piece removed though...
#33
Posted 21 January 2009 - 12:56 PM

ORIGINAL THICK AND THIN SPOKES, YOU CAN ALSO SEE THE GROOVE AROUND THE RIM AND THE REAR OF THE WHEELS IS PART OF THE RIM AND COVERED WITH A GRAIN FINISHED RUBBER

MEASURING THE THIN SPOKE WHEEL

MEASURING THE THICK SPOKED WHEEL

SHOWING THE CENTRE CAP IN RELATION TO THE WHEEL, NOTICE A SMALL GAP. NO UGLY BOLTS HOLDING THE RIM TO THE BOSS AND THE BOSS AREA IS THE SAME DIAMETER ALL THE WAY ALONG
#34
Posted 21 January 2009 - 05:55 PM
I'm not sure I understand what you are saying. If the UC Torana wheels (3mm) still meet modern ADRs, then of course if you were to manufacture a new SL/R wheel, you would do it 3mm thick, so that it could legally fit both early and late (and potentially even brand new) cars. We agree on that, right?correct, it wou;d have to meet ADR's, but the 3mm spokes were on the later wheels, thats not the real issue
#35
Posted 21 January 2009 - 10:16 PM
#36
Posted 22 January 2009 - 08:08 PM
I was just thinking if you couldn't make a car that doesn't meet an ADR then why would you be able to make a component of a car that doesn't meet an ADR, but I don't know how the system works there. And if you made a 3mm one then it could be fitted to early and late cars (such as HZ GTS?) so you don't need to produce two seperate wheels. But yeah all good, cheers
#37
_darrenmark1_
Posted 23 January 2009 - 07:13 AM
I think most people know my opinion on these, I'd pay double if it was correct, but I refuse to pay $300 for something thats not correct. However, in saying that, I'm fussy, and I'm not saying it's poor quality, what i am saying is if you are going to copy something, make it correct. For the record, 3mm spokes were introduced with the UC and HZ, the older wheels are not 5mm thick, they are imperial 3/16 from memory I could be wrong there I'd have to measure it. It would have to be a very late LX to have the metric wheel.
Both of mine are 3/16 of a inch.. which if my maths is correct is 4.762mm thick.
one 1974
two 1975
Edited by darrenmark1, 23 January 2009 - 07:14 AM.
#38
_HRV74_
Posted 11 February 2009 - 08:31 PM
Well, it's trial fitted and I'm not so sure about things. There seems to be a fraction too much friction where the back of the wheel touches the cover of the column, it's definitely an Interference Fit which seems strange doesn't it?? This is the case even when the nut is not torqued up. Was never an issue with the Momo.
Cheers
Harve

#39
_les_
Posted 21 February 2009 - 08:27 PM
We possibly could have made it closer to original but not in Australia and even in Asia we could not have produced it and sold it at its current price or any where close to it, I suggest that it would be twice the price or even more it is along time since we priced it. So we compromised as we sometimes have to do or we do not have the product I think it is a good product and I release that not everybody will be satisfied but the bottom line is we can not make it as per original.
Les
#40
_BCR42Y_
Posted 16 October 2009 - 04:56 PM
#41
_stu.slr_
Posted 16 October 2009 - 11:00 PM
#42
_stu.slr_
Posted 16 October 2009 - 11:12 PM
This is the story as far as I know GMH gave us permission to use the original tooling for the GTS wheel, we had Bridgestone make them for us using the 3mm spoke. The tooling for the spokes broke sometime later and Rare Spares took over the production of the spoke. We had production runs with the Bridgestone spoke and then the Rare Spares spoke; I am not sure how many of each where actually produced. The next problem we had was the hub tooling it had be come unusable and had to be repaired being GMH tooling we had to get their permission . When we finally got the ok to fix the tooling the company that originally did the hub and spoke (one piece moulding) no longer wanted to do it. After many months we still had not found any one able to do the moulding, in the mean time Bridgestone had returned the rest of the tooling to GMH (unbeknown to us) where it was dumped. Now we had a bigger problem no GTS wheels and Bridgestone where not that interested in making a wheel using this outdate method, we had no one to make the hub and no tooling. So we started from scratch to make a repro wheel, a wheel that we have to sell to the majority of people at a price they can afford.
We possibly could have made it closer to original but not in Australia and even in Asia we could not have produced it and sold it at its current price or any where close to it, I suggest that it would be twice the price or even more it is along time since we priced it. So we compromised as we sometimes have to do or we do not have the product I think it is a good product and I release that not everybody will be satisfied but the bottom line is we can not make it as per original.
Les
[/quote]
good on yer les . i am glad a company has come on board to this website and address issues instead of just a bunch of people whinging
[quote name='HRV74' date='11 February 2009 - 08:01 PM' timestamp='1234348302' post='369864']
Hi all
Well, it's trial fitted and I'm not so sure about things. There seems to be a fraction too much friction where the back of the wheel touches the cover of the column, it's definitely an Interference Fit which seems strange doesn't it?? This is the case even when the nut is not torqued up. Was never an issue with the Momo.
Cheers
Harv
Edited by stu.slr, 16 October 2009 - 11:21 PM.
#43
_stu.slr_
Posted 16 October 2009 - 11:24 PM

[/quote]
#44
_stu.slr_
Posted 16 October 2009 - 11:29 PM
#45
_HRV74_
Posted 18 October 2009 - 06:14 PM
Rare Spares happily replaced the original wheel that I bought some months ago, they suspect that the spline was not quite machined correctly, but that this was a one-off problem. Haven't even tried the replacement yet, will post the result when I do.
Cheers, H
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users