What was the cars weight?
Fastest Holden 6 Powered Sedan
Started by
_V6 Chev_
, Dec 12 2009 10:13 PM
461 replies to this topic
#77
greens nice
-
- Members
-
- 1,011 posts
Forum Fixture
- Name:Kevin
- Location:QLD
- Car:EH Holden
- Joined: 01-November 08
Posted 05 June 2010 - 11:20 PM
ran 11.55 @114.7mph naturally aspirated in LC 2 door back in 2005 with 9 port, 3 x 45mm webers,flat tappet cam, std crank,rods and cast pistons,trimatic and banjo
[/quote]
Red motor rods and a banjo holding 300 hp?
[/quote]
Red motor rods and a banjo holding 300 hp?
#78
WhaleOilBeefHooked
-
- Members
-
- 1,669 posts
Lord Humungus The Ayatolla of Rock N Rolla.
- Name:Andrew
- Location:Sydney
- Car:LJ GTR
- Joined: 06-July 09
Posted 06 June 2010 - 12:28 AM
[quote name='greens nice' date='05 June 2010 - 11:20 PM' timestamp='1275744053' post='512760']
ran 11.55 @114.7mph naturally aspirated in LC 2 door back in 2005 with 9 port, 3 x 45mm webers,flat tappet cam, std crank,rods and cast pistons,trimatic and banjo
[/quote]
Red motor rods and a banjo holding 300 hp?
[/quote]
What thu guy was running "THAT QUICK" with an AUTO ??? Damn right it's an AUTO for all those pedal pushers/auto H8R'ss..
ran 11.55 @114.7mph naturally aspirated in LC 2 door back in 2005 with 9 port, 3 x 45mm webers,flat tappet cam, std crank,rods and cast pistons,trimatic and banjo
[/quote]
Red motor rods and a banjo holding 300 hp?
[/quote]
What thu guy was running "THAT QUICK" with an AUTO ??? Damn right it's an AUTO for all those pedal pushers/auto H8R'ss..
#79
hip6
-
- Members
-
- 198 posts
Forum Member
- Joined: 18-November 05
Posted 07 June 2010 - 09:31 AM
[quote name='WHALEOILBEEFHOOKED' date='06 June 2010 - 12:28 AM' timestamp='1275748091' post='512776']
[quote name='greens nice' date='05 June 2010 - 11:20 PM' timestamp='1275744053' post='512760']
ran 11.55 @114.7mph naturally aspirated in LC 2 door back in 2005 with 9 port, 3 x 45mm webers,flat tappet cam, std crank,rods and cast pistons,trimatic and banjo
[/quote]
Red motor rods and a banjo holding 300 hp?
[/quote]
What thu guy was running "THAT QUICK" with an AUTO ??? Damn right it's an AUTO for all those pedal pushers/auto H8R'ss..
[/quote]
blue motor rods, and i got the same banjo rear end to run a 9.9 @ 135mph with a 1.36 60ft
[quote name='greens nice' date='05 June 2010 - 11:20 PM' timestamp='1275744053' post='512760']
ran 11.55 @114.7mph naturally aspirated in LC 2 door back in 2005 with 9 port, 3 x 45mm webers,flat tappet cam, std crank,rods and cast pistons,trimatic and banjo
[/quote]
Red motor rods and a banjo holding 300 hp?
[/quote]
What thu guy was running "THAT QUICK" with an AUTO ??? Damn right it's an AUTO for all those pedal pushers/auto H8R'ss..
[/quote]
blue motor rods, and i got the same banjo rear end to run a 9.9 @ 135mph with a 1.36 60ft
#80
_Bomber Watson_
_Bomber Watson_
-
- Guests
Posted 07 June 2010 - 06:37 PM
And the vehicle weighs???
Im curious...Is all.
Im curious...Is all.
#81
_CraigA_
_CraigA_
-
- Guests
Posted 07 June 2010 - 07:03 PM
^^^ Good question. I'd be very interested too.
With 300FWHP to get that time/mph you would need a wet weight around 2500 lbs (1100kgs) so its theoretically achievable.
With 300FWHP to get that time/mph you would need a wet weight around 2500 lbs (1100kgs) so its theoretically achievable.
#82
greens nice
-
- Members
-
- 1,011 posts
Forum Fixture
- Name:Kevin
- Location:QLD
- Car:EH Holden
- Joined: 01-November 08
Posted 07 June 2010 - 07:57 PM
^^^ Good question. I'd be very interested too.
With 300FWHP to get that time/mph you would need a wet weight around 2500 lbs (1100kgs) so its theoretically achievable.
oo how i wish that was spot on, dad would be 11.1 by now.
#83
hip6
-
- Members
-
- 198 posts
Forum Member
- Joined: 18-November 05
Posted 08 June 2010 - 10:56 AM
of course its theoretically achievable.its not that major of an achievment.its also not rocket science.its never been dynoed either,just trial and error and it weighs as much as a lightened but unbutchered LC 2 door weighs.theres more in it, just no quarter mile within 8 hours drive to test at, since our local track here in adelaide shut down in dec 2005. that combo ran 7.20 @ 93mph for the eighth mile,always seems to lack top end.
#84
_Bad Blood_
_Bad Blood_
-
- Guests
Posted 03 July 2010 - 04:06 PM
oh, well i have this fascination with hb's and was wondering what the running gear was lol.
holden blue, 2inch SU's, trimatic, borg warner, nothing to tuff runs 13.8
He ran a 13.3 tonight
I got it down to 12.38 now and its a 1 tonner diff 4.44
#86
hip6
-
- Members
-
- 198 posts
Forum Member
- Joined: 18-November 05
Posted 22 July 2010 - 11:41 AM
hip 6 b s
how so?
#87
_panic_
_panic_
-
- Guests
Posted 23 July 2010 - 09:43 PM
hip 6 b s
how so? 7.2 @92 b s
Edited by panic, 23 July 2010 - 09:45 PM.
#88
hip6
-
- Members
-
- 198 posts
Forum Member
- Joined: 18-November 05
Posted 26 July 2010 - 10:02 AM
7.20 @ 93MPH on the eighth with a 1.55 60ft, whats so hard to believe?
#89
greens nice
-
- Members
-
- 1,011 posts
Forum Fixture
- Name:Kevin
- Location:QLD
- Car:EH Holden
- Joined: 01-November 08
Posted 26 July 2010 - 12:28 PM
7.20 @ 93MPH on the eighth with a 1.55 60ft, whats so hard to believe?
the part where its a aspo holden 6 on petrol and the banjo part.
#90
hip6
-
- Members
-
- 198 posts
Forum Member
- Joined: 18-November 05
Posted 26 July 2010 - 02:00 PM
it ran 11.70 @ 114mph N/A with 3.9 HOLDEN BANJO, the same diff ran 9.90 @133mph with 1.36 60ft with nitrous, before the track shut down here in adelaide i put a cut down toyota hilux banjo set-up in it for a lower ratio which helped et's
#91
_1tuff383_
_1tuff383_
-
- Guests
Posted 27 July 2010 - 11:09 PM
Hip6
was this car orange by any chance???
was this car orange by any chance???
#92
hip6
-
- Members
-
- 198 posts
Forum Member
- Joined: 18-November 05
Posted 28 July 2010 - 09:16 AM
still is
#93
_1tuff383_
_1tuff383_
-
- Guests
Posted 03 August 2010 - 01:34 AM
did this have plates on it
STOCK or STOCK6???
STOCK or STOCK6???
#94
hip6
-
- Members
-
- 198 posts
Forum Member
- Joined: 18-November 05
Posted 03 August 2010 - 09:46 AM
yes it does have STOCK 6 plates,why do you ask.
#96
hip6
-
- Members
-
- 198 posts
Forum Member
- Joined: 18-November 05
Posted 03 August 2010 - 05:43 PM
one of my engines does, the other has the cast 9 port
#97
_1tuff383_
_1tuff383_
-
- Guests
Posted 03 August 2010 - 07:18 PM
i have a magazine which it was featured in from years ago....
very impressive what you got out of the combinations.
this car changed my veiws on the little 6's
top work
i would love to pic your brain on the suspension setups tips/hints you have.
i am very slowly between work comittments, kids etc
finalising my 186, tripple webered, trimatic with a borgy.
it made just over 300hp & 300ft lbs on the engine dyno N/A.
it wont leave the line like yours did (or still does?) but should still hammer.
actually i am hoping for similar times to what you have posted for the N/A runs.
very impressive what you got out of the combinations.
this car changed my veiws on the little 6's
top work
i would love to pic your brain on the suspension setups tips/hints you have.
i am very slowly between work comittments, kids etc
finalising my 186, tripple webered, trimatic with a borgy.
it made just over 300hp & 300ft lbs on the engine dyno N/A.
it wont leave the line like yours did (or still does?) but should still hammer.
actually i am hoping for similar times to what you have posted for the N/A runs.
Edited by 1tuff383, 03 August 2010 - 07:19 PM.
#98
hip6
-
- Members
-
- 198 posts
Forum Member
- Joined: 18-November 05
Posted 04 August 2010 - 09:45 AM
[quote name='greens nice' date='07 June 2010 - 07:57 PM' timestamp='1275904658' post='513231']
[quote name='CraigA' date='07 June 2010 - 07:03 PM' timestamp='1275901406' post='513205']
^^^ Good question. I'd be very interested too.
With 300FWHP to get that time/mph you would need a wet weight around 2500 lbs (1100kgs) so its theoretically achievable.
[/quote]
oo how i wish that was spot on, dad would be 11.1 by now.
[/quote
now that we may have established my details aren't [b.s] can you explain how low 12's at 108-109 mph equates to 11.1's please.
[quote name='CraigA' date='07 June 2010 - 07:03 PM' timestamp='1275901406' post='513205']
^^^ Good question. I'd be very interested too.
With 300FWHP to get that time/mph you would need a wet weight around 2500 lbs (1100kgs) so its theoretically achievable.
[/quote]
oo how i wish that was spot on, dad would be 11.1 by now.
[/quote
now that we may have established my details aren't [b.s] can you explain how low 12's at 108-109 mph equates to 11.1's please.
Edited by hip6, 04 August 2010 - 09:41 AM.
#99
Heath
View Garage
-
- Administrators
-
- 18,314 posts
I like cars.
- Name:Heath
- Location:Eastern Suburbs, Melbourne
- Car:Heavily Modified UC Sunbird Hatchback
- Joined: 07-November 05
View Garage
Posted 04 August 2010 - 09:52 AM
#100
greens nice
-
- Members
-
- 1,011 posts
Forum Fixture
- Name:Kevin
- Location:QLD
- Car:EH Holden
- Joined: 01-November 08
Posted 04 August 2010 - 12:56 PM
[quote name='hip6' date='04 August 2010 - 09:45 AM' timestamp='1280879100' post='528049']
[quote name='greens nice' date='07 June 2010 - 07:57 PM' timestamp='1275904658' post='513231']
[quote name='CraigA' date='07 June 2010 - 07:03 PM' timestamp='1275901406' post='513205']
^^^ Good question. I'd be very interested too.
With 300FWHP to get that time/mph you would need a wet weight around 2500 lbs (1100kgs) so its theoretically achievable.
[/quote]
oo how i wish that was spot on, dad would be 11.1 by now.
[/quote
now that we may have established my details aren't [b.s] can you explain how low 12's at 108-109 mph equates to 11.1's please.
[/quote]
because it makes more than 300 @ the fly.
i can punch those details in there into all the calcs ive found and it all says 290 @ the wheels.
im not doubting this anymore ive seen and heard enough, but the banjo holding up is very surprising.
[quote name='greens nice' date='07 June 2010 - 07:57 PM' timestamp='1275904658' post='513231']
[quote name='CraigA' date='07 June 2010 - 07:03 PM' timestamp='1275901406' post='513205']
^^^ Good question. I'd be very interested too.
With 300FWHP to get that time/mph you would need a wet weight around 2500 lbs (1100kgs) so its theoretically achievable.
[/quote]
oo how i wish that was spot on, dad would be 11.1 by now.
[/quote
now that we may have established my details aren't [b.s] can you explain how low 12's at 108-109 mph equates to 11.1's please.
[/quote]
because it makes more than 300 @ the fly.
i can punch those details in there into all the calcs ive found and it all says 290 @ the wheels.
im not doubting this anymore ive seen and heard enough, but the banjo holding up is very surprising.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
