how do i get the best out of a 253?
#26
Posted 15 June 2006 - 12:40 AM
I am unsure of my compression, but it is pretty high, it ONLY runs on BP Ultimate, or avgas if I had some
#27
Posted 15 June 2006 - 02:39 AM
Did u ever run it down the qtr?
#28 _Oldn64_
Posted 15 June 2006 - 06:05 PM
Cheers
#29
Posted 16 June 2006 - 03:03 PM
#30 _brett_32i_
Posted 16 June 2006 - 05:33 PM
thats crap...anyone who tells you that you are wasting your time with a 253 obviously hasnt tried hard enough to pull the monster out that lies beneath the typical boat anchor reputation they have. mine produced 264 rwhp, stock 4 barrel hq manifold and quaddy, the secrets lie in the comp and heads, mine ran 12.5:1 comp(avgas only or meth) and minor port work you just need someone who knows what they are doing, we recently put a cain tunnel ram on with twin 600 holleys and it made 318.2 rwhp at 7600rpm, unfortunately though i killed it apparently the ring lands wont stay where they are meant to when you turn it to 8500 for a minute.also line honing will gain power for you too...
if you spend that same time money and effort on a 308 and only run it avgas or meth, then you would end up having more than 400hp.
#31
Posted 16 June 2006 - 06:55 PM
#32 _switchedon_
Posted 16 June 2006 - 11:41 PM
#33 _Oldn64_
Posted 17 June 2006 - 02:52 AM
Ok been two years since I looked at this stuff so here I go...can I have some specs please Tim, especially on the heads and cam.
Cam I used was a Crow Cam grind #170 (it is a Commodore cup grind) and you where able to get it then. Not sure how availible it is now but I am sure it will be able to be Created. Cannot recall properly what the profile was but it didnot like idling for long. Great pull from 2000-7300. Ran a Carby (same as Matts with hanger H) so richer again, with standard 308 secodnary needles. The heads where smoothed on teh exhuast side (match ported) and the inlet side increased to create a 2mm Lip. (ie step into the head, so teh head port was 4mm in diameter than teh inlet. The small radius was smoothed and the large radius rounded so that it pointed to the inner corner of teh valve. The valve sizing was up graded slightly on the exhuast and the inlet kept the same. The head bowls were CCed to 52cc each and the pistons were acl race series. The crank was machines (offset grind) by only .5mm which was actually the race rules of teh period. This droppe dthe comp back to about 9.2:1.
Primary pipes where 1 3/4 4,2,1's and the secondaries 2 1/4" Cross over pip occured under the gearbox crossmember and exited in a single 2 3/4" system. Ran only one muffler and one hot dog. The muffler is connected about the rear seat (approx 40cm from diff assembly.
The cam was 2 degrees retarded and the rockers 1.7 on inlet and 1.6 on exhuast. thsi combo is not for the faint hearted. You will need to drive the engine but great torque and power was made. Best suited for a manual as vacuum at idle is a little poor. I always ran a double stack air filter so that the air velocity through the filter was not too great. filter hieght was 5" tall by 14" diameter. Always ran a race tray/cold air intake.
The other trick is using the original rocker covers. The chrome ones either leak oil everywhere through the breathers or the covers do not sit right on the head and therefore leak at the gasket surface.
The rockers where yella terras and the pushrods where selected engine by engine. (ie deck hieght etc etc) I always used a 5 thou tin head gasket (like the original holden ones) And got a mate to make them. unfortunately he past away a year and a half ago and I have not found anyone who can do them anymore.. :(
Well that is all teh grey matter can vaguely remember I how this helps.
Cheers
#34
Posted 18 June 2006 - 12:18 PM
the intake port was 2mm bigger all the way round?
what primary rods did you use? I have a set of AN (308) secondarys, But I havent got round to trying them yet. Mine runs well with CX's in
#35 _Oldn64_
Posted 19 June 2006 - 12:59 AM
I have a friend how use to race Cup. I have had two cup motors (or equivalents) that I have built. The above heads are nto permitted in the racing rules as teh CC's of teh ehad are too small. From memory that is the only thing that is not permitted. Cannot remember what the primaries or teh secondary hangs are 100% off teh top of my head but I do have a spare cup kit out in teh shed somewhere from our last tunign session. I am sure if I looked through teh garage I could find them for you.cheers Tim, so you had a commodore cup engine?
the intake port was 2mm bigger all the way round?
what primary rods did you use? I have a set of AN (308) secondarys, But I havent got round to trying them yet. Mine runs well with CX's in
Cheers
#36 _[BOTTLEDUP]_
Posted 19 June 2006 - 12:05 PM
Dur @ 0.050": 219/219
Lobe lift: 0.286/0.284
Adv Dur: 280/280
LCA: 111
Int Lift with 1.7:1 Rocker: 0.483
Exh Lift with 1.6:1 Rocker: 0.457
And its a hydraulic cam.
Commodore Cup racers used a control head manufactured by Yella Terra. It was referred to as the 'Hi-Torque' from the days when Yella Terra still did cast iron cyl heads. They were painted black for ID purposes out of YT.
#37
Posted 19 June 2006 - 03:10 PM
Tim, it would be good if you could see what 253 stuff you have lying around, I might be interested in some if you want to get rid of it.
#38 _chevy_253_torana_
Posted 20 June 2006 - 12:10 AM
cheers chevy
#39
Posted 21 June 2006 - 10:56 AM
Roller rockers would be good idea, dont roller rockers reduce friction? therefore reduce fuel consumption?
Electronic dizzy
Healthy gear box, if too much slip or holds back in gear change (auto) will use more fuel.
my2c
#40
Posted 22 June 2006 - 02:41 AM
Im looking at getting some L34 Heads for my Stroker...
#41
Posted 22 June 2006 - 10:29 AM
#43 _brett_32i_
Posted 22 June 2006 - 06:21 PM
it was mentioned in a n earlier post, that the block would need releiving to allow valves to open, and something about the fluffy being too small to get the best out of the big ports and valves...How about injected VN heads on a 253 for economy and power??
Roller rockers would be good idea, dont roller rockers reduce friction? therefore reduce fuel consumption?
Electronic dizzy
Healthy gear box, if too much slip or holds back in gear change (auto) will use more fuel.
my2c
#44 _TORANR AMORE_
Posted 22 June 2006 - 06:34 PM
I haven't read the whole thread, but to answer the original question, from my experience and from what I've seen and heard: A 253 is NOT cheaper to run than a 202 full stop!. It will however be a nicer engine to run in a Torry. If you want it to be cheap to run, then run it on either straight gas or duel fuel.Hey guys,
I've been convinced to change my 202 to a 253. I've been told that it will actually be cheaper on fuel, but is there anything I could do to make it even cheaper to run? its my daily driver...
I've got a set of genie extractors which I'm putting on it, as well as a twin 2.something inch exhaust, but it has a broken crossover just after the extractors. Should I repair the crossover or cut it out?
Any ideas on carbies or cams?
Cheers,
Kurt.
If not, and you decision is purely based on fuel economy, then stick to the 202 until you can get yourself a gas setup.
#45 _oikurtman_
Posted 23 June 2006 - 01:17 PM
well the old man gave me a blue 253 and trimatic the other day so i'm at no loss to fit it and try it...
I'll let you know how it goes, but no doubt i'll be back on here half way through when something goes wrong!
Cheers.
#46 _chevy_253_torana_
Posted 24 June 2006 - 01:10 AM
#47 _1QUICK LJ_
Posted 24 June 2006 - 09:23 PM
#48
Posted 25 June 2006 - 10:57 AM
#49
Posted 25 June 2006 - 02:17 PM
#50
Posted 25 June 2006 - 02:26 PM
Basic specs were 253+.060 = 261cu, 10.5:1 comp, 238 degree cam (@.050), 1.85"/1.5" intake/exhaust, basic head porting, 600 Holley (though they thought a 500 may have gone better), idles at 950rpm, runs out strongly to 7000rpm.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users