pick me a box
#1 _Bomber Watson_
Posted 02 December 2005 - 07:45 PM
so basicaly, any ideas what i can run?? i want something easily available, and that can be adapted easily. 5 speeds would be nice but 4 would do. i would like to keep it to about $1000 for the box alone...not counting what it will cost to adapt it to the car. so i can see the supra box maybie living, a top loader is on the list, any other ideas?? your comments on both of these, any others?
don't bother mentioning an auto, not interested.
thanks all.
#2
Posted 03 December 2005 - 07:49 AM
#3
Posted 03 December 2005 - 02:47 PM
#4
Posted 03 December 2005 - 03:01 PM
#5 _high_rpm_
Posted 03 December 2005 - 05:29 PM
#6
Posted 03 December 2005 - 07:08 PM
#7 _J&S Racing_
Posted 03 December 2005 - 07:12 PM
Can you get a Sequential shifter for M20/M21
#8 _Dirty Deeds_
Posted 03 December 2005 - 07:59 PM
Yep, Renegate make them ( or they used to ). They are on the web, www.renagate.com.I agree with high rpm, a good package for your bucks.
Can you get a Sequential shifter for M20/M21
I had one on the Top Loader and HATED IT !!!
Down shifting was a PITA.
#9 _high_rpm_
Posted 04 December 2005 - 02:09 AM
#10 _high_rpm_
Posted 04 December 2005 - 02:10 AM
your the one home on a saturday night^^ You really need to get out more often...
#11
Posted 04 December 2005 - 10:08 PM
Couldn't resist
#12 _Bomber Watson_
Posted 05 December 2005 - 09:11 PM
so the current ideas are, supra should live, top loader feels like trying to move rocks around when changing (not terrably good), but i can get a sequential shifter (good) but the shifter moves to far to be overly practical (not terrably good), and super t10 might be an option...what are t10's out of??? chevy yes?
#13 _Baronvonrort_
Posted 06 December 2005 - 04:14 PM
The maths simplified for calculating rotational inertia is:
Mass (kg) multiplied by radius squared(Metres) then divide that by 2.
With the 'radius' being squared a smaller diameter clutch for the same weight will have much less rotational inertia and therefore rev out much quicker.I wont confuse you with SI units so go for the one with the lower number to reduce rotational inertia.
The fibre cluch material is lighter than metal puck type and since this weight is near the edge of the radius i am not sure if it will actually have less rotational inertia.
A lighter clamping force from the pressure plate is what will reduce clutch cable stretch.
A smaller diameter or lighter pressure plate will reduce rotational inertia similar to the effect of a lightend flywheel and again the smaller diameter one for the same weight will have significantly less rotational inertia.
The supra box should have no worries behind a 202 in a Torana.
The Supra weighs just over 1500 kg and the 3 litre twin cam multivalve turbo engine would have more torque and power than the 202.The rice burners do increase the boost for even more power when modifying them and they still hold up in a supra.
If you get a quick shift for the supra box from dellow it has one of the best and shortest gearshift i have ever used.
The only problem i have had with the supra box is with the extension that is supplied for the input shaft so it can reach the spigot bush is too short and only just reaches the spigot bush so i have had to machine another one up on a lathe.
I have fitted these box's to many cars both 6 and V8 and they have all lasted for years if i have double checked the fit of input shaft extension to spigot bush.
I have a friend who enters "drift comps" with his toyota supra and he has never had any gearbox problems.
With all the shift linkages being inside the gearbox they never jam up like the m20/21's.
#14 _Bomber Watson_
Posted 07 December 2005 - 09:44 PM
so thus far it seems the supra box is on everyons list....most of ya seem to think it will live. might send an email to dellow and see what they say, blokes there know more bout boxes than i do lol. cheers for help so far guy's...keep the suggestions coming.
#15 _Eddie_
Posted 17 December 2005 - 09:53 PM
#16 _Bomber Watson_
Posted 17 December 2005 - 11:53 PM
#17
Posted 27 January 2016 - 10:56 AM
So which stickshift did you end up going with, mate?
#18
Posted 27 January 2016 - 11:50 AM
So which stickshift did you end up going with, mate?
lol
#19 _Bomber Watson_
Posted 27 January 2016 - 12:10 PM
Still rocking the trimatic. Will prolly get a new super t10 for it one day.
#20
Posted 27 January 2016 - 12:53 PM
I challenge you to find an older one...lol
#21 _Skapinad_
Posted 27 January 2016 - 01:33 PM
#22
Posted 27 January 2016 - 01:34 PM
So which stickshift did you end up going with, mate?
So you and Dave are the same person?
#23 _Skapinad_
Posted 27 January 2016 - 01:40 PM
I challenge you to find an older one...lol
Done
#24 _LS1 Taxi_
Posted 27 January 2016 - 01:41 PM
lol
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users