$75,000 xu1 will they hit $100,000
#26 _rorym_
Posted 15 June 2006 - 06:23 PM
See the above replies.
On my 71 CK Salamanca..I would love to have it and would be driving it in the sprints as well. To me a car is a car..its mechanical and repairable ...
See NOSLHs comments...drive the bloody thing..Hard!
Shevster is on the money.
Zook sort of lost me then got me back. He is correct..whatever turns your knobs...
I was expressing my thoughts on where I stand at the moment regarding concourse big $ items sitting in garages used once ever 3 months for 50 klms. Not my scene anymore.
I want speed...lots of it as regularly as possible..but the imporatnat thing is...there will always be at least one Torana in the fleet.!
R
#27 _racyrabbit_
Posted 15 June 2006 - 06:48 PM
#28
Posted 15 June 2006 - 07:31 PM
Now I have had my rant, back to the subject. I bought my car over 11 years ago now, and back then, you saw A9X's for sale every day, and they were reasonably cheap, especially by todays standards. I had my SS hatch, and it was modified in the way I wanted, but I always wanted an A9X. I liked my cars basically as they came from the factory, and since I liked Toranas, this was the logical choice for me to get. For the money I paid, I could not have bought a Torana and modified it up to much better anyway. Now, the prices have skyrocketed, and as someone pointed out, people with good money are willing to pay good money for them to collect for their own reasons. I'm sure the people paying this sort of money have the money to have other toys if they want them, or they can also go out and buy a HSV, they most likely don't care about the depreciation. If someone is spending big money on one of these cars, and doesn't want to wrap it round a pole in a sprint or hill climb, fair enough, I didn't pay big money, but I have never had the interest in doing that sort of thing, even if it was still only worth what I paid. Zook is on the right track, but the wannabees is a bit harse, just because you don't have a collectable car does not make it a nothing, it's someones pride and joy. I don't drive my car as much as some people drive their replicas or whatever, but I enjoy it for what it is and if I want to go hard or be comfortable, I'll take my HSV.
#29 _lx5008_
Posted 15 June 2006 - 07:43 PM
hi glenn, my first car was a torana ss hatch, them this one old blueI agree with NOSLH & bullitljv8. I've got a LX SLR 5000 & I didn't buy it to look at the thing sitting in my shed doing nothing. The most enjoyment I get out of my car is when I'm on a nice windy stretch of road in the country on a beautiful sunny day going for a cruise. I don't give a s*!t about the stone chips I'm having too much fun to worry about that. Hell in 5 years time I'll respray it, who cares. The things insured for more than it's worth anyway. Don't get me wrong it's definately not a daily driver but I try to drive it once a week if the weathers fine.I couldn't care less if it was 5k or 105k my attitude would still be the same. My only stipulations are I don't drive it in the rain if I can avoid it & I don't leave it where I can't see it. I do agree though reference circuit racing that's when I would use a replica. I hope LX5008 is reading this.
i built this a a9x look alike 308 quad webbers, toploader, 9", a9x brakes i drove this car as a daily driver for years and years. sold it in 1992 to build my house. so ive been there and done that. these days i drive my ex cop vt manual. the old slr justs sits in the shed who cares its like new. i work six days a week and on sundays with two young kids there is allways something else to do. how can you drive fast these days with two kids and a wife in the car.
see ya at amcm in sep glenn
cheers graham
#30 _Fairdinkum_
Posted 15 June 2006 - 09:21 PM
I agree with Zook,(except for the wannabees part) i think Zook is spot on with his comments.......I think that saying someone is a p&*^y for not driving their car is a bit harsh. If they have a desirable/expensive/rare car and they gain satisfaction from:
a) having it sit in the shed whilst they have a beer and look at it,
b ) saying "I have an XUA9XSSGTRXL34 and it's worth more than your 460ci Sunbird" or
c) taking it for a once a year drive on Boxing day,
then so be it - it's got nothing to do with anyone else, especially wannabes!
This forum and our allegiance to these cars is built on the great ones, like the XUA9XSSGTRXL34. If they all get smashed up, stolen and parted out until there are none left what will we all have to talk about?!
Ah racy,you just cant get over the fact that some people on this forum dont agree with your thoughts between the L34 And the A9X,how many times have you bought the same subject up ?????????????.Dont get me wrong i respect your point of view but how many times do we have to hear it,anyway in my opinion as i have stated before A9X is a superior car,a much better all round package,but i would not knock back an L34....
Anyway getting back to the point,you can still pick up an XU1 for around the 40000 mark,so why would anyone pay 75000?????? its to dear imo.,,,,,any way good luck to the seller trying to get 75000.
#31
Posted 15 June 2006 - 09:44 PM
I'll stick with my "S", modify to how i want (or how mum lets me), and drive the wheels off it, then maybe later I'll upgrade to an LX and do the same, mod and drive the wheels off it. If i had a chance to buy an A9X in the 80's i wouldve, but seeing as i was born in the 90's...
I think that XU-1s will get to be worth about $100k, keeping in mind that every time that someone wrecks a car, there is one less of that type of car in existence. so if the XU-1, A9X, L34 etc etc owners all keep their cars locked in sheds, what reason have they to go up in value?
RIM
#32 _racyrabbit_
Posted 15 June 2006 - 10:07 PM
#33 _pipjones_
Posted 15 June 2006 - 10:40 PM
#34
Posted 15 June 2006 - 10:48 PM
I was alive, not old enough to drive them, race cars are differnt to road cars however and the fact remains, a stock L34 was actually slower over the quarter than a stock LH SLR5000, simple as that and certainly not 140hp more, even the best HDT L34 engines could only manage 350hp. As pip says, who gives a rats butt which one is better, I don't, but lets at least stick to the facts, and I don't believe I brought this up in the first place, it's not even on subjectIf you were alive when they were new you could have showed me then RED as i used to race them frequently , i had a new 308 in 75,76,77 did you ? TREX
Edited by REDA9X, 15 June 2006 - 10:54 PM.
#35
Posted 15 June 2006 - 10:51 PM
We are fighting with ourselves when they are greater issues that need resolving (like how to save young guys from dieing in car crashes)
RIM
#36
Posted 15 June 2006 - 11:20 PM
there is proof of one selling for 70k on amcs , another for 90k in melb and a buyer who has offered 80k for one ... and after all the garden variety xu1,s have been fetching 55k in good nic , i hope they reach 100k , our little xu1,s are much undervalued compared to the gt falcons that are fetching close to 300k...
however the question still remains , have we missed the boat ?
racy just get that thing on the road then you can brag about it !!!!
#37
Posted 16 June 2006 - 08:07 AM
#38
Posted 16 June 2006 - 11:44 AM
As for whether to drive them or not, I think that part of the reason that Holden muscle cars are starting to hit the big $$ is because guys like Bullit, REDA9X and 2600s (and a host of others) are still willing to get their original cars out of the shed and get them dirty and rained on - take them for drives, cruises, show them at car shows, and let the general public see them. I know of lots of really nice muscle cars which spend their lives sitting in sheds, and it's a shame that the public doesn't get to see them. I don't blame the owners - it's their car, so they can do what they like with it, but it would be a shame if genuine examples simply disappeared from public view, and were forgotten about.
#39 _hux454_
Posted 16 June 2006 - 01:28 PM
Edited by hux454, 16 June 2006 - 01:30 PM.
#40 _Flamenco_
Posted 16 June 2006 - 01:35 PM
#41 _rorym_
Posted 16 June 2006 - 05:47 PM
R
#42 _jap-xu1_
Posted 17 June 2006 - 04:06 PM
some people just have more dollars than sense i spose
#43
Posted 17 June 2006 - 04:42 PM
Personally i think the market still undervalues the cars.i love my toranas but there isnt a stock torana in the world worth 75k. not even close imo.
some people just have more dollars than sense i spose
If I had bought an A9X in 1977 and had baby sit it for close to 30 years for some enthusiast to buy in 2006, I would have thought 70K was fair.
27 years X $500 per annum insurance and reg = 13.5K
12K invested in 1977 would be worth:
24K in 1987
48K in 1997
96K in 2007 based on average inflation.
Total 109K not allowing for repairs, tyres, servicing.
#44 _pipjones_
Posted 18 June 2006 - 08:34 AM
#45 _smiley_
Posted 18 June 2006 - 06:39 PM
If so is it what it should be for the money being asked?
$55 seems to be the mark at the moment for a real good one so for 11/72 at $75 it must have something special for the extra dollars
#46 _scooter_
Posted 18 June 2006 - 06:47 PM
I contacted the owner in SA and had a yarn about the car...said it's been owned by him for 18years or so...still has it's JP block/head and is in reasonable condition (few chips/scratches etc....I asked if I could get some pics and further numbers as I was genuinely interested in looking at a stable mate for my 8/73 but received an e-mail from the sellers partner saying she had been reading the comments on the forums and determined I was not interested.....I explained to her that I stood by my comments of not always getting the price asked but deadly silence...anyway I wil keep looking else where. IMHO a bit pricey for a standard xu-1....but if someone likes it and has the dough it will sell...(I like the colour) is it Lime green metallic????
scooter.
#47
Posted 18 June 2006 - 07:00 PM
#48
Posted 18 June 2006 - 07:54 PM
I brought an XU-1 new in �73 and paid top money at $4,100.
Before I brought the SMP XU-1 I have now I looked at them when they were asking $10k and I wouldn�t pay the money.
I looked again when the asking price for XU-1�s was $25k, I could have brought the SMP I have at the moment but never went through with it.
I looked again at XU-1�s at $35k and said no way����
Then down the track I paid $50k for SMP XU-1 that ends up with an offer of $70k even before I pick it up.
So what I�m trying to say is it�s like the young man waiting for the real-estate prices to drop, picture him now with a walking stick still waiting.
If you really want one and can afford it, considering the asking prices of XU-1�s that are available at the moment and work out a deal. The asking price for my SMP was $55k, I never made him an offer, I just asked him what price would he sell it to me for and the rest is history.
However I convinced myself of what I believe a true value is by drawing an analogy to purchasing a new SS commodore, what�s their price and how much do they devalue when you drive them off the showroom floor. I think the XU-1 will always be ahead in that deal.
Anyway, that�s my experience with XU-1�s�������regards
#49 _pipjones_
Posted 18 June 2006 - 08:30 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users