Jump to content


186 Triple Webers Running Rich


  • Please log in to reply
57 replies to this topic

#26 EunUCh

EunUCh

    Lotsa Posts!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,761 posts
  • Location:not this planet
  • Car:japos
  • Joined: 23-November 06

Posted 20 December 2014 - 08:54 PM

sounds "about" right on idle jets if not back firing on back off down hill.

The back fire on "take off" does sound lean ,although the mains are "just under" 202 specs. they could be a bit on the "high side" with F16 tube ?

causing the back fire initially but then running rich as with a bigger main jet.

This could be 2 things the way i see it ...mains too big causing stinky fumes combined with a "lean" tube ? 

Lean tube not pulling over earlier enough but when it does the main is too big?..stinky fumes/blue smoke..oil wash?



#27 _glennhailstone_

_glennhailstone_
  • Guests

Posted 21 December 2014 - 05:06 AM

Ok thanks, I'll pass that on.



#28 jd lj

jd lj

    Forum Fixture

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,100 posts
  • Name:James D
  • Location:in the shed
  • Car:LJ SVO
  • Joined: 03-December 10

Posted 21 December 2014 - 06:29 AM

You really don't want to wash the oil of the bores otherwise you'll glaze them and it will need to be rehoned. It's not a good idea to run in an engine on poorly tuned triples or any poorly tuned carb for that matter. Glazed bores can then lead to sump pressure due to the rings not bedding in and sealing, this will then cause oil leaks, probably from the rear main etc which means that the engine is coming back out to fix that one.

I'm sure that your 60f8 or whatever size they were are miles too big. If you have problems taking off this can also relate to the idle jets. You can actually drive the car with the whole emulsion tube, main jets and air correctors assembly removed but only up to 2.5 -3k rpm, the mains etc are doing nothing below these rpm's so they aren't the problem with taking off from the lights etc.

Put a mark on one of the idle mixture screws and the carb body then turn it clockwise until LIGHTLY seated counting the number of half turns required to do so. Then wind it back out to make the marks line up again using the same number of turns as you wound it in. I would expect them to be less than 3/4 of a turn out which will also indicate that the idle jets are too big.

#29 _glennhailstone_

_glennhailstone_
  • Guests

Posted 21 December 2014 - 07:03 PM

Ok thanks again, I will check this all out. And let you know the results.



#30 _glennhailstone_

_glennhailstone_
  • Guests

Posted 25 January 2015 - 06:53 PM

Ok so after much consideration and with the help of the people on this thread, it seems like the engine is running too lean! (With the back firing at initial throttle and now white spark plugs I think its safe to say it is running lean) Totally the opposite of what I originally thought.

 

So, if the engine is running lean could this be a cause of my flat spot at initial throttle.

 

And is there any internals of the webers I can change so that they don't run so lean.

 

Thanks



#31 _ljxu1torana_

_ljxu1torana_
  • Guests

Posted 25 January 2015 - 07:10 PM

hey glenn,maybe the best thing to do is to send your webers to weber performance,factory 15, 35-37 canterbury road braeside victoria 3195.telephone number is 03 95873277.



#32 RallyRed

RallyRed

    Oh My, Don't you post alot

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 7,843 posts
  • Name:Col
  • Location:NSW
  • Car:LC GTR etc
  • Joined: 02-October 11

Posted 25 January 2015 - 08:15 PM

Hi..
Im no weber expert...but had my car dyno'd in late december...was a eye opener to see how easy all this is..if you have the right equiptment...the guy just stuck the sensor up the exhaust pipe...and, as well as all sorts of other dyno stuff...he could see within a minute that it was leaning out at about 5000rpm. Thus upped a few jet sizes..redid test and graph was now showing correct mix. Maybe it was an easy one.. and he was good at it too...but it was all so obvious right there and then. Dyno time not cheap..but easy to do back to back tests very quickly and assess effect of the changes made. No new news there..I was just suprised how easy it seemed to be to nail an issue. Good luck too.

#33 LC-GTR-1969

LC-GTR-1969

    Shed tinkerer

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,162 posts
  • Location:New South Wales
  • Car:Which one?
  • Joined: 09-March 14
Garage View Garage

Posted 25 January 2015 - 08:19 PM

Ok so after much consideration and with the help of the people on this thread, it seems like the engine is running too lean! (With the back firing at initial throttle and now white spark plugs I think its safe to say it is running lean) Totally the opposite of what I originally thought.
 
So, if the engine is running lean could this be a cause of my flat spot at initial throttle.
 
And is there any internals of the webers I can change so that they don't run so lean.
 
Thanks


Have you checked for Intake vacuum leak?

I would be surprised if you were lean based on jetting, but vacuum leaks will cause lean condition...

#34 _glennhailstone_

_glennhailstone_
  • Guests

Posted 26 January 2015 - 06:17 AM

Ok thanks for that!



#35 jd lj

jd lj

    Forum Fixture

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,100 posts
  • Name:James D
  • Location:in the shed
  • Car:LJ SVO
  • Joined: 03-December 10

Posted 26 January 2015 - 06:09 PM

I'm thinking that to compensate for a slightly rich idle jet that the idle mixture screws are wound to far in and then to get it to idle the throttle plates are partly exposing the first progression hole to achieve an idle, this can also cause a stumble due to leanness on initial throttle.

When you come off the accelerator pedal will it drop back down to idle straight away or does it take a bit longer to do this?

Remove the progression hole covers and have a look at where the throttle plate is in relation to the holes, you'll be able to see the brass throttle plate when you shine a torch in there. The throttle plate should be positioned directly below the hole nearest the engine, you shouldn't be able to see either the front and definitely not the rear edge of the throttle plate through the hole.

There are many parts that you can change to adjust the air/fuel mixture, but first you need to determine what rpm range needs to be changed, this will then determine which jets need attention.

Ps. Where are you seriously located, eg Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane etc (not your home address). Also who tried to tune them for you previously, possibly good if other members don't use them for tuning webers. Who knows they might be better with other carbs.

JD

#36 jd lj

jd lj

    Forum Fixture

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,100 posts
  • Name:James D
  • Location:in the shed
  • Car:LJ SVO
  • Joined: 03-December 10

Posted 26 January 2015 - 06:11 PM

To check for vacuum leaks squirt some water around each end of the manifold and listen for a change in the idle.

#37 caterham2

caterham2

    Forum Fan

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 348 posts
  • Location:Mansfield North East Victoria not the other one in QLD
  • Car:Ford Focus RS AWD Gone over to the dark side .. Mercedes-Benz SLK350 Ford Cortina 2 door MK1 Twin Cam
  • Joined: 02-February 10

Posted 26 January 2015 - 06:47 PM

 

To check for vacuum leaks squirt some water around each end of the manifold and listen for a change in the idle.

 I have a number of Weber Factory publications and in their texts the way to test for vac leaks is with a small squirt bottle with................ get this................. PETROL IN IT. I am sure you get a very convincing change in engine sound doing this if you have a leak somewhere BUT over the top of a hot exhaust system on a 6 cylinder Holden will get some pyrotechnics as well I would imagine. On a more serious note to the O.P. if you are not able to pick rich from lean then almost certainly detonation and ruined pistons are coming your way. In a previous post to you I suggested that you take the car to someone who knows what they are on about, weeks later and much stumbling in the dark you are no further down the track to a fix, if you don't actually live in Bangladesh I may be able to point you to someone or 2 or 3 that will sort for you.

#38 jd lj

jd lj

    Forum Fixture

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,100 posts
  • Name:James D
  • Location:in the shed
  • Car:LJ SVO
  • Joined: 03-December 10

Posted 26 January 2015 - 07:29 PM

Yeah, I've read about using petrol or wd40 to test for vacuum leaks but I'm not about to recommend it to anyone, water is a much safer option.

#39 _macdou_

_macdou_
  • Guests

Posted 26 January 2015 - 08:01 PM

Yeah, I've read about using petrol or wd40 to test for vacuum leaks but I'm not about to recommend it to anyone, water is a much safer option.


Yes aerostart was an option and listen for increased revs....not as safe as water...:-)

#40 _glennhailstone_

_glennhailstone_
  • Guests

Posted 28 January 2015 - 07:23 AM

Thanks again. caterham2 I have taken it to a weber specialist, and I am taking it back to him. I am just trying to learn as much as I can from this forum so I kinda know whats going on.



#41 jd lj

jd lj

    Forum Fixture

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,100 posts
  • Name:James D
  • Location:in the shed
  • Car:LJ SVO
  • Joined: 03-December 10

Posted 28 January 2015 - 05:39 PM

Let us know what the outcome is and what jetting specs it ends up with and how it drives once done. That way maybe we can all learn from it. I hope they sort it out for you.

Did you check the position of the throttle plate compared to the progression holes?

#42 caterham2

caterham2

    Forum Fan

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 348 posts
  • Location:Mansfield North East Victoria not the other one in QLD
  • Car:Ford Focus RS AWD Gone over to the dark side .. Mercedes-Benz SLK350 Ford Cortina 2 door MK1 Twin Cam
  • Joined: 02-February 10

Posted 28 January 2015 - 07:27 PM

 

Thanks again. caterham2 I have taken it to a weber specialist, and I am taking it back to him. I am just trying to learn as much as I can from this forum so I kinda know whats going on.

 Not the same "specialist" that "set the carbs up" for you last time I hope.

#43 orangeLJ

orangeLJ

    Yes, yes I do post alot!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 10,259 posts
  • Joined: 02-May 06

Posted 30 January 2015 - 11:24 AM

Sending carbs off or having someone work on them off the car is fruitless.

Dyno time or road tuning with an exhaust bung is about the only way you'll get them perfect.

#44 warrenm

warrenm

    Forum Fixture

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,107 posts
  • Location:Central West NSW
  • Car:1972 LJ Torana
  • Joined: 08-November 05
Garage View Garage

Posted 30 January 2015 - 11:09 PM

What orangeLJ said. :spoton:



#45 jd lj

jd lj

    Forum Fixture

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,100 posts
  • Name:James D
  • Location:in the shed
  • Car:LJ SVO
  • Joined: 03-December 10

Posted 31 January 2015 - 01:07 PM

I think he's sending the whole car not the carbs by themselves, as you said that would be pointless.

#46 _glennhailstone_

_glennhailstone_
  • Guests

Posted 01 February 2015 - 07:15 AM

Ok finally some answers.

 

You were right orangeLJ, to take it to get put on a dyno was the correct thing to do, after I had got it running the best I could. This is important because if it was running too lean at high RPM apparently you can start welding pistons, not the best thing for a brand new engine. So I recommend this to anybody who has just built a new engine. I didn't know, and a dyno is the only way to be sure. 

 

The outcome of the dyno was that the carbs are set up fine, and all the emission figures are within spec. Its not running too lean or too rich.

 

I then took it to another carb specialist for a second opinion who immediately asked where my vac advance was. Now, the first guy told me that I didn't need a vac advance because it only helps with fuel efficiency. However this guy reckons that this is what is causing the hesitation at initial throttle.

 

So, he told me to advance my timing (which is currently set at 12BTDC) by 5 deg and see if it fixes the issue. It did, not completely, but it certainly made a difference.

 

The reason I didn't have my vac advance set up is that my triple webers did not come with vac advance as an option. It looks like you have to drill new holes in the carbs, which all seems a bit strange.

 

Anyway, she's putting down 83kw on the ground which isn't much, but not too bad for a little 186.

 

Thanks for all the help on this thread, I really appreciate it.



#47 Bigfella237

Bigfella237

    Socially Distant

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 4,377 posts
  • Name:Andrew
  • Location:Far South Coast of NSW
  • Car:(s) not as many as I'd like but more than I've got space for!
  • Joined: 31-October 14

Posted 01 February 2015 - 07:42 AM

83 kw = 111 rwhp = 27.46 cc/hp

 

I would have expected it to do a little better than that?



#48 jd lj

jd lj

    Forum Fixture

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,100 posts
  • Name:James D
  • Location:in the shed
  • Car:LJ SVO
  • Joined: 03-December 10

Posted 01 February 2015 - 07:46 AM

I'm glad you're happy with the outcome. Now it's time to go and enjoy it.

#49 _glennhailstone_

_glennhailstone_
  • Guests

Posted 01 February 2015 - 08:51 AM

I agree Andrew. It does seem like its either getting too much fuel or not enough. I don't think she's running to her full potential, but its not too bad for now. 



#50 _glennhailstone_

_glennhailstone_
  • Guests

Posted 01 February 2015 - 12:43 PM

https://www.youtube....8&v=l8Fbmd-D-kY






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users