481 replies to this topic

[yel327]

:wtf:I don't think either have ever even seen a dual cast block, that's so funny.............

 

I've seen at least one 173 with a second date code. Big deal. Its a 173. They go in the scrap bin like every other 173 I've ever seen. Nothing funny about that.

 

Give it up. You can throw stones, whinge like a girl, spit the dummy, cry CAMS do whatever you want. It doesn't change the fact you are wrong, will continue to be wrong and you know it as do most other intelligent people who read these threads. You cannot change history to suit your own ends. If you'd shut up about it people would pay no notice, but the continual carrying on about it has only made the hole you've dug for yourself deeper as more people get interested and can see you are wrong. Edit.

Edited by yel327, 04 April 2016 - 03:23 PM.

[S pack]

From the young denaro who has never seen a dual cast block WTF.................   

Anthony, is this a dual cast date block?

Attached Files

•  JP389335-1.JPG   143.62K   1 downloads

Edited by S pack, 04 April 2016 - 06:52 PM.

[RallyRed]

I dont have the knowledge of others regarding all this...and I am impressed by Anthony's knowledge of XU-1s.

However, this thread has thread and its tentacles have gone on that long, without resolution, that I would have to say if I was ever looking at buying an LJ XU-1 and there were two identical cars, one dual cast and one not....I'd buy the NON dual cast, as there is just too much grey area/confusion regarding the whole thing.

IMHO.

[FLY_AGAIN_XU-1]

Got in contact with C.A.M.S. yet Ian ? I can only hope that the LJ XU-1 you just purchased Col, at least has a 3 on the side............

[FLY_AGAIN_XU-1]

If not, you have just done your money...........

[Ice]

Got in contact with C.A.M.S. yet Ian ? I can only hope that the LJ XU-1 you just purchased Col, at least has a 3 on the side............

Where does he say he bought an XU1 you lost Cunning Stunt

[yel327]

And the 3 is only one part of the fairy tale, or you might want to call it "the never ending story".

[S pack]

You blokes are kidding ya selves,there are plenty of original JP's without 3s,there's 2 one owner unrestored cars that I know of that haven't got it.

........... however, in Narnia one does not need to look at the engine number to tell if a JP block is a restamp. All one needs to do is look at the core pattern number on the side of the block. 

Edited by S pack, 04 April 2016 - 10:38 PM.

[WhiteA9XS]

Anth have 8 dual casts been shown? l can't recall that many. Can you please list them all. And again thank you for finally acknowledging that my single cast is a legit 150 list motor. It would have been better to have done so a few months back rather trying create doubt that it may have been dodgy. But better late than never. And yes mine as you know is not stamped with the mythical '3'. It is '6'. So thanks buddy and how about we end this post right here.

 

 Hi Keith ,

 

 Your engine has the same configuration as mine , mine also has the "6" .

 

 These other 2 wallies do not know Shit from Clay . 

[lj72bathurst]

https://www.ebay.com...tm/301918831353

I can't upload pictures so i put a link.
This engine is not a 3

[lj72bathurst]

He's asking too much, even for a '2' stamp the price is about $2K too much, IMO. But rarity is a big plus so he may get over $6k anyway. Interesting to follow.

I think this thread has killed the sale of jps that do not have the number 3. Even though thier is still no proof or documents

Jason

[UCgazman]

Yep^^ read the whole thread, its pretty clear the 3 (and probs the 2nd cast date) means nothing besides which mould was used to pour the block...

[crabba67]

No Jason I totally disagree. It has been proven time and again the 3 campaign was a hoax and this thread has proven that!

No Hoax 

[yel327]

It is BS and you guys know it Anthony. Plenty might have 3's on them, but not all have 3 as part of the pattern number and that has been proven plenty of times.