Jump to content


Photo

Holden Pull Out

ABC report

  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
642 replies to this topic

#26 _LXSS350_

_LXSS350_
  • Guests

Posted 07 December 2013 - 01:33 AM

Currently the Commodore is the no. 2 selling car & would be no.1 if they included the ute in the same sales figures. So to say that people don't want to buy it is incorrect.

 

See my comments above regarding why it's not currently viable.

 

The auto industry in Australia is too valuable to lose, it supports too many allied trades.

 

Dr Terry

 

Well no 2 for how long? I hadn't seen the latest figures because last time I looked the dunny and fraud where not on the list of top selling cars. From the peak of dunny sales in 1988 of 94,642 to 2012 where it was down to 30,532. People are buying other cars just not the dunny.

 

The thing we have to remember is VIABLE BUSINESS. You don't run a business that stays in the red for very long as its pointless and just a non viable money trap. Holden is obviously not making money so something has to change either it closes its doors or they learn how to become viable which means big changes not following the same downhill path they have been on.

 

Crux of the matter here is Australia is that we are out of whack with the world and simply can't compete with our very high wages and costs. Doubt very much a dunnydore factory worker wants to be paid a bowl of rice and the consumer obviously doesn't want to pay anymore than the competition. Big cars are a dying breed, the only exception seems to be 4x4's which seem to be driven by every soccer mum in the metro area (and yet never go offroad).

 

 

Your spot on terry the new commodore would shit on most imported cars today not only in safety features but in build quality
And there not ugly col compared to some other crap that that lands here
The high wages in this country is going to be the demise of lots of business here notjust our car industry mark my words

 

 

Oh look I don't disagree on not the ugliest car in the world (sold today) but boy Holden where the style kings in the 50, 60's and seventies then for some reason they just  threw style out the door and adopted the dunny and became bland and boring. 

 

Remember this is the amazing company that had the HK GTS, Hatchback Torrie, A9X, L34, nearly released the amazing GTR-X, The mighty FJ, solid shapely EH etc. These where all amazing shapes and made fraud green with envy as Holdens where the obvious king of style and had both 2/4 door full sized and the mid sized solutions that grabbed your desire to buy. That's why Brock did so well with the mods to the dunny. He was just trying to inject some form of excitement from such a bland boring base. IMO it nearly got to XD/XE ugly with just as much cheap plastic at times over the dunnys run.

 

I would far prefer the bland looking Hyundai Sonata Hybrid than to be seen owning any dunny. The dunnys when driving along remind me of a blowfish with 4 wheels and mouth slightly adjar. Had a girl that looked that ugly decades ago but at least I was totally blotto drunk and it was a very dark room..... LOL

 

Look at some of the hot hatchs from Europe for what you can do from a styling point of view to what is so boring about a dunny. Take a look at some of the Merc Taxi's that have given a real shake to the typical style of a big 4 door car. You get in a dunny and it feels like a whale its no M3 even with the power of the LSA, its just doesn't give you that  drivers car feel. It feels like you just ate a few double beef whoppers. You get out of the M3 and its like pin point accurate guided missile. The dunny just doesn't feel like a $100k car inside or out.

 

Taxi's don't have to be shaped like the Pope mobile.

 

2010-fisker-karma-1_600x0w.jpg



#27 _SRV_

_SRV_
  • Guests

Posted 07 December 2013 - 01:47 AM

I was reading this and had an idea, it might sound stupid but I remember seeing the latest Top Gear episode when they put all the british built vehicles on display on London.

What if we put one model each of the Australian built Holdens out the front of parliament house to try and send the government and the buying public some sort of message?(it's also Holdens birthday)

You know one each of FX to WB, all the Toranas, all the Monaros, all the Statesmans and all the Commodores to date.

To show what has been achieved since 1948, all 65 years of the Australian car, that they're basically about to put an end to.


Edited by SRV, 07 December 2013 - 01:48 AM.


#28 TerrA LX

TerrA LX

    Fulcrum Fixture

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,241 posts
  • Location:Sid 'n' knee
  • Joined: 31-May 06

Posted 07 December 2013 - 02:57 AM

Both the Govt. & Holden have said that no decision has been made.

We all know what that means...

#29 Dr Terry

Dr Terry

    Technical + Numbers Guru + Moderator

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,276 posts
  • Location:Eastwood (Sydney) NSW
  • Joined: 13-November 05

Posted 07 December 2013 - 08:57 AM

Well no 2 for how long? I hadn't seen the latest figures because last time I looked the dunny and fraud where not on the list of top selling cars. From the peak of dunny sales in 1988 of 94,642 to 2012 where it was down to 30,532. People are buying other cars just not the dunny.

The thing we have to remember is VIABLE BUSINESS. You don't run a business that stays in the red for very long as its pointless and just a non viable money trap. Holden is obviously not making money so something has to change either it closes its doors or they learn how to become viable which means big changes not following the same downhill path they have been on.

Crux of the matter here is Australia is that we are out of whack with the world and simply can't compete with our very high wages and costs. Doubt very much a dunnydore factory worker wants to be paid a bowl of rice and the consumer obviously doesn't want to pay anymore than the competition. Big cars are a dying breed, the only exception seems to be 4x4's which seem to be driven by every soccer mum in the metro area (and yet never go offroad).




Oh look I don't disagree on not the ugliest car in the world (sold today) but boy Holden where the style kings in the 50, 60's and seventies then for some reason they just threw style out the door and adopted the dunny and became bland and boring.

Remember this is the amazing company that had the HK GTS, Hatchback Torrie, A9X, L34, nearly released the amazing GTR-X, The mighty FJ, solid shapely EH etc. These where all amazing shapes and made fraud green with envy as Holdens where the obvious king of style and had both 2/4 door full sized and the mid sized solutions that grabbed your desire to buy. That's why Brock did so well with the mods to the dunny. He was just trying to inject some form of excitement from such a bland boring base. IMO it nearly got to XD/XE ugly with just as much cheap plastic at times over the dunnys run.

I would far prefer the bland looking Hyundai Sonata Hybrid than to be seen owning any dunny. The dunnys when driving along remind me of a blowfish with 4 wheels and mouth slightly adjar. Had a girl that looked that ugly decades ago but at least I was totally blotto drunk and it was a very dark room..... LOL

Look at some of the hot hatchs from Europe for what you can do from a styling point of view to what is so boring about a dunny. Take a look at some of the Merc Taxi's that have given a real shake to the typical style of a big 4 door car. You get in a dunny and it feels like a whale its no M3 even with the power of the LSA, its just doesn't give you that drivers car feel. It feels like you just ate a few double beef whoppers. You get out of the M3 and its like pin point accurate guided missile. The dunny just doesn't feel like a $100k car inside or out.

Taxi's don't have to be shaped like the Pope mobile.

Several points to make here.

Firstly, it doesn't help your argument to denigrate the Commodore by calling it a "dunnydoor". I'm a dyed in the wool Holden & Aussie car fan, but I don't go around poo pooing Asian & Euro cars.

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. There are many people out there who would describe our beloved early Holdens & Toranas as very boring & bland, not me BTW. Also I've haven't met too many who think that the Hyundai Sonata is a good looking car, but that's all very subjective & not what we are discussing.

A BMW M3 is a very expensive (overpriced IMO) SMALL RWD car, about the only thing it shares with a VF Commodore is the fact that it's RWD. It's also quite small (did I mention that ?), Personally I can only just fit in the front seat, while the rear seat is out of the question. The VF is a competitor for the 7-series BMW, not the little 3-series.

Have you actually driven a VF ? They are one of the best handling large cars on the market, the steering is "pin point accurate", certainly better than some of your M/Benzes. The Commodore can't be compared to FWD 'shopping trolleys', either. BTW the VF is not $100,000, they are $35,000 on the road, slightly cheaper than the M3.

On your point, that car making should be a VIABLE BUSINESS, show me one car making country on the planet that doesn't subsidise its car industry. So you're quite happy to close down the Aussie car industry & put 50,000-60,000 workers on the dole & then go out a purchase a heavily subsidised Korean or German car. I can't understand your logic.

Dr Terry

#30 eyepeeler

eyepeeler

    Forum Fixture

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,958 posts
  • Location:Perth
  • Car:77 SL Hatchback, Chrome Yellow L34, LX IPRA Race Car the White Ghost
  • Joined: 16-August 08

Posted 07 December 2013 - 09:31 AM

Dr Terrry, would you like to see Holden survive cause its Holden and part of our history or to save jobs? Or is it a combination of both?
How many cars have to be sold combined with how much subsidy to keep Holden going?
I grew up in Holden's, LC GTR, HX Monaro 4 door, VC SL/E, VK Calais. My kids are in a Kluger. Times change.
Should Holden drop the commodore and build a totally different car, either big or small?
I would hate to lose Holden and it is bad for our country for so many job loses, but what needs to be done, AND to what extent, how much subsidy, what tarrif?
Does the subsidy needed to keep Holden going exceed that of other countries?

#31 yel327

yel327

    Oh My, Don't you post alot

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,088 posts
  • Joined: 10-February 08

Posted 07 December 2013 - 12:23 PM

I think they need to build or if not at least sell what people want. Not everyone wants fuel economy forced down their throat, not everyone wants a diesel and especially wants to pay a premium for it only to sell it prior to even breaking even on the purchase price.

 

I think to survive they need to build a smaller car, HZ sedan size. I look at my V2 CV8 side by side with my HJ Premier and the Premier looks small. The V2 is dwarfed by a VF. For those who want a bigger car they can buy a Statesman. And as a derivative they need a wagon version, a cab-chassis and the same thing with a tub (like Ford do). Offer a small diesel for those who subscribe to the diesel myth, a 6cyl of sorts and a V8 but offer them across the range. The 6.0L auto engine will easily give you 10L/100 highway and 14 around town in a smaller car, and this is as good or better than any 6cyl auto LH-LX ever gave when new. Maybe for the 6cyl they can buy the design of Ford when they close up shop!

And most importantly don't make them ugly, or make them uglier in the re-vamp of the car for the next series simply to make it different. Holden are capable of building a car from scratch that looks great and still looks great - V2 case in point.

 

All that is left is the will for GM to do it, and I suspect they are currently navel gazing and not looking at the bigger picture.



#32 Indy Orange

Indy Orange

    Lotsa Posts!

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,850 posts
  • Name:Paul
  • Location:Australia
  • Joined: 03-July 09

Posted 07 December 2013 - 12:34 PM

I work or a Government organisation and I cant believe we have mostly Hyundai i30s and some Mitsubishi outlanders ,if we wanted to support the Australian car industry why do we not have all Holden products in the fleet?

#33 _Lazarus_

_Lazarus_
  • Guests

Posted 07 December 2013 - 01:07 PM

It's pretty obvious what the market here wants, you just have to look around the supermarket carparks. And you can't lower wages without doing something about the ridiculously high cost of living here. High wages aren't responsible for the price of renting or buying real estate for example.

 

Whenever Australia comes up with an inovative idea now it is exported to countries where production is cheaper. We have to create jobs here somehow. If that means taxing the wealthy and the big dollar companies more, companies who are continually boasting of their huge profits while simultaneously laying off thousands of staff, and subsidising the manufacturing industry then so be it. That is the only thing keeping many European countries afloat. The US model is kaput, for the last 30 or more years it has just been a means of syphoning public wealth into the hands of the elite and has now hit bottom. The sooner people realise this the better. Democratic socialism is the only way forward. People working together for the common good.

 

Which is precisely why the capitalists spend so much time and money demonising it. It is not 'Communism', or in fact anything like it. Look to the Northern Europeans, who incidently have the highest average IQs on the planet.



#34 _LXSS350_

_LXSS350_
  • Guests

Posted 07 December 2013 - 01:59 PM

Several points to make here.

Firstly, it doesn't help your argument to denigrate the Commodore by calling it a "dunnydoor". I'm a dyed in the wool Holden & Aussie car fan, but I don't go around poo pooing Asian & Euro cars.

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. There are many people out there who would describe our beloved early Holdens & Toranas as very boring & bland, not me BTW. Also I've haven't met too many who think that the Hyundai Sonata is a good looking car, but that's all very subjective & not what we are discussing.

A BMW M3 is a very expensive (overpriced IMO) SMALL RWD car, about the only thing it shares with a VF Commodore is the fact that it's RWD. It's also quite small (did I mention that ?), Personally I can only just fit in the front seat, while the rear seat is out of the question. The VF is a competitor for the 7-series BMW, not the little 3-series.

Have you actually driven a VF ? They are one of the best handling large cars on the market, the steering is "pin point accurate", certainly better than some of your M/Benzes. The Commodore can't be compared to FWD 'shopping trolleys', either. BTW the VF is not $100,000, they are $35,000 on the road, slightly cheaper than the M3.

On your point, that car making should be a VIABLE BUSINESS, show me one car making country on the planet that doesn't subsidise its car industry. So you're quite happy to close down the Aussie car industry & put 50,000-60,000 workers on the dole & then go out a purchase a heavily subsidised Korean or German car. I can't understand your logic.

Dr Terry

 

 

Dr Terry your missing my point. The market for titanic sized cars is DOA and dying daily. One look at the figures will tell you that those people who want a big car (i.e. lots of kids or towing etc) will buy a 4x4 which is rightly or wrongly is perceived as safer and many times has more seats and a greater towing ability, greater visibility etc (+ diesel option). 

 

BMW sell on build quality and driving quality but they too know the whales are small sellers and those buyers buy the X5 or if tight budget the X3. The market wants smaller taxi's  and I can't believe Holden couldn't understand that the 80/90's market desire for big saloons changed. I mean seriously if you are in the car business reading your figures have gone from 96,000 to 30,000 and it doesn't tell you something about the market YOUR NOT GOOD at the game. You have to meet the market in business not try to go against what the market is telling you.

 

Look at the sales of say 3 series, 5 series, and 7 series BMW over the same period and the market screams what it wants. Why fight it and then cry your business is going broke? Of course bottom line profit matters and is another approach for gaining viability in a business, but if you don't have a standout reason for people to buy your competition no doubt will

 

Holden only has itself to blame and has goofed up. They couldn't even read its own declining market share and have persisted with the mentality that Australians want a big taxi saloon. Wrong and the market tells you that. They would have been better 10yrs ago to have gone back to a mid sized sized dunny and sold a small volume statesman sized version for the 30,000 that might be interested in driving a whale.

 

I think in these conversations the heart, memories and history of the brand interferes with logic in the conversation rather than looking at it from fixing an obvious business planning and management problem. Look at the all the successful businesses and work out why they are a success then apply a viable plan to suit the market.

 

Even apple knows that a 2kg iphone brick that they would have sold in the 80's is not going to sell in 2013. Its like the market wants Brunettes but Holden wants to sell Blondes and its useless crying that Blondes are world class, because it means zip because you are in business to meet the market needs not fight against it. It's a numbers game and one person saying my butt doesn't fit the seat is not want the majority of the market is screaming out for. That's why Holden has only their management to blame because they took the company down the wrong direction and now find the road is coming to an end.

 

The GTS is about $95k and I doubt any other dunny handles, go's and brakes better. But in truth its not a patch on the M3 you get out of the bimmer and it feels like you can dial in a mm of steering input and plot your path. The GTS feels bland,plastic and like a boat in comparison. There is nothing compelling about it and not even close to being mentioned in the same breath as the European. Now put all that gear in a VB dunny sized weighted car and put the money into the build quality you might have something the market will buy. If you want to increase the rrp you need to offer something to set yourself apart, or else cut the costs and go head to head with the Chinese, Korea etc and you will loose.

 

Excuses and oh if the government did this and that, or if Holden didn't get bad press just will not change the fact that Holden has taken the wrong path and obviously have the wrong business plan.

 

Holden new this after the 2005 figures and now have caused 50,000 jobs and the industry to look in serious doubt. Putting your hand out for help that was self inflicted is not the way to run a viable business and unless they scrap their whole business model and meet the market they will be a black hole for taxpayers. Look at the USA for handout success or failures in the Auto industry and take a lesson from the success stories. We are a worldwide car industry unlike the 70's and that worldwide market demand is what will dictate success or failure. Holden play the game or sadly they will be forced to close their doors.

 

 

I remember seeing the latest Top Gear episode when they put all the british built vehicles on display on London.

 

 

The automotive car manufacturing business would be a bloody hard business to be in. In 2013 much more so than the torana years because the worldwide market pressure from all brands is far more present in Oz today.

 

But yes the Top Gear boys showed true British innovation with that episode, it was easy to forget all of what Britain had produced and achieved. Unfortunately many of even the best ideas ended in the manufacturer becoming obsolete.

 

It would be an extremely sad day to see Holden close. Lets just hope a viable solution without it being the end of the car manufacturing industry in oz.



#35 Dr Terry

Dr Terry

    Technical + Numbers Guru + Moderator

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,276 posts
  • Location:Eastwood (Sydney) NSW
  • Joined: 13-November 05

Posted 07 December 2013 - 04:33 PM

I think LXSS350 you've also missed my point.

 

I'm not talking only about Holden, I'm talking about the entire Australian car industry. Also, when the VE/VF was in the planning stages (pre-GFC) the large RWD car WAS the car in demand. The GFC has seen the VF & the next gen. delayed by several years.

 

At the current time both of the Aussie-built GM-H cars, the Commodore & the Cruze, are selling quite well (usually both in the top 5), so they do make cars that many people want (not you though, quite obviously). The Falcon sadly is languishing in 20th spot, where it has been since their factory closure announcement  The problem is not so much gross local market sales, it's mainly the loss of export markets due to 2 factors, our high dollar & the failure of those markets due to the GFC. Toyota has been effected in the same manner.

 

Even if the Commodore was the top selling car in Australia, & Cruze no. 2 they would still be loosing money because of our high wages & other overheads (Carbon Tax anybody ?). Just like the other car makers in other countries, the ones you like to promote, Holden & Toyota need subsidies, tariffs or whatever to survive

 

Yes, there is a place for a smaller RWD car in Holden's line-up, similar to BMW 3 or Lexus LS 250, but GM-H are in no position currently to set-up & manufacture a 3rd car line.

 

Dr Terry

 

P.S. I think the M3 vs GTS argument is almost irrelevant, considering those cars sell in such miniscule numbers.



#36 yel327

yel327

    Oh My, Don't you post alot

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 13,088 posts
  • Joined: 10-February 08

Posted 07 December 2013 - 07:23 PM

I think you are both right.

 

Aussie manufacturers need to be smart and build what we want.

 

But even if they do it is not easy as there isn't a level playing field.



#37 _Bomber Watson_

_Bomber Watson_
  • Guests

Posted 07 December 2013 - 07:53 PM

Bingo. Aussie manufacturers need to build cars people want. 

 

Its all well and good having the fastest ute on the planet, but not much use if you cant put  a bucket of gravel in the back of that ute. Whats the point of having a ute?

 

At the same time we need to tweak our zero import tariffs and start taxing the countries we have said agreement with in various ways, and pumping that money back into the car industry.

 

Currently both parties (the manufacturers and the government) are failing to do what needs to be done.

 

Cheers.



#38 _UCLX_

_UCLX_
  • Guests

Posted 07 December 2013 - 09:33 PM

VF is a very good car. I recently drove a vf ssv redline, and my mate up the bush recently had a vf evoke renter for a while. the common factor here is that we are both raving about how good these cars are!

 

Problem is that there is NO loyalty to locally made cars. I see government - federal, state & local plated klugers, forresters, hundi's, landcruisers, kia's, Honda's, and heaps of awd's that never leave the city, etc.

 

WTF is it that our governments (and a lot of local companies) just blindly ignore our local industry. Where do they think us peasants income is going to come from to pay their taxes and buy there products?

 

For info, our family fleet currently consists of 6 holdens (one a roller) and one jeep cherokee for our bush/flinders trips.

Holdens: 1 X VT2 GTS, 1 X VY S crewman, 1 X LX sedan a9x, 2 X UC I6 hatches, 1 X LX rts Sunny roller.

 

My two bob's worth,

Cheers,

Daryl.



#39 S pack

S pack

    Scrivet Counter

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,541 posts
  • Name:Dave
  • Location:Luggage Point
  • Car:73 LJ
  • Joined: 25-January 10

Posted 07 December 2013 - 10:06 PM

Problem is that there is NO loyalty to locally made cars. I see government - federal, state & local plated klugers, forresters, hundi's, landcruisers, kia's, Honda's, and heaps of awd's that never leave the city, etc.

 

WTF is it that our governments (and a lot of local companies) just blindly ignore our local industry. Where do they think us peasants income is going to come from to pay their taxes and buy there products?

 

My two bob's worth,

Cheers,

Daryl.

Not wrong there Daryl.

 

For all our pollies (past and present) went on and on and on about being for jobs, jobs, jobs at election times what do our Govt's departments do? They buy imported stuff because it cheaper. Obviously there is no choice sometimes as some products just aren't made here anymore.

 

Hell, we can't even clothe our Defence Forces with Aussie made gear because our manufacturers (the few that are still operating here) are too expensive. No, we go and buy cheap rubbish Chinese boots (for example) that can't even make it through an Anzac Day Parade.

 

Pisses me off that our Govt's can't support Aussie companies, but that said, Aussie companies also need to take a long hard look at their counter productive policies of upping their prices because it's a Govt purchase.

 

My 5 cents

Cheers

Dave.



#40 _LXSS350_

_LXSS350_
  • Guests

Posted 08 December 2013 - 03:27 AM

I think LXSS350 you've also missed my point.

 

I'm not talking only about Holden, I'm talking about the entire Australian car industry. Also, when the VE/VF was in the planning stages (pre-GFC) the large RWD car WAS the car in demand. The GFC has seen the VF & the next gen. delayed by several years.

 

At the current time both of the Aussie-built GM-H cars, the Commodore & the Cruze, are selling quite well (usually both in the top 5), so they do make cars that many people want (not you though, quite obviously). The Falcon sadly is languishing in 20th spot, where it has been since their factory closure announcement  The problem is not so much gross local market sales, it's mainly the loss of export markets due to 2 factors, our high dollar & the failure of those markets due to the GFC. Toyota has been effected in the same manner.

 

Even if the Commodore was the top selling car in Australia, & Cruze no. 2 they would still be loosing money because of our high wages & other overheads (Carbon Tax anybody ?). Just like the other car makers in other countries, the ones you like to promote, Holden & Toyota need subsidies, tariffs or whatever to survive

 

Yes, there is a place for a smaller RWD car in Holden's line-up, similar to BMW 3 or Lexus LS 250, but GM-H are in no position currently to set-up & manufacture a 3rd car line.

 

Dr Terry

 

P.S. I think the M3 vs GTS argument is almost irrelevant, considering those cars sell in such miniscule numbers.

 

 

 

Dr Terry the GFC effected every manufacturer across the board so Holden is certainly not a special case. Unless you believe Holden where the only manufacturer who where working on a brand new new model when the GFC hit? (I know of quite a few that where put on the backburner after significant development costs and ultimately where released 5yrs+ late)

 

As I said to save Holden they would have to save on costs and/or improve sales.

 

Your answering your own questions and giving the only logical outcome that can happen in Holden's situation, - Because we all know that Holden can't competitively manufacture here in oz and they can't sell enough of the product they are offering because the public want different vehicles from what Holden is manufacturing.

 

One of the things that has hurt Holden has been the increased worldwide competition. However this has  just revealed all the flaws in their business model, line-up and management.

 

Sales numbers are the ONLY thing that could have saved Holden and that ship has sailed because no matter how much improved the VF is the market has clearly spoken and is not interested in buying big tanks. If buyers want a big tank like vehicle the market sales indicate they buy 4x4's.

 

As to why we the taxpayer should pay Holden to stay open that just makes no common sense. The key here is that instead of us risking millions on an obviously in trouble car manufacturer that builds cars very few people want to buy,  the majority of taxpayers are far better served by putting all that money into schools and hospitals.

 

Take a look at Obama and some of the loses that he has inflicted on the taxpayer with trying to save non viable car manufacturers. IMO no Government should ever be involved with propping up any failing commercial business unless like Qantas it was Government legislation that put special restrictions that clearly if they didn't exist would have saved Qantas from being close to closure (i.e. sell to any buyer)

 

The fact remains Holden should have not have developed and spent money on the big white elephant (vf dunny) because in 2005 the market spat back the big dunny in holdens face and it dropped from 85,000 odd over the previous 6yrs+ to around 66,000 odd in 2005 then down to 50,000 odd in 2006 - right down to pitiful 30,000 odd in 2012.

 

I mean seriously who is yanking who's chain in holden management and then crying and putting their handout for help to survive? My god there should be mass management sackings for the whole blunder of continuing on the downward spiral. What beats me is they say the VF is the best dunny ever --- yet NO ONE WANTS TO BUY IT like they did (see numbers pre 2005 for a clue where it went south for holden).

 

This is why its a money trap and the Government would be foolish to jump in bed with a sinking ship. Its a jungle in business and if you can't stand the heat you need to get out of the kitchen.

 

Sorry to sound blunt but this is business and the tough decisions have to be made you can't survive on charity and know you have no way of getting out of the red without a clean sheet of paper and a whole new and very large development funding for new models that the public wants to buy and most importantly are PROFITABLE to manufacture within the sales numbers expected in the business plan.

 

I have not driven a standard vf dunny and I imagine that the vf GTS dunny is a better car than the standard dunny? Perish the thought but I shudder to think what I would think of the std whale.

 

Holden's mainstay should have been sized comparable to a lexus IS250 and aim for 70,000 sales and build over the years. Holden just didn't read the markets needs.


Edited by LXSS350, 08 December 2013 - 03:37 AM.


#41 _Warren Turnbull_

_Warren Turnbull_
  • Guests

Posted 08 December 2013 - 08:54 AM

Is it about being viable or is it about supplying what the buying public wants?

 

The current Commodore is not my cup of tea as far as styling goes, but it is still a good car and I know lots of people that own them and I drove many when they came out.

 

Holden has always made "poor" choices as to what the public like. Look at the Monaro, what a flop. They should never have made the HQ version, as by the time it came out no one wanted them. They sold 13000 in 4 years. They sold 9000 TA Toranas in 12 months. Dropping the ute in the 80s, getting into a HP war with the V6 in the VZ, the list goes on of poor choices. But they can turn it around, like making the 3.0 litre version of the alloytec.

 

Now if we were to shut every industry that was not viable what would we have left. (you can buy banannas cheaper in England that you can here and they import from the West Indies). We have farmers plowing in their crops because you cannot get it to market for the price of importing.

 

The only thing we can make a fist of is pulling dirt out of the ground. How long will that last.


Edited by Warren Turnbull, 08 December 2013 - 08:57 AM.


#42 Dr Terry

Dr Terry

    Technical + Numbers Guru + Moderator

  • Moderators
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,276 posts
  • Location:Eastwood (Sydney) NSW
  • Joined: 13-November 05

Posted 08 December 2013 - 09:22 AM

I have not driven a standard vf dunny and I imagine that the vf GTS dunny is a better car than the standard dunny? Perish the thought but I shudder to think what I would think of the std whale.

I believe that if you did drive a normal everyday VF Commodore Evoke, you wouldn't have such a narrow minded view. They are the best & cheapest RWD car (of any size) on the Australian market bar none !!

 

I think that the GTS is built for a very select few rich people who prefer cars with silly low profile tyres, oversized alloy wheels & lots of add-on plastic bits. I think that a mid $40,000 V8 Calias would be a much better all round every day car than any HSV. BTW, an HSV is strictly speaking, not a Holden model & is not counted as such in the sales figures. 

 

My whole point here is why would you deny supporting the local industry, but are quite happy to buy an import which is propped up by their respective Government.

 

Both Toyota & Holden in Australia ARE viable if weren't for the so-called level playing field that handicaps them so badly.

 

Also I believe the current YTD production numbers for the Commodore (Utes, Caprices & exports included) is in the 80,000 area. So some people are actually buying them.

 

Dr Terry



#43 _LS1 Taxi_

_LS1 Taxi_
  • Guests

Posted 08 December 2013 - 09:25 AM

The only thing we can make a fist of is pulling dirt out of the ground. How long will that last.

 

Not entirely true.  It appears we can play cricket   :stirpot:



#44 WhiteA9XS

WhiteA9XS

    .

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,646 posts
  • Name:Shaun
  • Location:Billys Creek
  • Car:LJ LX
  • Joined: 08-November 05
Garage View Garage

Posted 08 December 2013 - 09:46 AM

I think you are both right.
 
Aussie manufacturers need to be smart and build what we want.
 
But even if they do it is not easy as there isn't a level playing field.

agree , cark parks are getting smaller , families are getting smaller , falcon and commodore are same size as the 80,s era . clearly should be building small to mid size cars here to meet the market . I was hoping holden were going to build the concept torana .

#45 S pack

S pack

    Scrivet Counter

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 15,541 posts
  • Name:Dave
  • Location:Luggage Point
  • Car:73 LJ
  • Joined: 25-January 10

Posted 08 December 2013 - 10:18 AM

My whole point here is why would you deny supporting the local industry, but are quite happy to buy an import which is propped up by their respective Government.

 

 

Dr Terry

Our farmers are ploughing their orange trees into the ground because they can't compete against the heavily subsidised American farmers dumping cheap oranges here.

Our Govt's, past and present continue to screw us with these so called free trade agreements.



#46 TerrA LX

TerrA LX

    Fulcrum Fixture

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,241 posts
  • Location:Sid 'n' knee
  • Joined: 31-May 06

Posted 08 December 2013 - 10:19 AM

I think you are both right.
 
Aussie manufacturers need to be smart and build what we want.
 
But even if they do it is not easy as there isn't a level playing field.

I have only quoted you in point of case and not directly but this whole country is farked, and it is directly related to everyone wanting a $2 toaster and the same thing happened to the TV industry as well as white goods.
We all have ourselves to blame just as much as the gov't for not stopping the decline.

#47 TerrA LX

TerrA LX

    Fulcrum Fixture

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 14,241 posts
  • Location:Sid 'n' knee
  • Joined: 31-May 06

Posted 08 December 2013 - 10:27 AM

I was hoping holden were going to build the concept torana .

Didn't they?
http://www.holden.co...n Holden Malibu

#48 Balfizar

Balfizar

    Forum Fan

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 461 posts
  • Joined: 15-December 10

Posted 08 December 2013 - 11:37 AM

History,

              When Holdens were first produced there was a huge and long waiting list to get a Holden and people were prepared to wait "because it was an AUSTRALIAN car" there was a sense of pride in Australia.  We seem to have lost that in this consumer world.  Isn't it funny manufacturers want to sell to 1st world countries where there is a high disposable income but want to pay those people in that country a bowl of rice to maxamise their profit. So where is the high disposable income going to come from if we are all on a bowl of rice a week?

 

GM has pilaged ever country they manufacture in maximising local tax concessions and leveraging their bargaining power with threats of withdrawal for year and globally.  I can only imagine their bargaining position is enhanced now that Ford is pulling out and it will be exploited.

 

US global companies have a habit in a recession of pulling back manufacturing to the onshore home base to keep themselves at profitable capacity,  they will go back offshore when things get better.

 

Not until Australians get smart enough to see the true effect of buying local manufactured car will our auto industry become viable. Buy local, employ your kids, lower government handouts, have your taxes spent on services not industry support. 

 

Don't hold your breath, today is all about me,me,me and not the big picture.

 

When you buy an overseas manufactured car you export your money, and employ every worker that manufactured that car, including all the suppliers to that manufacturer, wake-up Australia! You are the cause of this drama, don't blame anyone else.

 

Cheers

Balfizar


Edited by Balfizar, 08 December 2013 - 11:38 AM.


#49 A9X

A9X

    A fortunate run

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,024 posts
  • Name:Welby
  • Location:Perth
  • Joined: 09-November 05
Garage View Garage

Posted 08 December 2013 - 12:48 PM

I drive a v8 Calais, bought as a model run out 3 months ago.

I've had commodore company cars for 10 years.

 

Other than the stupid and dangerous a pillar, the car is fine. 

 

I don't own a personal HSV and have never had the inclination for one. ( came close on that callaway coupe though ). Not a comment on the car, i just prefer to throw my dollars into some classic muscle.

 

18 months ago i chose to rebuild my own LX four door instead of laying out 30 - 40 k on a new plastic fantastic. I thoroughly researched the market and couldn't find a suitable car for me in my budget. 

 

My wife 12 months ago bought a new car for work, she got her own choice on the same budget. I tried to steer her to the camry hybrid, having had 2 under my control in a previous company.

 

she bought a hyundai I something and while i ridiculed it for the first few months, i can't really complain about it.

 

Now i'm in a very interesting position of possibly having to replace a company fleet mid next year. 10 commercials and 18 cars, i'm just starting the soft research on the choices.

 

i'm not having fun doing this task.

 

I'm an aussie patriot, I'm not a bogan.

 

i genuinely use 'buy aussie' as first choice wherever i can

 

I don't normally comment on politics on this forum, but as a senior level manager for over 10 years , i'm telling you we are not selling the country out, we've given it away.

 

There are things the government can do to back holden without cash handouts. But i also believe GM is in it for itself first, the US second and the rest can fight it out for third.


Edited by A9X, 08 December 2013 - 12:50 PM.


#50 _LXSS350_

_LXSS350_
  • Guests

Posted 08 December 2013 - 12:54 PM

Dr Terry I am not part of the majority of the oz market and my taste is as a mad modified car nut. The M3 is a good example of a drivers car that I certainly admire but I wouldn't buy one because its too common for my taste. Where say a Plymonth Superbird, Veyron or Mclaren F1 are interesting because I don't see them and they are styled and built as very individual cars. I have never wanted to be driving the same car as what the coles trolley boy owns. But that personal choice is because I am part of the 1-2% of individual hotrod enthusiast market  and that choice has nothing to do with my opinion on Holden being viable in 2013.

 

My opinion is only based on being looking as I am driving and in car parks along with paying attention to the numbers. Its also based on experience from owning my own multiple businesses since I was 19yo and what it took to keep those businesses out of the red and making them profitable (oh what I would give to be 19 again).

 

I love the Lion and all of what it has meant to me in memories and the Torana A9X Hatch oh those wins ..... those days of glory will always be one of my biggest joys. Brock by 6 laps, lap record last lap "Go the General" real racing, real cars we could buy on Monday. So please don't think I am against Holden I am not although I will call it as I see it and not just think my favourite generals the A9X and HK GTS where something they where not. I know them backwards and yes in truth the where pretty bad but boy they look good and pull the covers off today and I still get chills and can't believe their aggressive and distinct style. You could be a mile away from a Holden and never confuse it with those Frauds even though you couldn't even make out the colour let alone a badge.

 

Hell you can park next to a dunny and a fraud and have to walk around and read the badge. Its a joke the general lost its distinct style that made it an Australian icon and desirable.

 

The big car is dead, the 80's are long gone and Holden made the wrong choice in basing their business on a whale no matter how much the latest whale is better than the last whale they produced. The public don't want monster sized cars and saying its a conspiracy by government's, currency variations etc ignores the fact that management just plain and simply made the wrong choice in their line-up. To really gauge the world market look at each manufacturer in europe, usa, asia etc and look at their big selling main stays. My bet is none have a titanic sizes car as their big earner and volume seller.

 

Holden closes its was caused by their choice and taxpayers should not foot the bill for stupidity in business.






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users