_duggan208_
Posted 31 March 2016 - 12:20 AM
Don't forget that the M-21 and banjo were thrashed around Bathurst for 6 hours in the XU1s and the SLR 5000s. They also had the loads of whopping great slicks. But if you are inclined to drop the clutch ever bloody corner and traffic light; they will bust regularly. With the 6, M-21 and banjo you wont need an engineer to have to sign off on that. The 6 can work well if you match up everything especially on a small budget.
regards
Cool
Posted 31 March 2016 - 12:28 AM
the lc 6 cylinder only came out with the 161.173.186.
Forum Member
Posted 31 March 2016 - 04:14 PM
thanks to ice bomber and r2160 for answering my question. lc69 go the black!!!!!!
Forum Fixture
Posted 31 March 2016 - 05:29 PM
So would a virgin black 202 be the best place to start?
Ideally a red 202 (to avoid the blue/black emissions requirements) with a rope rear main seal (if you want to run the blue/black counter weighted crank)
Cool
Posted 31 March 2016 - 05:36 PM
Ideally a red 202 (to avoid the blue/black emissions requirements) with a rope rear main seal (if you want to run the blue/black counter weighted crank)
_STRAIGHTLINEMICK_
Posted 31 March 2016 - 06:04 PM
Oh My, Don't you post alot
Posted 31 March 2016 - 06:15 PM
Today you'll find the only time it matters if you are Engineering something, like a red-blue-black 202 in an FC or something like that, where the Engineer would make you fit pollution gear in line with what the engine had - just like with a V6 conversion (but later emissions stuff for those). Or if you happened to get picked on by an overzealous EPA/TRA inspection but the chances of that are slim unless you are driving around like a d1ckhead or get defected and have to do some sort of formal pit inspection.
_ljxu1torana_
Posted 31 March 2016 - 07:57 PM
in your reply it said no they didnt then 3 lines down you said come out with 202 lc.it seems like it was 2 answers.
Cool
Posted 31 March 2016 - 08:31 PM
in your reply it said no they didnt then 3 lines down you said come out with 202 lc.it seems like it was 2 answers.
Forum Fan
Posted 31 March 2016 - 08:41 PM
image.jpeg 137.71K
0 downloads
image.jpeg 195.69K
0 downloads
Cool
Posted 31 March 2016 - 08:43 PM
Forum Fan
Posted 31 March 2016 - 08:52 PM
image.jpeg 229.22K
3 downloadsTony is your car licensed
Cool
Posted 31 March 2016 - 08:59 PM
Oh My, Don't you post alot
Posted 01 April 2016 - 06:10 AM
So it does say "model" when talking about equivalent engine replacements.
And question one might be hard to answer honestly if someone is going to look under the bonnet to verify the swap.
I'm under the impression it wouldn't need a mod plate but still requires certification?
Never done an engine swap, so any advice would be appreciated.
I know, the use of model rather than series is very confusing. If you were stuck with only using the engines optional for the model you'd have situations like if you had a 6cyl HQ Statesman, there was no optional engine for that model. Or in HT 80737 GTS, there was no optional engine - only 186S as V8 GTS was a separate model (80837), yet in HK GTS the 307 was optional as 6cyl and V8 were the same model (80737). What they really mean is series, as in the largest optional engine in HK, HQ, LC etc series. I asked one of the Engineers that helped write that COP and he told me that is what is intended. So in theory you can't fit a 202 to an LC without Engineering, but it is a no brainer for the Engineer as long as you have the same componentry as an LJ had with the 202 (brakes, suspension etc) and it will always be less powerful than a CK 186 XU1 unless you build a hot 202. If it is an issue just buy and old 186P or 186A block, they are still cheap, and get a 202 crank mains ground down then rebuild it. Voila, a 202.
_71lc_1JZ_
Posted 01 April 2016 - 08:09 AM
go a 1JZ mate that what im doingeasy as just need mod plate u got brakes done and easy as
Give this Man a call he is doing mine.
running 1JZ twin turbo BW diff LH brakes and 13's and its all going to be legal
Edited by 71lc_1JZ, 01 April 2016 - 08:15 AM.
Forum Fan
Posted 01 April 2016 - 07:28 PM
_Skapinad_
Posted 01 April 2016 - 07:34 PM
No they didnt
Come out with 202 LCs
Forum Fan
Posted 01 April 2016 - 07:34 PM
_Bomber Watson_
Posted 01 April 2016 - 08:09 PM
ANOTHER VICTORY FOR THE SIX BANGER CROWD!!!
I'll drink to that.
Cool
Posted 01 April 2016 - 08:14 PM
Me toANOTHER VICTORY FOR THE SIX BANGER CROWD!!!
I'll drink to that.
Do you do Engrish ?
Forum Fan
Posted 01 April 2016 - 08:40 PM
_Bomber Watson_
Posted 01 April 2016 - 08:47 PM
If your in brissy have a chat to Greens Nice, Kevy Brown.
IMO 250 @ .050 is still perfectly streetable, my new cam is 263 @ .050" and I intend to street it when the engine is finally back from the machine shop. So reconsider your cam choices.
Give us a budget and we will throw ideas from there, but what i'd look at would be something like blue block, crank, rods, Dont think you can get ACL flat tops anymore so probably looking at SRP forged slugs to get a flat top piston with thin rings, think its the only thing off the shelf. Get someone like kev to look over the 12 port, a basic 180 CFM job souldnt cost you to much. Either webbers or 2" SU's if you must go triples but a 500 holley spun 90 degrees on the blue motor intake manifold ala oj style would work, according to oj atleast. 240-250 on the cam. Stick with 1 1/2" pipes, so HM HM9's, not the C, or probably better pacemakers as there 6-2-1 and shoudl give you a bit more torque....
Million and five ways to go though.
_oldjohnno_
Posted 01 April 2016 - 08:57 PM
Either webbers or 2" SU's if you must go triples but a 500 holley spun 90 degrees on the blue motor intake manifold ala oj style would work, according to oj atleast.
The modified blue manifold is pretty good as far as a single carb goes - up to a point. Very good distribution, torquey, very good mileage. But beyond that point - and if we're talking 250 or so at 0.050" we've gone past it - you'll be a long way behind triples.
Forum Fan
Posted 01 April 2016 - 09:03 PM
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
