Staight Gas Setups in Torana's
#26
Posted 18 August 2006 - 01:59 PM
I can post pix of my Hatch on gas... tonight.
I'll have more time when I get home.
Cheers.
#27 _Herne_
Posted 18 August 2006 - 02:14 PM
they could make public transport free but I would still not use it, dont like it.Very valid argument, the same can be said about public transport, why don't they subsidise that.
But back on topic, there is an LH on here with the gas research carbies mounted vertically, Heath do you have a picture and it sticks up through the bonnet, just for something different.
Am considering getting a price on gas conversion though.
Herne
#28 _MAWLER_
Posted 18 August 2006 - 03:10 PM
#29
Posted 18 August 2006 - 03:17 PM
Believe it or not, I don't even have a photo of Luke's engine bay. Is it possible that he opened it and I didn't snap it? Doesn't sound like something I wouldn't do
Yes Devilsadvocate I do agree with you. I'm sortof surprised that more people aren't disagreeing, but it's an understandable argument to say the least.
Edited by Heath, 18 August 2006 - 03:19 PM.
#30 _MAWLER_
Posted 18 August 2006 - 05:15 PM
#31
Posted 18 August 2006 - 09:42 PM
That point will be proved if someone else that was present at the time, has a photo of the engine bay from that occasion.Sorry to burst your bubble Heath, but you are not the worlds best photographic journalist, cos yep, you missed it!
#32
Posted 19 August 2006 - 06:01 AM
#34
Posted 19 August 2006 - 05:40 PM
It better be getting replaced with another one.
At least it can be remembered with my uberskilled images from the photoshoot.
#35 _oikurtman_
Posted 22 August 2006 - 12:25 PM
Would it be possible to run a tunnel ram with dual (LPG equivalent) carbies sticking out the bonnet?
Or if keeping it more mellow, could a standard round airfilter be fitted to an LPG system? All the ones I've seen have offset air intakes.
Has the government actually passed that grant?
Cheers.
#36 _Yella SLuR_
Posted 22 August 2006 - 12:37 PM
The downside is the Government is also introducing in an excise on alternative fuels from 2008, which will phase in over 4 years till 2012. If your car is only a weekend driver do your sums carefully, as even with the rebate, will probably not turn out to be cost effective.
Edited by Yella SLuR, 22 August 2006 - 12:42 PM.
#37
Posted 22 August 2006 - 12:59 PM
Yes, Impco 425Or if keeping it more mellow, could a standard round airfilter be fitted to an LPG system? All the ones I've seen have offset air intakes.
Dual fuel applications almost always use the Elbow or "offset air intake", which obviously doesn't look fantastic.
#38 _MAWLER_
Posted 22 August 2006 - 01:08 PM
#39 _oikurtman_
Posted 23 August 2006 - 09:55 AM
So eventually gas will be as expensive as petrol? Or a lot more expensive than it is now? What's the point of the grant then?
Cheers.
#40 _MAWLER_
Posted 23 August 2006 - 10:15 AM
#41 _oikurtman_
Posted 24 August 2006 - 08:54 AM
Cheers.
#42
Posted 24 August 2006 - 10:02 AM
But for now, running a daily.... it does make sense.
If my circumstances change and I end up working 5 mins from home, it'll be back to PULP, and weekend fun! Get on the bike and get a bit fitter too!
#43
Posted 24 August 2006 - 11:42 AM
I didnt really see the point as I only drive it on weekends, I ride my bike during the week. thats the best part about living in the city, its quicker to ride my push bike! If the government was serious about things they would make the rego for motorcycles much cheaper than it is right now.
#44
Posted 24 August 2006 - 12:02 PM
Sorry makka, but had've been me in the car, I'd have pushed her over then driven off!
I say, They wanna share the road, pay bgucken rego!!!!
And get outta my bgucken way!!!
AHHHHHHH!!!!!!
And before anyone calls me a hypocrit, if those afore mentioned cicumstances change, i'd be riding along a creek on a bike track....where they belong!!!!
Edited by knoath, 24 August 2006 - 12:05 PM.
#45
Posted 24 August 2006 - 01:53 PM
#46
Posted 24 August 2006 - 09:07 PM
The environment is a complex issue. The ecological footprint a person places on the environment is a factor of many sources. To assume just because an individual drives a car or v8 they are more of a problem is very simplistic. What is the energy rating of the house you live in? What form of heating do you use? Do you recycle? Do you participate in community environmental initiatives? The fact that a Torry has survived 30+ years means a lot less energy has been consumed than pumping out a rice burner every 15 years. The new cars are more fuel efficient but require more inputs to produce than that Torry did!It would be my thoughts that everyone on this site that has a v8 torrie got one because they wanted one, and was prepared to pay for the privilege of this(there are cheaper alternatives)(petrol has never been cheap in this country and v8s have always been considered expensive on fuel), anyone with a good argument that a v8 is needed for basic transportation speak up! It sickens me that the government has now thrown $2000 of mine and everyone else�s money at anyone owning such a vehicle to now run it on cheaper fuel. Making it cheaper to run encourages more use, please don�t drivel on otherwise��that is a fact.
Sure LPG has far less toxic emissions, and produces less global warming carbon dioxide per kJ, about 20% less. However, this will easily be offset by the overall increase in consumption of lpg over what the owner would have used if the car was still on petrol fuel used due to the price diff.
#47
Posted 26 August 2006 - 12:05 PM
#48 _MAWLER_
Posted 26 August 2006 - 01:14 PM
#49
Posted 26 August 2006 - 01:43 PM
#50 _Viper_
Posted 26 August 2006 - 03:23 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users