GMH Service Letters XU1
#26
Posted 24 December 2022 - 05:57 AM
#27
Posted 24 December 2022 - 12:41 PM
#29
Posted 24 December 2022 - 06:48 PM
#30
Posted 24 December 2022 - 08:01 PM
Fly, I've been a member here for I don't know how many years now (can't be bothered looking it up, but a long time) and in all that time the one distinct memory I have is that you've been banging on about this stuff I'm sure just as long, on I don't know how many countless different threads, and it seems to just go round in circle after circle!
Why don't you start a whole new thread, list the production build sequences, the associated homologations (and maybe ADR's) with each run, and be done with it!!
I'm guessing a good 95% of people on here are like me and sick to death of seeing this same old crap time and time again - do you have a car? Get it out go for a drive and maybe realize there is more to life
No offence intended, but geez!
Cheers,
JPXU1
#31
Posted 24 December 2022 - 10:03 PM
#32
Posted 24 December 2022 - 11:53 PM
#33
Posted 25 December 2022 - 05:20 AM
Fly, I've been a member here for I don't know how many years now (can't be bothered looking it up, but a long time) and in all that time the one distinct memory I have is that you've been banging on about this stuff I'm sure just as long, on I don't know how many countless different threads, and it seems to just go round in circle after circle!
Why don't you start a whole new thread, list the production build sequences, the associated homologations (and maybe ADR's) with each run, and be done with it!!
I'm guessing a good 95% of people on here are like me and sick to death of seeing this same old crap time and time again - do you have a car? Get it out go for a drive and maybe realize there is more to life
No offence intended, but geez!
Cheers,
JPXU1
Yes Fly instead of filling my post up with the same old dribble start a new thread, so you can say what you want without us having to go thru this dribble on every thread that gets started these days.
I didn't put those service letter's up to help stir your pot, but i know i wont be posting anymore
#35
Posted 26 December 2022 - 08:51 AM
Yes Fly instead of filling my post up with the same old dribble start a new thread, so you can say what you want without us having to go thru this dribble on every thread that gets started these days.
I didn't put those service letter's up to help stir your pot, but i know i wont be posting anymore
He won’t listen.
Pretty sure he doesn’t read replies, just logs in, clicks the most recent thread and posts whatever dribble comes to mind.
#36
Posted 26 December 2022 - 12:54 PM
#37
Posted 26 December 2022 - 01:00 PM
#38
Posted 26 December 2022 - 01:13 PM
#39
Posted 26 December 2022 - 04:19 PM
No, sorry.
#41
Posted 26 December 2022 - 09:06 PM
Fine, got a 1969 or 1970 service bulletin for the GTR detailing the diff ratio’s though would ya ?
I have, but I won't put it up here.
#42
Posted 26 December 2022 - 09:37 PM
#43
Posted 01 January 2023 - 09:42 PM
#44
Posted 01 January 2023 - 10:02 PM
#45
Posted 03 January 2023 - 01:04 AM
#46
Posted 03 January 2023 - 07:01 AM
Of course the 2600S LC GTR only had the 1 gearbox & diff…..
Hey that's super......
#47
Posted 04 January 2023 - 10:46 PM
1D6E9DFB-7015-4CA0-BC2E-045CCF14C413.jpeg 98.43K 4 downloads
The rules also tell us that the Bathurst 5000 all had to be * Identical * as well. Meaning they could only be fitted with the 1 gearbox ( 50% ) and the 1 diff ( 50% ) the 3.08. Though it would be nice to see some LC GTR service letters in terms of diff ratio’s because I am not totally convinced the 3.36 was only homologated in 1971 for the LC GTR…..
Anyone got any factual documentation ?
#48
Posted 06 January 2023 - 10:12 PM
#49
Posted 07 January 2023 - 07:43 AM
#50
Posted 07 January 2023 - 09:04 AM
My info suggests 3.08 was standard and 3.36 was optional/performance. These were listed at introduction.
If you are asking about CAMS Homologation doco, then I don't know.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users